Tungsten Concentrate Prices Have Roughly Tripled Since January
Original announcement by cnw on
- Company
- GoldHaven Resources Corp.
- Ticker
- GOH
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Unavailable
- Primary commodity
- Tungsten
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Lead, Zinc, Copper, Molybdenum
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-29 14:14:55 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
GoldHaven Resources Corp. has received an amended Mines Act Permit for its Magno Project, authorizing up to 93 drill pads across seven work zones. While the company highlights tungsten-skarn and polymetallic targets, much of the reported high-grade mineralization is historical and has not been verified by a Qualified Person.
Reasoning: The company has secured significant permitting flexibility for its Magno Project, though much of the highlighted mineralization is historical and unverified.
Positive factors
- expanded permitting with 93 drill pads
- favorable tungsten market price trends
- government tax credits for critical minerals
Negative factors
- historical intercepts lack QP verification
- exploration stage with no defined resource
Facts used in scoring: 7
Classification and evidence
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: The historical intercepts for D Zone and Kuhn are explicitly stated as not having been verified by a Qualified Person.
Evidence · text
“The result is historical and has not been verified by a Qualified Person for GoldHaven.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The company uses geochemical and geophysical anomalies as conceptual targets within a larger intrusion-related system.
Evidence · text
“Geophysical and geochemical anomalies are conceptual exploration targets only”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 7. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (7)
GOH26-04MagnoView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GOH26-04
- Project
- Magno
- Region
- canada
- Reported Region
- canada
- Ticker
- GOH
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Mention of a newly identified skarn zone in this hole without specific assay values provided in the text.
Evidence · text
“reported a newly identified skarn zone in hole GOH26-04”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
historical_KuhnMagno · tungstenGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- historical_Kuhn
- Project
- Magno
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada
- Reported Region
- canada
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical intercept reported; lacks current QP verification.
Evidence · text
“13.0 metres grading 0.55% WO3”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
historical_KuhnMagno · tungstenGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- historical_Kuhn
- Project
- Magno
- Commodity
- tungsten
- Region
- canada
- Reported Region
- canada
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical intercept reported; lacks current QP verification.
Evidence · text
“11.3 metres grading 0.59% WO3”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
historical_KuhnMagno · molybdenumGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- historical_Kuhn
- Project
- Magno
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada
- Reported Region
- canada
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical byproduct grade reported alongside tungsten.
Evidence · text
“11.3 metres grading 0.59% WO3 plus 0.10% MoS2”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
historical_D_ZoneMagno · silverGrade: 240Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- historical_D_Zone
- Project
- Magno
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada
- Reported Region
- canada
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- Grade
- 240
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade historical intercept; explicitly noted as not verified by a QP.
Evidence · text
“7.6 metres grading 240 g/t silver”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
historical_D_ZoneMagno · leadGrade: 4.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- historical_D_Zone
- Project
- Magno
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada
- Reported Region
- canada
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.73
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical byproduct grade reported alongside silver.
Evidence · text
“4.73% lead”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
historical_D_ZoneMagno · zincGrade: 4.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- historical_D_Zone
- Project
- Magno
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada
- Reported Region
- canada
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- low_confidence
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical byproduct grade reported alongside silver.
Evidence · text
“4.74% zinc”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.