Triumph Gold Announces Discovery of High-Grade Gold in Least-Explored Portion of the Revenue Deposit Including a 7-metre Interval Grading 15.0 grams/tonne Gold
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Triumph Gold Corp.
- Ticker
- TIG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Yukon
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Copper, Molybdenum
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-22 15:19:12 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Triumph Gold announced the discovery of high-grade gold in an underexplored portion of its Revenue Deposit, with drill hole RVD17-14 intersecting 7 metres grading 15.04 grams/tonne gold. This represents the highest-grade gold ever found at the Revenue project and extends mineralization into a new area. The company also reported other significant intercepts, including 29.79 metres of 0.46 g/t AuEq, indicating broader mineralization.
Reasoning: The announcement reports an exceptional high-grade gold intercept in a new discovery area, significantly improving the project's known mineralization. The robust QA/QC and transparent metal equivalent calculations support the results, though the lack of true width for the bonanza intercept is a minor detractor.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade (15.04 g/t Au over 7m) significantly exceeds project averages and is the highest found at Revenue.
- Discovery in a previously underexplored area, indicating potential for new high-grade zones.
- Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure and QP sign-off enhance data credibility.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are transparently disclosed.
Negative factors
- True width of the high-grade intercept has not been determined, which introduces some uncertainty.
Facts used in scoring: 29
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The drill hole RVD17-14 was drilled in an 'underexplored portion' of the anomaly, '200 metres away from any historical trenching or drilling', indicating an extension of known mineralization.
Evidence · text
“RVD17-14, the first modern drill hole in the area, was collared in the Guder Zone, 200 metres away from any historical trenching or drilling, within an outstanding and previously untested portion of the gold-in-soil anomaly”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details the laboratory (ALS Global), methods (fire assay, ICP-AES, metallic screen), and internal QAQC procedures (standards, blanks, duplicates, re-analyses).
Evidence · text
“The samples were analyzed by ALS Global of North Vancouver , British Columbia. ... Quality assurance and control (QAQC) is maintained at the lab through rigorous use of internal standards, blanks and duplicates. An additional QAQC program was administered by Triumph Gold: at minimum one in ten samples submitted by Triumph Gold was a blank or certified reference standard.”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The technical content of the news release has been reviewed and approved by Tony Barresi, Ph.D., P.Geo., VP Exploration for the company, and qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.
Evidence · text
“The technical content of this news release has been reviewed and approved by Tony Barresi , Ph.D., P.Geo., VP Exploration for the company, and qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 29. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (29)
RVD17-14Revenue Deposit · goldGrade: 15.32Grade Unit: g/t AuEqIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RVD17-14
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 129 m
- To
- 136 m
- Hole Depth
- 341.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RVD17-14:129.00-136.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 382201
- Northing
- 6913044
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The high AuEq grade reinforces the significance of this discovery, with transparent assumptions supporting its calculation.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold equivalent grade, confirming the high value of the intercept.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are clearly disclosed, enhancing transparency.
Negative factors
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“15.32”
Context: 7.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states 'Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.'
Evidence · text
“Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.”
RVD17-14Revenue Deposit · silverGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RVD17-14
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 129 m
- To
- 136 m
- Hole Depth
- 341.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RVD17-14:129.00-136.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 382201
- Northing
- 6913044
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is good, contributing to the overall value of the high-grade gold intercept.
Positive factors
- Silver grade is above the project average (3.492 g/t Ag).
Negative factors
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“7.2”
Context: 7.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states 'Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.'
Evidence · text
“Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.”
RVD17-14Revenue Deposit · copperGrade: 9.41Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RVD17-14
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.41
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 129 m
- To
- 136 m
- Hole Depth
- 341.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RVD17-14:129.00-136.00
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Easting
- 382201
- Northing
- 6913044
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.41
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The high CuEq grade reinforces the significance of this discovery, with transparent assumptions supporting its calculation.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper equivalent grade, confirming the high value of the intercept.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are clearly disclosed, enhancing transparency.
Negative factors
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“9.41”
Context: 7.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states 'Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.'
Evidence · text
“Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.”
RVD17-14Revenue Deposit · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/t AuEqIntercept: 29.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RVD17-14
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Intercept
- 29.79 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 214.79 m
- Hole Depth
- 341.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RVD17-14:185.00-214.79
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 382201
- Northing
- 6913044
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This AuEq grade indicates broad, low-grade porphyry mineralization, which is common for this deposit type, with transparent assumptions.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length (29.79m) for porphyry mineralization.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are clearly disclosed, enhancing transparency.
Negative factors
- Gold equivalent grade is relatively low for porphyry gold.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: 29.79
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states 'Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.'
Evidence · text
“Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.”
RVD17-14Revenue Deposit · silverGrade: 3.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RVD17-14
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29.79 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 214.79 m
- Hole Depth
- 341.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RVD17-14:185.00-214.79
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 382201
- Northing
- 6913044
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is relatively low but contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the porphyry mineralization.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is below the project average (3.492 g/t Ag).
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“3.22”
Context: 29.79
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states 'Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.'
Evidence · text
“Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.”
RVD17-14Revenue Deposit · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 29.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RVD17-14
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 29.79 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 214.79 m
- Hole Depth
- 341.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RVD17-14:185.00-214.79
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 382201
- Northing
- 6913044
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.28
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This CuEq grade indicates broad, moderate-grade porphyry mineralization, which is common for this deposit type, with transparent assumptions.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length (29.79m) for porphyry mineralization.
- Metal equivalent assumptions are clearly disclosed, enhancing transparency.
Negative factors
- Copper equivalent grade is moderate for porphyry copper.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 29.79
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states 'Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.'
Evidence · text
“Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.”
RVD17-14Revenue Deposit · molybdenumGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RVD17-14
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 29.79 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 214.79 m
- Hole Depth
- 341.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RVD17-14:185.00-214.79
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 382201
- Northing
- 6913044
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade is slightly above the project average, adding to the polymetallic nature of the porphyry mineralization.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade is above the project average (0.011% Mo).
Negative factors
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: 29.79
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states 'Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.'
Evidence · text
“Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.”
RVD17-14Revenue Deposit · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/t AuEqIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RVD17-14
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 331 m
- To
- 337 m
- Hole Depth
- 341.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RVD17-14:331.00-337.00
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 382201
- Northing
- 6913044
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This AuEq grade indicates moderate-grade porphyry mineralization, with transparent assumptions.
Positive factors
- Metal equivalent assumptions are clearly disclosed, enhancing transparency.
Negative factors
- Gold equivalent grade is moderate for porphyry gold.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: 6.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states 'Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.'
Evidence · text
“Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.”
RVD17-14Revenue Deposit · silverGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RVD17-14
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 331 m
- To
- 337 m
- Hole Depth
- 341.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RVD17-14:331.00-337.00
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 382201
- Northing
- 6913044
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is slightly above the project average, adding some value to this intercept.
Positive factors
- Silver grade is above the project average (3.492 g/t Ag).
Negative factors
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“4.4”
Context: 6.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states 'Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.'
Evidence · text
“Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.”
RVD17-14Revenue Deposit · copperGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RVD17-14
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 331 m
- To
- 337 m
- Hole Depth
- 341.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RVD17-14:331.00-337.00
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 382201
- Northing
- 6913044
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This CuEq grade indicates moderate-grade porphyry mineralization, with transparent assumptions.
Positive factors
- Metal equivalent assumptions are clearly disclosed, enhancing transparency.
Negative factors
- Copper equivalent grade is moderate for porphyry copper.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: 6.00
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states 'Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.'
Evidence · text
“Length refers to drill hole intercept. True widths have not been determined.”
GRS84-09Guder Zone · goldGrade: 24.858Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GRS84-09
- Project
- Guder Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 24.858
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 51.82 m
- To
- 53.34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GRS84-09:51.82-53.34
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows high-grade gold, providing context for the current discovery, but is not new information.
Positive factors
- High historical gold grade.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“24.858”
Context: 1.52
GRS84-09Guder Zone · silverGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GRS84-09
- Project
- Guder Zone
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 51.82 m
- To
- 53.34 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GRS84-09:51.82-53.34
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate silver, providing context for the current discovery, but is not new information.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: 1.52
GRS84-09Guder Zone · goldGrade: 39.086Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.91 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GRS84-09
- Project
- Guder Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 39.086
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
- From
- 51.82 m
- To
- 52.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GRS84-09:51.82-52.73
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows very high-grade gold, providing context for the current discovery, but is not new information.
Positive factors
- Very high historical gold grade.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“39.086”
Context: 0.91
GRS84-09Guder Zone · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.91 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GRS84-09
- Project
- Guder Zone
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
- From
- 51.82 m
- To
- 52.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GRS84-09:51.82-52.73
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows moderate silver, providing context for the current discovery, but is not new information.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“6.2”
Context: 0.91
GRD68-05Guder Zone · goldGrade: 11.657Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.22 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GRD68-05
- Project
- Guder Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.657
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.22 m
- From
- 80.16 m
- To
- 81.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GRD68-05:80.16-81.38
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows high-grade gold, providing context for the current discovery, but is not new information.
Positive factors
- High historical gold grade.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“11.657”
Context: 1.22
GRD68-05Guder Zone · silverGrade: 69.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.22 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GRD68-05
- Project
- Guder Zone
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 69.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.22 m
- From
- 80.16 m
- To
- 81.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GRD68-05:80.16-81.38
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows high-grade silver, providing context for the current discovery, but is not new information.
Positive factors
- High historical silver grade.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“69.3”
Context: 1.22
GRD68-05Guder Zone · copperGrade: 6.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.22 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GRD68-05
- Project
- Guder Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.22 m
- From
- 80.16 m
- To
- 81.38 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GRD68-05:80.16-81.38
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows very high-grade copper, providing context for the current discovery, but is not new information.
Positive factors
- Very high historical copper grade.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“6.800”
Context: 1.22
GRD69-01Guder Zone · goldGrade: 5.486Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.38 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GRD69-01
- Project
- Guder Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.486
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.38 m
- From
- 38.22 m
- To
- 39.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GRD69-01:38.22-39.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows high-grade gold, providing context for the current discovery, but is not new information.
Positive factors
- High historical gold grade.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“5.486”
Context: 1.38
GRD69-01Guder Zone · silverGrade: 37.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.38 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GRD69-01
- Project
- Guder Zone
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.38 m
- From
- 38.22 m
- To
- 39.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GRD69-01:38.22-39.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows high-grade silver, providing context for the current discovery, but is not new information.
Positive factors
- High historical silver grade.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“37.03”
Context: 1.38
GRD69-01Guder Zone · copperGrade: 1.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.38 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GRD69-01
- Project
- Guder Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.38 m
- From
- 38.22 m
- To
- 39.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GRD69-01:38.22-39.60
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows high-grade copper, providing context for the current discovery, but is not new information.
Positive factors
- High historical copper grade.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- True width not determined.
Evidence · table
“1.680”
Context: 1.38
IncludingRevenue Deposit · goldGrade: 39.086Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.91 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 39.086
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
- From
- 51.82 m
- To
- 52.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51.82-52.73
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39.086 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 35.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 39.086 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“39.086”
Context: Including
IncludingRevenue Deposit · silverGrade: 6.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.91 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.91 m
- From
- 51.82 m
- To
- 52.73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51.82-52.73
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.2”
Context: Including
AndRevenue Deposit · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29.79 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 214.79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:185-214.79
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.150”
Context: And
AndRevenue Deposit · silverGrade: 3.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29.79 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 214.79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:185-214.79
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.22 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 95.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.22 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.22”
Context: And
AndRevenue Deposit · copperGrade: 0.122Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.122
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 29.79 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 214.79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:185-214.79
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.122 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 3.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.122 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.122”
Context: And
AndRevenue Deposit · moGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 29.79 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 214.79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:185-214.79
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.013 % mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: And
AndRevenue Deposit · goldGrade: 0.079Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.079
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 331 m
- To
- 337 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:331-337
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.079 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.079 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.079”
Context: And
AndRevenue Deposit · silverGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 331 m
- To
- 337 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:331-337
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.4”
Context: And
AndRevenue Deposit · copperGrade: 0.367Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Revenue Deposit
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.367
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 331 m
- To
- 337 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:331-337
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- NAD83, Zone 8
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2017-11-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.367 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.367”
Context: And
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.