YRL: Annual Report to shareholders
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Yandal Resources Limited
- Ticker
- YRL
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Western Australia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update, Capital raise
- Extracted
- 2026-09-22 10:13:11 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Yandal Resources Limited reported significant exploration progress in its 2026 Annual Report, highlighted by high-grade gold drill results at the Arrakis discovery and an updated mineral resource inventory of 450,200 ounces of gold. The company successfully raised $13.5 million to fund its extensive exploration programs and established new field infrastructure. However, the auditor noted a material uncertainty regarding the company's ability to continue as a going concern due to ongoing losses.
Reasoning: Yandal Resources Limited reported significant high-grade gold drill results, particularly at the Arrakis discovery, and provided an updated mineral resource inventory. The company successfully raised $13.5 million to fund its extensive exploration programs and established new field infrastructure. However, the auditor noted a material uncertainty regarding the company's ability to continue as a going concern due to ongoing losses, creating a mixed outlook.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercepts at Arrakis, including bonanza grades, indicate significant discovery potential.
- Expansion of known mineralization at Arrakis through step-out drilling demonstrates continuity and growth.
- Successful capital raise of $13.5 million strengthens the company's financial position for ongoing exploration.
- Establishment of the Stilgars Camp improves operational efficiency and supports extensive field programs.
- Resource estimates are JORC compliant and signed off by Competent Persons, indicating adherence to reporting standards.
Negative factors
- The auditor's report highlights a material uncertainty related to the company's ability to continue as a going concern due to ongoing losses.
- The overall Mineral Resource Inventory is a compilation of estimates from 2020 and 2022, suggesting staleness for some components.
- Most drill intercepts are reported as apparent widths only, without true width information, which may overstate actual thickness.
- Significant net loss for the financial year indicates ongoing cash burn from exploration activities.
- Board and management changes, while acknowledged, can introduce uncertainty during a critical exploration phase.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 37
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercepts of 3m @ 52.8g/t Au and 6m @ 28.3g/t Au are exceptionally high-grade for gold, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · text
“6m @ 28.3g/t Au”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercepts of 3m @ 52.8g/t Au and 6m @ 28.3g/t Au are exceptionally high-grade for gold, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · text
“3m @ 52.8g/t Au.”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: RC drilling expanded mineralisation approximately 150m to the southeast at Arrakis, extending beyond the previously known limit.
Evidence · text
“Drilling completed during the year expanded mineralisation approximately 150m to the southeast”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release includes a Competent Person Statement, indicating adherence to reporting standards and professional sign-off.
Evidence · text
“Competent Person Statement”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Most reported drill intercepts are given as downhole lengths without explicit true width or drill orientation information, meaning the apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“27m @ 1.2g/t Au from 87m”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The company explicitly states that targeted infill drilling was conducted at Arrakis, which is confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence.
Evidence · text
“Most notably, targeted infill drilling returned”
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The Competent Person Statement confirms the resource estimates are reported under the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code, a high reporting standard.
Evidence · text
“2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Mr Christopher Oorschot and Mr Andrew Bewsher are named as Competent Persons responsible for the exploration results and mineral resource estimates, respectively, indicating professional sign-off.
Evidence · text
“Mr Christopher Oorschot, a Competent Person”
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Inventory refers to estimates from 2020 and 2022 announcements for its components, indicating the overall inventory is not a fresh estimate and data currency is a concern.
Evidence · text
“1 Reported above 0.5g/t Au lower cut-off grade; refer to Yandal Resources Ltd ASX announcement dated 4 November 2020 for full details.”
Capital Raise Completedpositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The company successfully raised $13.5 million from existing and new shareholders, completing a financing round.
Evidence · text
“In late 2025, Yandal raised approximately $13.5 million from existing and new shareholders.”
Going Concern Warningnegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The auditor's report explicitly highlights a material uncertainty related to the company's ability to continue as a going concern due to incurred losses, which is a significant financial risk.
Evidence · text
“Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern: We draw attention to Note 2 in the financial report, which indicates that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: The document provides an updated Mineral Resource Inventory for the company's projects, establishing a revised estimate.
Evidence · text
“As at the date of this report, Yandal's Mineral Resource Inventory comprises approximately 450,200 ounces of gold”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 37. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (37)
Fact 1Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27 m
- From
- 87 m
- To
- 114 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:87-114
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept from RC drilling at Arrakis, contributing to the expansion of known mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good intercept length.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“27m @ 1.2g/t Au from 87m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 2Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 109 m
- To
- 114 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:109-114
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A higher-grade sub-interval within the broader Arrakis intercept, indicating localized stronger mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade within a sub-interval.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“including 5m @ 2.7g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 3Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 152 m
- To
- 164 m
- Intercept Depth
- 152 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:152-164
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept from RC drilling at Arrakis, contributing to the expansion of known mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade over a good intercept length.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“12m @ 2.3g/t Au from 152m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 4Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 158 m
- To
- 164 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:158-164
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A higher-grade sub-interval within the broader Arrakis intercept, indicating localized stronger mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade within a sub-interval.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“including 6m @ 3.7g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 5Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 206 m
- To
- 219 m
- Intercept Depth
- 206 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:206-219
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept from RC drilling at Arrakis, contributing to the expansion of known mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good intercept length.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“13m @ 1.6g/t Au from 206m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 6Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 211 m
- To
- 219 m
- Intercept Depth
- 211 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:211-219
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A higher-grade sub-interval within the broader Arrakis intercept, indicating localized stronger mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade within a sub-interval.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“including 8m @ 2.2g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 7Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 84 m
- To
- 95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 84 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:84-95
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept from RC drilling at Arrakis, contributing to the expansion of known mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good intercept length.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“11m @ 1.7g/t Au from 84m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 8Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 95 m
- Intercept Depth
- 89 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:89-95
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A higher-grade sub-interval within the broader Arrakis intercept, indicating localized stronger mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade within a sub-interval.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“including 6m @ 2.8g/t Au.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 9Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 290 m
- To
- 308 m
- Intercept Depth
- 290 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:290-308
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept from diamond drilling at Arrakis, confirming mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good intercept length at significant depth.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“18.0m @ 1.8g/t Au from 290.0m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 10Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 5.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.1 m
- From
- 293.9 m
- To
- 298 m
- Intercept Depth
- 293.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:293.9-298
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval within the deeper Arrakis intercept, indicating strong localized mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade within a sub-interval at significant depth.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“including 4.1m @ 5.7g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 11Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.5 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.5 m
- From
- 347.6 m
- To
- 359.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 347.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:347.6-359.1
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept from diamond drilling at Arrakis, confirming mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good intercept length at significant depth.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“11.5m @ 1.6g/t Au from 347.6m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 12Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 352.6 m
- To
- 357.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 352.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:352.6-357.6
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval within the deeper Arrakis intercept, indicating strong localized mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade within a sub-interval at significant depth.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“including 5.0m @ 3.1g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 13Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.7 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.7 m
- From
- 366 m
- To
- 387.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 366 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:366-387.7
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept from diamond drilling at Arrakis, confirming mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good intercept length at significant depth.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“21.7m @ 0.8g/t Au from 366m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 14Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 370 m
- To
- 374 m
- Intercept Depth
- 370 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:370-374
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A higher-grade sub-interval within the deeper Arrakis intercept, indicating localized stronger mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade within a sub-interval at significant depth.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“including 4m @ 2.1g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 15Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.2 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.2 m
- From
- 240.8 m
- To
- 251 m
- Intercept Depth
- 240.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:240.8-251
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept from diamond drilling at Arrakis, confirming mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good intercept length at significant depth.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“10.2m @ 1.3g/t Au from 240.8m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 16Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 247.2 m
- To
- 251 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Ironstone_Well-Barwidgee:247.2-251
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A higher-grade sub-interval within the deeper Arrakis intercept, indicating localized stronger mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade within a sub-interval at significant depth.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · text
“including 3.8m @ 2.9g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 17Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 28.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptionally high-grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Arrakis, significantly enhancing the discovery's potential.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza gold grade over a good intercept length.
- Represents the highest-grade result from the IWB Project to date.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“6m @ 28.3g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 18Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 52.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 52.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptionally high-grade gold intercept from infill drilling at Arrakis, significantly enhancing the discovery's potential.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza gold grade over a good intercept length.
- Represents the highest-grade result from the IWB Project to date.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“3m @ 52.8g/t Au.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 19Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.5 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept from diamond drilling at Arrakis, supporting the continuity of a newly identified high-grade zone.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade over a good intercept length, improving confidence in continuity.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“17.5m @ 2.3g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 20Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A higher-grade sub-interval within the Arrakis diamond drilling, supporting the continuity of a newly identified high-grade zone.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade within a sub-interval, improving confidence in continuity.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“including 4.8m @ 4.0g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 21Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Arrakis
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept from diamond drilling at Arrakis, further supporting the continuity of mineralization.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good intercept length, supporting continuity.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“17.0m @ 1.1g/t Au.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 22Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Flushing Meadows
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept from framework diamond drilling at Flushing Meadows, suggesting mineralization outside current resource boundaries.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good intercept length, indicating potential resource growth.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“20m @ 1.7g/t Au;”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 23Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Flushing Meadows
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept from framework diamond drilling at Flushing Meadows, suggesting mineralization outside current resource boundaries.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade over a good intercept length, indicating potential resource growth.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“9m @ 2.7g/t Au;”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 24Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.3 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Flushing Meadows
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept from framework diamond drilling at Flushing Meadows, suggesting mineralization outside current resource boundaries.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good intercept length, indicating potential resource growth.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“11.3m @ 1.1g/t Au;”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 25Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Flushing Meadows
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold intercept from framework diamond drilling at Flushing Meadows, suggesting mineralization outside current resource boundaries.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade over a good intercept length, indicating potential resource growth.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“4.8m @ 2.3g/t Au.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 26Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Siona
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept at Siona, demonstrating additional mineralization outside the original discovery trend.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good intercept length, indicating a new shallow mineralized zone.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“17m @ 1.3g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 27Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Siona
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval at Siona, demonstrating additional mineralization outside the original discovery trend.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade within a sub-interval, indicating a new shallow mineralized zone.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“including 3m @ 5.0g/t Au;”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 28Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Siona
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate gold intercept at Siona, demonstrating additional mineralization outside the original discovery trend.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a good intercept length, indicating a new shallow mineralized zone.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“13m @ 1.5g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 29Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 8.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Siona
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade sub-interval at Siona, demonstrating additional mineralization outside the original discovery trend.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade within a sub-interval, indicating a new shallow mineralized zone.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“including 2m @ 8.1g/t Au.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 30Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Salusa
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptionally high-grade gold intercept from air-core drilling at Salusa, providing further evidence of gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade over a good intercept length, indicating high prospectivity.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“6m @ 6.3g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 31Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 18.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Salusa
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A bonanza-grade sub-interval from air-core drilling at Salusa, providing further evidence of gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza gold grade within a sub-interval, indicating high prospectivity.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“including 2m @ 18.2g/t Au;”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 32Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Salusa
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptionally high-grade gold intercept from air-core drilling at Salusa, providing further evidence of gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade over a good intercept length, indicating high prospectivity.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“2m @ 6.0g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 33Ironstone Well-Barwidgee · goldGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- YRL
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Salusa
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A bonanza-grade sub-interval from air-core drilling at Salusa, providing further evidence of gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza gold grade within a sub-interval, indicating high prospectivity.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- No depth information provided.
Evidence · text
“including 1m @ 11.3g/t Au.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 34Ironstone Well-Barwidgee Gold Project and Mt McClure Gold Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Ironstone Well-Barwidgee Gold Project and Mt McClure Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- YRL
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The company reports a substantial total gold resource inventory, but it is a compilation of older estimates without a category breakdown, and not constrained by pit shells, leading to moderate confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant total contained gold ounces for an exploration company.
- Resource estimates are JORC compliant and signed off by Competent Persons.
Negative factors
- The total resource is a compilation of older estimates, indicating staleness for some components.
- No breakdown by resource category (Measured, Indicated, Inferred) is provided for the total.
- Resources are reported as global estimates, not constrained by optimized pit shells, which may overstate economic viability.
Evidence · text
“Yandal's Mineral Resource Inventory comprises approximately 450,200 ounces of gold, including the Flushing Meadows Mineral Resource and the Mt McClure Mineral Resource portfolio.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 35View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Ticker
- YRL
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A substantial capital raise was successfully completed, providing crucial funding for the company's exploration activities and demonstrating investor support.
Positive factors
- Successful capital raise provides significant funding for exploration programs.
- Funds were raised from both existing and new shareholders, indicating market confidence.
Evidence · text
“In late 2025, Yandal raised approximately $13.5 million from existing and new shareholders.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 36View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Ticker
- YRL
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The exercise of options generated additional cash for the company, contributing to its funding for operations.
Positive factors
- Additional cash received from options exercise strengthens the company's financial position.
Evidence · text
“The exercise of 23.9m $0.11 Options resulted in the receipt of an additional $2.6m of cash.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 37View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Ticker
- YRL
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The company successfully divested a non-core asset, receiving cash and shares, which enhances its financial position and strategic focus.
Positive factors
- Sale of non-core asset generates cash and shares, improving financial flexibility.
- Strategic review led to divestment, allowing focus on priority projects.
Evidence · text
“In August 2025, a Tenement Sale Agreement was executed with Horizon Minerals Ltd (ASX: HRZ) for the sale of the Gordons Gold Project.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.