TDG Continues Expanding Aurora West and Identifies New Porphyry Target
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- TDG Gold Corp.
- Ticker
- TDG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Copper, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-08-21 02:44:31 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
TDG Gold Corp. reported new drill results from its Aurora West Zone, including a significant step-out hole (TDG25-020) that extended mineralization by 350 metres down-dip with high-grade gold and copper intercepts. The company also identified a new porphyry-style alteration zone 600 metres north of the Aurora Complex, highlighting the district's exploration potential. Additionally, the release included details of the 2024 Shasta Mineral Resource Estimate, which outlines substantial indicated and inferred gold-silver resources.
Reasoning: TDG Gold Corp. announced strong drill results that significantly expand the Aurora West Zone mineralization and identified a new porphyry target, demonstrating substantial exploration potential. The accompanying Shasta MRE, while a restatement, provides a robust gold-silver resource that complements the exploration success.
Positive factors
- Step-out drilling significantly extended mineralization at Aurora West Zone.
- High-grade gold and copper intercepts were reported.
- A new porphyry target was identified, indicating district-scale potential.
- The resource estimate is NI 43-101 compliant and signed off by a Qualified Person.
Negative factors
- True width is unknown for the reported drill intercepts.
- The resource estimate is a restatement from 2025, limiting novelty for the MRE itself.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 49
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Drill hole TDG25-020 represents the largest step-out completed to date at the Aurora West Zone and extended mineralization approximately 350 m down-dip.
Evidence · text
“Phase II (northern step-out) drill hole TDG25-020 (Table 2) represents the largest step-out completed to date at the Aurora West Zone and marks a meaningful expansion of Aurora West Zone mineralization. The hole intersected mineralized intervals grading 1.02 grams per tonne (“g/t”) gold (“Au”) and 0.43% copper (“Cu”) over 14.0 m, and 0.57 g/t Au and 0.29% Cu over 24.0 m hosting in a broader interval of 86.3 m of 0.49 g/t Au and 0.23% Cu. TDG25-020 was terminated within mineralized compositionally andesitic rocks. These results extend mineralization approximately 350 m down-dip from drill hole TDG25-012”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details chain of custody, use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and mentions analysis by Bureau Veritas and ALS Global laboratories.
Evidence · text
“Samples for the GSN 2025 drill program followed chain of custody between collection, processing and delivery to a Bureau Veritas (“BV”) or ALS Global (“ALS”) laboratory in Vancouver, B.C and North Vancouver, respectively. The drill cores were delivered to the core shack at TDG’s Baker Mine site, and processed by geologists who inserted certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates (pulp and coarse) into the sampling sequence at regular intervals.”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The technical content of the news release has been reviewed and approved by Steven Kramar, MSc., P.Geo., VP Exploration for TDG, a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.
Evidence · text
“The technical content of this news release has been reviewed and approved by Steven Kramar, MSc., P.Geo., VP Exploration for TDG, a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The drill results tables explicitly state that 'True width is unknown'.
Evidence · text
“True width is unknown.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: Composite results were built using 0.30 g/t Au and/or 0.1% Cu cut-off, and the possibility of internal dilution is mentioned.
Evidence · text
“Composite results were built using 0.30 g/t Au and/or 0.1% Cu cut-off, although there may be intervals within the composite below 0.30 g/t Au and/or 0.1% Cu.”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The Mineral Resource estimate was estimated in accordance with the CIM 2019 Best Practices Guidelines, as required by NI43-101.
Evidence · text
“Mineral R esources are reported using the 2014 CIM Definition Standards and were estimated in accordance with the CIM 2019 Best Practices Guidelines, as required by NI43-101.”
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: The document presents an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for Shasta, effective December 29, 2024.
Evidence · text
“TDG completed ~13,250 m of modern large diameter diamond drilling at Shasta in 2021-2022 and published an updated Mineral Resource Estimate 4 on January 08, 2025 .”
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: The resource estimate includes detailed assumptions for economic extraction, including metal prices, recoveries, and costs, which are typical for supporting economic studies.
Evidence · text
“Th e Mineral Resource has been confined by a “reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction” pit using the following assumptions, which were estimated from comparable projects: Au price of US$2,250/oz, Ag price of US$25/oz at an exchange rate of 0.74 US$ per CDN$; a 1.5 % NSR royalty; 93 % metallurgical recovery for Au, based on past TDG test work, historical mill records 4 and nearby project comparables; 86 % recovery for Ag based on nearby project comparables 6 and, while prior MREs assumed somewhat lower Ag recoveries based on historical mill records 4 and limited past TDG test work, test work was not optimized for Ag recoveries. Further, test work at comparable projects indicate that improvement could be expected ; 99.9 % payable Au; 95.0 % payable Ag; US$7.00/oz Au and US$3.00/oz Ag offsite costs (refining, transport and insurance); Mining costs of CDN$4.00/tonne mineralized material; Processing Costs of CDN$15/tonne and G&A of CDN$8.00/tonne processed; Pit slopes of 45 degrees.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 49. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (47)
TDG25-020Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-020
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 806 m
- To
- 820 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- TDG25-020:806.0-820.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 622100
- Northing
- 6348685
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a moderate width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept and contributing to the expansion.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade over a moderate width.
Negative factors
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.02”
Context: 14.0
TDG25-020Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-020
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 806 m
- To
- 820 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- TDG25-020:806.0-820.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 622100
- Northing
- 6348685
- Elevation
- 1251 m
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- %
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong copper grade over a moderate width, significantly enhancing the overall intercept and contributing to the expansion.
Positive factors
- Strong copper grade over a moderate width.
Negative factors
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: 14.0
Fact 3Shasta · goldGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Shasta
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This inferred resource shows a moderate amount of contained gold equivalent metal, but with lower geological confidence and an undisclosed cut-off grade.
Positive factors
- NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.
Negative factors
- Resource estimate is a restatement from 2025.
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
- Cut-off grade not disclosed for this specific entry.
Evidence · table
“1.37”
Context: 0.276
TDG25-012Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 115 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-012
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 115 m
- From
- 554 m
- To
- 669 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-012:554-669
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 126.5 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.10”
Context: TDG25-012
TDG25-012Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 115 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-012
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 115 m
- From
- 554 m
- To
- 669 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-012:554-669
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 43.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: TDG25-012
incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 556 m
- To
- 571 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:556-571
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 8.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.57 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: incl.
incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 556 m
- To
- 571 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:556-571
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: incl.
and incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 88 m
- From
- 581 m
- To
- 669 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:581-669
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 114.4 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 88 m
- From
- 581 m
- To
- 669 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:581-669
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 37.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.43 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: and incl.
TDG25-015Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 183.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-015
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 183.1 m
- From
- 501.9 m
- To
- 685 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-015:501.9-685
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 84.2 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: TDG25-015
TDG25-015Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 183.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-015
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 183.1 m
- From
- 501.9 m
- To
- 685 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-015:501.9-685
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 34.8 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: TDG25-015
incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 520 m
- To
- 530 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:520-530
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.79 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 7.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.79 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.79”
Context: incl.
incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 520 m
- To
- 530 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:520-530
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: incl.
and incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 555 m
- To
- 566 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:555-566
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.53 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 5.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.53 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.53”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 555 m
- To
- 566 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:555-566
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 633 m
- To
- 648 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:633-648
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.03 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 15.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.03 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.03”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 633 m
- To
- 648 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:633-648
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: and incl.
TDG25-017Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-017
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 484 m
- To
- 497 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-017:484-497
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.5 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: TDG25-017
TDG25-017Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-017
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13 m
- From
- 484 m
- To
- 497 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-017:484-497
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: TDG25-017
andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32.3 m
- From
- 614 m
- To
- 646.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:614-646.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.38 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 44.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.38 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.38”
Context: and
andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32.3 m
- From
- 614 m
- To
- 646.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:614-646.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 13.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.41 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: and
andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.5 m
- From
- 653.5 m
- To
- 672 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:653.5-672
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.61 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.61”
Context: and
andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.5 m
- From
- 653.5 m
- To
- 672 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:653.5-672
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: and
TDG25-019Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 60.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-019
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 60.2 m
- From
- 631.9 m
- To
- 692 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-019:631.9-692
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 35.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.59 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: TDG25-019
TDG25-019Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 60.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-019
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 60.2 m
- From
- 631.9 m
- To
- 692 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-019:631.9-692
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 15.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: TDG25-019
incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.1 m
- From
- 635 m
- To
- 659.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:635-659.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.94 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 22.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.94 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.94”
Context: incl.
incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24.1 m
- From
- 635 m
- To
- 659.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:635-659.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: incl.
TDG25-014Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-014
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 174 m
- To
- 177.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-014:174-177.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: TDG25-014
TDG25-014Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-014
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 174 m
- To
- 177.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-014:174-177.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.12 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: TDG25-014
andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.5 m
- From
- 305 m
- To
- 313.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:305-313.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: and
andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.5 m
- From
- 305 m
- To
- 313.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:305-313.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 454.2 m
- To
- 454.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:454.2-454.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: and
andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 454.2 m
- To
- 454.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:454.2-454.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.24 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.24 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.24”
Context: and
TDG25-018Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-018
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 351 m
- To
- 362 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-018:351-362
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: TDG25-018
TDG25-018Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-018
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 351 m
- To
- 362 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-018:351-362
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.14 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: TDG25-018
andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 372 m
- To
- 378 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:372-378
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 372 m
- To
- 378 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:372-378
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.12 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: and
andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.2 m
- From
- 742.9 m
- To
- 756.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:742.9-756.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: and
andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.2 m
- From
- 742.9 m
- To
- 756.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:742.9-756.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: and
andAurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 775.6 m
- To
- 785 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:775.6-785
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: and
andAurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 775.6 m
- To
- 785 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:775.6-785
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: and
TDG25-020Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 86.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-020
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 86.3 m
- From
- 736.5 m
- To
- 822.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-020:736.5-822.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 42.3 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: TDG25-020
TDG25-020Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 86.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TDG25-020
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 86.3 m
- From
- 736.5 m
- To
- 822.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TDG25-020:736.5-822.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 19.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: TDG25-020
incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 770 m
- To
- 794 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:770-794
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 13.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.57 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: incl.
incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 770 m
- To
- 794 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- incl.:770-794
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: incl.
and incl.Aurora West Zone · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 806 m
- To
- 820 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:806-820
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.02 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 14.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.02 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.02”
Context: and incl.
and incl.Aurora West Zone · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and incl.
- Project
- Aurora West Zone
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- TDG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 806 m
- To
- 820 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and incl.:806-820
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.43 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: and incl.
Resource Estimates (2)
inferredgoldTonnes: 276000Grade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- TDG
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 276000
- Grade
- 0.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This inferred resource shows a significant amount of contained gold equivalent metal, but with lower geological confidence due to its inferred classification. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and contained metal.
- NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.
Negative factors
- Resource estimate is a restatement from 2025.
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“0.97”
Context: 0.276
inferredsilverTonnes: 276000Grade: 45Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- TDG
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 276000
- Grade
- 45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This inferred resource shows a significant amount of contained gold equivalent metal, but with lower geological confidence due to its inferred classification. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)
Positive factors
- Significant inferred resource tonnage and contained metal.
- NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.
Negative factors
- Resource estimate is a restatement from 2025.
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“45.0”
Context: 0.276
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.