TERRA BALCANICA DRILLS 102 G/T AG EQ OVER 2.55 M AT CUMAVICI RIDGE AND EXTEND MINERALIZED FOOTPRINT IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Terra Balcanica Resources Corp.
- Ticker
- TERA
- Exchange
- CSE
- Region
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-20 18:19:45 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Terra Balcanica Resources Corp. has announced high-grade silver equivalent drill results from its Cumavici Ridge epithermal vein zone in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Drillhole CMV25001 returned 102 g/t Ag Eq over 2.55 m, extending the known mineralized footprint.
Reasoning: The intercept of 102 g/t Ag Eq over 2.55 m is a strong result for an epithermal system and represents new assay results from a Phase III campaign.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver equivalent intercept
- Extension of mineralized footprint
Facts used in scoring: 2
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The release states the results extend the mineralized footprint.
Evidence · text
“EXTEND MINERALIZED FOOTPRINT”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
CMV25001Viogor-Zanik · silverGrade: 102Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CMV25001
- Project
- Viogor-Zanik
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- bosnia and herzegovina
- Reported Region
- bosnia and herzegovina
- Ticker
- TERA
Geometry
- Grade
- 102
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.55 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 68.55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CMV25001:66-68.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Cumavici Ridge
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 102 g/t Ag Eq is a strong intercept for an epithermal system.
Positive factors
- High-grade intercept
Evidence · text
“CMV25001 intersected 102g/t Ag Eq. over 2.55 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CMV25001Viogor-Zanik · silverGrade: 64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CMV25001
- Project
- Viogor-Zanik
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- bosnia and herzegovina
- Reported Region
- bosnia and herzegovina
- Ticker
- TERA
Geometry
- Grade
- 64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.7 m
- From
- 66 m
- To
- 70.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CMV25001:66-70.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Cumavici Ridge
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broader zone of 64 g/t Ag Eq over 4.7 m provides continuity.
Positive factors
- Broader mineralized zone
Evidence · text
“64 g/t Ag Eq. over 4.7 m from 66m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.