# TYX: Soils Up To 10.6% Treo at the Sulima West Ring Structure Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035 Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03155539 Publisher: asx Original announcement: 2026-10-21T21:49:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-21T22:23:35.976Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-21T22:23:35.976Z - Company: Tyranna Resources Limited - Ticker: TYX - Exchange: ASX - Region: Angola - Primary commodity: Rare earths - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Drill results, Other - Extracted: 2026-10-21 22:23:36 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.70 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Tyranna Resources has reported high-grade rare earth results from surface sampling at its Sulima West prospect in Angola, part of the Coola Project. Trench samples returned up to 10.6% TREO, while soil samples peaked at 10.8% TREO, with NdPr making up a significant portion of the total rare earths. These encouraging results, from less than 5% of the 4.2km diameter ring complex, highlight significant exploration upside, with further soil sample results pending and drilling planned for Q2 2027. Reasoning: High-grade rare earth results from surface sampling at the Sulima West prospect, with peak TREO values up to 10.8% and good NdPr content, are very encouraging for early-stage exploration. While some data is historical and there are QA/QC concerns for soil samples, the grades are significantly higher than previous project averages and indicate substantial upside given the limited area tested. - Positive factor: High TREO grades up to 10.8% in surface samples, significantly exceeding prior best grades for the project. - Positive factor: Good NdPr content \(up to 29% of TREO\) in the samples. - Positive factor: The geochemical anomaly is large \(900m long\) and remains open to the north. - Positive factor: Only a small portion \(less than 5%\) of the 4.2km diameter ring complex has been tested, indicating significant exploration upside. - Positive factor: JORC compliant reporting for exploration results. - Positive factor: Planned drilling in Q2 2027 to follow up on these results. - Negative factor: Results are from surface sampling \(trenches and soils\), not drilling, so true width and depth of mineralization are unknown. - Negative factor: Soil samples were analyzed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with an unspecified digest method, which may have resulted in understated rare earth concentrations. - Negative factor: Some of the reported results are historical \(collected by the vendor in 2021-2022\) and not new assays by Tyranna. - Negative factor: External certified reference samples were not included for the rock chip \(trench\) samples. Facts used in scoring: 67 ## Classification and evidence **Bonanza Intercept** Polarity: positive Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm. Why it applies: Multiple surface samples returned TREO grades above 5%, with a peak of 10.8% TREO, which is exceptionally high for rare earths. Evidence · text > Peak of 10.6% TREO, 14 of 22 samples above 2% TREO2, including 9 above 5% TREO, in near-surface laterite. ... Peak of 10.8% TREO, 49 of 238 samples form a cluster above 2% TREO, including 10 above 5% TREO. **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: The reported trench samples were collected in 2021 by the vendor, and the soil samples were collected in 2022 by the vendor, making them historical results for Tyranna. Evidence · text > Spot sampling of pre-1970 trenches by the Project vendor1: Peak of 10.6% TREO ... twenty-two samples from trench walls were sampled in 2021 by the Vendor ... Two hundred and thirty-eight soil samples were collected by the Vendor on a 50 m x 50 m grid over an area of 650 m x 800 m **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: The document mentions the proximity of the Coola Project to Pensana's Longonjo rare earths project as a point of reference for prospectivity. Evidence · text > In Angola, Pensana is developing the Longonjo rare earths project, about 45 km south of the Coola Prospect. **Uncertified Lab** Polarity: negative Story-specific tag Definition: No canonical definition is currently available. Why it applies: The soil samples were analyzed by an Angolan government laboratory \(IGEO\) which is noted as uncertified for this style of mineralization, with potential for partial digest. Evidence · text > Analysis by Angolan government laboratory, IGEO, by ICP-MS produced analyses fit for purpose despite QAQC evaluation establishing that rare earth concentrations reported were generally understated. ... The analysis of the soil samples was performed an an uncertified laboratory \(for this style of mineralisation\) and the internal QAQC evaluation has shown that the unspecified digest may have resulted in a partial digest of the pertinent minerals. **No External Standards** Polarity: negative Story-specific tag Definition: No canonical definition is currently available. Why it applies: The rock chip \(trench\) samples, analyzed by Nagrom, did not include external certified reference samples. Evidence · text > No external certified reference samples were included in the job for analysing the rock chip samples. ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 67. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (67) ### Fact 1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-0) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 10.56 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490712 - Northing: 8650128 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(10.56%\) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 10.56 Context: 22656 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-1) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 9.38 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490718 - Northing: 8650019 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(9.38%\) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 9.38 Context: 22649 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-2) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 8.39 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490786 - Northing: 8649858 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(8.39%\) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 8.39 Context: 22638 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-3) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 6.83 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490638 - Northing: 8650084 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(6.83%\) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 6.83 Context: 22654 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-4) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 6.32 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490767 - Northing: 8649986 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(6.32%\) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 6.32 Context: 22644 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 6 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-5) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 5.87 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490804 - Northing: 8649846 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(5.87%\) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 5.87 Context: 22639 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-6) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 5.72 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490716 - Northing: 8650072 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(5.72%\) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 5.72 Context: 22652 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 8 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-7) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 5.07 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490679 - Northing: 8650107 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(5.07%\) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 5.07 Context: 22655 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 9 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-8) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 5.04 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490737 - Northing: 8649911 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(5.04%\) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 5.04 Context: 22641 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-9) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 4 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490670 - Northing: 8650042 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(4.0%\) from surface sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 4.00 Context: 22653 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-10) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.31 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490640 - Northing: 8650123 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.31%\) from surface sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 3.31 Context: 22657 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-11) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.3 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490734 - Northing: 8649968 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.3%\) from surface sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 3.30 Context: 22646 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-12) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.24 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490797 - Northing: 8649946 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.24%\) from surface sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 3.24 Context: 22643 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 14 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-13) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.7 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490744 - Northing: 8650031 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Moderate TREO grade \(2.7%\) from surface sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 2.70 Context: 22650 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 15 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-14) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 1.99 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490687 - Northing: 8649997 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling is consistent with exploration targets, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Moderate TREO grade \(1.99%\) from surface sampling, consistent with geochemical anomaly thresholds. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 1.99 Context: 22648 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 16 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-15) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 1.89 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490768 - Northing: 8649929 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling is consistent with exploration targets, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Moderate TREO grade \(1.89%\) from surface sampling, consistent with geochemical anomaly thresholds. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 1.89 Context: 22642 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 17 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-16) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 1.82 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490709 - Northing: 8649953 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling is consistent with exploration targets, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Moderate TREO grade \(1.82%\) from surface sampling, consistent with geochemical anomaly thresholds. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 1.82 Context: 22647 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 18 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-17) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 1.77 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490778 - Northing: 8650319 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling is consistent with exploration targets, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Moderate TREO grade \(1.77%\) from surface sampling, consistent with geochemical anomaly thresholds. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 1.77 Context: 22660 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 19 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-18) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 1.56 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490766 - Northing: 8650318 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling is consistent with exploration targets, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Moderate TREO grade \(1.56%\) from surface sampling, consistent with geochemical anomaly thresholds. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 1.56 Context: 22658 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 20 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-19) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 1.13 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490785 - Northing: 8650303 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling is consistent with exploration targets, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Moderate TREO grade \(1.13%\) from surface sampling, consistent with geochemical anomaly thresholds. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 1.13 Context: 22661 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 21 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-20) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 0.98 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490807 - Northing: 8650302 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: TREO grade from historical trench sampling is near the geochemical anomaly threshold, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: TREO grade \(0.98%\) from surface sampling, near the geochemical anomaly threshold. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 0.98 Context: 22662 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 22 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-21) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 0.64 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490735 - Northing: 8650087 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: Nagrom, Perth - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low TREO grade from historical trench sampling is below the geochemical anomaly threshold, and it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations. - Positive factor: Analysis performed at a certified laboratory. - Negative factor: Low TREO grade \(0.64%\) from surface sampling, below geochemical anomaly threshold. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(trench\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2021\). - Negative factor: No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type. Evidence · table > 0.64 Context: 22651 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 23 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-22) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 10.76 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490800 - Northing: 8650000 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(10.76%\) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 10.76 Context: 22788 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 24 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-23) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 9.57 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490850 - Northing: 8649950 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(9.57%\) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 9.57 Context: 22804 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 25 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-24) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 8.89 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490800 - Northing: 8649850 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(8.89%\) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 8.89 Context: 22832 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 26 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-25) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 6.22 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490852 - Northing: 8649908 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(6.22%\) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 6.22 Context: 22818 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 27 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-26) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 6.17 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490850 - Northing: 8649850 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(6.17%\) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 6.17 Context: 22833 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 28 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-27) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 6.11 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490750 - Northing: 8650000 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(6.11%\) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 6.11 Context: 22787 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 29 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-28) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 5.25 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490700 - Northing: 8650050 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(5.25%\) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 5.25 Context: 22771 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 30 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-29) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 5.13 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490900 - Northing: 8649850 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Exceptional TREO grade \(5.13%\) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades. - Positive factor: Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 5.13 Context: 22834 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 31 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-30) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 4.63 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490850 - Northing: 8649800 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(4.63%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 4.63 Context: 22848 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 32 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-31) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 4.26 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490700 - Northing: 8649850 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(4.26%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 4.26 Context: 22830 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 33 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-32) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 4.26 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490750 - Northing: 8649850 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(4.26%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 4.26 Context: 22831 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 34 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-33) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 4.24 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490700 - Northing: 8650150 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(4.24%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 4.24 Context: 22741 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 35 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-34) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 4.17 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490650 - Northing: 8649850 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(4.17%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 4.17 Context: 22829 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 36 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-35) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 4.02 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490800 - Northing: 8649800 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(4.02%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 4.02 Context: 22847 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 37 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-36) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.89 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490600 - Northing: 8649700 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.89%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 3.89 Context: 22872 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 38 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-37) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.85 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490800 - Northing: 8649950 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.85%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 3.85 Context: 22803 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 39 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-38) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.66 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490950 - Northing: 8649850 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.66%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 3.66 Context: 22835 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 40 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-39) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.66 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490700 - Northing: 8649800 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.66%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 3.66 Context: 22845 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 41 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-40) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.45 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490700 - Northing: 8650100 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.45%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 3.45 Context: 22756 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 42 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-41) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.34 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490900 - Northing: 8649950 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.34%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 3.34 Context: 22805 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 43 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-42) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.27 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490900 - Northing: 8650150 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.27%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 3.27 Context: 22746 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 44 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-43) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.21 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490600 - Northing: 8649750 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.21%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 3.21 Context: 22857 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 45 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-44) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.16 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490774 - Northing: 8650050 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.16%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 3.16 Context: 22774 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 46 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-45) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.13 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490750 - Northing: 8650100 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.13%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 3.13 Context: 22757 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 47 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-46) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 3.04 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490800 - Northing: 8650200 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(3.04%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 3.04 Context: 22729 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 48 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-47) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.91 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490750 - Northing: 8650150 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.91%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.91 Context: 22743 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 49 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-48) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.87 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490650 - Northing: 8650100 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.87%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.87 Context: 22755 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 50 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-49) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.84 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490900 - Northing: 8650000 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.84%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.84 Context: 22790 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 51 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-50) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.78 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490950 - Northing: 8649900 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.78%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.78 Context: 22820 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 52 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-51) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.73 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490650 - Northing: 8650050 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.73%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.73 Context: 22770 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 53 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-52) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.72 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490650 - Northing: 8649950 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.72%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.72 Context: 22799 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 54 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-53) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.68 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490650 - Northing: 8650150 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.68%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.68 Context: 22740 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 55 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-54) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.67 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490750 - Northing: 8649750 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.67%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.67 Context: 22860 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 56 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-55) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.52 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490650 - Northing: 8650000 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.52%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.52 Context: 22785 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 57 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-56) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.51 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490750 - Northing: 8650200 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.51%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.51 Context: 22728 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 58 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-57) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.34 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490650 - Northing: 8649750 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.34%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.34 Context: 22858 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 59 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-58) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.27 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490600 - Northing: 8649800 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.27%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.27 Context: 22843 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 60 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-59) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.25 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490650 - Northing: 8649800 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.25%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.25 Context: 22844 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 61 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-60) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.23 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490850 - Northing: 8650200 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.23%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.23 Context: 22730 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 62 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-61) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.2 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490650 - Northing: 8650398 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.2%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.20 Context: 22667 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 63 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-62) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.17 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490700 - Northing: 8649900 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.17%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.17 Context: 22815 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 64 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-63) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.09 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490700 - Northing: 8650200 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.09%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.09 Context: 22727 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 65 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-64) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.08 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490900 - Northing: 8650250 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.08%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.08 Context: 22716 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 66 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-65) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.06 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490650 - Northing: 8649700 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.06%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.06 Context: 22873 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 67 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/tyx-soils-up-to-10-6-treo-at-the-sulima-west-ring-structure--3f80acd8-091d-4a38-b9fb-00517b5e0035#fact-drill-facts-66) Sulima West · rare\_earths Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Sulima West - Commodity: rare\_earths - Region: angola - Reported Region: Angola - Ticker: TYX #### Geometry - Grade: 2.04 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 490850 - Northing: 8650100 - CRS: epsg:32733 - EPSG: 32733 - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - Laboratory: IGEO Laboratories, Luanda - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: duplicates, standards #### Deleterious - Deleterious Flag: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab. - Positive factor: Strong TREO grade \(2.04%\) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades. - Positive factor: Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West. - Positive factor: QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples. - Negative factor: Result is from surface sampling \(soil\), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown. - Negative factor: Result is historical \(collected by vendor in 2022\). - Negative factor: Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory \(IGEO\) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations. Evidence · table > 2.04 Context: 22759 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.