Thunder Gold Intersects 298.5 metres Averaging 0.409 g/t Au (including 36.0 metres averaging 0.715 g/t Au) at Tower Mountain

Original announcement by prospectors_exchange on

Company
Thunder Gold Corp.
Ticker
TGOL
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Ontario
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-10-05 13:49:26 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Thunder Gold Corp. reported infill diamond drill results from the Bench Target at the Tower Mountain Property, featuring a 298.5m intercept at 0.409 g/t Au. The results suggest that actual drilled grades are trending approximately 10% higher than the 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate model, supporting the conversion of Inferred resources to Indicated.

Reasoning: The results confirm continuity in infill drilling and suggest higher-than-modeled grades, supporting resource conversion, though true widths are not yet estimated.

Positive factors

  • continuous mineralization observed in infill drilling
  • actual grades trending ~10% higher than MRE model
  • successful infill drilling targeting Inferred resource blocks

Negative factors

  • true width not disclosed

Facts used in scoring: 5

Classification and evidence

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The release explicitly states the results are from exploration and infill diamond drill results.

Evidence · text

“is pleased to announce the following exploration and infill diamond drill results”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release provides detailed QA/QC protocols, including lab names, standards, blanks, and duplicate procedures.

Evidence · text

“Certified standards and blanks are randomly inserted into the sample stream”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document states true width cannot be estimated at this time due to lack of data.

Evidence · text

“True Width cannot be estimated at this time due to lack of data”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (3)

TM26-218Tower Mountain · goldGrade: 0.409Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 298.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TM26-218
Project
Tower Mountain
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
TGOL

Geometry

Grade
0.409
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
298.5 m
From
100.5 m
To
399 m
Intercept Depth
100.5 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TM26-218:100.5-399
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant continuous intercept supporting resource conversion.

Positive factors

  • continuous mineralization

Negative factors

  • apparent width only

Evidence · text

“TM26-218 intersected continuous mineralization over 298.5 metres averaging 0.409 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

TM26-218Tower Mountain · goldGrade: 0.715Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TM26-218
Project
Tower Mountain
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
TGOL

Geometry

Grade
0.715
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36 m

Classification

Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TM26-218:100.5-399.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade portion of the main intercept.

Positive factors

  • higher grade sub-interval

Evidence · text

“including 36.0 metres averaging 0.715 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

TM26-215Tower Mountain · goldGrade: 0.737Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TM26-215
Project
Tower Mountain
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
TGOL

Geometry

Grade
0.737
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Loc. Confidence
medium

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exploration hole near end-of-hole.

Positive factors

  • supports sub-vertical continuity

Evidence · text

“TM26-215 intersected 7.5 metres averaging 0.737 g/t Au near the end-of-hole”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (2)

indicatedTower Mountain · goldTonnes: 34500000Grade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 514000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tower Mountain
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
TGOL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Charley Murahwi, William Lewis, Tudorel Ciuculescu, Richard Gowans
Resource group id
resource:376fe44c56837ed21ce5
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
34500000
Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
514000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.19
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-19

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Baseline resource for comparison.

Evidence · text

“The MRE has an effective date of January 19, 2026.”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredTower Mountain · goldTonnes: 211100000Grade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3.05Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tower Mountain
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
TGOL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2026-01-19T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Charley Murahwi, William Lewis, Tudorel Ciuculescu, Richard Gowans
Resource group id
resource:b43b57f9be44091e5d1b
Mining method
open_pit
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
211100000
Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3.05
Contained Unit
moz
Cutoff Grade
0.19
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-01-19

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Baseline resource for comparison.

Evidence · text

“The MRE has an effective date of January 19, 2026.”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.