TR2: Drilling Commencing at Don Juan Critical Minerals Prospect
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Tali Resources Ltd
- Ticker
- TR2
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Western Australia
- Primary commodity
- Rare earth elements
- Secondary commodities
- Niobium, Titanium, Phosphorus, Copper, Nickel, Chromium, Arsenic, Antimony, Gold, Yttrium
- Document categories
- Other, Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-12 22:13:24 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Tali Resources Ltd announced the commencement of a 9,000m aircore drilling program at its Don Juan Critical Minerals Prospect in Western Australia, targeting rare earth elements and other critical minerals. The program will test high-priority targets within a 45km-long alkaline intrusive system, building on historical drilling that intersected aillikite, a rock type commonly associated with carbonatites. While the current announcement focuses on planned work, it also provides historical drill results and rock chip data that indicate prospectivity for REE and other metals.
Reasoning: Tali Resources announced the commencement of a significant 9,000m aircore drilling program targeting critical minerals in the West Arunta Project, supported by historical geological indicators and drill results, which is a positive step for exploration but lacks new assay data.
Positive factors
- Announcement of a significant 9,000m aircore drilling program.
- Drilling targets high-priority areas within a 45km-long alkaline intrusive system.
- Historical drilling intersected aillikite, a rock type associated with carbonatites and critical minerals.
- Highly anomalous rare earth-bearing rock-chip samples provide further evidence of prospectivity.
- Exploration results are compiled by a Competent Person (Mr. John McIntyre) who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
- Historical RC drilling samples were subject to chain of custody procedures and inserted CRMs and blanks.
Negative factors
- The drilling program is planned to commence, so no new assay results are reported in this announcement.
- Historical drill results are re-reported and not new assays from the current program.
- True and apparent widths for historical RC drilling have not been interpreted, which limits geological understanding.
- Some historical rock chip and soil sampling QA/QC methods are not documented.
- Some areas are no longer accessible due to heritage approvals, potentially limiting future exploration.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 55
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 54. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (54)
DJRC0001Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 853Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DJRC0001
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 853
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 82 m
- To
- 101 m
- Hole Depth
- 348 m
- Intercept Depth
- 82 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DJRC0001:82-101
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362251
- Northing
- 7504012
- CRS
- GDA2020 MGA Zone 52
- Elevation
- 425 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 800
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical, broad intercept of REE+Y above cutoff is positive for prospectivity, but its novelty is low and the lack of true width information reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Reported grade of 853 ppm REE+Y exceeds the 800 ppm cutoff grade.
- Intercept length of 19m indicates a broad zone of mineralization.
- Historical results are presented with QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- True width is not reported, limiting understanding of the actual thickness.
- The hole is vertical (dip -90), which can be problematic for steeply dipping structures.
Evidence · table
“853”
Context: 19
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical drilling (2022 and 2023) and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“For the NHPL drilling in 2022 and 2023, Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling totalling 7,335m returned drill chip samples.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data'.
Evidence · text
“True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including chain of custody, CRMs, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The data aggregation criteria, including cutoff grade and maximum internal waste, are clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“Significant intercepts (Table 1) are calculated using an 800ppm TREE cutoff, >5m width, maximum 5m internal waste.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
DJRC0001Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 788Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 22 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DJRC0001
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 788
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 22 m
- From
- 116 m
- To
- 138 m
- Hole Depth
- 348 m
- Intercept Depth
- 82 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DJRC0001:116-138
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362251
- Northing
- 7504012
- CRS
- GDA2020 MGA Zone 52
- Elevation
- 425 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 800
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical intercept below the stated cutoff grade, combined with low novelty and lack of true width, makes this result less material.
Positive factors
- Intercept length of 22m indicates a broad zone of mineralization.
- Historical results are presented with QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- Reported grade of 788 ppm REE+Y is below the stated 800 ppm cutoff grade.
- True width is not reported, limiting understanding of the actual thickness.
- The hole is vertical (dip -90), which can be problematic for steeply dipping structures.
Evidence · table
“788”
Context: 22
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical drilling (2022 and 2023) and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“For the NHPL drilling in 2022 and 2023, Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling totalling 7,335m returned drill chip samples.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data'.
Evidence · text
“True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including chain of custody, CRMs, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The data aggregation criteria, including cutoff grade and maximum internal waste, are clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“Significant intercepts (Table 1) are calculated using an 800ppm TREE cutoff, >5m width, maximum 5m internal waste.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
DJRC0001Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 814Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DJRC0001
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 814
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 278 m
- To
- 283 m
- Hole Depth
- 348 m
- Intercept Depth
- 82 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DJRC0001:278-283
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362251
- Northing
- 7504012
- CRS
- GDA2020 MGA Zone 52
- Elevation
- 425 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 800
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical, narrow intercept just above cutoff grade has limited materiality and novelty, despite being technically positive.
Positive factors
- Reported grade of 814 ppm REE+Y is above the 800 ppm cutoff grade.
- Historical results are presented with QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- Intercept length of 5m is at the minimum width for significance.
- True width is not reported, limiting understanding of the actual thickness.
- The hole is vertical (dip -90), which can be problematic for steeply dipping structures.
Evidence · table
“814”
Context: 5
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical drilling (2022 and 2023) and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“For the NHPL drilling in 2022 and 2023, Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling totalling 7,335m returned drill chip samples.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data'.
Evidence · text
“True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including chain of custody, CRMs, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The data aggregation criteria, including cutoff grade and maximum internal waste, are clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“Significant intercepts (Table 1) are calculated using an 800ppm TREE cutoff, >5m width, maximum 5m internal waste.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
DJRC0001Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 834Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DJRC0001
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 834
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 308 m
- To
- 326 m
- Hole Depth
- 348 m
- Intercept Depth
- 82 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DJRC0001:308-326
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362251
- Northing
- 7504012
- CRS
- GDA2020 MGA Zone 52
- Elevation
- 425 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 800
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical, broad intercept of REE+Y above cutoff is positive for prospectivity, but its novelty is low and the lack of true width information reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Reported grade of 834 ppm REE+Y is above the 800 ppm cutoff grade.
- Intercept length of 18m indicates a broad zone of mineralization.
- Historical results are presented with QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- True width is not reported, limiting understanding of the actual thickness.
- The hole is vertical (dip -90), which can be problematic for steeply dipping structures.
Evidence · table
“834”
Context: 18
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical drilling (2022 and 2023) and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“For the NHPL drilling in 2022 and 2023, Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling totalling 7,335m returned drill chip samples.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data'.
Evidence · text
“True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including chain of custody, CRMs, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The data aggregation criteria, including cutoff grade and maximum internal waste, are clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“Significant intercepts (Table 1) are calculated using an 800ppm TREE cutoff, >5m width, maximum 5m internal waste.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
DJ_P002Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 847Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 48 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DJ_P002
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 847
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 48 m
- From
- 76 m
- To
- 124 m
- Hole Depth
- 202 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DJ_P002:76-124
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 361015
- Northing
- 7502634
- CRS
- GDA2020 MGA Zone 52
- Elevation
- 443 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 800
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical, very broad intercept of REE+Y above cutoff is a strong indicator of prospectivity, but its novelty is low and the lack of true width information reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Reported grade of 847 ppm REE+Y is above the 800 ppm cutoff grade.
- Exceptional intercept length of 48m indicates a very broad zone of mineralization.
- Historical results are presented with QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- True width is not reported, limiting understanding of the actual thickness.
- The hole is vertical (dip -90), which can be problematic for steeply dipping structures.
Evidence · table
“847”
Context: 48
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical drilling (2022 and 2023) and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“For the NHPL drilling in 2022 and 2023, Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling totalling 7,335m returned drill chip samples.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data'.
Evidence · text
“True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including chain of custody, CRMs, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The data aggregation criteria, including cutoff grade and maximum internal waste, are clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“Significant intercepts (Table 1) are calculated using an 800ppm TREE cutoff, >5m width, maximum 5m internal waste.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
DJ_P002Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 817Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DJ_P002
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 817
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 136 m
- To
- 144 m
- Hole Depth
- 202 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DJ_P002:136-144
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 361015
- Northing
- 7502634
- CRS
- GDA2020 MGA Zone 52
- Elevation
- 443 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 800
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical, moderate intercept just above cutoff grade has limited materiality and novelty, despite being technically positive.
Positive factors
- Reported grade of 817 ppm REE+Y is above the 800 ppm cutoff grade.
- Historical results are presented with QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- Intercept length of 8m is moderate.
- True width is not reported, limiting understanding of the actual thickness.
- The hole is vertical (dip -90), which can be problematic for steeply dipping structures.
Evidence · table
“817”
Context: 8
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical drilling (2022 and 2023) and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“For the NHPL drilling in 2022 and 2023, Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling totalling 7,335m returned drill chip samples.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data'.
Evidence · text
“True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including chain of custody, CRMs, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The data aggregation criteria, including cutoff grade and maximum internal waste, are clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“Significant intercepts (Table 1) are calculated using an 800ppm TREE cutoff, >5m width, maximum 5m internal waste.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
DJ_P002Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 872Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DJ_P002
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 872
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 152 m
- To
- 160 m
- Hole Depth
- 202 m
- Intercept Depth
- 76 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DJ_P002:152-160
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 361015
- Northing
- 7502634
- CRS
- GDA2020 MGA Zone 52
- Elevation
- 443 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Perth
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 800
- Cutoff Unit
- ppm
- Max Dilution
- 5 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical, moderate intercept above cutoff grade is positive for prospectivity, but its novelty is low and the lack of true width information reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Reported grade of 872 ppm REE+Y is above the 800 ppm cutoff grade.
- Historical results are presented with QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- Intercept length of 8m is moderate.
- True width is not reported, limiting understanding of the actual thickness.
- The hole is vertical (dip -90), which can be problematic for steeply dipping structures.
Evidence · table
“872”
Context: 8
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical drilling (2022 and 2023) and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“For the NHPL drilling in 2022 and 2023, Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling totalling 7,335m returned drill chip samples.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that 'True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data'.
Evidence · text
“True and apparent widths have not been interpreted from the available geological data.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures including chain of custody, CRMs, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
Compositing TransparentRejected · positive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Reason: The data aggregation criteria, including cutoff grade and maximum internal waste, are clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“Significant intercepts (Table 1) are calculated using an 800ppm TREE cutoff, >5m width, maximum 5m internal waste.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 8Don Juan South · arsenicGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with low arsenic grade is of limited materiality and novelty, and the presence of a deleterious element is a minor negative.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- Arsenic is a deleterious element, indicating potential processing challenges or penalties.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
- Grade is low for a rock chip sample.
Evidence · table
“4.9”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Arsenic is a known penalty element, and its presence in samples indicates potential processing considerations.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 9Don Juan South · goldGrade: 0.001Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.001
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with an extremely low gold grade is not material and has low novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The gold grade of 0.001 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“0.001”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 10Don Juan South · copperGrade: 67Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 67
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a very low copper grade is not material and has low novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The copper grade of 67 ppm is very low and not economically significant.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“67”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 11Don Juan South · dysprosiumGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- dysprosium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low dysprosium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The dysprosium grade of 2 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 12Don Juan South · iron_oreGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a very low iron grade is not material and has low novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The iron grade of 3.0% is very low and not economically significant for iron ore.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“3.0”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 13Don Juan South · neodymiumGrade: 11.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- neodymium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low neodymium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The neodymium grade of 11.6 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“11.6”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 14Don Juan South · praseodymiumGrade: 4.54Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- praseodymium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.54
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low praseodymium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The praseodymium grade of 4.54 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“4.54”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 15Don Juan South · antimonyGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with low antimony grade is of limited materiality and novelty, and the presence of a deleterious element is a minor negative.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- Antimony is a deleterious element, indicating potential processing challenges or penalties.
- The antimony grade of 5 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“5”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Antimony is a known penalty element, and its presence in samples indicates potential processing considerations.
Evidence · table
“Sb”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 16Don Juan South · seleniumGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- selenium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low selenium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The selenium grade of 4 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 17Don Juan South · terbiumGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- terbium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low terbium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The terbium grade of 0.4 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 18Don Juan South · yttriumGrade: 14Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- yttrium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 14
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low yttrium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The yttrium grade of 14 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“14”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 19Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 149Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 149
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low total rare earth element grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The TREE grade of 149 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“149”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 20Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 19Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 19
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 360171
- Northing
- 7502845
- Elevation
- 447 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low medium rare earth element grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The MREE grade of 19 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“19”
Context: 136001
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 21Don Juan South · arsenicGrade: 5.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with low arsenic grade is of limited materiality and novelty, and the presence of a deleterious element is a minor negative.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- Arsenic is a deleterious element, indicating potential processing challenges or penalties.
- Grade is low for a rock chip sample.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not documented in detail.
Evidence · table
“5.9”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Arsenic is a known penalty element, and its presence in samples indicates potential processing considerations.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 22Don Juan South · goldGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.002
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with an extremely low gold grade is not material and has low novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The gold grade of 0.002 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“0.002”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 23Don Juan South · copperGrade: 16Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 16
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a very low copper grade is not material and has low novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The copper grade of 16 ppm is very low and not economically significant.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“16”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 24Don Juan South · dysprosiumGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- dysprosium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low dysprosium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The dysprosium grade of 3 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 25Don Juan South · iron_oreGrade: 40Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 40
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low iron grade is not material and has low novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The iron grade of 40.0% is below typical economic thresholds for iron ore.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“40.0”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 26Don Juan South · neodymiumGrade: 15.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- neodymium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low neodymium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The neodymium grade of 15.9 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“15.9”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 27Don Juan South · praseodymiumGrade: 4.34Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- praseodymium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.34
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low praseodymium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The praseodymium grade of 4.34 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“4.34”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 28Don Juan South · antimonyGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with low antimony grade is of limited materiality and novelty, and the presence of a deleterious element is a minor negative.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- Antimony is a deleterious element, indicating potential processing challenges or penalties.
- The antimony grade of 0.2 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not documented in detail.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Antimony is a known penalty element, and its presence in samples indicates potential processing considerations.
Evidence · table
“Sb”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 29Don Juan South · seleniumGrade: 1Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- selenium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low selenium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The selenium grade of 1 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“1”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 30Don Juan South · terbiumGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- terbium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low terbium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The terbium grade of 0.5 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 31Don Juan South · yttriumGrade: 24Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- yttrium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 24
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low yttrium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The yttrium grade of 24 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“24”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 32Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 100Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 100
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low total rare earth element grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The TREE grade of 100 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“100”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 33Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 24Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 24
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362424
- Northing
- 7503273
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low medium rare earth element grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The MREE grade of 24 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“24”
Context: 136002
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 34Don Juan South · arsenicGrade: 52.9Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 52.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with arsenic present is of limited materiality and novelty, and the presence of a deleterious element is a minor negative.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- Arsenic is a deleterious element, indicating potential processing challenges or penalties.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not documented in detail.
Evidence · table
“52.9”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Arsenic is a known penalty element, and its presence in samples indicates potential processing considerations.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 35Don Juan South · goldGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with an extremely low gold grade is not material and has low novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The gold grade of 0.012 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 36Don Juan South · copperGrade: 87Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 87
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a very low copper grade is not material and has low novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The copper grade of 87 ppm is very low and not economically significant.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“87”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 37Don Juan South · dysprosiumGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- dysprosium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low dysprosium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The dysprosium grade of 3 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 38Don Juan South · iron_oreGrade: 46.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.3
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low iron grade is not material and has low novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The iron grade of 46.3% is below typical economic thresholds for iron ore.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“46.3”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 39Don Juan South · neodymiumGrade: 29.3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- neodymium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low neodymium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The neodymium grade of 29.3 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“29.3”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 40Don Juan South · praseodymiumGrade: 8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- praseodymium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low praseodymium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The praseodymium grade of 8 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 41Don Juan South · antimonyGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with low antimony grade is of limited materiality and novelty, and the presence of a deleterious element is a minor negative.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- Antimony is a deleterious element, indicating potential processing challenges or penalties.
- The antimony grade of 0.6 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not documented in detail.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Antimony is a known penalty element, and its presence in samples indicates potential processing considerations.
Evidence · table
“Sb”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 42Don Juan South · seleniumGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- selenium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low selenium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The selenium grade of 2 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 43Don Juan South · terbiumGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- terbium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low terbium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The terbium grade of 0.8 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 44Don Juan South · yttriumGrade: 24Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- yttrium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 24
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low yttrium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The yttrium grade of 24 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“24”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 45Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 188Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 188
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low total rare earth element grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The TREE grade of 188 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“188”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 46Don Juan South · rare earth elementsGrade: 42Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- rare earth elements
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 42
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362457
- Northing
- 7502949
- Elevation
- 433 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low medium rare earth element grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The MREE grade of 42 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“42”
Context: 136003
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 47Don Juan South · arsenicGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- arsenic
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362404
- Northing
- 7503230
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with low arsenic grade is of limited materiality and novelty, and the presence of a deleterious element is a minor negative.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- Arsenic is a deleterious element, indicating potential processing challenges or penalties.
- Grade is low for a rock chip sample.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not documented in detail.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: 136004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Arsenic is a known penalty element, and its presence in samples indicates potential processing considerations.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 48Don Juan South · goldGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.002
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362404
- Northing
- 7503230
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with an extremely low gold grade is not material and has low novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The gold grade of 0.002 ppm is extremely low and not economically significant.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“0.002”
Context: 136004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 49Don Juan South · copperGrade: 26Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 26
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362404
- Northing
- 7503230
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a very low copper grade is not material and has low novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The copper grade of 26 ppm is very low and not economically significant.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“26”
Context: 136004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 50Don Juan South · dysprosiumGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- dysprosium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362404
- Northing
- 7503230
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low dysprosium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The dysprosium grade of 3 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 136004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 51Don Juan South · iron_oreGrade: 30.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362404
- Northing
- 7503230
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low iron grade is not material and has low novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The iron grade of 30.1% is below typical economic thresholds for iron ore.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“30.1”
Context: 136004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 52Don Juan South · neodymiumGrade: 23.6Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- neodymium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362404
- Northing
- 7503230
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low neodymium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The neodymium grade of 23.6 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“23.6”
Context: 136004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 53Don Juan South · praseodymiumGrade: 6.38Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- praseodymium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.38
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362404
- Northing
- 7503230
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A historical rock chip sample with a low praseodymium grade is of limited materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- The praseodymium grade of 6.38 ppm is low.
- QA/QC methods for rock chip sampling are not described in detail.
Evidence · table
“6.38”
Context: 136004
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This result is from historical rock chip sampling and is being re-reported in this announcement.
Evidence · text
“Historical drilling (DJRC0001, DJRC0002, DJ_P001, DJ_P002 and DJ_P003), rock-chip sampling and soil sampling across 6.2km of strike at Don Juan were completed under heritage approvals in place at the time.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Reason: Historical rock chip and soil samples in the document report arsenic and antimony, which are penalty elements.
Evidence · table
“As”
Context: Sample ID
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The document details QA/QC procedures for drilling, which applies to the overall document's credibility.
Evidence · text
“sample security was ensured under a chain of custody between onsite Company personnel and the chosen laboratory (ALS Perth).”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: The exploration results are based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
Evidence · text
“The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. John McIntyre who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Fact 54Don Juan South · antimonyGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Don Juan South
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- TR2
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Easting
- 362404
- Northing
- 7503230
- Elevation
- 436 m
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenic, antimony
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
Positive factors
- Historical rock chip sample provides geochemical data for the project area.
- QA/QC disclosure and Competent Person sign-off for the overall document.
Negative factors
- This is a historical result, not new information from the current program.
- Antimony is a deleterious element, indicating potential processing challenges or penalties.
- The antimony grade of 0.5 ppm is low.
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.