Wesdome Extends Reserve Life to 8 Years at Both Mines, Establishes Robust Free Cash Flow Profile, and Outlines Significant Organic Growth Pipeline
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd.
- Ticker
- WDO
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Unavailable
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Resource update, Production, Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-10-01 03:38:45 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Wesdome Gold Mines has announced updated mineral reserve and resource estimates, extending the mine life at both its Eagle River and Kiena operations to eight years. The company reported a 17% increase in consolidated Proven and Probable reserves to 1.4 million ounces of gold and an 87% increase in Inferred resources to 1.2 million ounces. This update underpins a strong production outlook, with consolidated gold production expected to reach up to 230,000 ounces by 2028, and projects over $1 billion in free cash flow over the next three years.
Reasoning: The updated mineral reserve and resource estimates demonstrate significant growth in reserves and inferred resources, extending mine life and supporting a robust production and free cash flow profile for Wesdome's gold operations.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in Proven & Probable reserves (17% consolidated, 39% Eagle River)
- Extended mine life to 8 years at both operations
- Increased Inferred resources (87% consolidated, fourfold at Mishi)
- Strong production outlook and free cash flow generation
- High average recovery rates
- NI 43-101 compliant technical reports
Negative factors
- Overall average reserve grade at Eagle River reduced due to inclusion of lower-grade material
- Measured resources at Eagle River and consolidated Wesdome decreased
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 59
Classification and evidence
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: Consolidated Proven & Probable reserves increased by 50.2% from 3,626 kt to 5,448 kt.
Evidence · table
“5,448”
Context: Proven & Probable Reserves
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: Consolidated Proven & Probable contained gold increased by 16.7% from 1,188 koz to 1,387 koz.
Evidence · table
“1,387”
Context: Proven & Probable Reserves
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: Consolidated Proven & Probable reserve grade decreased by 22.5% from 10.2 g/t Au to 7.9 g/t Au.
Evidence · table
“7.9”
Context: Proven & Probable Reserves
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The Technical Reports for both Eagle River and Kiena are being prepared in accordance with NI 43-101.
Evidence · text
“The Technical Reports for both Eagle River and Kiena are being prepared in accordance with NI 43-101”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Multiple Qualified Persons from various consulting firms are listed as responsible for the scientific and technical information.
Evidence · text
“The scientific and technical information in this news release was provided, reviewed and approved by the following individuals, all of whom are independent "Qualified Persons" for the purposes of NI 43-101”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: Inferred mineral resources increased to 15.1 Mt at 2.5 g/t Au for a total of 1.2 Moz, led by a fourfold increase at Mishi.
Evidence · text
“Inferred Mineral Resources Increased 87%, Expanding the Conversion Pipeline: Inferred mineral resources increased to 15.1 Mt at 2.5 g/t Au for a total of 1.2 Moz”
Maiden Resourceneutral
First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.
Why it applies: The Mishi underground inferred resource is a new category with no prior estimate.
Evidence · text
“Inferred Underground - Mishi | 152 | 6.5 | 32 | - | - | -”
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: The document announces the results of its updated mineral reserve and mineral resource statement effective December 31, 2025.
Evidence · text
“Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. ... is pleased to announce the results of its updated mineral reserve and mineral resource ("MRMR") statement effective December 31, 2025”
High Recoverypositive · Story-specific tag
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: Kiena reports an average recovery of 98.4%, which is exceptional for gold.
Evidence · table
“98.4”
Context: Average recovery
High Recoverypositive · Story-specific tag
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: Eagle River reports an average recovery of 95.7%, which is exceptional for gold.
Evidence · table
“95.7”
Context: Average recovery
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 59. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Resource Estimates (41)
provenEagle River · goldTonnes: 296000Grade: 12.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 123Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Benny Zhang
- Resource group id
- resource:ea292ee3edf567466eab
Resource Data
- Category
- proven
- Tonnes
- 296000
- Grade
- 12.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 123
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 6.2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 433000
- Prior Grade
- 15.6
- Prior Contained Metal
- 217
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Proven reserves at Eagle River decreased in tonnes and contained gold, but the grade remains high, indicating a shift in the reserve profile.
Positive factors
- High grade for underground gold mining
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Decrease in tonnes and contained metal compared to prior estimate
Evidence · table
“12.9”
Context: 296
Tags used in scoring
Proven Reservepositive
Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.
Why it applies: category is "proven"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 296000 against 433000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 12.9 against 15.6 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 123 against 217 previously
probableEagle River · goldTonnes: 2596000Grade: 6.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 553Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Benny Zhang
- Resource group id
- resource:c93bfe62c0ee5015c43c
Resource Data
- Category
- probable
- Tonnes
- 2596000
- Grade
- 6.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 553
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 6.2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 794000
- Prior Grade
- 10.4
- Prior Contained Metal
- 265
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Probable reserves at Eagle River saw a substantial increase in tonnes and contained gold, despite a lower average grade, contributing significantly to the overall reserve growth.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in tonnes and contained metal
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Lower grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · table
“6.6”
Context: 2,596
Tags used in scoring
Probable Reservepositive
Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.
Why it applies: category is "probable"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 2596000 against 794000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 6.6 against 10.4 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 553 against 265 previously
provenEagle River · goldTonnes: 3000Grade: 5.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Benny Zhang
- Resource group id
- resource:037d7d55239d478ad8b3
- Deposit or zone
- Stockpile and inventory
Resource Data
- Category
- proven
- Tonnes
- 3000
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 6.2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 8000
- Prior Grade
- 17.8
- Prior Contained Metal
- 5
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Stockpile reserves at Eagle River decreased substantially in both quantity and quality, indicating depletion or reclassification of material.
Negative factors
- Significant decrease in tonnes, grade, and contained metal for stockpile reserves
Evidence · table
“5.3”
Context: 3
Tags used in scoring
Proven Reservepositive
Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.
Why it applies: category is "proven"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 3000 against 8000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 5.3 against 17.8 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 1 against 5 previously
Fact 4Eagle River · goldTonnes: 2895000Grade: 7.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 676Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Benny Zhang
- Resource group id
- resource:f341cd3fd7d0e7709e94
Resource Data
- Tonnes
- 2895000
- Grade
- 7.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 676
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 6.2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 1235000
- Prior Grade
- 12.3
- Prior Contained Metal
- 487
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's Proven & Probable reserves increased substantially by 39%, extending the mine life, despite a lower average grade due to the inclusion of additional material.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in total Proven & Probable reserves (39%)
- Extended mine life to 8 years
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Lower average grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · table
“7.3”
Context: 2,895
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 2895000 against 1235000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 7.3 against 12.3 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 676 against 487 previously
provenKiena · goldTonnes: 463000Grade: 9.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 143Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:f8f97ff612424654eb25
Resource Data
- Category
- proven
- Tonnes
- 463000
- Grade
- 9.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 143
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4.85
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 305000
- Prior Grade
- 11
- Prior Contained Metal
- 107
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Proven reserves at Kiena increased in tonnes and contained gold, indicating growth in the highest confidence category, despite a minor grade reduction.
Positive factors
- Increase in tonnes and contained metal
- High grade for underground gold mining
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Slight decrease in grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · table
“9.6”
Context: 463
Tags used in scoring
Proven Reservepositive
Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.
Why it applies: category is "proven"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 463000 against 305000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 9.6 against 11 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 143 against 107 previously
probableKiena · goldTonnes: 2090000Grade: 8.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 568Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:fbff8357be161049ee80
Resource Data
- Category
- probable
- Tonnes
- 2090000
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 568
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4.85
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 2076000
- Prior Grade
- 8.9
- Prior Contained Metal
- 592
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Probable reserves at Kiena remained stable in tonnes but saw a slight decrease in grade and contained metal, indicating some depletion or reclassification.
Positive factors
- Stable tonnes compared to prior estimate
- High grade for underground gold mining
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Slight decrease in grade and contained metal
Evidence · table
“8.5”
Context: 2,090
Tags used in scoring
Probable Reservepositive
Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.
Why it applies: category is "probable"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 568 against 592 previously
Dilutive Growthnegative
Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.
Why it applies: tonnage rose while contained metal went 568 from 592
provenKiena · goldTonnes: 0Contained Metal: 0View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:eeab5f9341d78431bf65
- Deposit or zone
- Stockpile and inventory
Resource Data
- Category
- proven
- Tonnes
- 0
- Contained Metal
- 0
- Cutoff Grade
- 4.85
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 10000
- Prior Grade
- 5.6
- Prior Contained Metal
- 2
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's stockpile reserves have been fully depleted, indicating material has been processed or reclassified.
Negative factors
- Complete depletion of stockpile reserves
Evidence · table
“-”
Context: -
Tags used in scoring
Proven Reservepositive
Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.
Why it applies: category is "proven"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 0 against 10000 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 0 against 2 previously
Fact 8Kiena · goldTonnes: 2553000Grade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 711Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:b293f9a91d1c19fa24af
Resource Data
- Tonnes
- 2553000
- Grade
- 8.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 711
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4.85
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 2391000
- Prior Grade
- 9.1
- Prior Contained Metal
- 701
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's Proven & Probable reserves increased in contained gold and tonnes, maintaining a high average grade and extending the mine life to 8 years.
Positive factors
- Increase in total Proven & Probable reserves
- Extended mine life to 8 years
- High average grade for underground gold mining
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Slight decrease in average grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · table
“8.7”
Context: 2,553
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Dilutive Growthnegative
Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.
Why it applies: tonnage rose while contained metal went 711 from 701
provenWesdome · goldTonnes: 760000Grade: 10.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 266Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wesdome
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Benny Zhang, Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:ae452422f54375ec7f7b
Resource Data
- Category
- proven
- Tonnes
- 760000
- Grade
- 10.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 266
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 6.2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 738000
- Prior Grade
- 13.7
- Prior Contained Metal
- 324
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated Proven reserves show a slight increase in tonnes but a decrease in grade and contained metal, indicating a shift in the overall reserve quality.
Positive factors
- Slight increase in tonnes
- High grade for underground gold mining
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Decrease in grade and contained metal
Evidence · table
“10.9”
Context: 760
Tags used in scoring
Proven Reservepositive
Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.
Why it applies: category is "proven"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 10.9 against 13.7 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 266 against 324 previously
Dilutive Growthnegative
Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.
Why it applies: tonnage rose while contained metal went 266 from 324
probableWesdome · goldTonnes: 4686000Grade: 7.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1121Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wesdome
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Benny Zhang, Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:70f1a661ebe6d475fb16
Resource Data
- Category
- probable
- Tonnes
- 4686000
- Grade
- 7.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1121
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 6.2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 2870000
- Prior Grade
- 9.3
- Prior Contained Metal
- 857
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated Probable reserves show a substantial increase in tonnes and contained gold, significantly contributing to the overall reserve growth, despite a lower average grade.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in tonnes and contained metal
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Lower grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · table
“7.4”
Context: 4,686
Tags used in scoring
Probable Reservepositive
Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.
Why it applies: category is "probable"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 4686000 against 2870000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 7.4 against 9.3 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 1121 against 857 previously
provenWesdome · goldTonnes: 3000Grade: 5.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wesdome
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Benny Zhang, Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:ceaecca39bfda468d91a
- Deposit or zone
- Stockpile and inventory
Resource Data
- Category
- proven
- Tonnes
- 3000
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 6.2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 18000
- Prior Grade
- 10.9
- Prior Contained Metal
- 6
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated stockpile reserves decreased in quantity and quality, indicating material has been processed or reclassified.
Negative factors
- Decrease in tonnes, grade, and contained metal for stockpile reserves
Evidence · table
“5.3”
Context: 3
Tags used in scoring
Proven Reservepositive
Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.
Why it applies: category is "proven"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 3000 against 18000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 5.3 against 10.9 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 1 against 6 previously
Fact 12Wesdome · goldTonnes: 5448000Grade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1387Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wesdome
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- reserve
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Benny Zhang, Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:1d9a3384d78c1ef3616b
Resource Data
- Tonnes
- 5448000
- Grade
- 7.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1387
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 6.2
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 3626000
- Prior Grade
- 10.2
- Prior Contained Metal
- 1188
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated Proven & Probable reserves increased by 17% to a record 1.4 Moz, extending the mine life to 8 years, despite a lower average grade.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in total Proven & Probable reserves (17%)
- Extended mine life to 8 years
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Lower average grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · table
“7.9”
Context: 5,448
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 5448000 against 3626000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 7.9 against 10.2 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 1387 against 1188 previously
measuredEagle River · goldTonnes: 59000Grade: 9.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 17Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee
- Resource group id
- resource:19d6629e5a808df13116
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 59000
- Grade
- 9.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 17
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 250000
- Prior Grade
- 11.6
- Prior Contained Metal
- 93
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resources at Eagle River saw a substantial decrease in tonnes, grade, and contained gold, indicating depletion or reclassification of high-confidence material.
Positive factors
- High grade for underground gold mining
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Significant decrease in tonnes, grade, and contained metal
Evidence · table
“9.1”
Context: 59
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 59000 against 250000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 9.1 against 11.6 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 17 against 93 previously
indicatedEagle River · goldTonnes: 796000Grade: 6.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 162Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee
- Resource group id
- resource:27aaed55717bce27ffdc
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 796000
- Grade
- 6.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 162
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 557000
- Prior Grade
- 7.5
- Prior Contained Metal
- 135
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resources at Eagle River increased in tonnes and contained gold, indicating growth in this confidence category, despite a lower average grade.
Positive factors
- Increase in tonnes and contained metal
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Lower grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · table
“6.3”
Context: 796
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 796000 against 557000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 6.3 against 7.5 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 162 against 135 previously
indicatedEagle River · goldTonnes: 855000Grade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 179Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee
- Resource group id
- resource:fff1294946c15021561c
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 855000
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 179
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 806000
- Prior Grade
- 8.8
- Prior Contained Metal
- 228
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Measured + Indicated resources at Eagle River increased in tonnes but decreased in grade and contained gold, reflecting a shift in the resource profile.
Positive factors
- Increase in tonnes
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Decrease in grade and contained metal
Evidence · table
“6.5”
Context: 855
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 6.5 against 8.8 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 179 against 228 previously
Dilutive Growthnegative
Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.
Why it applies: tonnage rose while contained metal went 179 from 228
inferredEagle River · goldTonnes: 512000Grade: 7.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 120Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee
- Resource group id
- resource:cbf9a72b6ee2d92a4d1d
- Deposit or zone
- Underground
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 512000
- Grade
- 7.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 120
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 431000
- Prior Grade
- 7.9
- Prior Contained Metal
- 109
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Underground Inferred resources at Eagle River increased in tonnes and contained gold, indicating potential for future conversion, despite a minor grade reduction.
Positive factors
- Increase in tonnes and contained metal
- High grade for inferred resource
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Slight decrease in grade
Evidence · text
“Eagle River Mine | 512 | 7.3 | 120 | 431 | 7.9 | 109”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 512000 against 431000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 7.3 against 7.9 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 120 against 109 previously
inferredEagle River · goldTonnes: 11487000Grade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 523Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee
- Resource group id
- resource:876743681e039bfa7b11
- Deposit or zone
- Open Pit - Mishi
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 11487000
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 523
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.55
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 2318000
- Prior Grade
- 1.6
- Prior Contained Metal
- 120
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Mishi Open Pit Inferred resources increased fourfold in tonnes and contained gold, representing a significant expansion of potential open-pit material.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in tonnes and contained metal (fourfold)
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Lower grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · text
“Inferred Open Pit - Mishi | 11,487 | 1.4 | 523 | 2,318 | 1.6 | 120”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 11487000 against 2318000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 1.4 against 1.6 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 523 against 120 previously
inferredEagle River · goldTonnes: 152000Grade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 32Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee
- Resource group id
- resource:fa16462b2d1028611112
- Deposit or zone
- Underground - Mishi
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 152000
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 32
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4.36
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A new underground inferred resource at Mishi adds significant potential high-grade material for future evaluation.
Positive factors
- New inferred resource category
- High grade for inferred resource
- NI 43-101 compliant
Evidence · text
“Inferred Underground - Mishi | 152 | 6.5 | 32 | - | - | -”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
inferredEagle River · goldTonnes: 12151000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 674Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee
- Resource group id
- resource:c43b7ffcbf9c093ce5f8
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12151000
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 674
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 2749000
- Prior Grade
- 2.6
- Prior Contained Metal
- 229
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Inferred resources at Eagle River increased substantially in tonnes and contained gold, providing a larger base for future conversion, despite a lower average grade.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in total inferred tonnes and contained metal
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Lower average grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · text
“Inferred Total | 12,151 | 1.7 | 674 | 2,749 | 2.6 | 229”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 12151000 against 2749000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 1.7 against 2.6 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 674 against 229 previously
measuredKiena · goldTonnes: 85000Grade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 23Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:f5ae726a7a38003c6b37
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 85000
- Grade
- 8.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 23
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 3.15
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 58000
- Prior Grade
- 10.2
- Prior Contained Metal
- 19
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Measured resources at Kiena increased in tonnes and contained gold, indicating growth in the highest confidence category, despite a minor grade reduction.
Positive factors
- Increase in tonnes and contained metal
- High grade for underground gold mining
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Decrease in grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · text
“Measured | 85 | 8.4 | 23 | 58 | 10.2 | 19”
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 85000 against 58000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 8.4 against 10.2 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 23 against 19 previously
indicatedKiena · goldTonnes: 893000Grade: 5.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 163Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:7ffa74cf4cca35dd952e
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 893000
- Grade
- 5.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 163
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 3.15
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 789000
- Prior Grade
- 5.4
- Prior Contained Metal
- 138
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resources at Kiena increased in tonnes, grade, and contained gold, showing positive growth in this confidence category.
Positive factors
- Increase in tonnes, grade, and contained metal
- NI 43-101 compliant
Evidence · text
“Indicated | 893 | 5.7 | 163 | 789 | 5.4 | 138”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Grade Improvementpositive
Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.
Why it applies: 5.7 against 5.4 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 163 against 138 previously
indicatedKiena · goldTonnes: 977000Grade: 5.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 186Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:cdad6ace75d1b550f155
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 977000
- Grade
- 5.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 186
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 3.15
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 847000
- Prior Grade
- 5.8
- Prior Contained Metal
- 158
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Total Measured + Indicated resources at Kiena increased in tonnes, grade, and contained gold, showing overall positive growth in higher confidence categories.
Positive factors
- Increase in tonnes, grade, and contained metal
- NI 43-101 compliant
Evidence · text
“M+I Resources | 977 | 5.9 | 186 | 847 | 5.8 | 158”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 977000 against 847000 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 186 against 158 previously
inferredKiena · goldTonnes: 2977000Grade: 5.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 525Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:3c013c0d9ebf405b7e17
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2977000
- Grade
- 5.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 525
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 3.15
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 2536000
- Prior Grade
- 5
- Prior Contained Metal
- 411
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resources at Kiena increased significantly in tonnes, grade, and contained gold, indicating strong potential for future resource conversion.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in tonnes, grade, and contained metal
- High grade for inferred resource
- NI 43-101 compliant
Evidence · text
“Inferred | 2,977 | 5.5 | 525 | 2,536 | 5.0 | 411”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 2977000 against 2536000 previously
Grade Improvementpositive
Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.
Why it applies: 5.5 against 5 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 525 against 411 previously
measuredWesdome · goldTonnes: 143000Grade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 40Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wesdome
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee, Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:68564563f9d8660ad004
Resource Data
- Category
- measured
- Tonnes
- 143000
- Grade
- 8.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 40
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 308000
- Prior Grade
- 11.3
- Prior Contained Metal
- 112
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated Measured resources saw a substantial decrease in tonnes, grade, and contained gold, indicating depletion or reclassification of high-confidence material.
Positive factors
- High grade for underground gold mining
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Significant decrease in tonnes, grade, and contained metal
Evidence · text
“Measured | 143 | 8.7 | 40 | 308 | 11.3 | 112”
Tags used in scoring
Measured Resourcepositive
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "measured"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Declinenegative
Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.
Why it applies: 143000 against 308000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 8.7 against 11.3 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 40 against 112 previously
indicatedWesdome · goldTonnes: 1689000Grade: 6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 325Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wesdome
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee, Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:164aafbe2bfdd0668648
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1689000
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 325
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 1346000
- Prior Grade
- 6.3
- Prior Contained Metal
- 271
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated Indicated resources increased in tonnes and contained gold, showing positive growth in this confidence category, despite a minor grade reduction.
Positive factors
- Increase in tonnes and contained metal
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Slight decrease in grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · text
“Indicated | 1,689 | 6.0 | 325 | 1,346 | 6.3 | 271”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 1689000 against 1346000 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 325 against 271 previously
indicatedWesdome · goldTonnes: 1833000Grade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 365Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wesdome
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee, Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:8cebee9e313582a909d9
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1833000
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 365
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 1653000
- Prior Grade
- 7.3
- Prior Contained Metal
- 386
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated Measured + Indicated resources increased in tonnes but decreased in grade and contained gold, reflecting a shift in the overall resource profile.
Positive factors
- Increase in tonnes
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Decrease in grade and contained metal
Evidence · text
“M+I Resources | 1,833 | 6.2 | 365 | 1,653 | 7.3 | 386”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 6.2 against 7.3 previously
Contained Metal Declinenegative
Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.
Why it applies: 365 against 386 previously
Dilutive Growthnegative
Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.
Why it applies: tonnage rose while contained metal went 365 from 386
inferredWesdome · goldTonnes: 3489000Grade: 5.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 645Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wesdome
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee, Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:23b236be76383ae2d37d
- Deposit or zone
- Underground Eagle River Mine & Kiena
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 3489000
- Grade
- 5.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 645
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 2967000
- Prior Grade
- 5.5
- Prior Contained Metal
- 520
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated Underground Inferred resources increased in tonnes, grade, and contained gold, indicating strong potential for future conversion.
Positive factors
- Increase in tonnes, grade, and contained metal
- High grade for inferred resource
- NI 43-101 compliant
Evidence · text
“Inferred Underground Eagle River Mine & Kiena | 3,489 | 5.7 | 645 | 2,967 | 5.5 | 520”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 3489000 against 2967000 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 645 against 520 previously
inferredWesdome · goldTonnes: 11487000Grade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 523Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wesdome
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee, Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:5d40ea469bba35d0fb2f
- Deposit or zone
- Open Pit - Mishi
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 11487000
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 523
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.55
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 2318000
- Prior Grade
- 1.6
- Prior Contained Metal
- 120
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated Open Pit Inferred resources at Mishi increased fourfold in tonnes and contained gold, representing a significant expansion of potential open-pit material.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in tonnes and contained metal (fourfold)
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Lower grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · text
“Inferred Open Pit - Mishi | 11,487 | 1.4 | 523 | 2,318 | 1.6 | 120”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 11487000 against 2318000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 1.4 against 1.6 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 523 against 120 previously
inferredWesdome · goldTonnes: 152000Grade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 32Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wesdome
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee, Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:eb4f6f140cf9424ff0b2
- Deposit or zone
- Underground - Mishi
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 152000
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 32
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4.36
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Au
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A new consolidated underground inferred resource at Mishi adds significant potential high-grade material for future evaluation.
Positive factors
- New inferred resource category
- High grade for inferred resource
- NI 43-101 compliant
Evidence · text
“Inferred Underground - Mishi | 152 | 6.5 | 32 | - | - | -”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
inferredWesdome · goldTonnes: 15128000Grade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1199Contained Unit: kozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Wesdome
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Souvik Banerjee, Eric Lecomte
- Resource group id
- resource:5db8996ee2417b0dfdd1
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 15128000
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 1199
- Contained Unit
- koz
- Cutoff Grade
- 4
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-31
- Prior Tonnes
- 5285000
- Prior Grade
- 3.8
- Prior Contained Metal
- 640
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated Inferred resources increased substantially by 87% in tonnes and contained gold, providing a larger base for future conversion, despite a lower average grade.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in total inferred tonnes and contained metal (87%)
- NI 43-101 compliant
Negative factors
- Lower average grade compared to prior estimate
Evidence · text
“Inferred Total | 15,128 | 2.5 | 1,199 | 5,285 | 3.8 | 640”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101
Tonnage Growthpositive
Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.
Why it applies: 15128000 against 5285000 previously
Grade Declinenegative
Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.
Why it applies: 2.5 against 3.8 previously
Contained Metal Growthpositive
True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.
Why it applies: 1199 against 640 previously
Fact 31Eagle River · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:f17e627850393d1ed197
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's 2026 production guidance is stable with competitive AISC, contributing to the company's overall outlook.
Positive factors
- Stable production guidance
- Competitive AISC range
Evidence · table
“105,000 - 115,000”
Context: Eagle River
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 32Eagle River · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:f17e627850393d1ed197
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's 2027 production guidance remains stable, with a slightly higher AISC range, reflecting ongoing operational costs.
Positive factors
- Stable production guidance
- Competitive AISC range
Evidence · table
“100,000 - 120,000”
Context: Eagle River
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 33Eagle River · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:f17e627850393d1ed197
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's 2028 production guidance maintains a stable output, contributing to the company's long-term production profile.
Positive factors
- Stable production guidance
Evidence · table
“100,000 - 120,000”
Context: Eagle River
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 34Kiena · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:42cff9ade9b2f2814284
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's 2026 production guidance is solid with competitive AISC, supporting the company's overall outlook.
Positive factors
- Solid production guidance
- Competitive AISC range
Evidence · table
“75,000 - 90,000”
Context: Kiena
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 35Kiena · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:42cff9ade9b2f2814284
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's 2027 production guidance shows an increase, indicating positive operational momentum, with a competitive AISC range.
Positive factors
- Increased production guidance
- Competitive AISC range
Evidence · table
“85,000 - 100,000”
Context: Kiena
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 36Kiena · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:42cff9ade9b2f2814284
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's 2028 production guidance shows continued growth, contributing significantly to the company's overall production profile.
Positive factors
- Increased production guidance
Evidence · table
“85,000 - 110,000”
Context: Kiena
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 37Consolidated · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Consolidated
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:be9ad4ad9b83994e6817
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated 2026 production guidance is strong and supported by competitive AISC, setting a positive tone for the company's performance.
Positive factors
- Strong consolidated production guidance
- Competitive AISC range
Evidence · table
“180,000 - 205,000”
Context: Total Gold Production
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 38Consolidated · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Consolidated
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:be9ad4ad9b83994e6817
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated 2027 production guidance shows an increase, indicating positive growth trajectory, with a competitive AISC range.
Positive factors
- Increased consolidated production guidance
- Competitive AISC range
Evidence · table
“185,000 - 220,000”
Context: Total Gold Production
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 39Consolidated · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Consolidated
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:be9ad4ad9b83994e6817
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consolidated 2028 production guidance shows continued growth, projecting a robust output for the company.
Positive factors
- Increased consolidated production guidance
Evidence · table
“185,000 - 230,000”
Context: Total Gold Production
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 40Eagle River · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:f17e627850393d1ed197
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's technical report highlights an 8-year mine life with substantial gold production and detailed cost estimates, providing a clear operational outlook.
Positive factors
- Extended mine life
- Significant gold production
- Detailed cost breakdown
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: Mineral reserve mine life
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 41Kiena · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:42cff9ade9b2f2814284
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's technical report highlights an 8-year mine life with substantial gold production from higher-grade ore and detailed cost estimates, indicating strong economic potential.
Positive factors
- Extended mine life
- Significant gold production
- Higher processed grade
- Detailed cost breakdown
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: Mineral reserve mine life
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Metallurgical Results (18)
Fact 1Eagle River · goldRecovery: 95.7 %Head Grade: 7.3Head Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 95.7 %
- Recovery Basis
- unspecified
- Head Grade
- 7.3
- Head Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River reports a high average gold recovery of 95.7% over the mine life, indicating efficient processing.
Positive factors
- High average recovery for gold
Negative factors
- Processing route not specified
Evidence · table
“95.7”
Context: Average recovery
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 95.7% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 2Kiena · goldRecovery: 98.4 %Head Grade: 8.7Head Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 98.4 %
- Recovery Basis
- unspecified
- Head Grade
- 8.7
- Head Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena reports a very high average gold recovery of 98.4% over the mine life, indicating excellent processing efficiency.
Positive factors
- Very high average recovery for gold
Negative factors
- Processing route not specified
Evidence · table
“98.4”
Context: Average recovery
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 98.4% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 3Eagle River · goldRecovery: 96.6 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 96.6 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's 2026 annual plan shows high-grade mill feed, excellent recovery, and strong gold production, supported by detailed cost projections.
Positive factors
- High mill feed grade and recovery
- Strong gold production
- Detailed annual cost breakdown
Evidence · table
“12.9”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 96.6% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 4Eagle River · goldRecovery: 96.1 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 96.1 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's 2027 plan projects increased mill feed and stable production with lower operating costs, despite a decrease in mill feed grade.
Positive factors
- Increased mill feed tonnes
- High recovery
- Stable gold production
- Lower total cost per tonne milled
Negative factors
- Lower mill feed grade
Evidence · table
“8.8”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 96.1% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 5Eagle River · goldRecovery: 95.9 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 95.9 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's 2028 plan maintains high mill feed and recovery, with stable operating costs, though gold production and grade see a slight decrease.
Positive factors
- High mill feed tonnes and recovery
- Stable operating costs
Negative factors
- Slight decrease in gold production and mill feed grade
Evidence · table
“8.2”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 95.9% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 6Eagle River · goldRecovery: 95.7 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 95.7 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's 2029 plan shows a continued decline in gold production and mill feed grade, with an increase in operating costs, despite lower capital expenditures.
Positive factors
- High recovery
- Lower total capital costs
Negative factors
- Decrease in gold production and mill feed grade
- Increase in total cost per tonne milled
Evidence · table
“7.2”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 95.7% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 7Eagle River · goldRecovery: 95.5 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 95.5 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's 2030 plan projects increased mill feed but continued decline in gold production and grade, with significantly reduced capital expenditures.
Positive factors
- Increased mill feed tonnes
- High recovery
- Significantly lower total capital costs
Negative factors
- Continued decrease in gold production and mill feed grade
Evidence · table
“6.6”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 95.5% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 8Eagle River · goldRecovery: 95 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 95 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's 2031 plan shows continued high mill feed and recovery, but gold production and grade continue to decline, with low capital costs.
Positive factors
- High mill feed tonnes and recovery
- Low total capital costs
Negative factors
- Continued decrease in gold production and mill feed grade
Evidence · table
“5.6”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 95% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 9Eagle River · goldRecovery: 94.9 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 94.9 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's 2032 plan projects continued high mill feed and recovery, but gold production and grade continue to decline, with very low capital costs.
Positive factors
- High mill feed tonnes and recovery
- Low total capital costs
Negative factors
- Continued decrease in gold production and mill feed grade
Evidence · table
“5.2”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Fact 10Eagle River · goldRecovery: 94.9 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eagle River
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 94.9 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Eagle River's 2033 plan shows continued high mill feed and recovery, with very low capital costs and the lowest operating costs per tonne, despite declining gold production.
Positive factors
- High mill feed tonnes and recovery
- Very low total capital costs
- Lowest total cost per tonne milled
Negative factors
- Continued decrease in gold production
Evidence · table
“5.3”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Fact 11Kiena · goldRecovery: 98.5 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 98.5 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's 2026 annual plan shows high-grade mill feed, excellent recovery, and strong gold production, supported by detailed cost projections.
Positive factors
- High mill feed grade and excellent recovery
- Strong gold production
- Detailed annual cost breakdown
Evidence · table
“8.6”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 98.5% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 12Kiena · goldRecovery: 98.5 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 98.5 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's 2027 plan projects increased mill feed, grade, and production with excellent recovery, alongside lower operating and capital costs, indicating strong operational improvements.
Positive factors
- Increased mill feed tonnes, grade, and gold production
- Excellent recovery
- Lower total cost per tonne milled and capital costs
Evidence · table
“8.9”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 98.5% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 13Kiena · goldRecovery: 98.5 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 98.5 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's 2028 plan maintains high mill feed and excellent recovery, with further reductions in capital costs, though gold production and grade see a slight decrease.
Positive factors
- High mill feed tonnes and excellent recovery
- Lower total capital costs
Negative factors
- Slight decrease in gold production and mill feed grade
Evidence · table
“8.4”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 98.5% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 14Kiena · goldRecovery: 98.5 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 98.5 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's 2029 plan projects a significant increase in mill feed grade and gold production with excellent recovery, despite a decrease in mill feed tonnes and an increase in operating costs.
Positive factors
- Significant increase in mill feed grade and gold production
- Excellent recovery
- Low total capital costs
Negative factors
- Decrease in mill feed tonnes
- Increase in total cost per tonne milled
Evidence · table
“10.2”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 98.5% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 15Kiena · goldRecovery: 98.5 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 98.5 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's 2030 plan shows a decrease in mill feed, production, and grade, with an increase in operating and capital costs, indicating a less favorable outlook for the year.
Positive factors
- High mill feed grade and excellent recovery
Negative factors
- Decrease in mill feed tonnes and gold production
- Increase in total cost per tonne milled and capital costs
Evidence · table
“9.3”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 98.5% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 16Kiena · goldRecovery: 98.3 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 98.3 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's 2031 plan projects increased mill feed with excellent recovery and lower operating costs, despite a slight decrease in gold production and grade.
Positive factors
- Increase in mill feed tonnes
- Excellent recovery
- Lower total cost per tonne milled
Negative factors
- Slight decrease in gold production and mill feed grade
Evidence · table
“8.1”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 98.3% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 17Kiena · goldRecovery: 98.3 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 98.3 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's 2032 plan shows continued high mill feed grade and excellent recovery, with low capital costs, though mill feed and production decrease.
Positive factors
- High mill feed grade and excellent recovery
- Low total capital costs
Negative factors
- Decrease in mill feed tonnes and gold production
Evidence · table
“8.3”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 98.3% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
Fact 18Kiena · goldRecovery: 98.2 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kiena
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- WDO
Recovery
- Recovery
- 98.2 %
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Kiena's 2033 plan projects a decrease in mill feed, grade, and production, but with excellent recovery and the lowest operating costs per tonne, though capital costs are not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Excellent recovery
- Lowest total cost per tonne milled
Negative factors
- Decrease in mill feed tonnes, grade, and gold production
- Capital costs not provided
Evidence · table
“7.5”
Context: Mill Feed Grade
Tags used in scoring
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 98.2% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.