StrikePoint Drills Broad Zones of Near Surface Oxide Gold at the Hercules Gold Project, Nevada

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
StrikePoint Gold Inc.
Ticker
SKP
Exchange
TSX
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-08-24 11:03:23 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

StrikePoint Gold announced final assay results from its Spring 2025 drill program at the Hercules Gold Project in Nevada, highlighting broad zones of near-surface oxide gold, including 12.19m at 2.17 g/t Au and 9.55 g/t Ag within a larger 117.35m interval in hole H25005. The company reported that mineralization remains open to the south and confirmed the project's potential for an open pit heap leach operation. The release also detailed a conceptual Exploration Target for the project.

Reasoning: The drill program successfully identified broad zones of near-surface oxide gold, with significant higher-grade sub-intervals, and extended mineralization to the south, supporting the potential for an open pit heap leach operation. The results are backed by robust QA/QC, though true widths are not yet available. The conceptual exploration target provides future guidance.

Positive factors

  • Broad zones of near-surface oxide gold
  • Higher-grade sub-intervals within broader zones
  • Mineralization remains open to the south
  • Potential for open pit heap leach operation
  • Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure and QP sign-off

Negative factors

  • True width not estimated for reported intercepts
  • Some gold grades are below the project average
  • Exploration Target is conceptual and not a mineral resource

Facts used in scoring: 83

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release explicitly details the sample preparation and assaying procedures by ALS Global, including fire-assay and ICP methods, and mentions the company's QA/QC program with duplicates, blanks, and standards.

Evidence · text

“Samples were split in the field using industry standard techniques. Samples were sealed in individual numbered bags prior to shipment to ALS Global in Reno, Nevada for sample preparation, prior to assaying in ALS Global facilities in North Vancouver. Gold is determined by fire-assay fusion of a 30-gram sub-sample with atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). Various metals including silver, arsenic, and antimony are analyzed by inductively-coupled plasma (ICP) atomic emission spectroscopy, following multi-acid digestion. ALS Geochemistry meets all requirements of International Standards ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and ISO 9001:2015. ALS Global operates according to the guidelines set out in ISO/IEC Guide 25. The Company maintains a robust QA/QC program that includes the collection and analysis of duplicate samples and the insertion of blanks and standards (certified reference material).”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Michael G. Allen, P. Geo, President and CEO of the Company, is stated as the Qualified Person who verified all technical data in the press release under NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“All technical data, as disclosed in this press release, has been verified by Michael G. Allen, P. Geo, President and CEO of the Company. Mr. Allen is a qualified person as defined under the terms of National Instrument 43-101.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that there is insufficient data to estimate true thickness for the reported intercept lengths.

Evidence · text

“Length reported above is sample length, there is insufficient data to estimate true thickness.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Hole H25005 is described as the furthest south drilling on the Cliffs target to date, indicating an extension of the system to the south.

Evidence · text

“Hole H25005 which cut 117.35 m of 0.45 g/t Au with 3.55 g/t Ag is the furthest south drilling on the Cliffs target to date and shows that the system remains open to the south.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Hole H25006 encountered mineralization showing that multiple zones of the Hercules showing are also open to the south.

Evidence · text

“H250006 encountered 10.67m of 1.17 g/t Au and 18.13 g/t Ag starting at surface with an additional 44.20m of 0.35 g/t Au and 4.34 g/t Ag showing that multiple zones of the Hercules showing are also open to the south.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The document states that initial results for some Spring 2025 holes (H25001-H25004) were reported in a prior news release dated April 28, 2025.

Evidence · text

“Initial results were reported in the Company's April 28, 2025 news release .”

Historical Estimate Onlynegative

Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.

Why it applies: The Exploration Target is explicitly stated as conceptual in nature, not a mineral resource, and refers to a prior release dated March 3, 2025.

Evidence · text

“The Hercules Gold Project features an Exploration Target, as defined by NI 43-101, as follows: ... * The stated potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature, and there has not been sufficient exploration to define a mineral resource, and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource. ... For further information on the Exploration Target on the Hercules Gold Project refer to the Company's March 3, 2025 release .”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 83. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (83)

H25005Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 117.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25005
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
117.35 m
From
187.45 m
To
304.8 m
Hole Depth
382.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25005:187.45-304.80
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad intercept, while below the project's average gold grade, is significant for bulk tonnage potential and extends mineralization to the south, indicating an open system. The grade-thickness product is strong for an open pit target.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • Supports open pit potential
  • Extends mineralization to the south

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: 117.35

H25005Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 3.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 117.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25005
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
3.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
117.35 m
From
187.45 m
To
304.8 m
Hole Depth
382.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25005:187.45-304.80
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The broad silver intercept, while below the project's average and weak threshold, contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization and extends the known footprint.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • Extends mineralization to the south

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“3.55”

Context: 117.35

H25005Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25005
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
2.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.19 m
From
210.31 m
To
222.5 m
Hole Depth
382.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25005:210.31-222.50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval significantly enhances the overall intercept, exceeding the project's average and the strong threshold for open pit gold, indicating robust mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval
  • Above project average and strong threshold for open pit
  • Contributes to overall project economics

Negative factors

  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“2.17”

Context: 12.19

H25005Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 9.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25005
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
9.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.19 m
From
210.31 m
To
222.5 m
Hole Depth
382.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25005:210.31-222.50
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver grade, while not high, is above the project average for silver and adds to the polymetallic value of the high-grade gold sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • Contributes to polymetallic nature
  • Above project average for silver

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“9.55”

Context: 12.19

H25006Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.67 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25006
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.67 m
From
0 m
To
10.67 m
Hole Depth
250 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25006:0.00-10.67
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This near-surface gold intercept is above the project average and the moderate threshold for open pit, supporting the potential for an open pit operation and indicating the system remains open.

Positive factors

  • Near-surface intercept
  • Above project average and moderate threshold for open pit
  • Indicates mineralization remains open to the south

Negative factors

  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“1.17”

Context: 10.67

H25006Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 18.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.67 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25006
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
18.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.67 m
From
0 m
To
10.67 m
Hole Depth
250 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25006:0.00-10.67
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This near-surface silver intercept, while below the weak threshold, is above the project average and contributes to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization at surface.

Positive factors

  • Near-surface intercept
  • Above project average for silver

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“18.13”

Context: 10.67

H25006Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25006
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Hole Depth
250 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25006:0.00-6.10
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval at surface is well above the project average and the moderate threshold for open pit gold, indicating strong near-surface mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval
  • Above project average and moderate threshold for open pit
  • Near-surface

Negative factors

  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“1.90”

Context: 6.10

H25006Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 29.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25006
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
29.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m
Hole Depth
250 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25006:0.00-6.10
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver grade, while below the weak threshold, is significantly above the project average and contributes to the near-surface polymetallic mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Near-surface intercept
  • Above project average for silver

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“29.90”

Context: 6.10

H25006Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25006
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.2 m
From
66.58 m
To
112.78 m
Hole Depth
250 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25006:66.58-112.78
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad gold intercept, while below the project average, is significant for bulk tonnage potential and indicates the continuation of mineralization to the south.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length
  • Indicates mineralization remains open to the south

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 44.20

H25006Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 4.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25006
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
4.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.2 m
From
66.58 m
To
112.78 m
Hole Depth
250 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25006:66.58-112.78
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad silver intercept, while below the project average and weak threshold, contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“4.34”

Context: 44.20

H25006Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25006
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
92.96 m
To
99.06 m
Hole Depth
250 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25006:92.96-99.06
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold sub-interval, while not high-grade, is above the project average and contributes positively to the overall mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Above project average and weak threshold for open pit
  • Contributes to overall intercept grade

Negative factors

  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.83”

Context: 6.10

H25006Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 14.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25006
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
14.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
92.96 m
To
99.06 m
Hole Depth
250 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25006:92.96-99.06
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This silver grade, while below the weak threshold, is above the project average and adds to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Above project average for silver

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“14.73”

Context: 6.10

H25007Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25007
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
121.92 m
To
124.97 m
Hole Depth
155.49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25007:121.92-124.97
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow gold intercept, while below the project average and weak threshold, is considered encouraging for an exploration target testing a geochemical anomaly.

Positive factors

  • Encouraging grade for exploration target

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: 3.05

H25007Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 2.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25007
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
2.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
121.92 m
To
124.97 m
Hole Depth
155.49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25007:121.92-124.97
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow silver intercept is low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall value of the exploration target.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“2.45”

Context: 3.05

H25007Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25007
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
138.68 m
To
141.73 m
Hole Depth
155.49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25007:138.68-141.73
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow gold intercept, while below the project average and weak threshold, is considered encouraging for an exploration target testing a geochemical anomaly.

Positive factors

  • Encouraging grade for exploration target

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: 3.05

H25007Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 5.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25007
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
5.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
138.68 m
To
141.73 m
Hole Depth
155.49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25007:138.68-141.73
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This narrow silver intercept is low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall value of the exploration target.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“5.33”

Context: 3.05

H25001Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25001
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.57 m
From
4.57 m
To
9.14 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25001:4.57-9.14
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall resource potential.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: 4.57

H25001Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 7.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25001
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
7.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.57 m
From
4.57 m
To
9.14 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25001:4.57-9.14
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept, while below the weak threshold, is above the project average and contributes to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Above project average for silver

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“7.37”

Context: 4.57

H25001Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.93 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25001
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.93 m
From
12.18 m
To
41.11 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25001:12.18-41.11
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept, while below the project average, is of moderate length and contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: 28.93

H25001Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 6.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.93 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25001
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
6.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.93 m
From
12.18 m
To
41.11 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25001:12.18-41.11
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept, while below the project average and weak threshold, contributes to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“6.05”

Context: 28.93

H25001Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.09 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25001
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.09 m
From
30.45 m
To
36.54 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25001:30.45-36.54
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold sub-interval is above the project average and the moderate threshold for open pit, enhancing the overall intercept grade.

Positive factors

  • Above project average and moderate threshold for open pit
  • Contributes to overall intercept grade

Negative factors

  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 6.09

H25001Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 14.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.09 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25001
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
14.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.09 m
From
30.45 m
To
36.54 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25001:30.45-36.54
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver grade, while below the weak threshold, is above the project average and contributes to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Above project average for silver

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“14.27”

Context: 6.09

H25001Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.27 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25001
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.27 m
From
62.42 m
To
80.69 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25001:62.42-80.69
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept, while below the project average, is of moderate length and contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: 18.27

H25001Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 4.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.27 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25001
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
4.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.27 m
From
62.42 m
To
80.69 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25001:62.42-80.69
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept is low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall polymetallic value.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“4.66”

Context: 18.27

H25001Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.09 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25001
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.09 m
From
66.99 m
To
73.08 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25001:66.99-73.08
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold sub-interval is above the project average and the moderate threshold for open pit, enhancing the overall intercept grade.

Positive factors

  • Above project average and moderate threshold for open pit
  • Contributes to overall intercept grade

Negative factors

  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 6.09

H25001Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 10.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.09 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25001
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
10.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.09 m
From
66.99 m
To
73.08 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25001:66.99-73.08
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
-45 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver grade, while below the weak threshold, is above the project average and contributes to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Above project average for silver

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“10.38”

Context: 6.09

H25002Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25002
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.29 m
From
0 m
To
18.29 m
Hole Depth
160.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25002:0.00-18.29
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical near-surface gold intercept is low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall resource potential.

Positive factors

  • Near-surface intercept

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 18.29

H25002Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25002
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.29 m
From
0 m
To
18.29 m
Hole Depth
160.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25002:0.00-18.29
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical near-surface silver intercept is very low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall polymetallic value.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“1.68”

Context: 18.29

H25002Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.91 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25002
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.91 m
From
89.92 m
To
115.82 m
Hole Depth
160.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25002:89.92-115.82
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept, while below the project average, is of moderate length and contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: 25.91

H25002Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 2.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.91 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25002
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
2.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.91 m
From
89.92 m
To
115.82 m
Hole Depth
160.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25002:89.92-115.82
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept is low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall polymetallic value.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“2.73”

Context: 25.91

H25003Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25003
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
0 m
To
3.05 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25003:0.00-3.05
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical near-surface gold intercept is low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall resource potential.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: 3.05

H25003Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25003
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
0 m
To
3.05 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25003:0.00-3.05
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical near-surface silver intercept is very low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall polymetallic value.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“1.60”

Context: 3.05

H25003Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25003
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
19.81 m
To
25.91 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25003:19.81-25.91
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept, while below the project average, contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 6.10

H25003Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 2.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25003
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
2.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
19.81 m
To
25.91 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25003:19.81-25.91
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept is very low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall polymetallic value.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“2.28”

Context: 6.10

H25003Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.48 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25003
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
30.48 m
From
30.48 m
To
60.96 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25003:30.48-60.96
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept, while below the project average, is of moderate length and contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 30.48

H25003Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 3.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.48 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25003
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
3.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
30.48 m
From
30.48 m
To
60.96 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25003:30.48-60.96
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept is low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall polymetallic value.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“3.57”

Context: 30.48

H25003Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25003
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
32 m
To
35.05 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25003:32.00-35.05
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold sub-interval is above the project average and the moderate threshold for open pit, enhancing the overall intercept grade.

Positive factors

  • Above project average and moderate threshold for open pit
  • Contributes to overall intercept grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 3.05

H25003Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25003
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
32 m
To
35.05 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25003:32.00-35.05
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver grade, while below the weak threshold, is below the project average and contributes minimally to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“4.50”

Context: 3.05

H25003Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.72 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25003
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.72 m
From
73.15 m
To
86.87 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25003:73.15-86.87
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall resource potential.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 13.72

H25003Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 2.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.72 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25003
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
2.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.72 m
From
73.15 m
To
86.87 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25003:73.15-86.87
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
360 °
Dip
-90 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept is very low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall polymetallic value.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“2.37”

Context: 13.72

H25004Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25004
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32.04 m
From
0 m
To
32.04 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25004:0.00-32.04
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
320 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical near-surface gold intercept, while below the project average, is of moderate length and contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Near-surface intercept

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 32.04

H25004Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 4.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32.04 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25004
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
4.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32.04 m
From
0 m
To
32.04 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25004:0.00-32.04
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
320 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical near-surface silver intercept is low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall polymetallic value.

Positive factors

  • Near-surface intercept

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“4.62”

Context: 32.04

H25004Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25004
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.57 m
From
0 m
To
4.57 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25004:0.00-4.57
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
320 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical high-grade sub-interval at surface is well above the project average and the moderate threshold for open pit gold, indicating strong near-surface mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval
  • Above project average and moderate threshold for open pit
  • Near-surface

Negative factors

  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 4.57

H25004Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 10.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25004
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
10.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.57 m
From
0 m
To
4.57 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25004:0.00-4.57
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
320 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver grade, while below the weak threshold, is above the project average and contributes to the near-surface polymetallic mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Near-surface intercept
  • Above project average for silver

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“10.53”

Context: 4.57

H25004Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25004
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
24.38 m
To
30.48 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25004:24.38-30.48
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
320 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical high-grade sub-interval is above the project average and the moderate threshold for open pit gold, enhancing the overall intercept grade.

Positive factors

  • High-grade sub-interval
  • Above project average and moderate threshold for open pit
  • Contributes to overall intercept grade

Negative factors

  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“1.50”

Context: 6.10

H25004Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 11.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25004
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
11.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
24.38 m
To
30.48 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25004:24.38-30.48
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
320 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver grade, while below the weak threshold, is above the project average and contributes to the polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Above project average for silver

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“11.75”

Context: 6.10

H25004Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25004
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.29 m
From
103.63 m
To
121.92 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25004:103.63-121.92
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
320 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall resource potential.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 18.29

H25004Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 3.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
H25004
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
3.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.29 m
From
103.63 m
To
121.92 m
Hole Depth
152.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
H25004:103.63-121.92
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
320 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
duplicates, blanks, standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-04-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept is low grade and below the project average, contributing minimally to the overall polymetallic value.

Negative factors

  • Grade is below project average and weak threshold
  • True width not estimated

Evidence · table

“3.12”

Context: 18.29

Fact 49Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.555Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.555
Grade Unit
g/t

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-03-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exploration target provides a conceptual scale for the project but is not a mineral resource and requires significant further exploration to be delineated. It is historical data from a prior release.

Positive factors

  • Provides a conceptual target for future exploration
  • Defined by NI 43-101

Negative factors

  • Conceptual in nature, not a mineral resource
  • Uncertain if further exploration will delineate a resource
  • No economic viability evaluation

Evidence · table

“0.48 - 0.63”

Context: 40,300,000 - 65,600,000

incl.Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
2.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.19 m
From
210.31 m
To
222.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:210.31-222.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.17 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 26.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.17 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.17”

Context: incl.

incl.Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 9.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
9.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.19 m
From
210.31 m
To
222.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:210.31-222.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 116.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.55”

Context: incl.

incl.Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 11.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.90”

Context: incl.

incl.Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 29.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
29.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
0 m
To
6.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:0-6.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 182.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 29.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“29.90”

Context: incl.

andHercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.2 m
From
66.58 m
To
112.78 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:66.58-112.78
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 15.5 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: and

andHercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 4.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
4.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.2 m
From
66.58 m
To
112.78 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:66.58-112.78
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.34 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 191.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.34 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.34”

Context: and

incl.Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
92.96 m
To
99.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:92.96-99.06
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.83 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.83”

Context: incl.

incl.Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 14.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
14.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
92.96 m
To
99.06 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:92.96-99.06
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.73 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 89.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 14.73 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.73”

Context: incl.

andHercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
138.68 m
To
141.73 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:138.68-141.73
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: and

andHercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 5.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
5.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
138.68 m
To
141.73 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:138.68-141.73
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.33 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.33 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.33”

Context: and

andHercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.93 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.93 m
From
12.18 m
To
41.11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:12.18-41.11
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 13.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: and

andHercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 6.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.93 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
6.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.93 m
From
12.18 m
To
41.11 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:12.18-41.11
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 175.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 6.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.05”

Context: and

incl.Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.09 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.09 m
From
30.45 m
To
36.54 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:30.45-36.54
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.04 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: incl.

incl.Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 14.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.09 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
14.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.09 m
From
30.45 m
To
36.54 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:30.45-36.54
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 86.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 14.27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“14.27”

Context: incl.

andHercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.27 m
From
62.42 m
To
80.69 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:62.42-80.69
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 11.1 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: and

andHercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 4.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.27 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
4.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.27 m
From
62.42 m
To
80.69 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:62.42-80.69
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.66 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 85.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.66 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.66”

Context: and

incl.Hercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.09 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.09 m
From
66.99 m
To
73.08 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:66.99-73.08
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.33 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: incl.

incl.Hercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 10.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.09 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
10.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.09 m
From
66.99 m
To
73.08 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:66.99-73.08
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 63.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.38”

Context: incl.

andHercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.91 m
From
89.92 m
To
115.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:89.92-115.82
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.55 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 14.3 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: and

andHercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 2.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.91 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
2.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.91 m
From
89.92 m
To
115.82 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:89.92-115.82
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.73 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 70.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.73 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.73”

Context: and

andHercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
19.81 m
To
25.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:19.81-25.91
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: and

andHercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 2.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
2.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
19.81 m
To
25.91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:19.81-25.91
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.28 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.28 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.28”

Context: and

andHercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.48 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
30.48 m
From
30.48 m
To
60.96 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:30.48-60.96
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 11.3 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: and

andHercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 3.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.48 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
3.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
30.48 m
From
30.48 m
To
60.96 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:30.48-60.96
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.57 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 108.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.57 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.57”

Context: and

inclHercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
32 m
To
35.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:32-35.05
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.97 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: incl

inclHercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.05 m
From
32 m
To
35.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:32-35.05
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.50”

Context: incl

andHercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.72 m
From
73.15 m
To
86.87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:73.15-86.87
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: and

andHercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 2.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
2.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.72 m
From
73.15 m
To
86.87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:73.15-86.87
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.37 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.37 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.37”

Context: and

inclHercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.57 m
From
0 m
To
4.57 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:0-4.57
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.14 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: incl

inclHercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 10.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.57 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
10.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.57 m
From
0 m
To
4.57 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl:0-4.57
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.53 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 48.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 10.53 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“10.53”

Context: incl

and inclHercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
24.38 m
To
30.48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl:24.38-30.48
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.50”

Context: and incl

and inclHercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 11.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and incl
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
11.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
24.38 m
To
30.48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and incl:24.38-30.48
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.75 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 71.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11.75 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.75”

Context: and incl

andHercules Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.29 m
From
103.63 m
To
121.92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:103.63-121.92
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: and

andHercules Gold Project · silverGrade: 3.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Hercules Gold Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
SKP

Geometry

Grade
3.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.29 m
From
103.63 m
To
121.92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:103.63-121.92
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.12 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 57.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.12 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.12”

Context: and

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.