TAR: Northern Agadul Exploration Update
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Taruga Minerals Limited
- Ticker
- TAR
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Molybdenum, Silver, Zinc, Lead, Manganese
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-07 00:11:57 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Taruga Minerals reported encouraging assay results from rock chip and channel sampling at its Kol Mountain Project in Papua New Guinea, identifying a porphyry-style copper-molybdenum signature in the new Northern Agadul access corridor. Highlights include 2.33% Cu, 9.4 g/t Ag, and 0.22 g/t Au from a skarn float sample, and 0.39 g/t Au from a gossanous outcrop. The results confirm copper mineralization and a metal zoning pattern typical of porphyry copper systems, supporting the Agadul Porphyry as a priority drill target and adding Northern Agadul for follow-up.
Reasoning: Strong copper and gold results from initial surface sampling confirm prospectivity and porphyry potential in new and existing target areas, providing strong justification for follow-up exploration and drill targeting.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper (2.33% Cu) and significant gold (0.39 g/t Au) and silver (9.4 g/t Ag) in surface samples confirm prospectivity.
- Identification of porphyry-style copper-molybdenum signature and metal zoning patterns typical of porphyry systems.
- New target area (Northern Agadul) delineated with confirmed mineralization, expanding exploration potential.
- Historical high-grade gold intercepts from Agadul Shear provide additional context for the project's potential.
Negative factors
- Surface rock chip and float samples are selective and not necessarily representative of average grades.
- True widths of historical drill intercepts are not known, and historical results are not JORC 2012 compliant.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 44
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release includes a JORC Table 1 with details on sampling, assaying by ISO17025 accredited Intertek lab, and mentions laboratory QC procedures including standards, blanks, and repeats.
Evidence · text
“2026 samples are sent to Intertek Mineral laboratory in Lae, PNG an ISO17025 accredited laboratory. ... Laboratory QC for the batch comprised internal certified standards (including OREAS 601C), blanks and repeats.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The historical drill intercepts are reported as downhole lengths with an explicit statement that true width is not known.
Evidence · text
“All historical intercepts are downhole lengths, true width is not known”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: The release states that no Company-inserted certified reference materials, blanks or field duplicates were included in this batch of 2026 rock samples, which limits independent verification of sample quality.
Evidence · text
“No Company-inserted certified reference materials, blanks or field duplicates were included in this batch; these will be included in future sample submissions.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 44. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (44)
Fact 1Kol Mountain Project · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Northern Agadul access corridor
- Easting
- 362726
- Northing
- 9445868
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong gold assay from a surface sample in a new exploration corridor indicates potential for further discovery.
Positive factors
- Significant gold grade (0.39 g/t Au) from surface sampling in a new target area.
- Gossanous outcrop indicates potential for mineralization.
Negative factors
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: 702126
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 2Kol Mountain Project · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Northern Agadul access corridor
- Easting
- 362726
- Northing
- 9445868
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade copper in a surface sample from a new area provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Copper presence in a gossanous outcrop supports broader mineralization potential.
Negative factors
- Low copper grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 702126
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 3Kol Mountain Project · silverGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Northern Agadul access corridor
- Easting
- 362726
- Northing
- 9445868
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver in a surface sample is not material but contributes to the multi-element signature.
Positive factors
- Silver presence in a gossanous outcrop supports broader mineralization potential.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 702126
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 4Kol Mountain Project · molybdenumGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Northern Agadul access corridor
- Easting
- 362726
- Northing
- 9445868
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade molybdenum in a surface sample supports the porphyry model but is not economically significant on its own.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum presence contributes to the porphyry-style signature in the new target area.
Negative factors
- Low molybdenum grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“1.2”
Context: 702126
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 5Kol Mountain Project · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Northern Agadul access corridor
- Easting
- 362471
- Northing
- 9445841
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper grade from an outcrop in a new target area confirms the presence of mineralization and supports the porphyry model.
Positive factors
- Copper grade of 0.11% in outcropping sulphide-rich breccia confirms mineralization in the new corridor.
- Associated with molybdenum, supporting a porphyry-style signature.
Negative factors
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 702110
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 6Kol Mountain Project · molybdenumGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Northern Agadul access corridor
- Easting
- 362471
- Northing
- 9445841
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Molybdenum presence in an outcrop from a new target area reinforces the porphyry model and potential for economic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade of 4.3 ppm in outcropping breccia supports the porphyry-style signature.
- Associated with copper, indicating a potential porphyry system.
Negative factors
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: 702110
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 7Kol Mountain Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Northern Agadul access corridor
- Easting
- 362471
- Northing
- 9445841
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold in a surface sample from a new area provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Gold presence in an outcropping breccia contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 702110
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 8Kol Mountain Project · silverGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Northern Agadul access corridor
- Easting
- 362471
- Northing
- 9445841
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver in a surface sample is not material but contributes to the multi-element signature.
Positive factors
- Silver presence in an outcropping breccia contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 702110
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 9Kol Mountain Project · copperGrade: 2.33Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.33
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- north-western margin of the main Agadul Porphyry zone
- Easting
- 363908
- Northing
- 9442396
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high-grade copper from a surface sample on the margin of a known anomaly is a significant positive indicator for the project's potential.
Positive factors
- Exceptional copper grade (2.33%) from a skarn float sample indicates high-grade mineralization potential.
- Located on the margin of a significant porphyry anomaly, suggesting extension or high-grade zones.
Negative factors
- Float sample is selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ grade.
Evidence · table
“2.33”
Context: 702105
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 10Kol Mountain Project · silverGrade: 9.4Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- north-western margin of the main Agadul Porphyry zone
- Easting
- 363908
- Northing
- 9442396
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant silver grade alongside high copper reinforces the prospectivity and polymetallic nature of the mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade (9.4 g/t) associated with high-grade copper in a skarn float sample.
- Indicates polymetallic potential within the porphyry system.
Negative factors
- Float sample is selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ grade.
Evidence · table
“9.4”
Context: 702105
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 11Kol Mountain Project · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- north-western margin of the main Agadul Porphyry zone
- Easting
- 363908
- Northing
- 9442396
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A solid gold assay alongside high copper and silver from a surface sample indicates strong polymetallic potential.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade (0.22 g/t) associated with high-grade copper and silver in a skarn float sample.
- Confirms multi-element potential.
Negative factors
- Float sample is selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ grade.
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 702105
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 12Kol Mountain Project · molybdenumGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- north-western margin of the main Agadul Porphyry zone
- Easting
- 363908
- Northing
- 9442396
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade molybdenum in a surface sample supports the porphyry model but is not economically significant on its own.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum presence contributes to the porphyry-style signature.
Negative factors
- Low molybdenum grade.
- Float sample is selective and not necessarily representative of in-situ grade.
Evidence · table
“0.7”
Context: 702105
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 13Kol Mountain Project · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- north-western margin of the main Agadul Porphyry zone
- Easting
- 363743
- Northing
- 9442330
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate copper grade from an outcrop on the margin of a known anomaly confirms mineralization and supports the porphyry model.
Positive factors
- Copper grade of 0.12% in outcrop confirms mineralization on the margin of the Agadul Porphyry anomaly.
- Associated with K-feldspar veining, typical of porphyry systems.
Negative factors
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 702103
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 14Kol Mountain Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- north-western margin of the main Agadul Porphyry zone
- Easting
- 363743
- Northing
- 9442330
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold in a surface sample provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Gold presence in an outcrop contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 702103
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 15Kol Mountain Project · silverGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- north-western margin of the main Agadul Porphyry zone
- Easting
- 363743
- Northing
- 9442330
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver in a surface sample is not material but contributes to the multi-element signature.
Positive factors
- Silver presence in an outcrop contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 702103
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 16Kol Mountain Project · molybdenumGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- north-western margin of the main Agadul Porphyry zone
- Easting
- 363743
- Northing
- 9442330
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade molybdenum in a surface sample supports the porphyry model but is not economically significant on its own.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum presence contributes to the porphyry-style signature.
Negative factors
- Low molybdenum grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 702103
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 17Kol Mountain Project · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362463
- Northing
- 9445856
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade copper in a surface sample from a new area provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Copper presence in sheared breccia supports mineralization in the Northern Agadul corridor.
Negative factors
- Low copper grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 702109
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 18Kol Mountain Project · molybdenumGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362463
- Northing
- 9445856
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Molybdenum presence in an outcrop from a new target area reinforces the porphyry model and potential for economic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade of 4.9 ppm in sheared breccia supports the porphyry-style signature.
Negative factors
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“4.9”
Context: 702109
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 19Kol Mountain Project · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362463
- Northing
- 9445856
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold in a surface sample provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Gold presence in sheared breccia contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 702109
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 20Kol Mountain Project · silverGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362463
- Northing
- 9445856
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver in a surface sample is not material but contributes to the multi-element signature.
Positive factors
- Silver presence in sheared breccia contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 702109
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 21Kol Mountain Project · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362455
- Northing
- 9445881
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade copper in a surface sample from a new area provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Copper presence in sheared breccia supports mineralization in the Northern Agadul corridor.
Negative factors
- Low copper grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 702107
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 22Kol Mountain Project · molybdenumGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362455
- Northing
- 9445881
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Molybdenum presence in an outcrop from a new target area reinforces the porphyry model and potential for economic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum grade of 6.3 ppm in sheared breccia supports the porphyry-style signature.
Negative factors
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“6.3”
Context: 702107
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 23Kol Mountain Project · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362455
- Northing
- 9445881
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold in a surface sample provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Gold presence in sheared breccia contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 702107
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 24Kol Mountain Project · silverGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362455
- Northing
- 9445881
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver in a surface sample is not material but contributes to the multi-element signature.
Positive factors
- Silver presence in sheared breccia contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 702107
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 25Kol Mountain Project · copperGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Agadul
- Easting
- 363743
- Northing
- 9442330
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade copper in a surface sample from a known anomaly provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Copper presence in quartz diorite supports mineralization on the margin of the Agadul Porphyry anomaly.
Negative factors
- Low copper grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 702104
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 26Kol Mountain Project · molybdenumGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Agadul
- Easting
- 363743
- Northing
- 9442330
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade molybdenum in a surface sample supports the porphyry model but is not economically significant on its own.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum presence contributes to the porphyry-style signature.
Negative factors
- Low molybdenum grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 702104
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 27Kol Mountain Project · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Agadul
- Easting
- 363743
- Northing
- 9442330
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold in a surface sample provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Gold presence in quartz diorite contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 702104
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 28Kol Mountain Project · silverGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Agadul
- Easting
- 363743
- Northing
- 9442330
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver in a surface sample is not material but contributes to the multi-element signature.
Positive factors
- Silver presence in quartz diorite contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 702104
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 29Kol Mountain Project · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362458
- Northing
- 9445890
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade copper in a channel sample from a new area provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Copper presence in a channel sample confirms mineralization in the Northern Agadul corridor.
Negative factors
- Low copper grade.
- Channel sample width is not necessarily true width.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 702135
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 30Kol Mountain Project · molybdenumGrade: 15.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362458
- Northing
- 9445890
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant molybdenum grade from a channel sample in a new target area reinforces the porphyry model and potential for economic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong molybdenum grade (15.7 ppm) in a channel sample supports the porphyry-style signature.
- Indicates potential for economic molybdenum mineralization.
Negative factors
- Channel sample width is not necessarily true width.
Evidence · table
“15.7”
Context: 702135
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 31Kol Mountain Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362458
- Northing
- 9445890
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold in a channel sample provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Gold presence in a channel sample contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Channel sample width is not necessarily true width.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 702135
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 32Kol Mountain Project · silverGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362458
- Northing
- 9445890
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver in a channel sample is not material but contributes to the multi-element signature.
Positive factors
- Silver presence in a channel sample contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
- Channel sample width is not necessarily true width.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 702135
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 33Kol Mountain Project · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- Upper Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362486
- Northing
- 9445825
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade copper in a channel sample from a new area provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Copper presence in a channel sample confirms mineralization in the Northern Agadul corridor.
Negative factors
- Low copper grade.
- Channel sample width is not necessarily true width.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 702139
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 34Kol Mountain Project · molybdenumGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- Upper Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362486
- Northing
- 9445825
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant molybdenum grade from a channel sample in a new target area reinforces the porphyry model and potential for economic mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong molybdenum grade (10.7 ppm) in a channel sample supports the porphyry-style signature.
- Indicates potential for economic molybdenum mineralization.
Negative factors
- Channel sample width is not necessarily true width.
Evidence · table
“10.7”
Context: 702139
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 35Kol Mountain Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- Upper Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362486
- Northing
- 9445825
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold in a channel sample provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Gold presence in a channel sample contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Channel sample width is not necessarily true width.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 702139
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 36Kol Mountain Project · silverGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- channel
Location
- Location
- Upper Agadul Creek
- Easting
- 362486
- Northing
- 9445825
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver in a channel sample is not material but contributes to the multi-element signature.
Positive factors
- Silver presence in a channel sample contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Very low silver grade.
- Channel sample width is not necessarily true width.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 702139
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 37Kol Mountain Project · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Palai Creek
- Easting
- 362686
- Northing
- 9445754
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade copper in a surface sample from a new area provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Copper presence in siliceous breccia supports mineralization in the Northern Agadul corridor.
Negative factors
- Low copper grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 702122
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 38Kol Mountain Project · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Palai Creek
- Easting
- 362686
- Northing
- 9445754
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade silver in a surface sample provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Silver presence in siliceous breccia contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 702122
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 39Kol Mountain Project · molybdenumGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Palai Creek
- Easting
- 362686
- Northing
- 9445754
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade molybdenum in a surface sample supports the porphyry model but is not economically significant on its own.
Positive factors
- Molybdenum presence contributes to the porphyry-style signature.
Negative factors
- Low molybdenum grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: 702122
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 40Kol Mountain Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Palai Creek
- Easting
- 362686
- Northing
- 9445754
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade gold in a surface sample provides an indication of mineralization but is not highly material on its own.
Positive factors
- Gold presence in siliceous breccia contributes to the multi-element signature.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 702122
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 41Kol Mountain Project · zincGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Kol Mountain Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- East New Britain, Papua New Guinea
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Palai Creek
- Easting
- 362686
- Northing
- 9445754
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM zone 56S
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low-grade zinc in a surface sample provides an indication of mineralization and supports the metal zoning model.
Positive factors
- Zinc presence in siliceous breccia contributes to the multi-element signature and metal zoning pattern.
Negative factors
- Low zinc grade.
- Surface sample is selective and not representative of average grade.
Evidence · text
“0.28% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
DD89BU1Kol Mountain · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DD89BU1
- Project
- Kol Mountain
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- png
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 42 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DD89BU1:36-42
Location
- Location
- Agadul Shear
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept confirms significant gold mineralization, providing context for current exploration efforts.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade (2.2 g/t) over a reasonable width (6m) from historical drilling confirms high-grade potential.
Negative factors
- Results are historical and not JORC 2012 compliant.
- True width is not known.
Evidence · text
“Hole DD89BU1 - 6m @ 2.2 g/t Au from 36m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
DD89BU2Kol Mountain · goldGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DD89BU2
- Project
- Kol Mountain
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- png
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 153 m
- To
- 155 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DD89BU2:153-155
Location
- Location
- Agadul Shear
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept confirms significant gold mineralization, providing context for current exploration efforts.
Positive factors
- High gold grade (3.5 g/t) from historical drilling confirms high-grade potential.
Negative factors
- Results are historical and not JORC 2012 compliant.
- Narrow intercept width (2m).
- True width is not known.
Evidence · text
“Hole DD89BU2 - 2m @ 3.5 g/t Au, from 153m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
DD89BU3Kol Mountain · goldGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DD89BU3
- Project
- Kol Mountain
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- png
- Reported Region
- png
- Ticker
- TAR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 60 m
- To
- 70 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DD89BU3:60-70
Location
- Location
- Agadul Shear
- EPSG
- 32756
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Intertek
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates, umpire
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept confirms significant gold mineralization, providing context for current exploration efforts.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade (1.6 g/t) over a significant width (10m) from historical drilling confirms high-grade potential.
Negative factors
- Results are historical and not JORC 2012 compliant.
- True width is not known.
Evidence · text
“Hole DD89BU3 - 10m @ 1.6 g/t Au, from 60m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.