Tudor Gold Reports Positive Metallurgical Test Results for Treaty Creek

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Tudor Gold Corp.
Ticker
TUD
Exchange
TSX
Region
British Columbia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper, Silver
Document categories
Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-08-24 05:39:47 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Tudor Gold has reported positive locked-cycle metallurgical test results for the Goldstorm Deposit at Treaty Creek. The results demonstrate that saleable gold and copper concentrates can be produced from the Upper, Central, and Lower zones, either individually or as a blended feed.

Reasoning: The metallurgical program successfully demonstrated the ability to produce saleable gold and copper concentrates from multiple deposit zones, supporting the upcoming PEA.

Positive factors

  • High gold recoveries in Upper and Lower zones
  • Saleable concentrates produced from all zones
  • Flexibility in mine planning via blended feed
  • High sulphur grades (>45%) enhancing marketability

Negative factors

  • Copper losses to sulphide concentrate require optimization

Facts used in scoring: 6

Classification and evidence

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: The program uses flotation and regrind circuits.

Evidence · text

“conventional sulphide flotation”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Renee Goold and Ken McNaughton are named as Qualified Persons.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Persons Renee Goold, P.Eng.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 6. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (6)

locked-cyclegoldRecovery: 86.3 %Head Grade: 3.57Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Ticker
TUD

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
locked-cycle
Processing Route
conventional sulphide flotation
Sample
Upper Zone Gold Concentrate

Recovery

Recovery
86.3 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
3.57
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
26.1
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
11.8 %

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 86.3% recovery is strong for a sulphide flotation route.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold recovery

Evidence · table

“86.3”

Context: 11.8

locked-cyclegoldRecovery: 87.3 %Head Grade: 3.06Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Ticker
TUD

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
locked-cycle
Processing Route
conventional sulphide flotation
Sample
Lower Zone Gold Concentrate

Recovery

Recovery
87.3 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
3.06
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
19
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
14 %

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 87.3% recovery is strong for a sulphide flotation route.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold recovery

Evidence · table

“87.3”

Context: 14.0

locked-cyclegoldRecovery: 55.1 %Head Grade: 2.22Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Ticker
TUD

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
locked-cycle
Processing Route
copper flotation followed by sulphide rougher
Sample
Central Zone Copper Concentrate

Recovery

Recovery
55.1 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
2.22
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
68.9
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
0.9 %

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 55.1% gold recovery in the copper concentrate is relatively low, though expected in a multi-stage flotation circuit.

Negative factors

  • Low gold recovery in copper concentrate

Evidence · table

“55.1”

Context: 0.9

locked-cyclegoldRecovery: 27 %Head Grade: 2.22Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Ticker
TUD

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
locked-cycle
Processing Route
copper flotation followed by sulphide rougher
Sample
Central Zone Gold Concentrate

Recovery

Recovery
27 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
2.22
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
10
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
3.1 %

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 27.0% recovery in the sulphide concentrate is low, though the combined recovery for the zone is much higher.

Negative factors

  • Low gold recovery

Evidence · table

“27.0”

Context: 3.1

locked-cyclegoldRecovery: 57.4 %Head Grade: 3Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Ticker
TUD

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
locked-cycle
Processing Route
copper flotation followed by sulphide rougher
Sample
Blended Zones Gold Concentrate

Recovery

Recovery
57.4 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
3
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
18.3
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
9.4 %

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 57.4% recovery in the sulphide concentrate is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Moderate gold recovery

Evidence · table

“57.4”

Context: 9.4

locked-cyclegoldRecovery: 80.3 %Head Grade: 3Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Ticker
TUD

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
locked-cycle
Processing Route
copper flotation followed by sulphide rougher
Sample
Blended Zones Combined Concentrate

Recovery

Recovery
80.3 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
3
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Mass Pull
9.8 %

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 80.3% combined recovery for the blended composite is a solid result.

Positive factors

  • Strong combined gold recovery

Evidence · table

“80.3”

Context: 9.8

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.