TomaGold Continues to Intersect Wide Zones of Zinc, Gold and Silver on Globex Royalty Claims
Original announcement by globenewswire on
- Company
- Globex Mining Enterprises Inc.
- Ticker
- GMX
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Chibougamau Mining Camp
- Primary commodity
- Zinc
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-30 14:35:58 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
TomaGold has reported final Phase 2 drill-hole extensions at the Berrigan Mine Project, successfully extending the Berrigan Deep Zone by 250m strike and 400m vertically. The results include wide polymetallic intercepts of zinc, gold, and silver at depths approaching 900m.
Reasoning: The drill results extend the Berrigan Deep Zone with significant polymetallic intercepts (ZnEq), though specific metal equivalent assumptions are not detailed in this summary.
Positive factors
- Step-Out Extension
- Wide polymetallic intercepts
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Metal Equivalent Opaque
Facts used in scoring: 10
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Jack Stoch, P.Geo. prepared the information as a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.
Evidence · text
“Jack Stoch, P.Geo., ... in his capacity as a Qualified Person (Q.P.) under Ni 43-101, prepared the information”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The program successfully extended the Berrigan Deep Zone for a strike length of 250 m.
Evidence · text
“extending the Berrigan Deep Zone for a strike length of 250 m”
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: Results are reported primarily in ZnEq and AuEq without disclosing the underlying price or recovery assumptions.
Evidence · text
“69.40 m grading 3.46% ZnEq (0.81 g/t Au Eq)”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 10. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (10)
TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 3.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 69.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-012EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Reported Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.46
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 69.4 m
- From
- 784.2 m
- To
- 853.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 784.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-012EXT:784.2-853.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.81
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Au Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant ZnEq intercept over a wide interval.
Positive factors
- Wide intercept
Negative factors
- Metal Equivalent Opaque
Evidence · text
“69.40 m grading 3.46% ZnEq (0.81 g/t Au Eq) from 784.20 m to 853.6 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 69.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-012EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Reported Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 69.4 m
- From
- 784.2 m
- To
- 853.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 784.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-012EXT:784.2-853.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Gold equivalent component of a wide ZnEq intercept.
Positive factors
- Wide intercept
Negative factors
- Metal Equivalent Opaque
Evidence · text
“69.40 m grading 3.46% ZnEq (0.81 g/t Au Eq)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TOM-25-012EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-012EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Reported Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 40.1 m
- From
- 784 m
- To
- 824.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 784 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-012EXT:784-824.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.25
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong high-grade sub-interval within the main intercept.
Positive factors
- High grade sub-interval
Negative factors
- Metal Equivalent Opaque
Evidence · text
“40.1 m grading 5.38% ZnEq (1.25 g/t AuEq) from 784.0 m to 824.3 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TOM-25-010EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-010EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Reported Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 19.1 m
- From
- 472.4 m
- To
- 491.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 472.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-010EXT:472.4-491.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate ZnEq intercept.
Negative factors
- Metal Equivalent Opaque
Evidence · text
“19.1 m grading 2.23% ZnEq (0.52 g/t AuEq) from 472.4 m to 491.5 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-013EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Reported Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 631.5 m
- To
- 638.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 631.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-013EXT:631.5-638.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc equivalent intercept with silver inclusion.
Negative factors
- Metal Equivalent Opaque
Evidence · text
“7.0 m grading 2.21% ZnEq (0.52 g/t AuEq)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
TOM-25-013EXTBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 28.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-013EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Reported Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 631.5 m
- To
- 638.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 631.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-013EXT:631.5-638.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grade included in sub-interval.
Evidence · text
“28.25 g/t Ag from 631.5 m to 638.5 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 98.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-015
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Reported Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 98.5 m
- From
- 451.2 m
- To
- 549.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 451.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-015:451.2-549.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical intersection in the Berrigan Deep Zone.
Positive factors
- Wide intercept
Negative factors
- Stale Data Re-release
- Metal Equivalent Opaque
Evidence · text
“98.50 m at 5.08% ZnEq (1.19 g/t AuEq) from 451.20 m to 549.70 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 98.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-015
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Reported Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 98.5 m
- From
- 451.2 m
- To
- 549.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 451.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-015:451.2-549.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.08
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold equivalent component.
Negative factors
- Stale Data Re-release
- Metal Equivalent Opaque
Evidence · text
“98.50 m at 5.08% ZnEq (1.19 g/t AuEq)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 2.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 204.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Reported Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 204.25 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 758.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-758.15
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical wide intersection.
Positive factors
- Very wide intercept
Negative factors
- Stale Data Re-release
- Metal Equivalent Opaque
Evidence · text
“204.25 m at 2.05% ZnEq (0.48 g/t AuEq) from 553.90 m to 758.15 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TOM-25-011EXTBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 204.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-011EXT
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Reported Region
- chibougamau mining camp
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 204.25 m
- From
- 553.9 m
- To
- 758.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 553.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-011EXT:553.9-758.15
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % ZnEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical gold equivalent component.
Negative factors
- Stale Data Re-release
- Metal Equivalent Opaque
Evidence · text
“204.25 m at 2.05% ZnEq (0.48 g/t AuEq)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.