TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project, Tasmania

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
TinOne Resources Inc.
Ticker
TORC
Exchange
TSX
Region
Tasmania, Australia
Primary commodity
Tin
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-08-21 09:17:32 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

TinOne Resources announced high-grade tin drill results from its Great Pyramid Project in Tasmania, including 29 metres of 0.71% tin from 2 metres depth and 14 metres of 1.03% tin from 14 metres depth. The confirmatory drilling demonstrated significantly higher grades than historical results, indicating potential for an improved resource. The project currently hosts an inferred mineral resource of 8.39 Mt at 0.17% tin.

Reasoning: The drill program successfully confirmed and significantly upgraded tin grades compared to historical drilling, with multiple strong near-surface intercepts, indicating potential for an improved resource estimate. The resource update provides a baseline but is entirely in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts
  • near_surface_mineralization
  • grade_improvement_vs_historical
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 18

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release explicitly states that RC samples were processed by ALS Limited, an ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 17025 certified lab, and that control samples (certified reference samples, duplicates, blanks) were systematically inserted.

Evidence · text

“RC samples were shipped to ALS Limited in Burnie, Australia for sample preparation. Analytical work was carried out at the ALS Brisbane facilities, which are ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 17025 certified. Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The document clearly states the cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn and maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres used for calculating intersections.

Evidence · text

“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.

Evidence · text

“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill program is described as 'confirmatory drilling' with holes designed to 'test and verify the tenor of mineralization returned from the 1970 percussion holes', including 'effectively twins' of older drill holes.

Evidence · text

“Confirmatory drilling A line of five vertical RC holes was drilled in an area that was previously drilled in 1970 using the open hole percussion method. The RC holes were designed to test and verify the tenor of mineralization returned from the 1970 percussion holes (Figure 1).”

Grade Improvement vs Historicalpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The release highlights that 'The recent modern Reverse Circulation (" RC ") drilling has returned higher tin grades than the historical open hole percussion drilling' and 'returned significantly higher grades'.

Evidence · text

“The recent modern Reverse Circulation (" RC ") drilling has returned higher tin grades than the historical open hole percussion drilling.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Russell Fulton (MAIG), VP Exploration for TinOne, is named as a Qualified Person and approved the technical information.

Evidence · text

“The Company's disclosure of technical or scientific information in this press release has been reviewed and approved by Russell Fulton (MAIG), VP Exploration for TinOne. Mr. Fulton is a Qualified Person as defined under the terms of National Instrument 43-101.”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The resource table explicitly states a cut-off grade of '> 0.10' Sn %.

Evidence · table

“> 0.10”

Context: Cut Off (Sn %)

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The mineral resource estimate was prepared 'in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects'.

Evidence · text

“prepared in accordance with Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted May 19, 2014, and in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is classified as 'Inferred'.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Classification

All Inferrednegative

100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.

Why it applies: The resource estimate only reports an 'Inferred' classification, with no Measured or Indicated categories.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: Classification

Maiden Resourceneutral

First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.

Why it applies: The document states 'In 2023, a mineral resource estimate (MRE) was prepared' and does not refer to any prior estimates, suggesting this is the first formal MRE for the project.

Evidence · text

“In 2023, a mineral resource estimate (MRE) was prepared in accordance with Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted May 19, 2014, and in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The resource is reported 'within a conceptual pit shell', which is typical for early-stage economic assessments like a PEA.

Evidence · text

“Mineral resources are reported within a conceptual pit shell.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 18. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (18)

24GPRC025Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC025
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
24 m
From
7 m
To
31 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC025:7.0-31.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade tin intercept from near surface, part of a confirmatory drill program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • near_surface_mineralization
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 24.0

24GPRC025Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC025
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
8 m
To
14 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC025:8.0-14.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade tin sub-interval from near surface, part of a confirmatory drill program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • near_surface_mineralization
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: 6.0

24GPRC025Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC025
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
28 m
To
31 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC025:28.0-31.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade tin sub-interval from near surface, part of a confirmatory drill program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • near_surface_mineralization
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: 3.0

24GPRC026Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC026
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
29 m
From
2 m
To
31 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC026:2.0-31.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong, wide, near-surface tin intercept with moderate grade, significantly improving upon historical understanding and part of a confirmatory drill program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts
  • near_surface_mineralization
  • grade_improvement_vs_historical
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.71”

Context: 29.0

24GPRC026Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC026
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
14 m
To
28 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC026:14.0-28.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade tin sub-interval from near surface, significantly improving upon historical understanding and part of a confirmatory drill program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts
  • near_surface_mineralization
  • grade_improvement_vs_historical
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“1.03”

Context: 14.0

24GPRC027Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC027
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
28 m
From
0 m
To
28 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC027:0.0-28.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade tin intercept from surface, showing significant grade improvement over historical drilling in a twin hole, with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • near_surface_mineralization
  • grade_improvement_vs_historical
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 28.0

24GPRC027Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC027
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
0 m
To
4 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC027:0.0-4.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade tin sub-interval from surface, showing significant grade improvement over historical drilling in a twin hole, with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts
  • near_surface_mineralization
  • grade_improvement_vs_historical
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 4.0

24GPRC028Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC028
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
37 m
From
0 m
To
37 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC028:0.0-37.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong, wide, near-surface tin intercept with moderate grade, significantly improving upon historical understanding and part of a confirmatory drill program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts
  • near_surface_mineralization
  • grade_improvement_vs_historical
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 37.0

24GPRC028Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC028
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
0 m
To
7 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC028:0.0-7.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade tin sub-interval from surface, showing significant grade improvement over historical drilling in a twin hole, with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts
  • near_surface_mineralization
  • grade_improvement_vs_historical
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.91”

Context: 7.0

24GPRC028Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 1.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC028
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
1.57
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
19 m
To
23 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC028:19.0-23.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade tin sub-interval from near surface, significantly improving upon historical understanding and part of a confirmatory drill program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_intercepts
  • near_surface_mineralization
  • grade_improvement_vs_historical
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“1.57”

Context: 4.0

24GPRC029Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC029
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
36 m
From
0 m
To
36 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC029:0.0-36.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade tin intercept from surface, part of a confirmatory drill program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • near_surface_mineralization
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 36.0

24GPRC029Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC029
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
0 m
To
3 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC029:0.0-3.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade tin sub-interval from surface, part of a confirmatory drill program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • near_surface_mineralization
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: 3.0

24GPRC029Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC029
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m
From
8 m
To
13 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC029:8.0-13.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade tin sub-interval from near surface, part of a confirmatory drill program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • near_surface_mineralization
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: 5.0

24GPRC030AGreat Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC030A
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9 m
From
14 m
To
23 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC030A:14.0-23.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade tin intercept from near surface, targeting a fault structure as part of an exploration program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • near_surface_mineralization
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 9.0

24GPRC030AGreat Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC030A
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
31 m
To
41 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC030A:31.0-41.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade tin intercept, targeting a fault structure as part of an exploration program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 10.0

24GPRC030AGreat Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC030A
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
67 m
To
78 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC030A:67.0-78.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade tin intercept, targeting a fault structure as part of an exploration program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 11.0

24GPRC030AGreat Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
24GPRC030A
Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8 m
From
243 m
To
251 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
24GPRC030A:243.0-251.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Limited
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade tin intercept at depth, targeting a fault structure as part of an exploration program with good QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent

Negative factors

  • apparent_width_only

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 8.0

Fact 18Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Great Pyramid
Commodity
tin
Region
australia_tas
Reported Region
Tasmania, Australia
Ticker
TORC

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
%

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The resource estimate is entirely in the Inferred category, representing a low confidence level, although it is NI 43-101 compliant and provides a baseline for the project.

Positive factors

  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed

Negative factors

  • all_inferred

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 8.39

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.