TomaGold Unveils the Growing Scale of Berrigan Deep

Original announcement by investingnews on

Company
TomaGold Corporation
Ticker
LOT
Exchange
TSXV
Region
Quebec
Primary commodity
Zinc
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver, Copper
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-29 14:31:47 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

TomaGold announced assay results from the final three Phase 2 extension holes at its Berrigan Mine Project in Quebec, significantly expanding the Berrigan Deep zone. Drilling intersected high-grade zinc-gold-silver-copper mineralization over broad widths, including 69.40 m at 3.46% ZnEq in TOM-25-012EXT and 19.10 m at 2.23% ZnEq in TOM-25-010EXT. The results extend the zone to nearly 900m depth, demonstrating continuity and high-grade potential, with the system remaining open laterally and at depth.

Reasoning: The final Phase 2 drill results from Berrigan Deep demonstrate significant high-grade polymetallic mineralization over broad widths, extending the zone laterally and to a record depth of nearly 900m, with the system remaining open.

Positive factors

  • High grades at depth
  • Broad intersections
  • Significant expansion of mineralized zone
  • Polymetallic nature
  • Open at depth and laterally
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Facts used in scoring: 161

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release explicitly mentions that the drilling program was managed by Explo-Logik, drill core was split and submitted to AGAT Laboratories for analysis, and QA/QC procedures including sample preparation duplicates, certified reference standards, and blanks were inserted into the sample stream.

Evidence · text

“The drilling program was managed by Explo-Logik of Val-d'Or, Québec. Drill core was split in half, with one half submitted to AGAT Laboratories at Val-d'Or for analysis. Gold was analyzed by fire assay (50 g) with atomic absorption finish, while base metals were analyzed by four-acid digestion with ICP-OES finish. Samples with gold grades greater than 10 g/t are reprocessed using metallic screening with a 106 µm cutoff. The processed material is split and analyzed by fire assay with ICP-OES finish to extinction. A separate split is prepared to independently analyze mineralized intervals with a target grade greater than 1.00% Cu-Zn using a Na₂O₂ fusion with ICP-OES or ICP-MS finish. Sample preparation duplicates, certified reference standards, and blanks are inserted into the sample stream.”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The technical content of this press release has been reviewed by Jean Lafleur, P.Geo., and Suzie Tremblay, P.Geo., both Qualified Persons as defined under National Instrument 43-101.

Evidence · text

“The technical content of this press release has been reviewed by Jean Lafleur, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration of the Company, and Suzie Tremblay, P.Geo., Vice President of Operations at Explo-Logik Inc. and a consultant to TomaGold , each of whom is a Qualified Person as defined under National Instrument 43-101.”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: The metal equivalent calculations (AuEq and ZnEq) are provided with detailed price and recovery assumptions.

Evidence · text

“AuEq calculation was based on US$4,150/oz Au, $51.34/oz Ag, US$5.023/lb Cu and $1.392/lb Zn. AuEq = Au g/t + (Ag g/t × 0.01237) + (Cu ppm × 0.000083) + (Zn ppm × 0.000023), applying metallurgical recovery factors of 95% for zinc, 85% for gold and silver, and 90% for copper, based on a metallurgical report on Berrigan Mine zinc material prepared by Process Research Associates Ltd. in February 2002 and on recoveries from nearby deposits for gold, silver and copper. ZnEq calculation was based on US$4,047/oz Au, $50.22/oz Ag, US$4.796/lb Cu and $1.390/lb Zn. ZnEq = Zn ppm + (Ag g/t × 527) + (Au g/t x 42466) + (Cu ppm × 3.45) / 10,000, applying metallurgical recovery factors of 95% for zinc, 85% for gold and silver, and 90% for copper, based on a metallurgical report on Berrigan Mine zinc material prepared by Process Research Associates Ltd. in February 2002 and on recoveries from nearby deposits for gold, silver and copper.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document states that reported widths represent core lengths and true width is estimated to be approximately 80-85% of the core length, but does not provide specific true width values for each intercept.

Evidence · text

“The reported widths represent core lengths. True width is estimated to be approximately 80-85% of the core length, depending on the deviation angles.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: The document does not explicitly state the cut-off grade used for reporting the drill intercepts.

Evidence · text

“Table 1: Results from Holes TOM-25-010EXT, TOM-25-012EXT and TOM-25-013EXT”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept 4.20 m at 21.18% ZnEq (4.90 g/t AuEq) from 805.60 m to 809.80 m in TOM-25-012EXT is exceptionally high-grade for a polymetallic VMS deposit, well above the strong threshold for zinc and gold.

Evidence · table

“21.18”

Context: 4.20

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The Phase 2 drilling program consists of 'extension holes' that have 'significantly expanded the known extent of Berrigan Deep' and 'pushed exploration to a record depth of 907.4 metres'.

Evidence · text

“With just 5 extension holes, Berrigan Deep already extends more than 250 m laterally by approximately 400 m vertically, with mineralization intersected to nearly 900 m depth and significant potential for further expansion laterally and at depth”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Several intercepts from Phase 1 and earlier Phase 2 results (e.g., TOM-25-015, TOM-25-011EXT, TOM-25-009EXT) are mentioned as 'previously reported' or 'discovery hole' with specific dates in 2025 and early 2026, indicating they are not new assays from this release.

Evidence · text

“These new results build on the two standout intersections previously reported at Berrigan Deep: 98.50 m at 5.08% ZnEq (1.19 g/t AuEq) in discovery hole TOM-25-015, including 4.90 m at 23.20% ZnEq (5.44 g/t AuEq) , and 204.25 m at 2.05% ZnEq (0.48 g/t AuEq) in TOM-25-011EXT, including 2.40 m at 31.31% ZnEq (7.38 g/t AuEq) .”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 161. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (161)

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 8.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
8.76
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
257.9 m
To
258.5 m
Hole Depth
575.45 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:257.9-258.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542419
Northing
5532647
Elevation
388.39 m
Azimuth
130.01 °
Dip
-55.05 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow, high-grade zinc intercept with significant metal equivalent, contributing to the expansion of the Berrigan Deep zone.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“8.76”

Context: 0.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.65 m
From
398 m
To
404.65 m
Hole Depth
575.45 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:398-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542419
Northing
5532647
Elevation
388.39 m
Azimuth
130.01 °
Dip
-55.05 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with lower zinc grade, contributing to the overall polymetallic system.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: 6.65

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
5.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.45 m
From
403.2 m
To
404.65 m
Hole Depth
575.45 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:403.2-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542419
Northing
5532647
Elevation
388.39 m
Azimuth
130.01 °
Dip
-55.05 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.48
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow, high-grade zinc sub-interval within a broader zone, indicating localized high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“5.18”

Context: 1.45

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19.1 m
From
472.4 m
To
491.5 m
Intercept Depth
472.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:472.4-491.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.52
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A previously reported strong intercept from Phase 2, contributing to the Berrigan Deep zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept length
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale Data Re-release
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.23”

Context: 19.10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
473 m
To
477 m
Hole Depth
575.45 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:473-477
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542419
Northing
5532647
Elevation
388.39 m
Azimuth
130.01 °
Dip
-55.05 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A high-grade zinc sub-interval within a broader zone, indicating localized high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.09”

Context: 4.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.1 m
From
477.9 m
To
481 m
Hole Depth
575.45 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:477.9-481
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542419
Northing
5532647
Elevation
388.39 m
Azimuth
130.01 °
Dip
-55.05 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with lower zinc grade, part of a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 3.10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.69
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
477.8 m
To
479 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:477.8-479
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with moderate zinc grade, contributing to the overall polymetallic system at depth.

Positive factors

  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.69”

Context: 1.20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.8 m
From
519.15 m
To
521.95 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:519.15-521.95
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with high zinc equivalent grade, indicating good mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“1.90”

Context: 2.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.75 m
From
574.5 m
To
576.25 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:574.5-576.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with moderate zinc equivalent grade, part of the polymetallic system.

Positive factors

  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower grade
  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 1.75

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.25 m
From
587.75 m
To
589 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:587.75-589
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with moderate zinc equivalent grade, part of the polymetallic system.

Positive factors

  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower grade
  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 1.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.05 m
From
663.95 m
To
671 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:663.95-671
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with moderate zinc equivalent grade, contributing to the overall polymetallic system at depth.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: 7.05

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
665 m
To
667 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:665-667
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow, high-grade zinc equivalent sub-interval, indicating localized high-grade mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.65 m
From
687.55 m
To
688.2 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:687.55-688.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept with moderate zinc equivalent grade, part of the polymetallic system at depth.

Positive factors

  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: 0.65

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.55 m
From
716.3 m
To
716.85 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:716.3-716.85
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept with moderate zinc equivalent grade, part of the polymetallic system at depth.

Positive factors

  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Lower grade
  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 0.55

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
5.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
727.25 m
To
727.75 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:727.25-727.75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow, high-grade zinc intercept with significant metal equivalent, indicating localized high-grade mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“5.38”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 4.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
4.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
764 m
To
765 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:764-765
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.09
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow, high-grade zinc intercept with significant metal equivalent, indicating good mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“4.48”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 3.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 69.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
3.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
69.4 m
From
784.2 m
To
853.6 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:784.2-853.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.81
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A previously reported very significant and broad intercept from Phase 2, demonstrating the continuity and potential of the system at substantial depth.

Positive factors

  • Continuous intercept length
  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • High grades at depth

Negative factors

  • Stale Data Re-release
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“3.46”

Context: 69.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 3.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
3.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
40.1 m
From
784.2 m
To
824.3 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:784.2-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very strong and broad sub-interval with high zinc equivalent grade at substantial depth, indicating significant mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept length
  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • High grades at depth

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“3.15”

Context: 40.10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
784.2 m
To
794.9 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:784.2-794.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width sub-interval with moderate zinc equivalent grade at substantial depth, part of a broader mineralized zone.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • High grades at depth

Negative factors

  • Lower grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 10.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 9.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
9.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
797.8 m
To
799 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:797.8-799
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow, very high-grade zinc sub-interval with significant metal equivalent at substantial depth, indicating strong localized mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • High grades at depth

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“9.45”

Context: 1.20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 16.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
16.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.2 m
From
805.6 m
To
809.8 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:805.6-809.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptionally high-grade zinc sub-interval with significant metal equivalent at substantial depth, demonstrating bonanza-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept
  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • High grades at depth

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“16.49”

Context: 4.20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.96
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.55 m
From
810.3 m
To
812.85 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:810.3-812.85
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width sub-interval with high zinc equivalent grade at substantial depth, indicating good mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • High grades at depth

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.96”

Context: 2.55

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 6.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
6.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.65 m
From
815 m
To
816.65 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:815-816.65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow, very high-grade zinc sub-interval with significant metal equivalent at substantial depth, indicating strong localized mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • High grades at depth

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“6.44”

Context: 1.65

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.4 m
From
819.9 m
To
824.3 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:819.9-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width sub-interval with high zinc equivalent grade at substantial depth, indicating good mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • High grades at depth

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“1.78”

Context: 4.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.65 m
From
866.65 m
To
867.3 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:866.65-867.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept with moderate zinc equivalent grade at substantial depth, part of the polymetallic system.

Positive factors

  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • High grades at depth

Negative factors

  • Lower grade
  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 0.65

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
878.4 m
To
879.8 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:878.4-879.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with moderate zinc equivalent grade at substantial depth, part of the polymetallic system.

Positive factors

  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • High grades at depth

Negative factors

  • Lower grade
  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 1.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.3 m
From
565.2 m
To
567.5 m
Hole Depth
762.25 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:565.2-567.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
180.34 °
Dip
-55.49 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with high zinc equivalent grade, contributing to the polymetallic system at depth.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: 2.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
631.5 m
To
638.5 m
Intercept Depth
631.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:631.5-638.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.52
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A previously reported moderate intercept from Phase 2, contributing to the Berrigan Deep zone.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale Data Re-release
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.21”

Context: 7.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
659.8 m
To
661.2 m
Hole Depth
762.25 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:659.8-661.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
180.34 °
Dip
-55.49 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with moderate zinc equivalent grade, contributing to the polymetallic system at depth.

Positive factors

  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.36”

Context: 1.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
5.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
669.5 m
To
671.2 m
Hole Depth
762.25 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:669.5-671.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
180.34 °
Dip
-55.49 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.5
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow, high-grade zinc intercept with significant metal equivalent, indicating good mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“5.50”

Context: 1.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
688 m
To
692 m
Hole Depth
762.25 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:688-692
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
180.34 °
Dip
-55.49 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with very low zinc grade, but still contributing to the polymetallic system at depth.

Positive factors

  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Low grade
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 4.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-009Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 48.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-009
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
5.82
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
48.05 m
From
156.7 m
To
204.75 m
Intercept Depth
156.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-009:156.7-204.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.36
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A previously reported strong intercept from Phase 1, indicating good polymetallic mineralization in the Berrigan Main zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept length
  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale Data Re-release
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“5.82”

Context: 48.05

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TOM-25-009EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-009EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
29.9 m
From
469.25 m
To
499.15 m
Intercept Depth
469.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-009EXT:469.25-499.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.52
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-07-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A previously reported strong intercept from Phase 2, extending lateral continuity of the Berrigan Deep zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept length
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale Data Re-release
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.24”

Context: 29.90

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TOM-25-010Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 48.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
48.3 m
From
130.7 m
To
179 m
Intercept Depth
130.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010:130.7-179
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A previously reported strong intercept from Phase 1, indicating good polymetallic mineralization in the Berrigan Main zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept length
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale Data Re-release
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.38”

Context: 48.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TOM-25-011Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.81
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.5 m
From
291 m
To
309.5 m
Intercept Depth
291 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011:291-309.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A previously reported strong intercept from Phase 1, indicating good polymetallic mineralization in the Berrigan Main zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept length
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale Data Re-release
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“1.81”

Context: 18.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 204.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
204.25 m
From
553.9 m
To
758.15 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-758.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.48
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A previously reported exceptionally broad intercept from Phase 2, representing the longest mineralized interval at Berrigan Deep.

Positive factors

  • Continuous intercept length
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale Data Re-release
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.05”

Context: 204.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TOM-25-012Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
5.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.15 m
From
283.85 m
To
285 m
Intercept Depth
283.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012:283.85-285
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.31
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A previously reported narrow, high-grade intercept from Phase 1, indicating good polymetallic mineralization in the Berrigan Main zone.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale Data Re-release
  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“5.51”

Context: 1.15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TOM-25-013Berrigan MineGrade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013
Project
Berrigan Mine
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade Unit
%

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A previously reported hole from Phase 1 with no significant mineralization, indicating a barren or low-grade intercept.

Positive factors

  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale Data Re-release
  • No significant value

Evidence · table

“No significant value”

Context: No significant value

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TOM-25-014Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 24.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
24.85
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:185-187.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.83
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A previously reported narrow, very high-grade intercept from Phase 1, indicating strong polymetallic mineralization in the Berrigan Main zone.

Positive factors

  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale Data Re-release
  • Narrow intercept length
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“24.85”

Context: 2.10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 98.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
5.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:451.2-549.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-12-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A previously reported exceptionally broad and high-grade discovery intercept, establishing the Berrigan Deep zone.

Positive factors

  • Continuous intercept length
  • High grade
  • Polymetallic nature
  • QP/CP signed
  • QA/QC disclosed

Negative factors

  • Stale Data Re-release
  • Apparent width only
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“5.08”

Context: 98.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
257.9 m
To
258.5 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:257.9-258.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.68 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.68”

Context: TOM-25-010EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 19.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
19.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
257.9 m
To
258.5 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:257.9-258.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 19.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.50”

Context: TOM-25-010EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
257.9 m
To
258.5 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:257.9-258.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 % copper is weak against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: TOM-25-010EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.65 m
From
398 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
398 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:398-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.65 m
From
398 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
398 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:398-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.50”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.65 m
From
398 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
398 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:398-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.65 m
From
398 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
398 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:398-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.32 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 8.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.32 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.45 m
From
403.2 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
403.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:403.2-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.48
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 3.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
3.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.45 m
From
403.2 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
403.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:403.2-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.48
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.76 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.76 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.76”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.45 m
From
403.2 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
403.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:403.2-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.48
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 5.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
5.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.45 m
From
403.2 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
403.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:403.2-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.48
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.18 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.18”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.1 m
From
472.4 m
To
491.5 m
Intercept Depth
472.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:472.4-491.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 2.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.1 m
From
472.4 m
To
491.5 m
Intercept Depth
472.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:472.4-491.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 54.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.86”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19.1 m
From
472.4 m
To
491.5 m
Intercept Depth
472.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:472.4-491.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19.1 m
From
472.4 m
To
491.5 m
Intercept Depth
472.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:472.4-491.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.63 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 12.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.63 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
473 m
To
477 m
Intercept Depth
473 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:473-477
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 3.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
3.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
473 m
To
477 m
Intercept Depth
473 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:473-477
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.18 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.18 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.18”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
473 m
To
477 m
Intercept Depth
473 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:473-477
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
473 m
To
477 m
Intercept Depth
473 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:473-477
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.09 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.09”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
From
477.9 m
To
481 m
Intercept Depth
477.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:477.9-481
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.53 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 3.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
3.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
From
477.9 m
To
481 m
Intercept Depth
477.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:477.9-481
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.79 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.79 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.79”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.1 m
From
477.9 m
To
481 m
Intercept Depth
477.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:477.9-481
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.1 m
From
477.9 m
To
481 m
Intercept Depth
477.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:477.9-481
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.63 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.63 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
477.8 m
To
479 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:477.8-479
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: TOM-25-012EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
3.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
477.8 m
To
479 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:477.8-479
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.05”

Context: TOM-25-012EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
477.8 m
To
479 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:477.8-479
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: TOM-25-012EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
From
519.15 m
To
521.95 m
Intercept Depth
519.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:519.15-521.95
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.07 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 3.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
3.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
From
519.15 m
To
521.95 m
Intercept Depth
519.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:519.15-521.95
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.32 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.32 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.32”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.8 m
From
519.15 m
To
521.95 m
Intercept Depth
519.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:519.15-521.95
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.8 m
From
519.15 m
To
521.95 m
Intercept Depth
519.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:519.15-521.95
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.9 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.90”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m
From
574.5 m
To
576.25 m
Intercept Depth
574.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:574.5-576.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m
From
574.5 m
To
576.25 m
Intercept Depth
574.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:574.5-576.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.73 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.73 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.73”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.75 m
From
574.5 m
To
576.25 m
Intercept Depth
574.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:574.5-576.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.75 m
From
574.5 m
To
576.25 m
Intercept Depth
574.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:574.5-576.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.09 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.09 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
From
587.75 m
To
589 m
Intercept Depth
587.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:587.75-589
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.82 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
From
587.75 m
To
589 m
Intercept Depth
587.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:587.75-589
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.20”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.25 m
From
587.75 m
To
589 m
Intercept Depth
587.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:587.75-589
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.25 m
From
587.75 m
To
589 m
Intercept Depth
587.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:587.75-589
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.05 m
From
663.95 m
To
671 m
Intercept Depth
663.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:663.95-671
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.91 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.91”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 4.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
4.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.05 m
From
663.95 m
To
671 m
Intercept Depth
663.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:663.95-671
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.06 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.06 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.06”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.05 m
From
663.95 m
To
671 m
Intercept Depth
663.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:663.95-671
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.05 m
From
663.95 m
To
671 m
Intercept Depth
663.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:663.95-671
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.67 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 2.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
665 m
To
667 m
Intercept Depth
665 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:665-667
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.52 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.52 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.52”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 8.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
8.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
665 m
To
667 m
Intercept Depth
665 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:665-667
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.05”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
665 m
To
667 m
Intercept Depth
665 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:665-667
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
665 m
To
667 m
Intercept Depth
665 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:665-667
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.46 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
From
687.55 m
To
688.2 m
Intercept Depth
687.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:687.55-688.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.54 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
From
687.55 m
To
688.2 m
Intercept Depth
687.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:687.55-688.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.00”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.65 m
From
687.55 m
To
688.2 m
Intercept Depth
687.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:687.55-688.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.19 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.65 m
From
687.55 m
To
688.2 m
Intercept Depth
687.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:687.55-688.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.51 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
From
716.3 m
To
716.85 m
Intercept Depth
716.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:716.3-716.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 16.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
16.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
From
716.3 m
To
716.85 m
Intercept Depth
716.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:716.3-716.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.50”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.55 m
From
716.3 m
To
716.85 m
Intercept Depth
716.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:716.3-716.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % copper is weak against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.55 m
From
716.3 m
To
716.85 m
Intercept Depth
716.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:716.3-716.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.32 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
727.25 m
To
727.75 m
Intercept Depth
727.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:727.25-727.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.74 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.74”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
727.25 m
To
727.75 m
Intercept Depth
727.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:727.25-727.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.30”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
727.25 m
To
727.75 m
Intercept Depth
727.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:727.25-727.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 5.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
5.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
727.25 m
To
727.75 m
Intercept Depth
727.25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:727.25-727.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.38 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.38”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
764 m
To
765 m
Intercept Depth
764 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:764-765
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.09
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.29 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.29”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
764 m
To
765 m
Intercept Depth
764 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:764-765
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.09
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.95 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.95 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.95”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
764 m
To
765 m
Intercept Depth
764 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:764-765
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.09
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 4.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
4.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
764 m
To
765 m
Intercept Depth
764 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:764-765
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.09
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.48 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.48”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 69.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
69.4 m
From
784.2 m
To
853.6 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-853.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 28.5 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 69.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
69.4 m
From
784.2 m
To
853.6 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-853.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.52 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 105.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.52 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.52”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 69.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
69.4 m
From
784.2 m
To
853.6 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-853.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 2.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 1.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 69.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.94
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
69.4 m
From
784.2 m
To
853.6 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-853.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.94 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 134.6 %·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.94 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.94”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
40.1 m
From
784.2 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 24.5 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
40.1 m
From
784.2 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 62.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.55”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
40.1 m
From
784.2 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 3.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
3.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
40.1 m
From
784.2 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.15 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 126.3 %·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.15 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.15”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
784.2 m
To
794.9 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-794.9
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
784.2 m
To
794.9 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-794.9
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.12 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.12 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
784.2 m
To
794.9 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-794.9
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
784.2 m
To
794.9 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-794.9
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.04 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.04 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
797.8 m
To
799 m
Intercept Depth
797.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:797.8-799
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.01 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 3.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
3.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
797.8 m
To
799 m
Intercept Depth
797.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:797.8-799
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.08 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.08 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.08”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
797.8 m
To
799 m
Intercept Depth
797.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:797.8-799
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 9.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
9.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
797.8 m
To
799 m
Intercept Depth
797.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:797.8-799
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.45 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.45”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
From
805.6 m
To
809.8 m
Intercept Depth
805.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:805.6-809.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.47 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.47”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
From
805.6 m
To
809.8 m
Intercept Depth
805.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:805.6-809.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.22 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.22 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.22”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.2 m
From
805.6 m
To
809.8 m
Intercept Depth
805.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:805.6-809.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 16.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
16.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.2 m
From
805.6 m
To
809.8 m
Intercept Depth
805.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:805.6-809.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.49 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 69.3 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 16.49 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.49”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.55 m
From
810.3 m
To
812.85 m
Intercept Depth
810.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:810.3-812.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.55 m
From
810.3 m
To
812.85 m
Intercept Depth
810.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:810.3-812.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.80”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.55 m
From
810.3 m
To
812.85 m
Intercept Depth
810.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:810.3-812.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 2.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.96
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.55 m
From
810.3 m
To
812.85 m
Intercept Depth
810.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:810.3-812.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.96 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.96”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.65 m
From
815 m
To
816.65 m
Intercept Depth
815 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:815-816.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.93 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.93”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.65 m
From
815 m
To
816.65 m
Intercept Depth
815 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:815-816.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.92 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.92 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.92”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.65 m
From
815 m
To
816.65 m
Intercept Depth
815 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:815-816.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 6.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
6.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.65 m
From
815 m
To
816.65 m
Intercept Depth
815 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:815-816.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.44 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 10.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.44”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
From
819.9 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
819.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:819.9-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.93 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.93”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
From
819.9 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
819.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:819.9-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.19 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.19 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.19”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.4 m
From
819.9 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
819.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:819.9-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 1.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.4 m
From
819.9 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
819.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:819.9-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.78 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.78 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.78”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
From
866.65 m
To
867.3 m
Intercept Depth
866.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:866.65-867.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.63 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
From
866.65 m
To
867.3 m
Intercept Depth
866.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:866.65-867.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.65 m
From
866.65 m
To
867.3 m
Intercept Depth
866.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:866.65-867.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.65 m
From
866.65 m
To
867.3 m
Intercept Depth
866.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:866.65-867.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
878.4 m
To
879.8 m
Intercept Depth
878.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:878.4-879.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
878.4 m
To
879.8 m
Intercept Depth
878.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:878.4-879.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
878.4 m
To
879.8 m
Intercept Depth
878.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:878.4-879.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
878.4 m
To
879.8 m
Intercept Depth
878.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:878.4-879.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
From
565.2 m
To
567.5 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:565.2-567.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.99 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.99”

Context: TOM-25-013EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 6.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
6.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
From
565.2 m
To
567.5 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:565.2-567.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.25”

Context: TOM-25-013EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.3 m
From
565.2 m
To
567.5 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:565.2-567.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: TOM-25-013EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
631.5 m
To
638.5 m
Intercept Depth
631.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:631.5-638.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.21
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.23 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 28.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
28.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
631.5 m
To
638.5 m
Intercept Depth
631.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:631.5-638.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.21
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 197.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 28.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“28.25”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
631.5 m
To
638.5 m
Intercept Depth
631.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:631.5-638.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.21
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
631.5 m
To
638.5 m
Intercept Depth
631.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:631.5-638.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.21
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
659.8 m
To
661.2 m
Intercept Depth
659.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:659.8-661.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.27 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 9.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
9.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
659.8 m
To
661.2 m
Intercept Depth
659.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:659.8-661.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.73 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.73 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.73”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
659.8 m
To
661.2 m
Intercept Depth
659.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:659.8-661.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 2.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
2.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
659.8 m
To
661.2 m
Intercept Depth
659.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:659.8-661.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.36 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.36”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
669.5 m
To
671.2 m
Intercept Depth
669.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:669.5-671.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.5
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 11.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
11.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
669.5 m
To
671.2 m
Intercept Depth
669.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:669.5-671.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.5
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.56 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.56 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.56”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
669.5 m
To
671.2 m
Intercept Depth
669.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:669.5-671.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.5
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 5.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
5.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
669.5 m
To
671.2 m
Intercept Depth
669.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:669.5-671.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.5
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.5 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 9.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.50”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
688 m
To
692 m
Intercept Depth
688 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:688-692
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 31.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
31.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
688 m
To
692 m
Intercept Depth
688 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:688-692
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.85 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 127.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“31.85”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
688 m
To
692 m
Intercept Depth
688 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:688-692
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the vms deposit band [2.5, 1.5, 0.8, 0.4] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.4 %) on the vms deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
688 m
To
692 m
Intercept Depth
688 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:688-692
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.