# U3O8 Corp. Reports a Positive Start to Retooling Its Battery Commodities - Uranium Project - the Berlin Deposit

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/u3o8-corp-reports-a-positive-start-to-retooling-its-battery-commodities-uranium--4d4c988e-457c-447c-a65a-c12655fd53e5

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/GCOM/news/4696772899602692/u3o8-corp-reports-a-positive-start-to-retooling-its-battery-commodities-uranium-

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2021-07-13T11:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: U3O8 Corp.

- Ticker: UWE.H

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Colombia

- Primary commodity: Uranium

- Secondary commodities: Nickel, Vanadium, Molybdenum, Manganese, Zinc, Phosphate

- Document categories: Metallurgy

- Extracted: 2026-08-21 12:38:37 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

U3O8 Corp. has completed an initial study indicating that membrane separation technology could significantly reduce the required size of the processing plant at the Berlin Project to 15% of the original PEA design. This technology aims to simplify the extraction of uranium, battery metals, and phosphate, potentially leading to substantial capital cost savings. The company plans to proceed with testing using a synthetic pregnant liquor solution \(PLS\).

Reasoning: The announcement details a positive initial study on membrane separation technology that could reduce processing plant size to 15% of the original PEA design, significantly improving project economics.

- Positive factor: potential for significant capital cost savings

- Positive factor: substantial reduction in processing plant size

- Positive factor: simplification of metal and phosphate extraction

- Negative factor: technology is in early stage \(synthetic PLS testing next\)

- Negative factor: results are based on modelling rather than physical plant testing

Facts used in scoring: 1

## Classification and evidence

**Bench Scale Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.

Why it applies: The study is currently at the modelling and synthetic PLS stage, not yet moving to larger sample leaching.

Evidence · text

> The next step is to perform membrane separation tests using a synthetic PLS

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: The technology is intended to enhance the existing leaching and processing flowsheet.

Evidence · text

> leaching the mineralized rock from the Berlin Deposit is amenable to treatment by membrane separation

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Metallurgical Results (1)

### membrane separation

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/u3o8-corp-reports-a-positive-start-to-retooling-its-battery-commodities-uranium--4d4c988e-457c-447c-a65a-c12655fd53e5#fact-metallurgical-facts-0)

uranium

#### Identity

- Commodity: uranium
- Ticker: UWE.H

#### Test Work

- Program Status: scoping
- Test Type: membrane separation
- Processing Route: membrane separation
- Sample: Berlin Deposit PLS \(modelling\)

#### Lab

- Consultant: Synexus \(Pty\) Ltd

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2021-07-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Initial modelling suggests membrane separation can concentrate value metals into 15% of the original leach solution volume.

- Positive factor: potential for 85% reduction in solution volume

- Negative factor: results currently based on modelling

Evidence · text

> concentration of the value metals into only 15% of the leach solution volume originally used

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.