TYX: Soils Up To 10.6% Treo at the Sulima West Ring Structure
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Tyranna Resources Limited
- Ticker
- TYX
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Angola
- Primary commodity
- Rare earths
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-10-21 22:23:36 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Tyranna Resources has reported high-grade rare earth results from surface sampling at its Sulima West prospect in Angola, part of the Coola Project. Trench samples returned up to 10.6% TREO, while soil samples peaked at 10.8% TREO, with NdPr making up a significant portion of the total rare earths. These encouraging results, from less than 5% of the 4.2km diameter ring complex, highlight significant exploration upside, with further soil sample results pending and drilling planned for Q2 2027.
Reasoning: High-grade rare earth results from surface sampling at the Sulima West prospect, with peak TREO values up to 10.8% and good NdPr content, are very encouraging for early-stage exploration. While some data is historical and there are QA/QC concerns for soil samples, the grades are significantly higher than previous project averages and indicate substantial upside given the limited area tested.
Positive factors
- High TREO grades up to 10.8% in surface samples, significantly exceeding prior best grades for the project.
- Good NdPr content (up to 29% of TREO) in the samples.
- The geochemical anomaly is large (900m long) and remains open to the north.
- Only a small portion (less than 5%) of the 4.2km diameter ring complex has been tested, indicating significant exploration upside.
- JORC compliant reporting for exploration results.
- Planned drilling in Q2 2027 to follow up on these results.
Negative factors
- Results are from surface sampling (trenches and soils), not drilling, so true width and depth of mineralization are unknown.
- Soil samples were analyzed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with an unspecified digest method, which may have resulted in understated rare earth concentrations.
- Some of the reported results are historical (collected by the vendor in 2021-2022) and not new assays by Tyranna.
- External certified reference samples were not included for the rock chip (trench) samples.
Facts used in scoring: 67
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Multiple surface samples returned TREO grades above 5%, with a peak of 10.8% TREO, which is exceptionally high for rare earths.
Evidence · text
“Peak of 10.6% TREO, 14 of 22 samples above 2% TREO2, including 9 above 5% TREO, in near-surface laterite. ... Peak of 10.8% TREO, 49 of 238 samples form a cluster above 2% TREO, including 10 above 5% TREO.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The reported trench samples were collected in 2021 by the vendor, and the soil samples were collected in 2022 by the vendor, making them historical results for Tyranna.
Evidence · text
“Spot sampling of pre-1970 trenches by the Project vendor1: Peak of 10.6% TREO ... twenty-two samples from trench walls were sampled in 2021 by the Vendor ... Two hundred and thirty-eight soil samples were collected by the Vendor on a 50 m x 50 m grid over an area of 650 m x 800 m”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The document mentions the proximity of the Coola Project to Pensana's Longonjo rare earths project as a point of reference for prospectivity.
Evidence · text
“In Angola, Pensana is developing the Longonjo rare earths project, about 45 km south of the Coola Prospect.”
Uncertified Labnegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The soil samples were analyzed by an Angolan government laboratory (IGEO) which is noted as uncertified for this style of mineralization, with potential for partial digest.
Evidence · text
“Analysis by Angolan government laboratory, IGEO, by ICP-MS produced analyses fit for purpose despite QAQC evaluation establishing that rare earth concentrations reported were generally understated. ... The analysis of the soil samples was performed an an uncertified laboratory (for this style of mineralisation) and the internal QAQC evaluation has shown that the unspecified digest may have resulted in a partial digest of the pertinent minerals.”
No External Standardsnegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The rock chip (trench) samples, analyzed by Nagrom, did not include external certified reference samples.
Evidence · text
“No external certified reference samples were included in the job for analysing the rock chip samples.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 67. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (67)
Fact 1Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 10.56Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.56
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490712
- Northing
- 8650128
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (10.56%) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“10.56”
Context: 22656
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 2Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 9.38Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.38
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490718
- Northing
- 8650019
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (9.38%) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“9.38”
Context: 22649
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 3Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 8.39Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.39
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490786
- Northing
- 8649858
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (8.39%) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“8.39”
Context: 22638
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 4Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 6.83Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.83
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490638
- Northing
- 8650084
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (6.83%) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“6.83”
Context: 22654
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 5Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 6.32Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.32
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490767
- Northing
- 8649986
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (6.32%) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“6.32”
Context: 22644
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 6Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 5.87Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.87
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490804
- Northing
- 8649846
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (5.87%) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“5.87”
Context: 22639
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 7Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 5.72Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.72
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490716
- Northing
- 8650072
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (5.72%) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“5.72”
Context: 22652
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 8Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 5.07Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.07
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490679
- Northing
- 8650107
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (5.07%) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“5.07”
Context: 22655
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 9Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 5.04Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.04
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490737
- Northing
- 8649911
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (5.04%) from surface sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“5.04”
Context: 22641
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 10Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490670
- Northing
- 8650042
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (4.0%) from surface sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“4.00”
Context: 22653
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 11Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.31Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.31
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490640
- Northing
- 8650123
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.31%) from surface sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“3.31”
Context: 22657
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 12Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.3
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490734
- Northing
- 8649968
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.3%) from surface sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“3.30”
Context: 22646
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 13Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.24
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490797
- Northing
- 8649946
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.24%) from surface sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“3.24”
Context: 22643
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 14Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490744
- Northing
- 8650031
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Moderate TREO grade (2.7%) from surface sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“2.70”
Context: 22650
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 15Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 1.99Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.99
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490687
- Northing
- 8649997
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling is consistent with exploration targets, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Moderate TREO grade (1.99%) from surface sampling, consistent with geochemical anomaly thresholds.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“1.99”
Context: 22648
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 16Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 1.89Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.89
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490768
- Northing
- 8649929
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling is consistent with exploration targets, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Moderate TREO grade (1.89%) from surface sampling, consistent with geochemical anomaly thresholds.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“1.89”
Context: 22642
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 17Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 1.82Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.82
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490709
- Northing
- 8649953
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling is consistent with exploration targets, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Moderate TREO grade (1.82%) from surface sampling, consistent with geochemical anomaly thresholds.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“1.82”
Context: 22647
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 18Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.77
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490778
- Northing
- 8650319
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling is consistent with exploration targets, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Moderate TREO grade (1.77%) from surface sampling, consistent with geochemical anomaly thresholds.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“1.77”
Context: 22660
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 19Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.56
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490766
- Northing
- 8650318
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling is consistent with exploration targets, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Moderate TREO grade (1.56%) from surface sampling, consistent with geochemical anomaly thresholds.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“1.56”
Context: 22658
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 20Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.13
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490785
- Northing
- 8650303
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate TREO grade from historical trench sampling is consistent with exploration targets, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Moderate TREO grade (1.13%) from surface sampling, consistent with geochemical anomaly thresholds.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“1.13”
Context: 22661
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 21Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490807
- Northing
- 8650302
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: TREO grade from historical trench sampling is near the geochemical anomaly threshold, but it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- TREO grade (0.98%) from surface sampling, near the geochemical anomaly threshold.
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“0.98”
Context: 22662
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 22Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490735
- Northing
- 8650087
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Nagrom, Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low TREO grade from historical trench sampling is below the geochemical anomaly threshold, and it's a surface sample with some QA/QC limitations.
Positive factors
- Analysis performed at a certified laboratory.
Negative factors
- Low TREO grade (0.64%) from surface sampling, below geochemical anomaly threshold.
- Result is from surface sampling (trench), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2021).
- No external certified reference samples were included for this sample type.
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 22651
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 23Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 10.76Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.76
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490800
- Northing
- 8650000
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (10.76%) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“10.76”
Context: 22788
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 24Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 9.57Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.57
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490850
- Northing
- 8649950
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (9.57%) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“9.57”
Context: 22804
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 25Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 8.89Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.89
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490800
- Northing
- 8649850
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (8.89%) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“8.89”
Context: 22832
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 26Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 6.22Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.22
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490852
- Northing
- 8649908
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (6.22%) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“6.22”
Context: 22818
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 27Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 6.17Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.17
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490850
- Northing
- 8649850
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (6.17%) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“6.17”
Context: 22833
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 28Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 6.11Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.11
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490750
- Northing
- 8650000
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (6.11%) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“6.11”
Context: 22787
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 29Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 5.25Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.25
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490700
- Northing
- 8650050
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (5.25%) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“5.25”
Context: 22771
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 30Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 5.13Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.13
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490900
- Northing
- 8649850
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms high-grade rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Exceptional TREO grade (5.13%) from surface soil sampling, significantly higher than previous project best grades.
- Confirms high-grade rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“5.13”
Context: 22834
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 31Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 4.63Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.63
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490850
- Northing
- 8649800
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (4.63%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“4.63”
Context: 22848
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 32Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 4.26Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.26
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490700
- Northing
- 8649850
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (4.26%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“4.26”
Context: 22830
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 33Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 4.26Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.26
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490750
- Northing
- 8649850
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (4.26%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“4.26”
Context: 22831
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 34Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 4.24Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.24
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490700
- Northing
- 8650150
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (4.24%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“4.24”
Context: 22741
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 35Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 4.17Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.17
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490650
- Northing
- 8649850
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (4.17%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“4.17”
Context: 22829
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 36Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 4.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.02
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490800
- Northing
- 8649800
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (4.02%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“4.02”
Context: 22847
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 37Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.89Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.89
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490600
- Northing
- 8649700
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.89%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“3.89”
Context: 22872
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 38Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.85
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490800
- Northing
- 8649950
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.85%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“3.85”
Context: 22803
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 39Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.66Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.66
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490950
- Northing
- 8649850
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.66%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“3.66”
Context: 22835
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 40Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.66Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.66
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490700
- Northing
- 8649800
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.66%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“3.66”
Context: 22845
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 41Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.45Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.45
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490700
- Northing
- 8650100
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.45%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“3.45”
Context: 22756
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 42Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.34Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.34
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490900
- Northing
- 8649950
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.34%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“3.34”
Context: 22805
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 43Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.27Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.27
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490900
- Northing
- 8650150
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.27%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“3.27”
Context: 22746
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 44Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.21
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490600
- Northing
- 8649750
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.21%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“3.21”
Context: 22857
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 45Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.16Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.16
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490774
- Northing
- 8650050
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.16%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“3.16”
Context: 22774
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 46Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.13Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.13
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490750
- Northing
- 8650100
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.13%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“3.13”
Context: 22757
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 47Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 3.04Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.04
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490800
- Northing
- 8650200
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (3.04%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“3.04”
Context: 22729
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 48Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.91Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.91
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490750
- Northing
- 8650150
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.91%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.91”
Context: 22743
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 49Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.87Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.87
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490650
- Northing
- 8650100
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.87%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.87”
Context: 22755
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 50Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.84Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.84
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490900
- Northing
- 8650000
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.84%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.84”
Context: 22790
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 51Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.78
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490950
- Northing
- 8649900
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.78%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.78”
Context: 22820
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 52Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.73Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.73
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490650
- Northing
- 8650050
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.73%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.73”
Context: 22770
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 53Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.72Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.72
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490650
- Northing
- 8649950
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.72%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.72”
Context: 22799
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 54Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.68Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.68
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490650
- Northing
- 8650150
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.68%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.68”
Context: 22740
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 55Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.67Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.67
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490750
- Northing
- 8649750
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.67%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.67”
Context: 22860
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 56Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.52Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.52
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490650
- Northing
- 8650000
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.52%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.52”
Context: 22785
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 57Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.51Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.51
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490750
- Northing
- 8650200
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.51%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.51”
Context: 22728
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 58Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.34Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.34
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490650
- Northing
- 8649750
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.34%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.34”
Context: 22858
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 59Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.27Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.27
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490600
- Northing
- 8649800
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.27%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.27”
Context: 22843
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 60Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.25Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.25
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490650
- Northing
- 8649800
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.25%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.25”
Context: 22844
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 61Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.23
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490850
- Northing
- 8650200
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.23%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.23”
Context: 22730
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 62Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490650
- Northing
- 8650398
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.2%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.20”
Context: 22667
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 63Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.17
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490700
- Northing
- 8649900
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.17%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.17”
Context: 22815
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 64Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.09
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490700
- Northing
- 8650200
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.09%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.09”
Context: 22727
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 65Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.08Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.08
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490900
- Northing
- 8650250
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.08%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.08”
Context: 22716
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 66Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.06Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.06
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490650
- Northing
- 8649700
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.06%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.06”
Context: 22873
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 67Sulima West · rare_earthsGrade: 2.04Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Sulima West
- Commodity
- rare_earths
- Region
- angola
- Reported Region
- Angola
- Ticker
- TYX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.04
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 490850
- Northing
- 8650100
- CRS
- epsg:32733
- EPSG
- 32733
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- IGEO Laboratories, Luanda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong TREO grade from historical soil sampling confirms rare earth potential, but it's a surface sample with QA/QC limitations from an uncertified lab.
Positive factors
- Strong TREO grade (2.04%) from surface soil sampling, higher than previous project average grades.
- Confirms rare earth prospectivity at Sulima West.
- QA/QC procedures included field duplicates and external certified reference samples.
Negative factors
- Result is from surface sampling (soil), not drilling, so true width and depth are unknown.
- Result is historical (collected by vendor in 2022).
- Analysis performed by an uncertified laboratory (IGEO) with potential for partial digest, possibly understating concentrations.
Evidence · table
“2.04”
Context: 22759
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.