Tarku Confirms the Presence of a Strong Gold-Bearing Orogenic System over a 3 km Strike Length on Apollo

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Tarku Resources Ltd
Ticker
TKU
Exchange
TSX
Region
Quebec
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Copper, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-22 15:11:21 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Tarku Resources announced successful results from its first-ever drilling program on the Apollo project, confirming a strong gold-bearing orogenic system over a 3 km strike length. The program intersected wide gold intervals, notably in hole AP-22-07, which included 46.9 m at 0.33 g/t Au and a high-grade sub-interval of 1.00 m at 5.75 g/t Au. The company plans further drilling to confirm continuity along strike and at depth.

Reasoning: The first drilling program on the Apollo project successfully identified a 3 km long gold-bearing orogenic system with multiple wide intercepts, including a high-grade sub-interval, confirming significant exploration potential that remains open.

Positive factors

  • First-ever drilling program on the project
  • Confirmation of a 3 km gold-bearing orogenic system
  • Multiple wide gold intercepts, including 46.9 m at 0.33 g/t Au
  • High-grade sub-intercept of 5.75 g/t Au over 1.00 m
  • Mineralization remains open along strike and at depth
  • Geological similarities to the Detour Lake Mine

Negative factors

  • Many reported intercepts are low-grade (<1 g/t Au)
  • True width is an estimate (75% of core length)

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 28

Classification and evidence

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The document states that 'True width is estimated at 75% of core length' for the reported intercepts.

Evidence · text

“* True width is estimated at 75% of core length.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: This is the 'First-ever drilling program on Apollo', which by definition extends knowledge into previously undrilled areas.

Evidence · text

“First-ever drilling program on Apollo successful in identifying a strong gold-bearing orogenic system”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including the use of duplicates, blank samples, and certified material, and names Actlab as the analytical laboratory.

Evidence · text

“Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) includes the use of duplicates representing one quarter (1/4) of the drill core, blank samples and material certified for Au, Ag and Cu. QA/QC additions to the sample stream total an additional 10% of samples analysed.”

First-Pass Drillingpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states this was the 'First-ever drilling program on Apollo', indicating early-stage exploration.

Evidence · text

“First-ever drilling program on Apollo successful in identifying a strong gold-bearing orogenic system”

Wide Interceptspositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Hole AP-22-07 intersected a significant width of 46.9 m at 0.33 g/t Au, indicating a broad mineralized zone.

Evidence · text

“Hole AP-22-07 intersected four gold-bearing structures over 10 metres wide between 300 and 550 m depth, including 46.9 m at 0.33 g/t Au”

Orogenic System Confirmedpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The title and body of the document confirm the presence of a 'Strong Gold-Bearing Orogenic System over a 3 km Strike Length'.

Evidence · text

“Tarku Confirms the Presence of a Strong Gold-Bearing Orogenic System over a 3 km Strike Length on Apollo”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 28. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (28)

AP-22-002Apollo · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-002
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.3 m
True Width
9.975 m
From
116.27 m
To
129.57 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with low gold grade from the initial drilling program, contributing to the overall confirmation of the gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Moderate intercept width

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 13.30

AP-22-002Apollo · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.58 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-002
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.58 m
True Width
4.935 m
From
116.27 m
To
122.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A sub-interval with low gold grade from the initial drilling program, contributing to the overall confirmation of the gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 6.58

AP-22-002Apollo · goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-002
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.28 m
True Width
0.96 m
From
116.27 m
To
117.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a moderate gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating localized higher-grade mineralization within the broader system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Moderate gold grade for a narrow intercept

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“1.80”

Context: 1.28

AP-22-002Apollo · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-002
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.27 m
True Width
0.9525 m
From
128.3 m
To
129.57 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with low gold grade from the initial drilling program, contributing to the overall confirmation of the gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • Narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: 1.27

AP-22-002Apollo · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-002
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
True Width
0.375 m
From
224 m
To
224.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept with very low gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating minor mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade
  • Very narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 0.50

Ap-22-003Apollo · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Ap-22-003
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.75 m
From
199 m
To
200 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with very low gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating minor mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade
  • Narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 1.00

Ap-22-003Apollo · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Ap-22-003
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
True Width
0.6 m
From
226 m
To
226.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept with very low gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating minor mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade
  • Very narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 0.80

AP-22-005Apollo · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-005
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.62 m
True Width
1.965 m
From
295 m
To
297.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with very low gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating minor mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade
  • Narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 2.62

AP-22-005Apollo · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-005
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.33 m
True Width
4.7475 m
From
307.67 m
To
314 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with very low gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating minor mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 6.33

AP-22-005Apollo · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-005
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.27 m
True Width
3.2025 m
From
342.73 m
To
347 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with very low gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating minor mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 4.27

AP-22-005Apollo · goldGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-005
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
True Width
6 m
From
362 m
To
370 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with a near 1 g/t gold grade from the initial drilling program, contributing positively to the confirmed gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Moderate intercept width
  • Near 1 g/t gold grade

Evidence · table

“0.98”

Context: 8.00

AP-22-005Apollo · goldGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-005
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
2.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
True Width
2.25 m
From
363 m
To
366 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a good gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Good gold grade for a narrow intercept

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“2.23”

Context: 3.00

AP-22-005Apollo · goldGrade: 5.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-005
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
5.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
True Width
0.75 m
From
363 m
To
364 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept with a high gold grade from the initial drilling program, representing a significant high-grade hit within the confirmed gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • High gold grade for a narrow intercept

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“5.75”

Context: 1.00

AP-22-006Apollo · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-006
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
True Width
1.725 m
From
192.7 m
To
195 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with very low gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating minor mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade
  • Narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 2.30

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.22 m
True Width
0.165 m
From
247.71 m
To
247.93 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An extremely narrow intercept with very low gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating minor mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade
  • Extremely narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 0.22

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 46.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
46.9 m
True Width
35.175 m
From
303.1 m
To
350 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very wide intercept with low gold grade from the initial drilling program, confirming a significant mineralized zone within the newly identified gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Very wide intercept, indicating significant mineralized zone

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 46.90

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35.4 m
True Width
26.55 m
From
303.1 m
To
338.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very wide sub-interval with low gold grade from the initial drilling program, confirming a significant mineralized zone within the newly identified gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Very wide intercept, indicating significant mineralized zone

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 35.40

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
True Width
4.5 m
From
307 m
To
313 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width sub-interval with low gold grade from the initial drilling program, contributing to the overall confirmed gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 6.00

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
True Width
11.25 m
From
319 m
To
334 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A wide sub-interval with low gold grade from the initial drilling program, contributing to the overall confirmed gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Wide intercept

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 15.00

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11.27 m
True Width
8.4525 m
From
371.38 m
To
382.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with low gold grade from the initial drilling program, contributing to the overall confirmed gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Moderate intercept width

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 11.27

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.16 m
True Width
3.12 m
From
375.84 m
To
380 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width sub-interval with near 1 g/t gold grade from the initial drilling program, contributing to the overall confirmed gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Near 1 g/t gold grade

Negative factors

  • Moderate intercept width

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 4.16

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.46 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.46 m
True Width
0.345 m
From
440.92 m
To
441.38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An extremely narrow intercept with very low gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating minor mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade
  • Extremely narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 0.46

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.48 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.48 m
True Width
15.36 m
From
457.52 m
To
478 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A wide intercept with low gold grade from the initial drilling program, confirming a significant mineralized zone within the newly identified gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Wide intercept, indicating significant mineralized zone

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: 20.48

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.28 m
True Width
0.96 m
From
457.52 m
To
458.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a moderate gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating localized higher-grade mineralization within the broader system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Moderate gold grade for a narrow intercept

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 1.28

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
True Width
10.5 m
From
495.5 m
To
509.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with low gold grade from the initial drilling program, contributing to the overall confirmed gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Moderate intercept width

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 14.00

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 2.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
2.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
True Width
1.125 m
From
495.5 m
To
497 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with a good gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system
  • Good gold grade for a narrow intercept

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“2.84”

Context: 1.50

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.8 m
True Width
6.6 m
From
525 m
To
533.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate width intercept with low gold grade from the initial drilling program, contributing to the overall confirmed gold system.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • Moderate intercept width

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 8.80

AP-22-007Apollo · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.81 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AP-22-007
Project
Apollo
Commodity
gold
Ticker
TKU

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.81 m
True Width
1.3575 m
From
547.8 m
To
549.61 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-04-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept with very low gold grade from the initial drilling program, indicating minor mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Part of the first-ever drilling program confirming a new gold system

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade
  • Narrow intercept width

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 1.81

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.