WGR: Annual Report to shareholders
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Western Gold Resources Limited
- Ticker
- WGR
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Western Australia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Resource update, Other, Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-09-30 06:19:07 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Western Gold Resources Limited has released its Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2026, highlighting a significant update to its Gold Duke Project Mineral Resource Estimate. The updated estimate, effective 20 December 2025, now totals 4.84 Mt at 1.8 g/t Au for 277,000 oz of contained gold, representing a 49% increase in total tonnes and 29% increase in contained gold ounces from the prior year. Notably, Measured and Indicated Resources increased by 107% in tonnes and 44% in contained ounces, providing a stronger foundation for the Expanded Scoping Study and advancing the project towards production.
Reasoning: The annual resource statement confirms a substantial increase in total and higher-confidence gold resources at the Gold Duke Project, driven by new drilling and updated modeling, which significantly de-risks the project and supports its development pathway, despite a slight decrease in overall average grade.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in Measured and Indicated Resources, enhancing project confidence and de-risking.
- Overall contained gold ounces increased by 29%, demonstrating substantial growth in the resource base.
- Extensive close-spaced RC drilling (33,980 m) supported the resource update and improved geological confidence.
- Resource estimate is JORC Code 2012 compliant and signed off by a Competent Person.
- Underpins an Expanded Scoping Study with positive project economics.
Negative factors
- Overall average resource grade decreased from 2.1 g/t Au to 1.8 g/t Au, indicating some dilution.
- Indicated category tonnes and ounces decreased, primarily due to conversion to Measured, but still a reduction in that specific category.
Facts used in scoring: 57
Classification and evidence
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: Measured Resources increased from 3,000 oz to 81,000 oz, indicating a significant upgrade in confidence.
Evidence · text
“Measured Resources increased from 31,000 t for 3,000 oz to 1.60 Mt for 81,000 oz.”
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: The resource update includes 0.45 Mt at 1.6 g/t Au for 23,000 oz in the Indicated category.
Evidence · text
“0.45 Mt at 1.6 g/t Au for 23,000 oz in the Indicated category”
Category Upgradepositive
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Why it applies: Measured and Indicated Resources increased by approximately 107% in tonnes and 44% in contained gold ounces, with a significant reclassification of material into the Measured category.
Evidence · text
“Measured and Indicated Resources increased from approximately 0.99 Mt for 72,000 oz at 30 June 2025 to approximately 2.05 Mt for 104,000 oz at 30 June 2026. This represents an increase of approximately 107% in Measured and Indicated tonnes and approximately 44% in contained Measured and Indicated gold ounces”
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: Overall Gold Duke Mineral Resource increased from 3.25 Mt at 30 June 2025 to 4.84 Mt at 30 June 2026, an increase of approximately 49% in total tonnes.
Evidence · text
“Overall, the Gold Duke Mineral Resource increased from 3.25 Mt at 2.1 g/t Au for 214,000 oz at 30 June 2025 to 4.84 Mt at 1.8 g/t Au for 277,000 oz at 30 June 2026. This represents an increase of approximately 49% in total tonnes”
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: Overall Gold Duke Mineral Resource increased from 214,000 oz at 30 June 2025 to 277,000 oz at 30 June 2026, an increase of approximately 29% in contained gold ounces.
Evidence · text
“Overall, the Gold Duke Mineral Resource increased from 3.25 Mt at 2.1 g/t Au for 214,000 oz at 30 June 2025 to 4.84 Mt at 1.8 g/t Au for 277,000 oz at 30 June 2026. This represents an increase of approximately 49% in total tonnes and 29% in contained gold ounces.”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The information relating to the Gold Duke Mineral Resource estimates is based on data compiled by Mr. Richard Bray, a Competent Person as defined in the JORC Code.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement relating to the Grade Control Drilling Exploration Results and information informing the Gold Duke Mineral Resource estimates is based on data compiled by Mr. Richard Bray, a Registered Professional Geologist with the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and an employee of the Company. ... to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code).”
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate has been reported in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the “JORC Code”).
Evidence · text
“The Mineral Resource Estimate has been reported in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the “JORC Code”).”
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: The document presents the Annual Mineral Resource Statement for 30 June 2026, reflecting an updated Mineral Resource Estimate.
Evidence · text
“Annual Mineral Resource Statement”
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: The overall Gold Duke Mineral Resource average grade decreased from 2.1 g/t Au at 30 June 2025 to 1.8 g/t Au at 30 June 2026.
Evidence · text
“Overall, the Gold Duke Mineral Resource increased from 3.25 Mt at 2.1 g/t Au for 214,000 oz at 30 June 2025 to 4.84 Mt at 1.8 g/t Au for 277,000 oz at 30 June 2026.”
High Recoverypositive · Story-specific tag
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: Metallurgical testwork has previously demonstrated recoveries of up to 95.1% from Gold Duke oxide mineralisation, which is considered high for gold.
Evidence · text
“Metallurgical testwork has previously demonstrated recoveries of up to 95.1% from Gold Duke oxide mineralisation”
Recovery Stagnantneutral · Story-specific tag
No improvement across multiple test programs on comparable material.
Why it applies: The document states 'Metallurgical testwork has previously demonstrated recoveries of up to 95.1%', implying no new testwork results are being presented, only a conservative figure applied.
Evidence · text
“Metallurgical testwork has previously demonstrated recoveries of up to 95.1% from Gold Duke oxide mineralisation, with a more conservative 93% recovery applied in the Expanded Scoping Study.”
Single Domain Onlynegative
Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.
Why it applies: only one composite was tested
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 57. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Resource Estimates (55)
measuredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 548000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 32000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:21fc360015ba8c2ee319
- Deposit or zone
- Eagle
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 548000
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 32000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: New Measured Resource established for Eagle deposit, significantly improving confidence and contributing to overall resource growth.
Positive factors
- New Measured Resource established from close-spaced 2025 grade control/infill drilling, which materially improved confidence in the continuity and geometry of the Eagle mineralised lodes.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 548
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 312000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 13000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:79af4c255bef5952a8bd
- Deposit or zone
- Emu
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 312000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 13000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: New Measured Resource established for Emu deposit, improving confidence, though with a lower grade reflecting better definition.
Positive factors
- New Measured Resource established from close-spaced 2025 grade control/infill drilling.
Negative factors
- The lower Measured grade reflects improved definition of the local grade distribution within the mining area.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 312
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 491000Grade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 22000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:aeff581884a5251c1905
- Deposit or zone
- Golden Monarch
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 491000
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 22000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 31000
- Prior Grade
- 3.1
- Prior Contained Metal
- 3000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant increase in Measured Resource for Golden Monarch, improving confidence, though with a lower grade due to better delineation.
Positive factors
- Measured Resource increased substantially following close-spaced drilling and revised lode interpretation.
Negative factors
- The lower Measured grade reflects improved delineation of mineralised boundaries and local grade variability.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: 491
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 491000 against 31000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 1.4 against 3.1 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 22000 against 3000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 250000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 14000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:a27aa47b4ad3932fef50
- Deposit or zone
- Gold King
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 250000
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 14000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: New Measured Resource established for Gold King, increasing confidence and contributing to overall resource growth.
Positive factors
- New Measured Resource established from close-spaced 2025 drilling, refined modelling of the Gold King/Gold Hawk mineralised domains and increased confidence in geological and grade continuity.
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 250
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 1601000Grade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 81000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:4362aa3a23bfb6b0182f
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 1601000
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 81000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 31000
- Prior Grade
- 3.1
- Prior Contained Metal
- 3000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A substantial increase in Measured Resources, driven by new drilling, significantly de-risks the project, despite a lower average grade.
Positive factors
- Total Measured Resource increased substantially from 3,000 oz to 81,000 oz, indicating a significant upgrade in confidence.
- Close-spaced drilling significantly improved geological confidence.
Negative factors
- The average grade for Total Measured Resources decreased from 3.1 g/t Au to 1.6 g/t Au.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: 1,601
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 1601000 against 31000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 1.6 against 3.1 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 81000 against 3000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedGold Duke · goldTonnes: 72000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 6000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:ee41b9ad89d774cf657c
- Deposit or zone
- Eagle
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 72000
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 6000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 310000
- Prior Grade
- 2.5
- Prior Contained Metal
- 26000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resources for Eagle decreased due to successful conversion to Measured category, which is a positive for overall confidence but a reduction in this specific category.
Positive factors
- Indicated material was reduced principally through conversion to Measured following close-spaced drilling, indicating an upgrade in confidence for a portion of the resource.
Negative factors
- Indicated material reduced significantly from 26 koz to 6 koz.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: 72
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 72000 against 310000 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 6000 against 26000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedGold Duke · goldTonnes: 81000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:ecf54caa479310155ca2
- Deposit or zone
- Emu
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 81000
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 3000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 120000
- Prior Grade
- 1.9
- Prior Contained Metal
- 7000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resources for Emu decreased due to conversion to Measured and refined modeling, which is positive for confidence but shows a reduction in this category and grade.
Positive factors
- Indicated material reduced principally through conversion to Measured, indicating an upgrade in confidence for a portion of the resource.
Negative factors
- Indicated material reduced significantly from 7 koz to 3 koz.
- Updated drilling and interpretation also refined the grade distribution and mineralised boundaries, resulting in a lower grade.
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 81
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 81000 against 120000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 1.3 against 1.9 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 3000 against 7000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedGold Duke · goldTonnes: 135000Grade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 6000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:32e8561b1701310bba84
- Deposit or zone
- Golden Monarch
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 135000
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 6000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 280000
- Prior Grade
- 2.3
- Prior Contained Metal
- 20000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resources for Golden Monarch decreased due to conversion to Measured and revised modeling, which is positive for confidence but shows a reduction in this category and grade.
Positive factors
- Indicated material reduced principally through conversion to Measured, indicating an upgrade in confidence for a portion of the resource.
Negative factors
- Indicated material reduced significantly from 20 koz to 6 koz.
- Revised geological interpretation and RPEEE constraints redistributed material between classification categories, resulting in a lower grade.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: 135
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 135000 against 280000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 1.4 against 2.3 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 6000 against 20000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedGold Duke · goldTonnes: 165000Grade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 8000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:bd6d76f813f918e2b513
- Deposit or zone
- Gold King
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 165000
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 8000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 250000
- Prior Grade
- 2
- Prior Contained Metal
- 16000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resources for Gold King decreased due to conversion to Measured and refined modeling, which is positive for confidence but shows a reduction in this category and grade.
Positive factors
- Indicated material reduced principally through conversion to Measured following infill drilling and refined modelling, indicating an upgrade in confidence for a portion of the resource.
Negative factors
- Indicated material reduced significantly from 16 koz to 8 koz.
- Grade decreased from 2.0 g/t Au to 1.6 g/t Au.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: 165
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 165000 against 250000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 1.6 against 2 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 8000 against 16000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedGold Duke · goldTonnes: 453000Grade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 23000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:c1dc1787535a82991728
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 453000
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 23000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 960000
- Prior Grade
- 2.2
- Prior Contained Metal
- 69000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: While the Indicated category saw a reduction in tonnes and ounces, this was largely due to successful conversion to Measured resources, indicating an overall positive shift in confidence.
Positive factors
- The reduction in Indicated category is primarily a consequence of material being upgraded into the Measured category, which is a positive for overall resource confidence.
Negative factors
- Total Indicated Resources decreased significantly from 69,000 oz to 23,000 oz.
- Average grade for Total Indicated Resources decreased from 2.2 g/t Au to 1.6 g/t Au.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: 453
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 453000 against 960000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 1.6 against 2.2 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 23000 against 69000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 27000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:d7466bc5f07eade0ea31
- Deposit or zone
- Eagle
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 27000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 2000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 100000
- Prior Grade
- 2
- Prior Contained Metal
- 7000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resources for Eagle decreased due to conversion to higher confidence categories, which is a positive for overall resource confidence.
Positive factors
- Inferred Resource reduced as close-spaced drilling converted most of the previously lower-confidence Eagle inventory to Measured and Indicated, indicating an upgrade in confidence for a portion of the resource.
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource reduced from 7 koz to 2 koz.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 27
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 27000 against 100000 previously
Grade Improvementpositive
Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.
Why it applies: 2.6 against 2 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 2000 against 7000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 72000Grade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:5f2b91c3d6b86f0ab6eb
- Deposit or zone
- Emu
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 72000
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 3000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 120000
- Prior Grade
- 2.1
- Prior Contained Metal
- 8000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resources for Emu decreased due to conversion to higher confidence categories, which is positive for overall resource confidence, but also shows a grade reduction.
Positive factors
- Inferred Resource reduced as drilling increased confidence and converted material to higher classifications, indicating an upgrade in confidence for a portion of the resource.
Negative factors
- Inferred Resource reduced from 8 koz to 3 koz.
- Grade decreased from 2.1 g/t Au to 1.2 g/t Au.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: 72
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 72000 against 120000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 1.2 against 2.1 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 3000 against 8000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 650000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 40000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:02a3d371aa38afbd6a1b
- Deposit or zone
- Golden Monarch
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 650000
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 40000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 200000
- Prior Grade
- 1.9
- Prior Contained Metal
- 12000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant increase in Inferred resources for Golden Monarch, indicating potential for future upgrades and resource expansion.
Positive factors
- Inferred Resource increased significantly following revised geological interpretation and modelling of additional mineralised lodes/volumes within the A$7,000/oz RPEEE shell.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: 650
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 650000 against 200000 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 40000 against 12000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 391000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 22000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:bd52cdaaf38b2c793bb7
- Deposit or zone
- Gold King
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 391000
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 22000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 180000
- Prior Grade
- 1.8
- Prior Contained Metal
- 10000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant increase in Inferred resources for Gold King, indicating potential for future upgrades and resource expansion.
Positive factors
- Inferred Resource increased following revised modelling of the Gold King/Gold Hawk mineralised system and inclusion of additional mineralised volumes within the updated RPEEE shell.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 391
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 391000 against 180000 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 22000 against 10000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 90000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:8fd28662556242a743a2
- Deposit or zone
- Joyners Find
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 90000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 7000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 90000
- Prior Grade
- 2.6
- Prior Contained Metal
- 7000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No change in Inferred resources for Joyners Find, indicating stability but no new information.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 90
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 640000Grade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 33000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:85e0d4cd0449d51990ab
- Deposit or zone
- Bottom Camp
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 640000
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 33000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 640000
- Prior Grade
- 1.6
- Prior Contained Metal
- 33000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No change in Inferred resources for Bottom Camp, indicating stability but no new information.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: 640
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 230000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 17000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:232d19fa61ba3b89b090
- Deposit or zone
- Bowerbird
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 230000
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 17000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 230000
- Prior Grade
- 2.4
- Prior Contained Metal
- 17000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No change in Inferred resources for Bowerbird, indicating stability but no new information.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: 230
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 110000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 9000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:7538f1644d7c9321f0cc
- Deposit or zone
- Bronzewing
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 110000
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 9000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 110000
- Prior Grade
- 2.7
- Prior Contained Metal
- 9000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No change in Inferred resources for Bronzewing, indicating stability but no new information.
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: 110
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 210000Grade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 21000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:ab74bbbb3fa87d7e17a5
- Deposit or zone
- Brilliant
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 210000
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 21000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 210000
- Prior Grade
- 3.1
- Prior Contained Metal
- 21000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No change in Inferred resources for Brilliant, indicating stability but no new information.
Evidence · table
“3.1”
Context: 210
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 260000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 12000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:80126b809396dbdf0448
- Deposit or zone
- Comedy King
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 260000
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 12000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 260000
- Prior Grade
- 1.5
- Prior Contained Metal
- 12000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No change in Inferred resources for Comedy King, indicating stability but no new information.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 260
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 110000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 8000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:375e2ab4648829ae8d2b
- Deposit or zone
- Wren
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 110000
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 8000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 110000
- Prior Grade
- 2.4
- Prior Contained Metal
- 8000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No change in Inferred resources for Wren, indicating stability but no new information.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: 110
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 2790000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 174000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:17245bb88e36459ec106
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2790000
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 174000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 2250000
- Prior Grade
- 2
- Prior Contained Metal
- 144000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant growth in Inferred resources, indicating potential for future upgrades and overall project expansion, despite a slight grade reduction.
Positive factors
- Total Inferred Resources increased by approximately 24% in tonnes and 21% in contained ounces, indicating significant resource expansion.
Negative factors
- Average grade for Total Inferred Resources decreased from 2.0 g/t Au to 1.9 g/t Au.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: 2,790
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 2790000 against 2250000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 1.9 against 2 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 174000 against 144000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedGold Duke · goldTonnes: 2050000Grade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 104000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:0865888700192ad96f0e
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 2050000
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 104000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 991000
- Prior Contained Metal
- 72000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Substantial growth in Measured and Indicated resources provides a strong foundation for development and significantly de-risks the project.
Positive factors
- Measured and Indicated Resources increased by approximately 107% in tonnes and 44% in contained gold ounces, significantly improving confidence and de-risking the project.
Evidence · text
“2.05 Mt at 1.6 g/t Au for approximately 104,000 oz in the Measured and Indicated categories”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 2050000 against 991000 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 104000 against 72000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 4843000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 277000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-12-20T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:c8728fe6341e191fce5c
- Mining method
- open_pit
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
- Resource basis
- gross
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 4843000
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 277000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-20
- Prior Tonnes
- 3250000
- Prior Grade
- 2.1
- Prior Contained Metal
- 214000
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant overall growth in the Gold Duke Mineral Resource, enhancing the project's scale and potential, despite a slight decrease in average grade.
Positive factors
- Overall Gold Duke Mineral Resource increased by approximately 49% in total tonnes and 29% in contained gold ounces.
Negative factors
- The lower overall reported grade reflects the updated geological interpretation, revised classification and the inclusion of additional mineralised material within the updated RPEEE constraints.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 4,843
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 4843000 against 3250000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 1.8 against 2.1 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 277000 against 214000 previously
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 31000Grade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:8da87c363ad8e6d96516
- Deposit or zone
- Golden Monarch
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 31000
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 3000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Measured Resource for Golden Monarch, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“3.1”
Context: 31
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
measuredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 31000Grade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:05820da3c2e9df145000
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 31000
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 3000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Total Measured Resource, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“3.1”
Context: 31
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedGold Duke · goldTonnes: 310000Grade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 26000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:e69cdc3e222d065dd5d5
- Deposit or zone
- Eagle
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 310000
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 26000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Indicated Resource for Eagle, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: 310
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedGold Duke · goldTonnes: 120000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:19e55690675acd6928c3
- Deposit or zone
- Emu
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 120000
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 7000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Indicated Resource for Emu, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: 120
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedGold Duke · goldTonnes: 280000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 20000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:10ec4bb3356808b95e5f
- Deposit or zone
- Golden Monarch
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 280000
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 20000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Indicated Resource for Golden Monarch, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: 280
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedGold Duke · goldTonnes: 250000Grade: 2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 16000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:07c891115dba5d15edfd
- Deposit or zone
- Gold King
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 250000
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 16000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Indicated Resource for Gold King, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 250
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedGold Duke · goldTonnes: 960000Grade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 69000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:77fbd0e81fdc8fdaf9d0
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 960000
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 69000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Total Indicated Resource, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: 960
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 100000Grade: 2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:60898b2cc628f45b03a9
- Deposit or zone
- Eagle
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 100000
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 7000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Resource for Eagle, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 100
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 120000Grade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 8000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:48932f5f38230313ea54
- Deposit or zone
- Emu
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 120000
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 8000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Resource for Emu, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: 120
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 200000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 12000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:45d3fa6055f13a2f950f
- Deposit or zone
- Golden Monarch
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 200000
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 12000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Resource for Golden Monarch, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: 200
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 180000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 10000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:c56bf53f8449745ab7bf
- Deposit or zone
- Gold King
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 180000
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 10000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Resource for Gold King, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 180
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 90000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:09b75592fd308b4a6cb4
- Deposit or zone
- Joyners Find
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 90000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 7000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Resource for Joyners Find, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 90
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 640000Grade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 33000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:d8cb04a86214c783db4b
- Deposit or zone
- Bottom Camp
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 640000
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 33000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Resource for Bottom Camp, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: 640
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 230000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 17000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:4657722651f22cf4241c
- Deposit or zone
- Bowerbird
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 230000
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 17000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Resource for Bowerbird, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: 230
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 110000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 9000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:5b1bdeb8c66de3b50540
- Deposit or zone
- Bronzewing
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 110000
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 9000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Resource for Bronzewing, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: 110
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 210000Grade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 21000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:bb7ac89f891c562cfd3d
- Deposit or zone
- Brilliant
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 210000
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 21000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Resource for Brilliant, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“3.1”
Context: 210
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 260000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 12000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:4c77ab01bd31cca42991
- Deposit or zone
- Comedy King
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 260000
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 12000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Resource for Comedy King, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 260
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 110000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 8000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:c3f7e5018e8e0d98b1e1
- Deposit or zone
- Wren
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 110000
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 8000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Inferred Resource for Wren, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: 110
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 2250000Grade: 2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 144000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:b0711f27176b508c0a6a
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2250000
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 144000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Total Inferred Resource, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 2,250
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 420000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 33000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:8c8e49b73f5ad2894b2e
- Deposit or zone
- Eagle
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 420000
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 33000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Combined Resource for Eagle, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: 420
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 240000Grade: 2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 15000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:be89d9d25040345103ad
- Deposit or zone
- Emu
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 240000
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 15000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Combined Resource for Emu, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 240
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 510000Grade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 32000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:3d15218c160b2a3277dc
- Deposit or zone
- Golden Monarch
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 510000
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 32000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Combined Resource for Golden Monarch, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.2”
Context: 510
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 430000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 26000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:e86e3f9f54d76decda16
- Deposit or zone
- Gold King
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 430000
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 26000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Combined Resource for Gold King, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“1.9”
Context: 430
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 90000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:09b75592fd308b4a6cb4
- Deposit or zone
- Joyners Find
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 90000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 7000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Combined Resource for Joyners Find, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 90
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 640000Grade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 33000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:d8cb04a86214c783db4b
- Deposit or zone
- Bottom Camp
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 640000
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 33000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Combined Resource for Bottom Camp, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: 640
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 230000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 17000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:4657722651f22cf4241c
- Deposit or zone
- Bowerbird
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 230000
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 17000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Combined Resource for Bowerbird, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: 230
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 110000Grade: 2.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 9000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:5b1bdeb8c66de3b50540
- Deposit or zone
- Bronzewing
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 110000
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 9000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Combined Resource for Bronzewing, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: 110
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 210000Grade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 21000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:bb7ac89f891c562cfd3d
- Deposit or zone
- Brilliant
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 210000
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 21000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Combined Resource for Brilliant, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“3.1”
Context: 210
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 260000Grade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 12000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:4c77ab01bd31cca42991
- Deposit or zone
- Comedy King
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 260000
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 12000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Combined Resource for Comedy King, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 260
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 110000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 8000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:c3f7e5018e8e0d98b1e1
- Deposit or zone
- Wren
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 110000
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 8000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Combined Resource for Wren, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.4”
Context: 110
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredGold Duke · goldTonnes: 3250000Grade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 214000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Mr. Richard Bray
- Resource group id
- resource:9c0a959a3ca298799c36
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 3250000
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 214000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical Total Combined Resource, used for comparison with the current update.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: 3,250
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
Metallurgical Results (2)
Fact 1Gold Duke · goldRecovery: 95.1 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Processing Route
- oxide mineralisation
- Sample
- Gold Duke oxide mineralisation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 95.1 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Previously demonstrated high recovery for oxide mineralisation is a positive indicator, though details are historical.
Positive factors
- High recovery demonstrated for oxide mineralisation.
Negative factors
- No specific date or details provided for the previous testwork.
Evidence · text
“Metallurgical testwork has previously demonstrated recoveries of up to 95.1% from Gold Duke oxide mineralisation”
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 95.1% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 2Gold Duke · goldRecovery: 93 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Gold Duke
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- WGR
Test Work
- Program Status
- scoping
- Processing Route
- oxide mineralisation
- Sample
- Gold Duke oxide mineralisation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 93 %
- Recovery Basis
- unspecified
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A conservative 93% recovery is applied in the scoping study, which is a reasonable assumption for economic modeling.
Positive factors
- Conservative recovery applied in the Expanded Scoping Study, providing a realistic basis for economic assessment.
Negative factors
- Specific details on the basis for the 93% recovery are not provided, only that it is conservative.
Evidence · text
“a more conservative 93% recovery applied in the Expanded Scoping Study”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.