YRL: Arrakis Results Extend Gold Mineralisation at Depth

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Yandal Resources Ltd
Ticker
YRL
Exchange
ASX
Region
Western Australia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-10-18 22:23:13 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Yandal Resources announced new drill results from its Ironstone Well-Barwidgee Gold Project in Western Australia, highlighted by diamond drilling at the Arrakis prospect which extended gold mineralization at depth. Significant intercepts include 56.6m at 1.1 g/t gold and 16.7m at 1.0 g/t gold, confirming continuity of the high-grade domain. Additional RC drilling at the Siona and Flushing Meadows prospects also returned gold intercepts, further defining mineralization in those areas.

Reasoning: The drilling successfully extended gold mineralization at depth at Arrakis, confirming continuity with significant widths, which is a positive for exploration. While grades are moderate compared to the project average and peer deposits, the results from Siona and Flushing Meadows also confirm mineralization, contributing to overall project understanding.

Positive factors

  • Extension of gold mineralization at depth at Arrakis
  • Confirmation of mineralization continuity at Arrakis
  • Significant widths for key intercepts
  • Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure
  • Compositing parameters clearly stated

Negative factors

  • Grades generally below project average and peer comparison
  • True width is estimated, not precisely stated for each intercept
  • Some intervals include significant internal waste
  • Potential for sampling bias due to drilling direction noted

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 22

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The document includes a detailed JORC Table 1 with extensive information on sampling techniques, sample preparation, assaying, and quality control procedures, including the use of CRMs and blanks.

Evidence · text

“YRL QAQC field protocols include the insertion of commercially prepared certified reference material (CRM) and blank material at a rate of approximately 1 CRM/blank for every 20 samples collected.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Results from 26IWBDD0017 extend high-grade Domain A by 100m down-dip, indicating an extension of known mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Results from 26IWBDD0017 extend high-grade Domain A by 100m down-dip.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intercept lengths are reported as down-hole lengths and provides only estimated true widths for the prospects, not specific true widths for each intercept.

Evidence · text

“All intercept lengths are reported as down-hole lengths.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The document clearly states the cut-off grade for reporting significant intercepts and the maximum internal waste included in composites.

Evidence · text

“Composites may include up to 4m of continuous internal waste unless otherwise stated, and the final composite grade must exceed 0.3g/t Au.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The Siona RC drilling program is described as 'following up shallow oxide intercepts', which suggests infill or definition drilling.

Evidence · text

“Results from seven of nine RC holes following up shallow oxide intercepts from the Siona Prospect”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 22. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (22)

26IWBDD0017Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 56.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBDD0017
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
56.6 m
From
398.5 m
To
455.1 m
Hole Depth
529 m
Intercept Depth
398.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBDD0017:398.5-455.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Arrakis
Easting
287687
Northing
7027217
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
524.7 m
Azimuth
225 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept represents a significant width at depth, extending the known mineralization, although the grade is moderate and includes internal waste.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length
  • Extends mineralization at depth
  • True width estimated

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Includes more than 4m of continuous internal waste
  • True width is an estimate, not precisely stated

Evidence · text

“56.6m @ 1.1g/t Au from 398.5m in 26IWBDD0017 (ETW*1 32m)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBDD0017Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBDD0017
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.8 m
From
398.5 m
To
428.3 m
Hole Depth
529 m
Intercept Depth
398.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBDD0017:398.5-428.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Arrakis
Easting
287687
Northing
7027217
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
524.7 m
Azimuth
225 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a good sub-interval within the broader intercept, showing higher grade over a significant length, contributing positively to the overall result.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length
  • Higher grade than parent interval

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • True width is an estimate, not precisely stated

Evidence · text

“29.8m @ 1.4g/t Au from 398.5m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBDD0017Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBDD0017
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
398.5 m
To
406.5 m
Hole Depth
529 m
Intercept Depth
398.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBDD0017:398.5-406.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Arrakis
Easting
287687
Northing
7027217
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
524.7 m
Azimuth
225 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a higher grade within the broader intercept, contributing to the overall positive result.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade than parent interval

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • True width is an estimate, not precisely stated

Evidence · text

“8.0m @ 1.8g/t Au from 398.5m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBDD0017Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBDD0017
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.4 m
From
413.5 m
To
419.9 m
Hole Depth
529 m
Intercept Depth
398.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBDD0017:413.5-419.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Arrakis
Easting
287687
Northing
7027217
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
524.7 m
Azimuth
225 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a higher grade within the broader intercept, contributing to the overall positive result.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade than parent interval

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • True width is an estimate, not precisely stated

Evidence · text

“6.4m @ 2.3g/t Au from 413.5m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBDD0017Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBDD0017
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.5 m
From
434.7 m
To
455.1 m
Hole Depth
529 m
Intercept Depth
398.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBDD0017:434.7-455.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Arrakis
Easting
287687
Northing
7027217
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
524.7 m
Azimuth
225 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval contributes to the overall significant intercept length at depth, despite a moderate grade.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • True width is an estimate, not precisely stated

Evidence · text

“20.5m @ 1.0g/t Au from 434.7m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBDD0017Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBDD0017
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.8 m
From
434.7 m
To
438.4 m
Hole Depth
529 m
Intercept Depth
398.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBDD0017:434.7-438.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Arrakis
Easting
287687
Northing
7027217
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
524.7 m
Azimuth
225 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a higher grade within the broader intercept, contributing to the overall positive result.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade than parent interval

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • True width is an estimate, not precisely stated

Evidence · text

“3.8m @ 2.8g/t Au from 434.7m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBDD0016Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBDD0016
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
373.3 m
To
390 m
Hole Depth
431.4 m
Intercept Depth
373.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBDD0016:373.3-390
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Arrakis
Easting
287413
Northing
7027377
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
522.6 m
Azimuth
223 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization at depth with a good width, contributing to the understanding of the Arrakis structure.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length
  • Extends mineralization at depth
  • True width estimated

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • True width is an estimate, not precisely stated

Evidence · text

“16.7m @ 1.0g/t Au from 373.3m in 26IWBDD0016 (ETW*1 12m)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBDD0016Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBDD0016
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
373.3 m
To
376 m
Hole Depth
431.4 m
Intercept Depth
373.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBDD0016:373.3-376
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Arrakis
Easting
287413
Northing
7027377
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
522.6 m
Azimuth
223 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a higher grade within the broader intercept, contributing to the overall positive result.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade than parent interval

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • True width is an estimate, not precisely stated

Evidence · text

“2.7m @ 1.8g/t Au from 373.3m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0110DIronstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0110D
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
468.6 m
To
470.2 m
Hole Depth
499.3 m
Intercept Depth
468.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0110D:468.6-470.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Arrakis
Easting
287783
Northing
7027165
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
523.1 m
Azimuth
225 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, moderate-grade intercept from a diamond tail did not intercept the main Arrakis structure as hoped, indicating limited extension in this area.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Grade below project average
  • True width is an estimate, not precisely stated

Evidence · text

“1.6m @ 1.2g/t Au from 468.6m in 26IWBRC0110D”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0116DIronstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0116D
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
206.6 m
To
208 m
Hole Depth
273.3 m
Intercept Depth
206.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0116D:206.6-208
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Arrakis
Easting
286943
Northing
7027595
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
522.4 m
Azimuth
225 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow, low-grade intercept from a diamond tail indicates a very narrow occurrence of the Arrakis structure in this area.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Low grade
  • True width is an estimate, not precisely stated

Evidence · text

“1.4m @ 0.6g/t Au from 206.6m in 26IWBRC0116D”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0150Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0150
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19 m
From
45 m
To
64 m
Hole Depth
117 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0150:45-64
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Siona
Easting
295796
Northing
7013359
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
502 m
Azimuth
47 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow, good-width intercept confirms gold mineralization at Siona, although the grade is moderate and its nature as secondary mineralization is noted.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length
  • Shallow mineralization

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • True width not stated
  • May represent secondary mineralization

Evidence · text

“19m @ 1.2g/t Au from 45m in 26IWBRC0150”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0150Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0150
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
53 m
To
64 m
Hole Depth
117 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0150:53-64
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Siona
Easting
295796
Northing
7013359
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
502 m
Azimuth
47 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a higher grade over a good length within the broader shallow intercept at Siona.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length
  • Higher grade than parent interval

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • True width not stated

Evidence · text

“11m @ 1.8g/t Au from 53m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0150Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0150
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
59 m
To
62 m
Hole Depth
117 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0150:59-62
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Siona
Easting
295796
Northing
7013359
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
502 m
Azimuth
47 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval within the shallow Siona intercept is a positive result, indicating a higher-grade zone.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade than parent interval
  • Good grade for shallow mineralization

Negative factors

  • True width not stated

Evidence · text

“3m @ 3.9g/t Au from 59m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0142Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0142
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
56 m
To
67 m
Hole Depth
127 m
Intercept Depth
56 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0142:56-67
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Siona
Easting
295756
Northing
7013433
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
502.9 m
Azimuth
47 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept confirms mineralization at Siona, but the grade is low compared to project averages.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length
  • Shallow mineralization

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • True width not stated

Evidence · text

“11m @ 0.4g/t Au from 56m in 26IWBRC0142”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0142Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0142
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
72 m
To
82 m
Hole Depth
127 m
Intercept Depth
56 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0142:72-82
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Siona
Easting
295756
Northing
7013433
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
502.9 m
Azimuth
47 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow intercept confirms mineralization at Siona, but the grade is low compared to project averages.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length
  • Shallow mineralization

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • True width not stated

Evidence · text

“10m @ 0.4g/t Au from 72m in 26IWBRC0142”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0094DIronstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0094D
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.7 m
From
280.2 m
To
284.9 m
Hole Depth
453 m
Intercept Depth
280.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0094D:280.2-284.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Flushing Meadows
Easting
279302
Northing
7030427
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
540.4 m
Azimuth
245 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization at Flushing Meadows, but the grade is low compared to project averages.

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • True width not stated

Evidence · text

“4.7m @ 0.5g/t Au from 280.2m in 26IWBRC0094D”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0094DIronstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0094D
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
300.3 m
To
304.9 m
Hole Depth
453 m
Intercept Depth
280.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0094D:300.3-304.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Flushing Meadows
Easting
279302
Northing
7030427
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
540.4 m
Azimuth
245 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization at Flushing Meadows, but the grade is low compared to project averages.

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • True width not stated

Evidence · text

“4.6m @ 0.7g/t Au from 300.3m in 26IWBRC0094D”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0094DIronstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0094D
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.4 m
From
317.7 m
To
323.4 m
Hole Depth
453 m
Intercept Depth
280.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0094D:317.7-323.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Flushing Meadows
Easting
279302
Northing
7030427
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
540.4 m
Azimuth
245 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization at Flushing Meadows with a good width, but the grade is low compared to project averages.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • True width not stated

Evidence · text

“8.4m @ 0.5g/t Au from 309.2m in 26IWBRC0094D”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0153Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0153
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
121 m
To
131 m
Hole Depth
332 m
Intercept Depth
121 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0153:121-131
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Flushing Meadows
Easting
279744
Northing
7029704
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
548 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization at Flushing Meadows with a good width, but the grade is low compared to project averages.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • True width not stated

Evidence · text

“10m @ 0.9/t Au from 121m in 26IWBRC0153”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0153Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0153
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
191 m
To
195 m
Hole Depth
332 m
Intercept Depth
121 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0153:191-195
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Flushing Meadows
Easting
279744
Northing
7029704
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
548 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization at Flushing Meadows, but the grade is low compared to project averages.

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • True width not stated

Evidence · text

“4m @ 0.7g/t Au from 191m in 26IWBRC0153”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0153Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0153
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
210 m
To
217 m
Hole Depth
332 m
Intercept Depth
121 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0153:210-217
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Flushing Meadows
Easting
279744
Northing
7029704
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
548 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization at Flushing Meadows with a good width, but the grade is low compared to project averages.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • True width not stated

Evidence · text

“7m @ 0.8g/t Au from 210m in 26IWBRC0153”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

26IWBRC0153Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26IWBRC0153
Project
Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
YRL

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
274 m
To
282 m
Hole Depth
332 m
Intercept Depth
121 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
26IWBRC0153:274-282
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Flushing Meadows
Easting
279744
Northing
7029704
CRS
UTM MGA94 Zone 51s
EPSG
28351
Elevation
548 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Intertek Genalysis
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization at Flushing Meadows with a good width, but the grade is at the cutoff, indicating marginal economic potential.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • Low grade (at cutoff)
  • True width not stated

Evidence · text

“8m @ 0.3g/t Au from 271m in 26IWBRC0153”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The project has prospectivity for new shallow gold deposits adjacent to current Resources and in the footwall and hangin"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.