TomaGold Unveils the Growing Scale of Berrigan Deep

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
TomaGold Corp.
Ticker
LOT.V
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Quebec
Primary commodity
Zinc
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver, Copper
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-29 13:04:40 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

TomaGold announced positive assay results from the final three Phase 2 extension holes at its Berrigan Deep project in Quebec, significantly expanding the zone to over 250 meters laterally and 400 meters vertically, reaching nearly 900 meters depth. Highlights include 69.40 meters at 3.46% ZnEq (0.81 g/t AuEq) in TOM-25-012EXT, with high-grade sub-intervals like 4.20 meters at 21.18% ZnEq (4.90 g/t AuEq) at over 800 meters depth. The company emphasized the continuity, broad mineralized envelopes, and high-grade zones, noting the system remains open for further expansion.

Reasoning: New Phase 2 extension drilling at Berrigan Deep has significantly expanded the known mineralization laterally and at depth, with several broad and high-grade polymetallic intercepts, demonstrating strong continuity and potential for further growth. The regional M&A activity also highlights the strategic importance of the area.

Positive factors

  • Significant step-out extension (250m lateral, 400m vertical, to 900m depth)
  • High-grade intercepts at significant depth
  • Broad mineralized intervals
  • Polymetallic nature (Zn, Au, Ag, Cu)
  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
  • Positive regional M&A activity

Negative factors

  • True width estimated, not precisely stated for each intercept
  • No specific cut-off grade disclosed for compositing

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 162

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The document reports 'extension holes' and states that the Berrigan Deep zone 'remains open laterally and at depth', indicating successful expansion beyond previously known limits.

Evidence · text

“With just 5 extension holes, Berrigan Deep already extends more than 250 m laterally by approximately 400 m vertically, with mineralization intersected to nearly 900 m depth and significant potential for further expansion laterally and at depth”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details the drilling program management, laboratory used (AGAT Laboratories), assay methods (fire assay, ICP-OES), and QA/QC procedures including duplicates, standards, and blanks.

Evidence · text

“The drilling program was managed by Explo-Logik of Val-d’Or, Québec. Drill core was split in half, with one half submitted to AGAT Laboratories at Val-d’Or for analysis. Gold was analyzed by fire assay (50 g) with atomic absorption finish, while base metals were analyzed by four-acid digestion with ICP-OES finish. Samples with gold grades greater than 10 g/t are reprocessed using metallic screening with a 106 µm cutoff. The processed material is split and analyzed by fire assay with ICP-OES finish to extinction. A separate split is prepared to independently analyze mineralized intervals with a target grade greater than 1.00% Cu-Zn using a Na₂O₂ fusion with ICP-OES or ICP-MS finish. Sample preparation duplicates, certified reference standards, and blanks are inserted into the sample stream.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The technical content of the press release has been reviewed and approved by Jean Lafleur, P.Geo., and Suzie Tremblay, P.Geo., both Qualified Persons as defined under NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“The technical content of this press release has been reviewed by Jean Lafleur, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration at TomaGold, and Suzie Tremblay, P.Geo., Vice President of Operations at Explo-Logik Inc. and a consultant to TomaGold, each of whom is a Qualified Person as defined under National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Lafleur has approved the technical content of this press release.”

Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states the metal prices, metallurgical recovery factors, and formulas used for calculating both ZnEq and AuEq.

Evidence · text

“ZnEq and AuEq are calculated using the Company’s standard parameters. AuEq calculation was based on US$4,150/oz Au, $51.34/oz Ag, US$5.023/lb Cu and $1.392/lb Zn. AuEq = Au g/t + (Ag g/t × 0.01237) + (Cu ppm × 0.000083) + (Zn ppm × 0.000023), applying metallurgical recovery factors of 95% for zinc, 85% for gold and silver, and 90% for copper, based on a metallurgical report on Berrigan Mine zinc material prepared by Process Research Associates Ltd. in February 2002 and on recoveries from nearby deposits for gold, silver and copper. ZnEq calculation was based on US$4,047/oz Au, $50.22/oz Ag, US$4.796/lb Cu and $1.390/lb Zn. ZnEq = Zn ppm + (Ag g/t × 527) + (Au g/t x 42466) + (Cu ppm × 3.45) / 10,000, applying metallurgical recovery factors of 95% for zinc, 85% for gold and silver, and 90% for copper, based on a metallurgical report on Berrigan Mine zinc material prepared by Process Research Associates Ltd. in February 2002 and on recoveries from nearby deposits for gold, silver and copper.”

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The release highlights significant M&A activity in the Chibougamau Mining Camp, including acquisitions by IAMGOLD and Central Asia Metals, and mentions Cygnus projects adjacent to TomaGold’s properties, suggesting value based on proximity to other active projects.

Evidence · text

“Chibougamau is back on the radar of major mining companies: the progress at Berrigan Deep comes amid significant M&A activity in the Chibougamau Mining Camp, including IAMGOLD’s acquisition of Northern Superior Resources for consideration of approximately $329 million, completed in December 2025, as well as Central Asia Metals’ proposed acquisition of Cygnus Metals for approximately A$232 million. Certain Cygnus projects are adjacent to TomaGold’s properties, highlighting the growing interest in this area of the mining camp.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The reported widths represent core lengths, and the true width is estimated to be approximately 80-85% of the core length, rather than precisely stated for each intercept.

Evidence · text

“The reported widths represent core lengths. True width is estimated to be approximately 80-85% of the core length, depending on the deviation angles.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: The document does not explicitly state the cut-off grade used for reporting the drill intervals.

Evidence · text

“The reported widths represent core lengths. True width is estimated to be approximately 80-85% of the core length, depending on the deviation angles.”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 4.20 m at 21.18% ZnEq (4.90 g/t AuEq) is exceptionally high-grade for zinc and gold, well above typical thresholds.

Evidence · text

“4.20 m at 21.18% ZnEq (4.90 g/t AuEq) from 805.60 m to 809.80 m”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 4.90 m at 23.20% ZnEq (5.44 g/t AuEq) is exceptionally high-grade for zinc and gold, well above typical thresholds.

Evidence · text

“4.90 m at 23.20% ZnEq (5.44 g/t AuEq) from 452.20 m to 457.10 m”

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 2.40 m at 31.31% ZnEq (7.38 g/t AuEq) is exceptionally high-grade for zinc and gold, well above typical thresholds.

Evidence · text

“2.40 m at 31.31% ZnEq (7.38 g/t AuEq) from 554.40 m to 556.80 m”

Historical Estimate Onlynegative

Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.

Why it applies: The resource estimate for the Berrigan Mine zone is explicitly stated as historical, prepared in April 2001, and not compliant with NI 43-101 standards.

Evidence · text

“Met-Chem Canada Inc. prepared the most recent of these in April 2001 in a report titled: “Pre-feasibility study: Etude Conceptuelle, Projects Berrigan and Tortigny” by Chuinard et al. In the report, a resource estimate completed using polygonal estimation techniques stated 1.39 Mt grading 3.17% Zn and 1.77 g/t Au on the main Berrigan Mine zone. No resource classifications were given for the resource (GM61359). The mineral resource estimate presented above is historical in nature and was not prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 standards.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 162. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (160)

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 17.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
17.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
257.9 m
To
258.5 m
Hole Depth
575.45 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:257.9-258.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542419
Northing
5532647
Elevation
388.39 m
Azimuth
130.01 °
Dip
-55.05 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program, contributing to the overall understanding of the system.

Positive factors

  • High equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“17.01”

Context: 0.60

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.65 m
From
398 m
To
404.65 m
Hole Depth
575.45 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:398-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542419
Northing
5532647
Elevation
388.39 m
Azimuth
130.01 °
Dip
-55.05 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New mineralized intersection from the Phase 2 program, contributing to the overall understanding of the system.

Positive factors

  • Solid equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.26”

Context: 6.65

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 6.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
6.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.45 m
From
403.2 m
To
404.65 m
Hole Depth
575.45 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:403.2-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542419
Northing
5532647
Elevation
388.39 m
Azimuth
130.01 °
Dip
-55.05 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.48
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade zinc equivalent sub-interval from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Good equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“6.48”

Context: 1.45

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19.1 m
From
472.4 m
To
491.5 m
Hole Depth
575.45 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:472.4-491.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542419
Northing
5532647
Elevation
388.39 m
Azimuth
130.01 °
Dip
-55.05 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New mineralized intersection from the Phase 2 program, expanding the Berrigan Deep zone.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length
  • Solid equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.23”

Context: 19.10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
5.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
473 m
To
477 m
Hole Depth
575.45 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:473-477
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542419
Northing
5532647
Elevation
388.39 m
Azimuth
130.01 °
Dip
-55.05 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade zinc equivalent sub-interval from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Good equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“5.29”

Context: 4.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.77
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.1 m
From
477.9 m
To
481 m
Hole Depth
575.45 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:477.9-481
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542419
Northing
5532647
Elevation
388.39 m
Azimuth
130.01 °
Dip
-55.05 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid zinc equivalent sub-interval from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Solid equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.77”

Context: 3.10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 3.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
3.57
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
477.8 m
To
479 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:477.8-479
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Good equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“3.57”

Context: 1.20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.8 m
From
519.15 m
To
521.95 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:519.15-521.95
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Good equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“6.00”

Context: 2.80

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.75 m
From
574.5 m
To
576.25 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:574.5-576.25
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Solid equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.46”

Context: 1.75

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 3.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
3.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.25 m
From
587.75 m
To
589 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:587.75-589
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Solid equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“3.28”

Context: 1.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 4.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
4.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.05 m
From
663.95 m
To
671 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:663.95-671
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Good equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“4.31”

Context: 7.05

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 10.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
10.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
665 m
To
667 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:665-667
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade zinc equivalent sub-interval from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • High equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“10.22”

Context: 2.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 3.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
3.35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.65 m
From
687.55 m
To
688.2 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:687.55-688.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Solid equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“3.35”

Context: 0.65

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.55 m
From
716.3 m
To
716.85 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:716.3-716.85
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Solid equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.32”

Context: 0.55

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 7.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
7.99
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
727.25 m
To
727.75 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:727.25-727.75
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Good equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“7.99”

Context: 0.50

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 9.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
9.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
764 m
To
765 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:764-765
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.09
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • High equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“9.09”

Context: 1.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 3.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 69.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
3.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
69.4 m
From
784.2 m
To
853.6 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:784.2-853.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Broad intercept with good zinc equivalent grade, contributing to the vertical extension of the Berrigan Deep zone.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length
  • Good equivalent grade
  • Depth extension

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“3.46”

Context: 69.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
5.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
40.1 m
From
784.2 m
To
824.3 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:784.2-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade zinc equivalent sub-interval within a broader zone, indicating strong mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • High equivalent grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Depth extension

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“5.38”

Context: 40.10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
784.2 m
To
794.9 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:784.2-794.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid zinc equivalent sub-interval from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Solid equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.18”

Context: 10.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 13.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
13.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
797.8 m
To
799 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:797.8-799
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade zinc equivalent sub-interval from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • High equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“13.10”

Context: 1.20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 21.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
21.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.2 m
From
805.6 m
To
809.8 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:805.6-809.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade zinc equivalent intercept at over 800m depth, confirming the presence of very high-grade zones within the system.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional equivalent grade
  • High-grade at significant depth
  • Demonstrates system's potential

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“21.18”

Context: 4.20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
5.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.55 m
From
810.3 m
To
812.85 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:810.3-812.85
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good zinc equivalent sub-interval from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Good equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“5.10”

Context: 2.55

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 13.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
13.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.65 m
From
815 m
To
816.65 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:815-816.65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade zinc equivalent sub-interval from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • High equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“13.28”

Context: 1.65

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 8.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
8.81
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.4 m
From
819.9 m
To
824.3 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:819.9-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade zinc equivalent sub-interval from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • High equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“8.81”

Context: 4.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.65 m
From
866.65 m
To
867.3 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:866.65-867.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Solid equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.38”

Context: 0.65

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
878.4 m
To
879.8 m
Hole Depth
907.4 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:878.4-879.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
130.32 °
Dip
-60.04 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Solid equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.31”

Context: 1.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 4.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
4.85
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.3 m
From
565.2 m
To
567.5 m
Hole Depth
762.25 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:565.2-567.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
180.34 °
Dip
-55.49 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Good equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“4.85”

Context: 2.30

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
631.5 m
To
638.5 m
Hole Depth
762.25 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:631.5-638.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
180.34 °
Dip
-55.49 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.21
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: New mineralized intersection expanding the Berrigan Deep zone, with notable silver content.

Positive factors

  • Solid equivalent grade
  • Includes silver credit

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.21”

Context: 7.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 3.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
3.74
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
659.8 m
To
661.2 m
Hole Depth
762.25 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:659.8-661.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
180.34 °
Dip
-55.49 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Solid equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“3.74”

Context: 1.40

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 7.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
7.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
669.5 m
To
671.2 m
Hole Depth
762.25 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:669.5-671.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
180.34 °
Dip
-55.49 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.5
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Positive factors

  • Good equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“7.50”

Context: 1.70

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
688 m
To
692 m
Hole Depth
762.25 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:688-692
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
542410
Northing
5532750
Elevation
386.64 m
Azimuth
180.34 °
Dip
-55.49 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lower grade zinc equivalent intercept from the Phase 2 program.

Negative factors

  • Low equivalent grade
  • True width estimated
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · table

“1.49”

Context: 4.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
5.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:451.2-549.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.08
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant broad intercept from the discovery hole, demonstrating the potential of the system, though previously reported.

Positive factors

  • Very broad intercept
  • High equivalent grade
  • Discovery hole

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Previously reported
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · text

“TOM-25-015: 98.50 m at 5.08% ZnEq (1.19 g/t AuEq) from 451.20 m to 549.70 m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:451.2-549.7
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant broad intercept from the discovery hole, demonstrating the potential of the system, though previously reported.

Positive factors

  • Very broad intercept
  • High equivalent grade
  • Discovery hole

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Previously reported
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · text

“TOM-25-015: 98.50 m at 5.08% ZnEq (1.19 g/t AuEq) from 451.20 m to 549.70 m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 23.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
23.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:452.2-457.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.2
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade zinc equivalent sub-interval from the discovery hole, confirming very high-grade potential, though previously reported.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional equivalent grade
  • High-grade zone

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Previously reported
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · text

“including 4.90 m at 23.20% ZnEq (5.44 g/t AuEq) from 452.20 m to 457.10 m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 5.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
5.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:452.2-457.1
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.44
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade gold equivalent sub-interval from the discovery hole, confirming very high-grade potential, though previously reported.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional equivalent grade
  • High-grade zone

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Previously reported
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · text

“including 4.90 m at 23.20% ZnEq (5.44 g/t AuEq) from 452.20 m to 457.10 m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 204.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
204.25 m
From
553.9 m
To
758.15 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-758.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Extremely broad intercept with good zinc equivalent grade, demonstrating significant scale, though previously reported.

Positive factors

  • Extremely broad intercept
  • Good equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Previously reported
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · text

“TOM-25-011EXT: 204.25 m at 2.05% ZnEq (0.48 g/t AuEq) from 553.90 m to 758.15 m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 204.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
204.25 m
From
553.9 m
To
758.15 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-758.15
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.48
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Extremely broad intercept with good gold equivalent grade, demonstrating significant scale, though previously reported.

Positive factors

  • Extremely broad intercept
  • Good equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Previously reported
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · text

“TOM-25-011EXT: 204.25 m at 2.05% ZnEq (0.48 g/t AuEq) from 553.90 m to 758.15 m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 31.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
31.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m
From
554.4 m
To
556.8 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:554.4-556.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% ZnEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade zinc equivalent sub-interval, confirming very high-grade potential, though previously reported.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional equivalent grade
  • High-grade zone

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Previously reported
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · text

“including 2.40 m at 31.31% ZnEq (7.38 g/t AuEq) from 554.40 m to 556.80 m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 7.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-011EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
7.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
554.4 m
To
556.8 m
Intercept Depth
553.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-011EXT:554.4-556.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.38
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade gold equivalent sub-interval, confirming very high-grade potential, though previously reported.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional equivalent grade
  • High-grade zone

Negative factors

  • True width estimated
  • Previously reported
  • Cut-off undisclosed

Evidence · text

“including 2.40 m at 31.31% ZnEq (7.38 g/t AuEq) from 554.40 m to 556.80 m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
257.9 m
To
258.5 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:257.9-258.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.68 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.68”

Context: TOM-25-010EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 19.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
19.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
257.9 m
To
258.5 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:257.9-258.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 19.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“19.50”

Context: TOM-25-010EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-010EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m
From
257.9 m
To
258.5 m
Intercept Depth
257.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-010EXT:257.9-258.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
17.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: TOM-25-010EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.65 m
From
398 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
398 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:398-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.65 m
From
398 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
398 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:398-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.50”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.65 m
From
398 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
398 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:398-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.65 m
From
398 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
398 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:398-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.32 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 8.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.32 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.45 m
From
403.2 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
403.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:403.2-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.48
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 3.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
3.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.45 m
From
403.2 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
403.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:403.2-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.48
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.76 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.76 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.76”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.45 m
From
403.2 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
403.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:403.2-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.48
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 5.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
5.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.45 m
From
403.2 m
To
404.65 m
Intercept Depth
403.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:403.2-404.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.48
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.18 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.18”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.1 m
From
472.4 m
To
491.5 m
Intercept Depth
472.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:472.4-491.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 2.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.1 m
From
472.4 m
To
491.5 m
Intercept Depth
472.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:472.4-491.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 54.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.86”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19.1 m
From
472.4 m
To
491.5 m
Intercept Depth
472.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:472.4-491.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19.1 m
From
472.4 m
To
491.5 m
Intercept Depth
472.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:472.4-491.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.23
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.63 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 12.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.63 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
473 m
To
477 m
Intercept Depth
473 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:473-477
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 3.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
3.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
473 m
To
477 m
Intercept Depth
473 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:473-477
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.18 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.18 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.18”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
473 m
To
477 m
Intercept Depth
473 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:473-477
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
473 m
To
477 m
Intercept Depth
473 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:473-477
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.09 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.09”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
From
477.9 m
To
481 m
Intercept Depth
477.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:477.9-481
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.53 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 3.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
3.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
From
477.9 m
To
481 m
Intercept Depth
477.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:477.9-481
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.79 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 11.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.79 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.79”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.1 m
From
477.9 m
To
481 m
Intercept Depth
477.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:477.9-481
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.1 m
From
477.9 m
To
481 m
Intercept Depth
477.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:477.9-481
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.77
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.63 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.63 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
477.8 m
To
479 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:477.8-479
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: TOM-25-012EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
3.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
477.8 m
To
479 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:477.8-479
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.05”

Context: TOM-25-012EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-012EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
477.8 m
To
479 m
Intercept Depth
477.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-012EXT:477.8-479
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.57
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: TOM-25-012EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
From
519.15 m
To
521.95 m
Intercept Depth
519.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:519.15-521.95
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.07 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.07”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 3.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
3.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.8 m
From
519.15 m
To
521.95 m
Intercept Depth
519.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:519.15-521.95
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.32 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.32 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.32”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.8 m
From
519.15 m
To
521.95 m
Intercept Depth
519.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:519.15-521.95
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.8 m
From
519.15 m
To
521.95 m
Intercept Depth
519.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:519.15-521.95
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.9 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.90”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m
From
574.5 m
To
576.25 m
Intercept Depth
574.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:574.5-576.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m
From
574.5 m
To
576.25 m
Intercept Depth
574.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:574.5-576.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.73 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.73 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.73”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.75 m
From
574.5 m
To
576.25 m
Intercept Depth
574.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:574.5-576.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.75 m
From
574.5 m
To
576.25 m
Intercept Depth
574.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:574.5-576.25
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.09 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.09 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
From
587.75 m
To
589 m
Intercept Depth
587.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:587.75-589
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.82 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.25 m
From
587.75 m
To
589 m
Intercept Depth
587.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:587.75-589
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.20”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.25 m
From
587.75 m
To
589 m
Intercept Depth
587.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:587.75-589
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.25 m
From
587.75 m
To
589 m
Intercept Depth
587.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:587.75-589
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.05 m
From
663.95 m
To
671 m
Intercept Depth
663.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:663.95-671
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.91 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.91”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 4.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
4.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.05 m
From
663.95 m
To
671 m
Intercept Depth
663.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:663.95-671
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.06 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.06 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.06”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.05 m
From
663.95 m
To
671 m
Intercept Depth
663.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:663.95-671
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.05 m
From
663.95 m
To
671 m
Intercept Depth
663.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:663.95-671
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.67 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 2.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
665 m
To
667 m
Intercept Depth
665 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:665-667
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.52 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.52 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.52”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 8.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
8.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
665 m
To
667 m
Intercept Depth
665 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:665-667
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.05”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
665 m
To
667 m
Intercept Depth
665 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:665-667
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
665 m
To
667 m
Intercept Depth
665 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:665-667
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.46 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
From
687.55 m
To
688.2 m
Intercept Depth
687.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:687.55-688.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.54 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
From
687.55 m
To
688.2 m
Intercept Depth
687.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:687.55-688.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.00”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.65 m
From
687.55 m
To
688.2 m
Intercept Depth
687.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:687.55-688.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.19 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.65 m
From
687.55 m
To
688.2 m
Intercept Depth
687.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:687.55-688.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.35
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.51 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
From
716.3 m
To
716.85 m
Intercept Depth
716.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:716.3-716.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 16.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
16.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.55 m
From
716.3 m
To
716.85 m
Intercept Depth
716.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:716.3-716.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.50”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.55 m
From
716.3 m
To
716.85 m
Intercept Depth
716.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:716.3-716.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.55 m
From
716.3 m
To
716.85 m
Intercept Depth
716.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:716.3-716.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.32
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.32 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
727.25 m
To
727.75 m
Intercept Depth
727.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:727.25-727.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.74 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.74”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
727.25 m
To
727.75 m
Intercept Depth
727.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:727.25-727.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.30”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
727.25 m
To
727.75 m
Intercept Depth
727.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:727.25-727.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 5.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
5.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
727.25 m
To
727.75 m
Intercept Depth
727.25 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:727.25-727.75
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.38 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.38”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
764 m
To
765 m
Intercept Depth
764 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:764-765
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.09
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.29 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.29”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
764 m
To
765 m
Intercept Depth
764 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:764-765
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.09
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.95 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.95 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.95”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
764 m
To
765 m
Intercept Depth
764 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:764-765
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.09
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 4.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
4.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
764 m
To
765 m
Intercept Depth
764 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:764-765
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.09
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.48 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.48”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 69.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
69.4 m
From
784.2 m
To
853.6 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-853.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 28.5 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 69.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
69.4 m
From
784.2 m
To
853.6 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-853.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.52 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 105.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.52 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.52”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 69.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
69.4 m
From
784.2 m
To
853.6 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-853.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 2.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 1.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 69.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.94
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
69.4 m
From
784.2 m
To
853.6 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-853.6
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.94 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 134.6 %·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.94 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.94”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
40.1 m
From
784.2 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 24.5 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
40.1 m
From
784.2 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 62.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.55”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
40.1 m
From
784.2 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 3.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
3.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
40.1 m
From
784.2 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.15 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 126.3 %·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.15 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.15”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
784.2 m
To
794.9 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-794.9
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
784.2 m
To
794.9 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-794.9
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.12 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.12 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
784.2 m
To
794.9 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-794.9
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.7 m
From
784.2 m
To
794.9 m
Intercept Depth
784.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:784.2-794.9
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.04 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.04 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
797.8 m
To
799 m
Intercept Depth
797.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:797.8-799
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.01 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 3.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
3.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m
From
797.8 m
To
799 m
Intercept Depth
797.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:797.8-799
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.08 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.08 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.08”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
797.8 m
To
799 m
Intercept Depth
797.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:797.8-799
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 9.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
9.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m
From
797.8 m
To
799 m
Intercept Depth
797.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:797.8-799
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.45 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.45”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
From
805.6 m
To
809.8 m
Intercept Depth
805.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:805.6-809.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.47 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.47”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
From
805.6 m
To
809.8 m
Intercept Depth
805.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:805.6-809.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.22 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.22 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.22”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.2 m
From
805.6 m
To
809.8 m
Intercept Depth
805.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:805.6-809.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 16.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
16.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.2 m
From
805.6 m
To
809.8 m
Intercept Depth
805.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:805.6-809.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.18
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.49 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 69.3 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 16.49 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.49”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.55 m
From
810.3 m
To
812.85 m
Intercept Depth
810.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:810.3-812.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.55 m
From
810.3 m
To
812.85 m
Intercept Depth
810.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:810.3-812.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.80”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.55 m
From
810.3 m
To
812.85 m
Intercept Depth
810.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:810.3-812.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 2.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.96
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.55 m
From
810.3 m
To
812.85 m
Intercept Depth
810.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:810.3-812.85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.96 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.96”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.65 m
From
815 m
To
816.65 m
Intercept Depth
815 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:815-816.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.93 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.93”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.65 m
From
815 m
To
816.65 m
Intercept Depth
815 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:815-816.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.92 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.92 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.92”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.65 m
From
815 m
To
816.65 m
Intercept Depth
815 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:815-816.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 6.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
6.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.65 m
From
815 m
To
816.65 m
Intercept Depth
815 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:815-816.65
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.28
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.44 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 10.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.44”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
From
819.9 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
819.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:819.9-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.93 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.93”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m
From
819.9 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
819.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:819.9-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.19 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.19 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.19”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.4 m
From
819.9 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
819.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:819.9-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 1.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.4 m
From
819.9 m
To
824.3 m
Intercept Depth
819.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:819.9-824.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.81
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.78 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.78 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.78”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
From
866.65 m
To
867.3 m
Intercept Depth
866.65 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:866.65-867.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.63 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.65 m
From
866.65 m
To
867.3 m
Intercept Depth
866.65 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:866.65-867.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.65 m
From
866.65 m
To
867.3 m
Intercept Depth
866.65 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:866.65-867.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.65 m
From
866.65 m
To
867.3 m
Intercept Depth
866.65 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:866.65-867.3
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
878.4 m
To
879.8 m
Intercept Depth
878.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:878.4-879.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
878.4 m
To
879.8 m
Intercept Depth
878.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:878.4-879.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
878.4 m
To
879.8 m
Intercept Depth
878.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:878.4-879.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
878.4 m
To
879.8 m
Intercept Depth
878.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:878.4-879.8
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
From
565.2 m
To
567.5 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:565.2-567.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.99 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.99”

Context: TOM-25-013EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 6.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
6.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
From
565.2 m
To
567.5 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:565.2-567.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.25”

Context: TOM-25-013EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-013EXT
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.3 m
From
565.2 m
To
567.5 m
Intercept Depth
565.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-013EXT:565.2-567.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.85
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: TOM-25-013EXT

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
631.5 m
To
638.5 m
Intercept Depth
631.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:631.5-638.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.21
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.23 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 28.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
28.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
631.5 m
To
638.5 m
Intercept Depth
631.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:631.5-638.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.21
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 197.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 28.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“28.25”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
631.5 m
To
638.5 m
Intercept Depth
631.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:631.5-638.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.21
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
631.5 m
To
638.5 m
Intercept Depth
631.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:631.5-638.5
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.21
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
659.8 m
To
661.2 m
Intercept Depth
659.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:659.8-661.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.27 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 9.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
9.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
659.8 m
To
661.2 m
Intercept Depth
659.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:659.8-661.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.73 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.73 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.73”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
659.8 m
To
661.2 m
Intercept Depth
659.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:659.8-661.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 2.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
2.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m
From
659.8 m
To
661.2 m
Intercept Depth
659.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:659.8-661.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.74
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.36 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.36”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
669.5 m
To
671.2 m
Intercept Depth
669.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:669.5-671.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.5
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 11.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
11.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m
From
669.5 m
To
671.2 m
Intercept Depth
669.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:669.5-671.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.5
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.56 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.56 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.56”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
669.5 m
To
671.2 m
Intercept Depth
669.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:669.5-671.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.5
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 5.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
5.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m
From
669.5 m
To
671.2 m
Intercept Depth
669.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:669.5-671.2
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.5
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.5 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 9.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.50”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
688 m
To
692 m
Intercept Depth
688 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:688-692
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · silverGrade: 31.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
31.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
688 m
To
692 m
Intercept Depth
688 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:688-692
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 31.85 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 127.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“31.85”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
688 m
To
692 m
Intercept Depth
688 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:688-692
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andFrom Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
From Discovery to an Expanding Mineralized
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
LOT.V

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
688 m
To
692 m
Intercept Depth
688 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:688-692
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.49
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (2)

Fact 1Berrigan Mine Project · zincTonnes: 1390000Grade: 3.17Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Berrigan Mine Project
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec
Ticker
LOT.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
other
QP Signed
No
Resource group id
resource:e9d5b82ee4d04f02a47a

Resource Data

Tonnes
1390000
Grade
3.17
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2001-04-01

Lab

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2001-04-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical estimate from 2001, not compliant with current standards and cannot be relied upon.

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate
  • Not NI 43-101 compliant
  • No resource classification

Evidence · text

“1.39 Mt grading 3.17% Zn and 1.77 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 25.5 years before this release

Fact 2Berrigan Mine Project · goldTonnes: 1390000Grade: 1.77Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Berrigan Mine Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec
Ticker
LOT.V

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
other
QP Signed
No
Resource group id
resource:e9d5b82ee4d04f02a47a

Resource Data

Tonnes
1390000
Grade
1.77
Grade Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2001-04-01

Lab

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2001-04-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical estimate from 2001, not compliant with current standards and cannot be relied upon.

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate
  • Not NI 43-101 compliant
  • No resource classification

Evidence · text

“1.39 Mt grading 3.17% Zn and 1.77 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 25.5 years before this release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.