VMS: Red Mountain MRE Updated with Strontium and Magnesium

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Venari Minerals NL
Ticker
VMS
Exchange
ASX
Region
Nevada, USA
Primary commodity
Lithium
Secondary commodities
Strontium, Magnesium
Document categories
Resource update, Drill results, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-10-05 23:08:53 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Venari Minerals has updated its Red Mountain Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) to include significant strontium and magnesium by-products, alongside the previously estimated lithium. This enhancement positions Red Mountain as the only MRE in the USA containing strontium, a strategic material for which the US is 100% import-dependent, and adds substantial economic potential to the project. The MRE now comprises 500Mt at 0.61% LCE, 0.53% Strontium Carbonate Equivalent (SCE), and 2.40% Mg, all in the Inferred category.

Reasoning: The MRE update significantly enhances the project's value and strategic importance by incorporating high-value strontium and magnesium by-products, positioning it uniquely in the US market for strategic materials, despite the resource remaining entirely in the Inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Addition of high-value strategic by-products (strontium, magnesium)
  • Red Mountain is the only MRE in the USA containing strontium
  • Strontium is a US Strategic Material with 100% import dependence
  • Magnesium is a US Critical Mineral with 59% import dependence
  • By-products enhance economic potential and revenue optionality
  • JORC compliant MRE
  • QP/CP signed off
  • Clear MRE expansion upside
  • Ongoing infill drilling for MRE upgrade
  • Comprehensive metallurgical test-work program underway

Negative factors

  • All resources are Inferred
  • By-products are not economic to mine on their own
  • No new metallurgical results presented for by-products
  • Drill intersections are historical, only updated with new elements

Facts used in scoring: 105

Classification and evidence

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a mill_cil route ("concentrator")

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")

POX/BIOX Routeneutral

Pressure or bio-oxidation for refractory ore — high CAPEX and OPEX.

Why it applies: the document describes a pox_biox route ("roasting")

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 105. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (42)

RMRC001Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 1300Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 59.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC001
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1300
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
59.4 m
From
73.2 m
To
132.6 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC001:73.2-132.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637610.2
Northing
4285588.8
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1732.2 m
Azimuth
179.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical lithium intercept with good grade and width, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Good grade and width for lithium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC001 intersected 59.4m @ 1,300ppm Li, 2,170ppm Sr and 2.5% Mg from 73.2m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC001Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 2170Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 59.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC001
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
2170
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
59.4 m
From
73.2 m
To
132.6 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC001:73.2-132.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637610.2
Northing
4285588.8
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1732.2 m
Azimuth
179.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of strontium grades for a historical intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • Good grade and width for strontium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC001 intersected 59.4m @ 1,300ppm Li, 2,170ppm Sr and 2.5% Mg from 73.2m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC001Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 59.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC001
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
59.4 m
From
73.2 m
To
132.6 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC001:73.2-132.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637610.2
Northing
4285588.8
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1732.2 m
Azimuth
179.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • Good grade and width for magnesium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC001 intersected 59.4m @ 1,300ppm Li, 2,170ppm Sr and 2.5% Mg from 73.2m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC002Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 707Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC002
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
707
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
15.2 m
From
10.7 m
To
25.9 m
Intercept Depth
10.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC002:10.7-25.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637104.6
Northing
4290200.8
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1723.8 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical lithium intercept above cut-off grade, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Above cut-off grade
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC002 intersected 15.2m @ 707ppm Li, 1,710ppm Sr and 2.9% Mg from 10.7m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC002Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 1710Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC002
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1710
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
15.2 m
From
10.7 m
To
25.9 m
Intercept Depth
10.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC002:10.7-25.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637104.6
Northing
4290200.8
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1723.8 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of strontium grades for a historical intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC002 intersected 15.2m @ 707ppm Li, 1,710ppm Sr and 2.9% Mg from 10.7m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC002Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC002
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
2.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15.2 m
From
10.7 m
To
25.9 m
Intercept Depth
10.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC002:10.7-25.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637104.6
Northing
4290200.8
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1723.8 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC002 intersected 15.2m @ 707ppm Li, 1,710ppm Sr and 2.9% Mg from 10.7m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC003Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 1050Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC003
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1050
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC003:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637104.6
Northing
4290200.8
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1723.8 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical near-surface lithium intercept with good grade, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Good grade for lithium
  • Near surface
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC003 intersected 6.1m @ 1,050ppm Li, 1,090ppm Sr and 2.8% Mg from 0m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC003Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 1090Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC003
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1090
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC003:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637104.6
Northing
4290200.8
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1723.8 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of strontium grades for a historical near-surface intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • Near surface
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC003 intersected 6.1m @ 1,050ppm Li, 1,090ppm Sr and 2.8% Mg from 0m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC003Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC003
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC003:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637104.6
Northing
4290200.8
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1723.8 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical near-surface intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • Near surface
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC003 intersected 6.1m @ 1,050ppm Li, 1,090ppm Sr and 2.8% Mg from 0m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC003Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 856Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC003
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
856
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
18.3 m
From
12.2 m
To
30.5 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC003:12.2-30.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637104.6
Northing
4290200.8
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1723.8 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical lithium intercept above cut-off grade, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Above cut-off grade
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC003 intersected 18.3m @ 856ppm Li, 2,220ppm Sr and 3% Mg from 12.2m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC003Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 2220Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC003
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
2220
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
18.3 m
From
12.2 m
To
30.5 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC003:12.2-30.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637104.6
Northing
4290200.8
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1723.8 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of strontium grades for a historical intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC003 intersected 18.3m @ 856ppm Li, 2,220ppm Sr and 3% Mg from 12.2m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC003Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC003
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.3 m
From
12.2 m
To
30.5 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC003:12.2-30.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637104.6
Northing
4290200.8
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1723.8 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC003 intersected 18.3m @ 856ppm Li, 2,220ppm Sr and 3% Mg from 12.2m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC004Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 1070Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC004
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1070
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
13.7 m
From
0 m
To
13.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC004:0-13.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637782.2
Northing
4288743.1
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1731.4 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical near-surface lithium intercept with good grade, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Good grade for lithium
  • Near surface
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC004 intersected 13.7m @ 1,070ppm Li, 776ppm Sr and 2.7% Mg from 0m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC004Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 776Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC004
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
776
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
13.7 m
From
0 m
To
13.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC004:0-13.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637782.2
Northing
4288743.1
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1731.4 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of strontium grades for a historical near-surface intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • Near surface
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC004 intersected 13.7m @ 1,070ppm Li, 776ppm Sr and 2.7% Mg from 0m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC004Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC004
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.7 m
From
0 m
To
13.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC004:0-13.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637782.2
Northing
4288743.1
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1731.4 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical near-surface intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • Near surface
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC004 intersected 13.7m @ 1,070ppm Li, 776ppm Sr and 2.7% Mg from 0m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC004Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 1230Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 83.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC004
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1230
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
83.8 m
From
16.8 m
To
100.6 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC004:16.8-100.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637782.2
Northing
4288743.1
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1731.4 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical lithium intercept with good grade and significant width, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Good grade and significant width for lithium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC004 intersected 83.8m @ 1,230ppm Li, 2,870ppm Sr and 2.7% Mg from 16.8m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC004Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 2870Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 83.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC004
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
2870
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
83.8 m
From
16.8 m
To
100.6 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC004:16.8-100.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637782.2
Northing
4288743.1
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1731.4 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of strontium grades for a historical intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • Good grade and significant width for strontium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC004 intersected 83.8m @ 1,230ppm Li, 2,870ppm Sr and 2.7% Mg from 16.8m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC004Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 83.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC004
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
83.8 m
From
16.8 m
To
100.6 m
Intercept Depth
16.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC004:16.8-100.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637782.2
Northing
4288743.1
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1731.4 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • Good grade and significant width for magnesium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC004 intersected 83.8m @ 1,230ppm Li, 2,870ppm Sr and 2.7% Mg from 16.8m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC005Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 656Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC005
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
656
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
25.9 m
From
3 m
To
28.9 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC005:3-28.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637320.8
Northing
4288194.4
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1707.7 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical near-surface lithium intercept above cut-off grade, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Above cut-off grade
  • Near surface
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC005 intersected 25.9m @ 656ppm Li, 1,550ppm Sr and 1.3% Mg from 3m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC005Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 1550Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC005
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1550
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
25.9 m
From
3 m
To
28.9 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC005:3-28.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637320.8
Northing
4288194.4
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1707.7 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of strontium grades for a historical near-surface intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • Near surface
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC005 intersected 25.9m @ 656ppm Li, 1,550ppm Sr and 1.3% Mg from 3m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC005Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC005
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
25.9 m
From
3 m
To
28.9 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC005:3-28.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637320.8
Northing
4288194.4
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1707.7 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical near-surface intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • Near surface
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC005 intersected 25.9m @ 656ppm Li, 1,550ppm Sr and 1.3% Mg from 3m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC005Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 1270Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 80.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC005
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1270
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
80.8 m
From
56.4 m
To
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
56.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC005:56.4-137.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637320.8
Northing
4288194.4
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1707.7 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical lithium intercept with good grade and significant width, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Good grade and significant width for lithium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC005 intersected 80.8m @ 1,270ppm Li, 5,500ppm Sr and 1.9% Mg from 56.4m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC005Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 5500Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 80.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC005
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
5500
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
80.8 m
From
56.4 m
To
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
56.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC005:56.4-137.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637320.8
Northing
4288194.4
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1707.7 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of high-grade strontium for a historical intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • High grade and significant width for strontium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC005 intersected 80.8m @ 1,270ppm Li, 5,500ppm Sr and 1.9% Mg from 56.4m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC005Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 80.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC005
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
80.8 m
From
56.4 m
To
137.2 m
Intercept Depth
56.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC005:56.4-137.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637320.8
Northing
4288194.4
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1707.7 m
Azimuth
270.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • Good grade and significant width for magnesium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC005 intersected 80.8m @ 1,270ppm Li, 5,500ppm Sr and 1.9% Mg from 56.4m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC006Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 1070Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC006
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1070
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
62.5 m
From
6.1 m
To
68.6 m
Intercept Depth
6.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC006:6.1-68.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637341
Northing
4288618
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1719.7 m
Azimuth
265.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical lithium intercept with good grade and significant width, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Good grade and significant width for lithium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC006 intersected 62.5m @ 1,070ppm Li, 3,580ppm Sr and 1.9% Mg from 6.1m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC006Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 3580Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC006
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
3580
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
62.5 m
From
6.1 m
To
68.6 m
Intercept Depth
6.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC006:6.1-68.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637341
Northing
4288618
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1719.7 m
Azimuth
265.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of strontium grades for a historical intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • Good grade and significant width for strontium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC006 intersected 62.5m @ 1,070ppm Li, 3,580ppm Sr and 1.9% Mg from 6.1m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC006Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 62.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC006
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
62.5 m
From
6.1 m
To
68.6 m
Intercept Depth
6.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC006:6.1-68.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637341
Northing
4288618
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1719.7 m
Azimuth
265.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • Good grade and significant width for magnesium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC006 intersected 62.5m @ 1,070ppm Li, 3,580ppm Sr and 1.9% Mg from 6.1m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC006Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 896Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC006
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
896
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
15.2 m
From
71.6 m
To
86.8 m
Intercept Depth
71.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC006:71.6-86.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637341
Northing
4288618
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1719.7 m
Azimuth
265.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical lithium intercept above cut-off grade, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Above cut-off grade
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC006 intersected 15.2m @ 896ppm Li, 2,040ppm Sr and 1.4% Mg from 71.6m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC006Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 2040Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC006
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
2040
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
15.2 m
From
71.6 m
To
86.8 m
Intercept Depth
71.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC006:71.6-86.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637341
Northing
4288618
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1719.7 m
Azimuth
265.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of strontium grades for a historical intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC006 intersected 15.2m @ 896ppm Li, 2,040ppm Sr and 1.4% Mg from 71.6m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC006Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC006
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15.2 m
From
71.6 m
To
86.8 m
Intercept Depth
71.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC006:71.6-86.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637341
Northing
4288618
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1719.7 m
Azimuth
265.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC006 intersected 15.2m @ 896ppm Li, 2,040ppm Sr and 1.4% Mg from 71.6m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC006Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 1090Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 70.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC006
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1090
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
70.1 m
From
89.9 m
To
160 m
Intercept Depth
89.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC006:89.9-160
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637341
Northing
4288618
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1719.7 m
Azimuth
265.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical lithium intercept with good grade and significant width, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Good grade and significant width for lithium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC006 intersected 70.1m @ 1,090ppm Li, 3,000ppm Sr and 1.8% Mg from 89.9m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC006Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 3000Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 70.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC006
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
3000
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
70.1 m
From
89.9 m
To
160 m
Intercept Depth
89.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC006:89.9-160
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637341
Northing
4288618
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1719.7 m
Azimuth
265.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of strontium grades for a historical intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • Good grade and significant width for strontium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC006 intersected 70.1m @ 1,090ppm Li, 3,000ppm Sr and 1.8% Mg from 89.9m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC006Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 70.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC006
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
70.1 m
From
89.9 m
To
160 m
Intercept Depth
89.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC006:89.9-160
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637341
Northing
4288618
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1719.7 m
Azimuth
265.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • Good grade and significant width for magnesium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC006 intersected 70.1m @ 1,090ppm Li, 3,000ppm Sr and 1.8% Mg from 89.9m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC007Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 1150Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 74.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC007
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1150
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
74.7 m
From
18.3 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
18.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC007:18.3-93
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637327
Northing
4288197
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1707.7 m
Azimuth
269.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical lithium intercept with good grade and significant width, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Good grade and significant width for lithium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC007 intersected 74.7m @ 1,150ppm Li, 3,030ppm Sr and 1.9% Mg from 18.3m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC007Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 3030Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 74.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC007
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
3030
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
74.7 m
From
18.3 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
18.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC007:18.3-93
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637327
Northing
4288197
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1707.7 m
Azimuth
269.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of strontium grades for a historical intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • Good grade and significant width for strontium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC007 intersected 74.7m @ 1,150ppm Li, 3,030ppm Sr and 1.9% Mg from 18.3m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC007Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 74.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC007
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
74.7 m
From
18.3 m
To
93 m
Intercept Depth
18.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC007:18.3-93
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637327
Northing
4288197
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1707.7 m
Azimuth
269.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • Good grade and significant width for magnesium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC007 intersected 74.7m @ 1,150ppm Li, 3,030ppm Sr and 1.9% Mg from 18.3m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC007Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 1580Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC007
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1580
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
25.9 m
From
115.8 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC007:115.8-141.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637327
Northing
4288197
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1707.7 m
Azimuth
269.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical high-grade lithium intercept with good width, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • High grade for lithium
  • Good width
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC007 intersected 25.9m @ 1,580ppm Li, 4,450ppm Sr and 2.5% Mg from 115.8m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC007Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 4450Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC007
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
4450
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
25.9 m
From
115.8 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC007:115.8-141.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637327
Northing
4288197
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1707.7 m
Azimuth
269.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of high-grade strontium for a historical intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • High grade and good width for strontium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC007 intersected 25.9m @ 1,580ppm Li, 4,450ppm Sr and 2.5% Mg from 115.8m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC007Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC007
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
25.9 m
From
115.8 m
To
141.7 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC007:115.8-141.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637327
Northing
4288197
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1707.7 m
Azimuth
269.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • Good grade and good width for magnesium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC007 intersected 25.9m @ 1,580ppm Li, 4,450ppm Sr and 2.5% Mg from 115.8m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC008Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · lithiumGrade: 1120Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC008
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1120
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
25.9 m
From
73.2 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC008:73.2-99.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637516
Northing
4286902
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1724.1 m
Azimuth
265.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical lithium intercept with good grade and width, now re-reported with additional elements, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Good grade and width for lithium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC008 intersected 25.9m @ 1,120ppm Li, 2,000ppm Sr and 1.9% Mg from 73.2m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC008Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · strontiumGrade: 2000Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC008
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
2000
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
25.9 m
From
73.2 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC008:73.2-99.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637516
Northing
4286902
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1724.1 m
Azimuth
265.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of strontium grades for a historical intercept, adding strategic value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product reporting
  • Good grade and width for strontium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC008 intersected 25.9m @ 1,120ppm Li, 2,000ppm Sr and 1.9% Mg from 73.2m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

RMRC008Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals · magnesiumGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMRC008
Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
VMS

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
25.9 m
From
73.2 m
To
99.1 m
Intercept Depth
73.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMRC008:73.2-99.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Central Zone
Easting
637516
Northing
4286902
CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11
Elevation
1724.1 m
Azimuth
265.5 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
carbonates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3.048 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-01-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New reporting of magnesium grades for a historical intercept, adding critical value, but still an inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product reporting
  • Good grade and width for magnesium
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Inferred mining method

Evidence · text

“RMRC008 intersected 25.9m @ 1,120ppm Li, 2,000ppm Sr and 1.9% Mg from 73.2m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Red Mountain project is well-serviced by infrastructure, being located immediately adjacent to the transcontinental "

Resource Estimates (63)

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 91600000Grade: 0.86Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.79Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:4428a134efea1ad8b1f6
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
91600000
Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
0.79
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.86
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade lithium in the North zone, contributing to the overall strategic resource update, but remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • High grade for clay-hosted lithium
  • Part of a strategic resource update
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only

Evidence · table

“0.86%”

Context: 91.6

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 91600000Grade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 446Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:4428a134efea1ad8b1f6
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
91600000
Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
446
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product significantly enhances project value, but is currently only in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • Significant contained metal
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.49%”

Context: 91.6

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 91600000Grade: 3.63Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 3330Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:4428a134efea1ad8b1f6
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
91600000
Grade
3.63
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
3330
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product adds value, but is currently only in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • Significant contained metal
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“3.63%”

Context: 91.6

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 408000000Grade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2.24Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:9b5b893af90397d6589d
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
408000000
Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2.24
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Large tonnage lithium resource in the Central zone, contributing to the overall strategic resource update, but with lower grade and remaining in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Large tonnage
  • Part of a strategic resource update
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Lower grade than North zone
  • Inferred category only

Evidence · table

“0.55%”

Context: 408

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 408000000Grade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2230Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:9b5b893af90397d6589d
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
408000000
Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2230
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product significantly enhances project value, but is currently only in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • Significant contained metal
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.55%”

Context: 408

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 408000000Grade: 2.12Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 8660Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:9b5b893af90397d6589d
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
408000000
Grade
2.12
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
8660
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product adds value, but is currently only in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • Significant contained metal
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“2.12%”

Context: 408

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 500000000Grade: 0.61Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 3.03Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:0df3c54ce9f62504d1f3
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
500000000
Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
3.03
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06
Prior Tonnes
500000000
Prior Grade
0.61
Prior Contained Metal
3.03

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.61
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The lithium component of the MRE remains unchanged, providing a large contained metal figure but still entirely in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Large contained metal
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lithium component unchanged from prior MRE

Evidence · table

“0.61%”

Context: 500

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 500000000Grade: 0.53Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2.67Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:0df3c54ce9f62504d1f3
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
500000000
Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2.67
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.53
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The addition of strontium as a strategic by-product is highly novel and material, making Red Mountain unique in the USA, despite the resource being inferred and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • Significant contained metal
  • Only MRE in USA containing strontium
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.53%”

Context: 500

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 500000000Grade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 12Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:0df3c54ce9f62504d1f3
Deposit or zone
TOTAL
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
500000000
Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
12
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The addition of magnesium as a critical by-product is highly novel and material, adding significant contained metal, despite the resource being inferred and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • Significant contained metal
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“2.40%”

Context: 500

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 113000000Grade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.85Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:223059400ecfa773ea1d
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
113000000
Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
0.85
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Increased tonnage at a lower cut-off grade for lithium in the North zone, but with a lower average grade and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Increased tonnage at lower cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower grade than higher cut-off

Evidence · table

“0.76%”

Context: 113

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 113000000Grade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 493Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:223059400ecfa773ea1d
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
113000000
Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
493
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.44
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.44%”

Context: 113

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 113000000Grade: 3.34Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 3770Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:223059400ecfa773ea1d
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
113000000
Grade
3.34
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
3770
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“3.34%”

Context: 113

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 77800000Grade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.73Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:1bbce3e3b22626558a4d
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
77800000
Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
0.73
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
900
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.94
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium in the North zone at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“0.94%”

Context: 77.8

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 77800000Grade: 0.53Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 409Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:1bbce3e3b22626558a4d
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
77800000
Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
409
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
900
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.53
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.53%”

Context: 77.8

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 77800000Grade: 3.83Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2980Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:1bbce3e3b22626558a4d
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
77800000
Grade
3.83
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2980
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
900
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“3.83%”

Context: 77.8

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 60300000Grade: 1.06Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.64Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:7161684c32c30274f861
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
60300000
Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
0.64
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
1100
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.06
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium in the North zone at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“1.06%”

Context: 60.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 60300000Grade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 346Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:7161684c32c30274f861
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
60300000
Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
346
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1100
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.57%”

Context: 60.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 60300000Grade: 4.09Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2470Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:7161684c32c30274f861
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
60300000
Grade
4.09
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2470
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1100
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“4.09%”

Context: 60.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 47900000Grade: 1.17Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.56Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:2c34651eabbe10285c75
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
47900000
Grade
1.17
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
0.56
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
1300
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.17
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium in the North zone at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“1.17%”

Context: 47.9

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 47900000Grade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 303Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:2c34651eabbe10285c75
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
47900000
Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
303
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1300
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.63
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.63%”

Context: 47.9

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 47900000Grade: 4.39Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2100Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:2c34651eabbe10285c75
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
47900000
Grade
4.39
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2100
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1300
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“4.39%”

Context: 47.9

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 38200000Grade: 1.27Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.49Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:36076804037635361718
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
38200000
Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
0.49
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
1500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.27
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium in the North zone at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“1.27%”

Context: 38.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 38200000Grade: 0.68Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 260Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:36076804037635361718
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
38200000
Grade
0.68
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
260
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.68
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.68%”

Context: 38.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 38200000Grade: 4.66Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1780Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:36076804037635361718
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
38200000
Grade
4.66
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1780
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“4.66%”

Context: 38.2

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 30000000Grade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.42Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:bdaca0a43d7eb534588b
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
30000000
Grade
1.39
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
0.42
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
1700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.39
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium in the North zone at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“1.39%”

Context: 30.0

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 30000000Grade: 0.74Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 222Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:bdaca0a43d7eb534588b
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
30000000
Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
222
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.74%”

Context: 30.0

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 30000000Grade: 5.03Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1510Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:bdaca0a43d7eb534588b
Deposit or zone
North
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
30000000
Grade
5.03
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1510
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“5.03%”

Context: 30.0

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 563000000Grade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2.73Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:9e7abb068f0f84966fe6
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
563000000
Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2.73
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Increased tonnage at a lower cut-off grade for lithium in the Central zone, but with a lower average grade and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Increased tonnage at lower cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower grade than higher cut-off

Evidence · table

“0.49%”

Context: 563

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 563000000Grade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2.67Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:9e7abb068f0f84966fe6
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
563000000
Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2.67
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.47%”

Context: 563

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 563000000Grade: 1.96Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 11000Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:9e7abb068f0f84966fe6
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
563000000
Grade
1.96
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
11000
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“1.96%”

Context: 563

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 266000000Grade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1.64Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:3edd5c981f6946c10662
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
266000000
Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1.64
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
900
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.62
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium in the Central zone at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“0.62%”

Context: 266

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 266000000Grade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1640Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:3edd5c981f6946c10662
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
266000000
Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1640
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
900
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.62
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.62%”

Context: 266

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 266000000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 6120Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:3edd5c981f6946c10662
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
266000000
Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
6120
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
900
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“2.30%”

Context: 266

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 145600000Grade: 0.69Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:9e5a960e77a993e8e340
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
145600000
Grade
0.69
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
1100
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium in the Central zone at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“0.69%”

Context: 145.6

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 145600000Grade: 0.69Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1010Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:9e5a960e77a993e8e340
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
145600000
Grade
0.69
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1010
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1100
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.69%”

Context: 145.6

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 145600000Grade: 2.45Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 3560Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:9e5a960e77a993e8e340
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
145600000
Grade
2.45
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
3560
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1100
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“2.45%”

Context: 145.6

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 66000000Grade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.5Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:78abda3b057e51f1aba1
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
66000000
Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
0.5
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
1300
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium in the Central zone at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“0.76%”

Context: 66.0

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 66000000Grade: 0.79Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 521Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:78abda3b057e51f1aba1
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
66000000
Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
521
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1300
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.79%”

Context: 66.0

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 66000000Grade: 2.64Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1740Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:78abda3b057e51f1aba1
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
66000000
Grade
2.64
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1740
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1300
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“2.64%”

Context: 66.0

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 20300000Grade: 0.84Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.17Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:7bd114acf9a39c0158e8
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
20300000
Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
0.17
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
1500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.84
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium in the Central zone at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“0.84%”

Context: 20.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 20300000Grade: 0.83Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 168Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:7bd114acf9a39c0158e8
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
20300000
Grade
0.83
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
168
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.83
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.83%”

Context: 20.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 20300000Grade: 2.74Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 555Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:7bd114acf9a39c0158e8
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
20300000
Grade
2.74
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
555
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“2.74%”

Context: 20.3

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 3900000Grade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.04Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:4a85a7a8618c73c17591
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3900000
Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
0.04
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
1700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.94
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium in the Central zone at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“0.94%”

Context: 3.9

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 3900000Grade: 1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 39Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:4a85a7a8618c73c17591
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3900000
Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
39
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“1.00%”

Context: 3.9

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 3900000Grade: 2.69Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 105Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:4a85a7a8618c73c17591
Deposit or zone
Central
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3900000
Grade
2.69
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
105
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“2.69%”

Context: 3.9

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 675000000Grade: 0.53Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 3.59Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:ef5bca7ab7ee6b8a27e3
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
675000000
Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
3.59
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.53
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Increased tonnage at a lower cut-off grade for lithium, but with a lower average grade and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Increased tonnage at lower cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower grade than higher cut-off

Evidence · table

“0.53%”

Context: 675

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 675000000Grade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 3160Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:ef5bca7ab7ee6b8a27e3
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
675000000
Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
3160
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.47%”

Context: 675

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 675000000Grade: 2.19Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 14800Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:ef5bca7ab7ee6b8a27e3
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
675000000
Grade
2.19
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
14800
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“2.19%”

Context: 675

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 344000000Grade: 0.69Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2.37Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:53c1cc48baadf9ed15b7
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
344000000
Grade
0.69
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2.37
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
900
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“0.69%”

Context: 344

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 344000000Grade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2050Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:53c1cc48baadf9ed15b7
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
344000000
Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2050
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
900
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.6
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.60%”

Context: 344

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 344000000Grade: 2.65Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 9110Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:53c1cc48baadf9ed15b7
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
344000000
Grade
2.65
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
9110
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
900
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“2.65%”

Context: 344

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 206000000Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1.64Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:4c77dee3e13dff7462f0
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
206000000
Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1.64
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
1100
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“0.80%”

Context: 206

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 206000000Grade: 0.66Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1360Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:4c77dee3e13dff7462f0
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
206000000
Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1360
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1100
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.66
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.66%”

Context: 206

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 206000000Grade: 2.92Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 6020Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:4c77dee3e13dff7462f0
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
206000000
Grade
2.92
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
6020
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1100
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“2.92%”

Context: 206

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 114000000Grade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1.06Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:ee0a38eb6c4e3ec4b4cf
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
114000000
Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1.06
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
1300
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.93
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“0.93%”

Context: 114

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 114000000Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 827Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:ee0a38eb6c4e3ec4b4cf
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
114000000
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
827
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1300
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.73%”

Context: 114

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 114000000Grade: 3.36Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 3830Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:ee0a38eb6c4e3ec4b4cf
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
114000000
Grade
3.36
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
3830
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1300
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“3.36%”

Context: 114

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 58500000Grade: 1.12Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.66Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:4322b0503f2ddb276ad6
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
58500000
Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
0.66
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
1500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.12
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“1.12%”

Context: 58.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 58500000Grade: 0.74Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 431Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:4322b0503f2ddb276ad6
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
58500000
Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
431
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.74%”

Context: 58.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 58500000Grade: 3.94Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2300Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:4322b0503f2ddb276ad6
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
58500000
Grade
3.94
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2300
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1500
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“3.94%”

Context: 58.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · lithiumTonnes: 33900000Grade: 1.34Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.45Contained Unit: mtView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:f630ebf8e3e53de7b7fb
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
33900000
Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
0.45
Contained Unit
mt
Cutoff Grade
1700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% LCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Higher grade lithium at a higher cut-off, but with reduced tonnage and still in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade at higher cut-off
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Lower tonnage than lower cut-off

Evidence · table

“1.34%”

Context: 33.9

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · strontiumTonnes: 33900000Grade: 0.79Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 267Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
strontium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:f630ebf8e3e53de7b7fb
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
33900000
Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
267
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% SCE
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of strontium as a strategic by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New strategic by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“0.79%”

Context: 33.9

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredRed Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project · magnesiumTonnes: 33900000Grade: 4.61Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1560Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Red Mountain Lithium and Strategic Metals Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
VMS

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Richard Newport
Resource group id
resource:f630ebf8e3e53de7b7fb
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
open_pit
Material type
clay-hosted
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
33900000
Grade
4.61
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1560
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
1700
Cutoff Unit
ppm Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-10-06

Location

CRS
NAD83 UTM Zone 11

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New addition of magnesium as a critical by-product, but in the inferred category and not economic as a standalone.

Positive factors

  • New critical by-product addition
  • JORC compliant

Negative factors

  • Inferred category only
  • Not economic to mine on its own

Evidence · table

“4.61%”

Context: 33.9

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.