Update on Drilling on Globex's Berrigan Mine Royalty Asset

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
GLOBEX MINING ENTERPRISES INC.
Ticker
GMX
Exchange
TSX
Region
Quebec
Primary commodity
Zinc
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver, Copper
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-23 14:44:53 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Globex reports positive drilling results from the Berrigan Mine project in Quebec, where Tomagold Corporation intersected significant ZnEq and AuEq mineralization in a new lower zone. The results include a 98.5 m intercept with 5.75% ZnEq and several high-grade sub-intervals, supporting the potential of the Berrigan Deep zone.

Reasoning: Drilling intersected high-grade ZnEq and AuEq zones in a new lower zone, demonstrating depth extension of the Berrigan Mine mineralization.

Positive factors

  • significant ZnEq intercepts
  • extension of mineralization at depth
  • systematic mineralization observed

Negative factors

  • true width is only an estimate (80-85% of core length)

Facts used in scoring: 31

Atlas analysis — GLOBEX MINING ENTERPRISES INC.: Update on Drilling on Globex's Berrigan Mine Royalty Asset. 28.69 % ZnEq over 2.1 m; 5.75 % ZnEq over 98.5 m; 16610 ppm over 8.45 m

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Jack Stoch, P.Geo. and other professionals are named as Qualified Persons (QP) under NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“Jack Stoch, P.Geo., in his capacity as a Qualified Person (Q.P.) under Ni 43-101”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drilling was designed to test the core of modelled conductive plates at depth and evaluate the Berrigan Deep zone.

Evidence · text

“designed to test the core of modelled conductive plates at depth and evaluate the potential of the Berrigan Deep zone”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 31. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (31)

TOM-25-014Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 28.69Grade Unit: % ZnEqIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
28.69
Grade Unit
% ZnEq
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:185.0-187.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong ZnEq intercept in the Berrigan zone.

Positive factors

  • high ZnEq grade

Evidence · table

“28.69”

Context: 2.10

TOM-25-014Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 4.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
4.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:185.0-187.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade gold intercept.

Positive factors

  • high gold grade

Evidence · table

“4.94”

Context: 2.10

TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.75Grade Unit: % ZnEqIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
5.75
Grade Unit
% ZnEq
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:451.2-549.7

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very wide intercept with significant ZnEq in the new lower zone.

Positive factors

  • large width
  • significant ZnEq

Evidence · table

“5.75”

Context: 98.50

TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/t AuEqIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t AuEq
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:451.2-549.7

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Wide intercept with moderate AuEq.

Positive factors

  • large width

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: 98.50

TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 4.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
4.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:452.2-457.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade sub-interval within the larger intercept.

Positive factors

  • high grade sub-interval

Evidence · table

“4.69”

Context: 4.90

TOM- 25-014Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 56.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-014
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
56.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-014:185-187.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 56.44 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 118.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“56.44”

Context: TOM- 25-014

TOM- 25-014Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 545Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-014
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
545
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-014:185-187.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 545 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“545”

Context: TOM- 25-014

TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.45 m
From
132.55 m
To
141 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-015:132.55-141

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: TOM- 25-015

TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
5.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.45 m
From
132.55 m
To
141 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-015:132.55-141

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.51 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.51 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.51”

Context: TOM- 25-015

TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 338Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
338
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
8.45 m
From
132.55 m
To
141 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-015:132.55-141

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 338 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“338”

Context: TOM- 25-015

TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 16610Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
16610
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
8.45 m
From
132.55 m
To
141 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-015:132.55-141

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 16610 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“16610”

Context: TOM- 25-015

includingBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 4.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
4.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:452.2-457.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.69 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 23.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.69 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.69”

Context: including

includingBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 18.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
18.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:452.2-457.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 92.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.80”

Context: including

includingBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 2897Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
2897
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:452.2-457.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2897 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“2897”

Context: including

includingBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 47876Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
47876
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:452.2-457.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 47876 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“47876”

Context: including

includingBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
49.35 m
From
500.35 m
To
549.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:500.35-549.7

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 44.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: including

includingBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
3.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
49.35 m
From
500.35 m
To
549.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:500.35-549.7

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.48 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 171.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.48 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.48”

Context: including

includingBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 310Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 49.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
310
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
49.35 m
From
500.35 m
To
549.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:500.35-549.7

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 310 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“310”

Context: including

includingBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 31250Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 49.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
31250
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
49.35 m
From
500.35 m
To
549.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
including:500.35-549.7

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 31250 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“31250”

Context: including

IncludingBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
521 m
To
535.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:521-535.6

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.34 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 19.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: Including

IncludingBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
5.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
521 m
To
535.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:521-535.6

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.91 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 86.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.91 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.91”

Context: Including

IncludingBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 420Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
420
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
14.6 m
From
521 m
To
535.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:521-535.6

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 420 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“420”

Context: Including

IncludingBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 41158Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
41158
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
14.6 m
From
521 m
To
535.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:521-535.6

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 41158 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“41158”

Context: Including

IncludingBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.25 m
From
537.85 m
To
541.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:537.85-541.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: Including

IncludingBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
3.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.25 m
From
537.85 m
To
541.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:537.85-541.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.85 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.85 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.85”

Context: Including

IncludingBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 529Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
529
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.25 m
From
537.85 m
To
541.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:537.85-541.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 529 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“529”

Context: Including

IncludingBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 58200Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
58200
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.25 m
From
537.85 m
To
541.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:537.85-541.1

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 58200 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“58200”

Context: Including

IncludingBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
1.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.2 m
From
542 m
To
548.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:542-548.2

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.63 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.63”

Context: Including

IncludingBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
5.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.2 m
From
542 m
To
548.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:542-548.2

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.26 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.26 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.26”

Context: Including

IncludingBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 511Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
511
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.2 m
From
542 m
To
548.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:542-548.2

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 511 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“511”

Context: Including

IncludingBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 74276Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
GMX

Geometry

Grade
74276
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.2 m
From
542 m
To
548.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:542-548.2

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 74276 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“74276”

Context: Including

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.