TG6: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report

Original announcement by asx on

Company
TG Metals Limited
Ticker
TG6
Exchange
ASX
Region
Western Australia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Lithium, Rubidium, Tantalum, Iron ore, Magnesium
Document categories
Other, Resource update, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-10-18 23:03:21 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

TG Metals Limited announced a positive Scoping Study for its Van Uden Gold Project, outlining strong financial metrics for a heap leach operation. The company also declared a maiden Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate for the Burmeister Lithium Deposit at Lake Johnston and reported encouraging metallurgical testwork results for both gold and lithium. A A$2.5 million capital raise was completed during the quarter, though the company's cash runway is limited to just over one quarter.

Reasoning: TG Metals Limited reported a highly positive Scoping Study for its Van Uden Gold Project, a maiden Inferred Lithium Resource for the Burmeister deposit, and encouraging metallurgical testwork results for both projects. A capital raise was also completed, though the company's cash runway remains short.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Inferred Lithium Resource declared for the Burmeister deposit.
  • Van Uden Gold Heap Leach Scoping Study shows strong financial metrics with a 121.7% IRR and 12-month payback.
  • High gold recoveries of over 95% achieved in column leach tests for Van Uden laterite.
  • Good lithium recoveries (75.5-80.2%) and concentrate grades (5.28-5.74% Li2O) from Lake Johnston metallurgical testwork.
  • Successful capital raise of A$2.5 million provides funding.
  • Ore Processing and Profit Share agreement provides a near-term processing option for Van Uden stockpiles.

Negative factors

  • The Burmeister lithium resource is entirely in the Inferred category, indicating an early stage of confidence.
  • The Scoping Study results are preliminary with an accuracy of +/-35%.
  • The estimated quarters of funding available is low at 1.05 quarters, indicating short-term funding needs.
  • The gold price assumption of US$4,400/oz used in the Scoping Study is very high and may not be sustainable.

Facts used in scoring: 10

Classification and evidence

Low Funding Runwaynegative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The company's estimated quarters of funding available is 1.05, indicating a short cash runway.

Evidence · text

“Estimated quarters of funding available (item 8.6 divided by item 8.3) 1.05”

Heap Leach Routeneutral

Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.

Why it applies: the document describes a heap_leach route ("heap leach")

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("flotation")

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("DMS")

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: 2 distinct composites were tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 8. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (6)

inferredLake Johnston Lithium Project · lithiumTonnes: 6710000Grade: 1.18Grade Unit: % Li2OHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lake Johnston Lithium Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
TG6

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:e14de12f0275bcf37850
Deposit or zone
Burmeister Lithium Deposit

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6710000
Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-31

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The maiden Inferred Mineral Resource for the Burmeister Lithium Deposit establishes a high-grade lithium inventory, but its classification as entirely Inferred indicates an early stage of confidence. This is a restatement of a previously announced resource.

Positive factors

  • Maiden resource estimate for the Burmeister deposit.
  • High-grade lithium (1.18% Li2O) suitable for Direct Shipping Ore (DSO) metrics.
  • JORC Code (2012) compliant and signed off by a Competent Person.

Negative factors

  • The entire resource is in the Inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence.
  • This is a restatement of a previously announced resource.

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 6.71

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The entire resource estimate for Burmeister is classified as Inferred.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 6.71

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredLake Johnston Lithium Project · rubidiumTonnes: 6710000Grade: 3668Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lake Johnston Lithium Project
Commodity
rubidium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
TG6

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:e14de12f0275bcf37850
Deposit or zone
Burmeister Lithium Deposit

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6710000
Grade
3668
Grade Unit
ppm
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-31

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Rubidium is reported as a trace element within the maiden Inferred Lithium Resource, which is an early-stage estimate and a restatement of prior information.

Negative factors

  • The entire resource is in the Inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence.
  • This is a restatement of a previously announced resource.

Evidence · table

“3,668”

Context: 6.71

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The entire resource estimate for Burmeister is classified as Inferred.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 6.71

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredLake Johnston Lithium Project · tantalumTonnes: 6710000Grade: 104Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lake Johnston Lithium Project
Commodity
tantalum
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
TG6

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:e14de12f0275bcf37850
Deposit or zone
Burmeister Lithium Deposit

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6710000
Grade
104
Grade Unit
ppm
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-31

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Tantalum is reported as a trace element within the maiden Inferred Lithium Resource, which is an early-stage estimate and a restatement of prior information.

Negative factors

  • The entire resource is in the Inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence.
  • This is a restatement of a previously announced resource.

Evidence · table

“104”

Context: 6.71

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The entire resource estimate for Burmeister is classified as Inferred.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 6.71

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredLake Johnston Lithium Project · iron_oreTonnes: 6710000Grade: 1.32Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lake Johnston Lithium Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
TG6

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:e14de12f0275bcf37850
Deposit or zone
Burmeister Lithium Deposit

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6710000
Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-31

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Iron is reported as a trace element within the maiden Inferred Lithium Resource, which is an early-stage estimate and a restatement of prior information.

Negative factors

  • The entire resource is in the Inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence.
  • This is a restatement of a previously announced resource.

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: 6.71

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The entire resource estimate for Burmeister is classified as Inferred.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 6.71

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredLake Johnston Lithium Project · magnesiumTonnes: 6710000Grade: 1.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lake Johnston Lithium Project
Commodity
magnesium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
TG6

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:e14de12f0275bcf37850
Deposit or zone
Burmeister Lithium Deposit

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6710000
Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-31

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Magnesium oxide is reported as a trace element within the maiden Inferred Lithium Resource, which is an early-stage estimate and a restatement of prior information.

Negative factors

  • The entire resource is in the Inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence.
  • This is a restatement of a previously announced resource.

Evidence · table

“1.02”

Context: 6.71

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The entire resource estimate for Burmeister is classified as Inferred.

Evidence · table

“Inferred”

Context: 6.71

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredLake Johnston Lithium Project · iron_oreTonnes: 6710000Grade: 1.32Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lake Johnston Lithium Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
TG6

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Lynn Widenbar
Resource group id
resource:e14de12f0275bcf37850
Deposit or zone
Burmeister Lithium Deposit

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6710000
Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-08-31

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The maiden Inferred Mineral Resource for the Burmeister Lithium Deposit establishes a high-grade lithium inventory, but its classification as entirely Inferred indicates an early stage of confidence. This is a restatement of a previously announced resource. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Maiden resource estimate for the Burmeister deposit.
  • High-grade lithium (1.18% Li2O) suitable for Direct Shipping Ore (DSO) metrics.
  • JORC Code (2012) compliant and signed off by a Competent Person.

Negative factors

  • The entire resource is in the Inferred category, indicating lower geological confidence.
  • This is a restatement of a previously announced resource.

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: 6.71

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Metallurgical Results (2)

column leachVan Uden Gold Project · goldRecovery: 81.3 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Van Uden Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
TG6

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
column leach
Processing Route
heap leach
Sample
laterite composites

Recovery

Recovery
81.3 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A third column leach test for the Van Uden Gold Project achieved 81.3% gold recovery and was still leaching, indicating promising metallurgical performance for the heap leach route.

Positive factors

  • Good gold recovery of 81.3% achieved while still leaching.
  • Column leach tests are a good scale for preliminary metallurgical work.
  • Supports the proposed heap leach approach for the project.

Negative factors

  • The column was still leaching, implying the final recovery could be higher but is not yet known.

Evidence · text

“while a third 2 m column was still leaching at 81.3%.”
flotationLake Johnston Project · lithiumRecovery: 80.2 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lake Johnston Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
TG6

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
Flotation/HLS concentration
Sample
spodumene-rich, relatively low-impurity material

Recovery

Recovery
80.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
5.74
Conc. Grade Unit
% Li2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Flotation/HLS tests for the Lake Johnston Lithium Project yielded high lithium recovery and high concentrate grades, indicating a viable processing route for the spodumene-rich material.

Positive factors

  • High lithium recovery of 80.2% achieved.
  • High concentrate grade of 5.74% Li2O.
  • Testwork indicates spodumene-rich, low-impurity material.

Evidence · text

“Flotation/HLS tests produced 75.5 – 80.2% lithium recovery into concentrates grading 5.28 – 5.74% Li2O.”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.