TNM Drill Down: Revival Gold in Idaho leads assays for July-August
Original announcement by northernminer on
- Company
- Revival Gold
- Ticker
- RVG
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Idaho
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-04 12:48:50 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Revival Gold reported high-grade gold drill results at its Beartrack-Arnett project in Idaho, highlighted by a 131.7m intercept at 3.43 g/t Au. The results suggest the presence of a north-plunging mineralized shoot in the Joss area.
Reasoning: Strong gold intercept (3.43 g/t over 131.7m) at the Beartrack-Arnett project, suggesting structural continuity.
Positive factors
- High-grade intercept
- Suggests north-plunging mineralized shoot
- Expansion of high-grade underground sulphide resource
Facts used in scoring: 8
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 16.6 g/t gold in DDCO26-001 is exceptionally high grade.
Evidence · text
“13.5 metres grading 16.6 grams gold”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Sentinel Metals' DDCO26-001 reports downhole width without true width or orientation.
Evidence · text
“returned 46.8 metres grading 5.5 grams gold”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: The document does not disclose specific QA/QC protocols or lab certification for the reported assays.
Evidence · text
“returned 46.8 metres grading 5.5 grams gold”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 8. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (8)
BT26-255DBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 3.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 131.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-255D
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 131.7 m
- From
- 543 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-255D:543.0-674.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant gold intercept of 3.43 g/t over 131.7m.
Positive factors
- High grade-thickness
Evidence · text
“cut 131.7 metres grading 3.43 grams gold per tonne from 543 metres downhole”
BT26-255DBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 6.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 42.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-255D
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 42.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-255D:543.0-674.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong high-grade sub-interval within the main intercept.
Positive factors
- High grade sub-interval
Evidence · text
“including 42.5 metres grading 6.56 grams gold”
BT26-255DBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 11.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-255D
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-255D:543.0-674.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high grade intercept of 11.58 g/t Au.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade
Evidence · text
“12.1 metres grading 11.58 grams gold”
TM26-210Tower Mountain · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 661.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TM26-210
- Project
- Tower Mountain
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 661.5 m
- From
- 72 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TM26-210:72.0-733.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Extremely long continuous interval, though grade is relatively low.
Positive factors
- Longest continuous mineralization
Evidence · text
“cut 661.5 metres grading 0.55 gram gold from 72 metres downhole”
TM26-210Tower Mountain · goldGrade: 1.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TM26-210
- Project
- Tower Mountain
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TM26-210:72.0-733.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Higher grade sub-interval within the long intercept.
Positive factors
- Higher grade sub-interval
Evidence · text
“including 24 metres grading 1.82 grams gold”
DDCO26-001Columbia · goldGrade: 5.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 46.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDCO26-001
- Project
- Columbia
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- Montana
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 46.8 m
- From
- 88.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDCO26-001:88.2-135.0
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold intercept, but very low core recovery (20%) poses significant sampling bias risk.
Positive factors
- Confirms mineralization in fresh rock
Negative factors
- Low core recovery
Evidence · text
“returned 46.8 metres grading 5.5 grams gold from 88.2 metres downhole”
DDCO26-001Columbia · goldGrade: 11.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDCO26-001
- Project
- Columbia
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- Montana
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDCO26-001:88.2-135.0
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade sub-interval, but recovery concerns remain.
Positive factors
- High grade sub-interval
Negative factors
- Low core recovery
Evidence · text
“including 21.4 metres grading 11.1 grams gold”
DDCO26-001Columbia · goldGrade: 16.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDCO26-001
- Project
- Columbia
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- Montana
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDCO26-001:88.2-135.0
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional grade sub-interval, but core recovery averaged only 20% through this specific interval.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade sub-interval
Negative factors
- Low core recovery
Evidence · text
“13.5 metres grading 16.6 grams gold”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.