Sterling Metals Expands MEPS Discovery Confirming 400m of East-West Strike
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Sterling Metals Corp.
- Ticker
- SAG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Ontario
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Molybdenum, Gold, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-21 01:49:02 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Sterling Metals announced new assay results from its 2025 drilling program at the Soo Copper Project in Ontario, confirming 400m of continuous copper mineralization and expanding the high-grade bornite zone. The program delivered multiple bonanza-grade intercepts, including 38.9% Cu over 0.3m, within broad intervals of copper equivalent mineralization. These results demonstrate strong continuity and expansion of the porphyry-style system, with mineralization remaining open for further growth.
Reasoning: Sterling Metals has reported exceptional drill results from its Soo Copper Project, confirming a significant 400m east-west strike length of continuous copper mineralization, which remains open. The program successfully expanded the high-grade bornite zone with multiple bonanza-grade intercepts, including 38.9% Cu over 0.3m, within broader, long intervals of copper equivalent mineralization. The presence of a porphyry-style system and robust QA/QC procedures further de-risk the project, indicating strong potential for a nationally significant asset.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- wide_intervals
- step_out_extension
- porphyry_deposit_type
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
- lab_certified
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- cutoff_undisclosed
- grades_uncapped
Facts used in scoring: 199
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 199. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (199)
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 540 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 540 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 543 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:3.0-543.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept of 540.0m at 0.22% CuEq, indicating significant mineralization continuity from near surface, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 540.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 135.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 540 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 135.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 540 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 543 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:3.0-543.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept of 540.0m at 135.9 ppm Mo, indicating the presence of molybdenum as a byproduct in the porphyry system.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“135.9”
Context: 540.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 540 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 540 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 543 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:3.0-543.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept of 540.0m at 0.02 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct in the porphyry system.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 540.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 540 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 540 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 543 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:3.0-543.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept of 540.0m at 0.75 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct in the porphyry system.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: 540.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 190 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 190 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 373 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:183.0-373.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant sub-interval of 190.0m at 0.30% CuEq, contributing to the overall broad mineralization, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 190.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 117.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 190 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 117.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 190 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 373 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:183.0-373.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant sub-interval of 190.0m at 117.8 ppm Mo, indicating the presence of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“117.8”
Context: 190.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 190 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 190 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 373 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:183.0-373.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant sub-interval of 190.0m at 0.04 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 190.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 190 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 190 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 373 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:183.0-373.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant sub-interval of 190.0m at 1.28 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“1.28”
Context: 190.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 237 m
- To
- 273 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 237 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:237.0-273.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 36.0m at 0.50% CuEq, indicating consistent mineralization within the porphyry system, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 36.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 136.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 136.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 237 m
- To
- 273 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 237 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:237.0-273.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 36.0m at 136.1 ppm Mo, indicating the presence of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“136.1”
Context: 36.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.071Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.071
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 237 m
- To
- 273 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 237 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:237.0-273.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 36.0m at 0.071 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.071”
Context: 36.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 237 m
- To
- 273 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 237 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:237.0-273.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 36.0m at 2.26 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“2.26”
Context: 36.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 248 m
- To
- 255 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:248.0-255.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional intercept of 7.0m at 1.02% CuEq, exceeding the 0.8% exceptional threshold for porphyry copper, indicating a high-grade zone, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“1.02”
Context: 7.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 1.02% CuEq over 7.0m is exceptionally high-grade, exceeding the 0.8% exceptional threshold for porphyry copper.
Evidence · table
“1.02”
Context: 7.0
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 170.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 170.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 248 m
- To
- 255 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:248.0-255.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 7.0m at 170.8 ppm Mo, indicating the presence of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“170.8”
Context: 7.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 248 m
- To
- 255 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:248.0-255.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 7.0m at 0.17 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 7.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 6.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 248 m
- To
- 255 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:248.0-255.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 7.0m at 6.32 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“6.32”
Context: 7.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 23.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 23.85 m
- From
- 415.15 m
- To
- 439 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 415.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:415.15-439.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.45
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 23.85m at 0.45% CuEq, indicating consistent mineralization within the porphyry system, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: 23.85
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 680.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 23.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 680.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 23.85 m
- From
- 415.15 m
- To
- 439 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 415.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:415.15-439.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 23.85m at 680.4 ppm Mo, indicating a notable presence of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“680.4”
Context: 23.85
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 23.85 m
- From
- 415.15 m
- To
- 439 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 415.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:415.15-439.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept of 23.85m at 0.02 g/t Au, indicating trace gold mineralization.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 23.85
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 23.85 m
- From
- 415.15 m
- To
- 439 m
- Hole Depth
- 543 m
- Intercept Depth
- 415.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:415.15-439.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 680877
- Northing
- 5212702
- Elevation
- 504 m
- Azimuth
- 138 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept of 23.85m at 0.29 g/t Ag, indicating trace silver mineralization.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 23.85
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 282.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 282.9 m
- From
- 3.9 m
- To
- 287 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:3.9-287.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept of 282.9m at 0.30% CuEq, indicating significant mineralization continuity from near surface, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 282.9
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 56.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 282.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 56.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 282.9 m
- From
- 3.9 m
- To
- 287 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:3.9-287.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept of 282.9m at 56.1 ppm Mo, indicating the presence of molybdenum as a byproduct in the porphyry system.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“56.1”
Context: 282.9
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.034Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 282.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.034
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 282.9 m
- From
- 3.9 m
- To
- 287 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:3.9-287.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept of 282.9m at 0.034 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct in the porphyry system.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.034”
Context: 282.9
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 282.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 282.9 m
- From
- 3.9 m
- To
- 287 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:3.9-287.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept of 282.9m at 1.39 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct in the porphyry system.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“1.39”
Context: 282.9
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 147.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 147.2 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 219 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:72.0-219.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant sub-interval of 147.2m at 0.40% CuEq, contributing to the overall broad mineralization, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 147.2
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 79.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 147.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 79.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 147.2 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 219 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:72.0-219.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant sub-interval of 147.2m at 79.8 ppm Mo, indicating the presence of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“79.8”
Context: 147.2
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 147.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 147.2 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 219 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:72.0-219.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant sub-interval of 147.2m at 0.04 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.040”
Context: 147.2
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 147.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 147.2 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 219 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:72.0-219.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant sub-interval of 147.2m at 1.77 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“1.77”
Context: 147.2
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 62.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 62.2 m
- From
- 178 m
- To
- 240.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:178.0-240.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 62.2m at 0.50% CuEq, indicating consistent mineralization within the porphyry system, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 62.2
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 29.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 62.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 62.2 m
- From
- 178 m
- To
- 240.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:178.0-240.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 62.2m at 29.1 ppm Mo, indicating the presence of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“29.1”
Context: 62.2
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.045
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 62.2 m
- From
- 178 m
- To
- 240.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:178.0-240.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 62.2m at 0.045 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.045”
Context: 62.2
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 62.2 m
- From
- 178 m
- To
- 240.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 178 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:178.0-240.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 62.2m at 2.38 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“2.38”
Context: 62.2
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 38.8 m
- From
- 179.8 m
- To
- 218.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:179.8-218.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 38.8m at 0.70% CuEq, indicating a higher-grade zone within the porphyry system, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.70”
Context: 38.8
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 36.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 38.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 38.8 m
- From
- 179.8 m
- To
- 218.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:179.8-218.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 38.8m at 36.5 ppm Mo, indicating the presence of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“36.5”
Context: 38.8
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.059Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.059
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38.8 m
- From
- 179.8 m
- To
- 218.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:179.8-218.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 38.8m at 0.059 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.059”
Context: 38.8
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 3.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38.8 m
- From
- 179.8 m
- To
- 218.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 179.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:179.8-218.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 38.8m at 3.29 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“3.29”
Context: 38.8
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.1 m
- From
- 87.9 m
- To
- 106 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:87.9-106.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.04
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional intercept of 18.1m at 1.04% CuEq, exceeding the 0.8% exceptional threshold for porphyry copper, indicating a high-grade zone, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“1.04”
Context: 18.1
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 1.04% CuEq over 18.1m is exceptionally high-grade, exceeding the 0.8% exceptional threshold for porphyry copper.
Evidence · table
“1.04”
Context: 18.1
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 364.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 364.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 18.1 m
- From
- 87.9 m
- To
- 106 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:87.9-106.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 18.1m at 364.7 ppm Mo, indicating a notable presence of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“364.7”
Context: 18.1
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.1 m
- From
- 87.9 m
- To
- 106 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:87.9-106.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 18.1m at 0.12 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 18.1
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.1 m
- From
- 87.9 m
- To
- 106 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 87.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:87.9-106.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 18.1m at 4.21 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“4.21”
Context: 18.1
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 7.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 96.24 m
- To
- 97.18 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 96.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:96.24-97.18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.64
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional intercept of 0.9m at 7.64% CuEq, significantly exceeding the 0.8% exceptional threshold for porphyry copper, indicating a bonanza intercept, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
- high_grade_width_product
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“7.64”
Context: 0.9
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 7.64% CuEq over 0.9m is exceptionally high-grade, exceeding the 0.8% exceptional threshold for porphyry copper.
Evidence · table
“7.64”
Context: 0.9
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 632Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 632
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 96.24 m
- To
- 97.18 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 96.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:96.24-97.18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 0.9m at 632 ppm Mo, indicating a notable presence of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“632”
Context: 0.9
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 96.24 m
- To
- 97.18 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 96.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:96.24-97.18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional intercept of 0.9m at 1.11 g/t Au, exceeding the 1 g/t exceptional threshold for porphyry gold, indicating a high-grade zone.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 0.9
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 1.11 g/t Au over 0.9m is exceptionally high-grade, exceeding the 1 g/t exceptional threshold for porphyry gold.
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 0.9
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 51.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 96.24 m
- To
- 97.18 m
- Hole Depth
- 324 m
- Intercept Depth
- 96.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:96.24-97.18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 0.9m at 51.4 g/t Ag, exceeding the 30 g/t weak threshold for silver, indicating a higher-grade zone.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“51.4”
Context: 0.9
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 294.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 294.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 297 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:2.7-297.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept of 294.3m at 0.30% CuEq, indicating significant mineralization continuity from near surface, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 294.3
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 89Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 294.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 89
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 294.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 297 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:2.7-297.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept of 294.3m at 89.0 ppm Mo, indicating the presence of molybdenum as a byproduct in the porphyry system.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“89.0”
Context: 294.3
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 294.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.039
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 294.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 297 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:2.7-297.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept of 294.3m at 0.039 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct in the porphyry system.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.039”
Context: 294.3
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 294.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 294.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 297 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:2.7-297.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A broad intercept of 294.3m at 1.4 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct in the porphyry system.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: 294.3
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 117.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 117.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 120 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:2.7-120.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.4
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant sub-interval of 117.3m at 0.40% CuEq, contributing to the overall broad mineralization, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 117.3
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 187.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 117.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 187.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 117.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 120 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:2.7-120.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant sub-interval of 117.3m at 187.6 ppm Mo, indicating the presence of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“187.6”
Context: 117.3
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.053Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 117.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.053
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 117.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 120 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:2.7-120.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant sub-interval of 117.3m at 0.053 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.053”
Context: 117.3
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 117.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 117.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 120 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:2.7-120.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant sub-interval of 117.3m at 1.66 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- wide_intervals
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“1.66”
Context: 117.3
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.5 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 108.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:94.0-108.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.01
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional intercept of 14.5m at 1.01% CuEq, exceeding the 0.8% exceptional threshold for porphyry copper, indicating a high-grade zone, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“1.01”
Context: 14.5
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 1.01% CuEq over 14.5m is exceptionally high-grade, exceeding the 0.8% exceptional threshold for porphyry copper.
Evidence · table
“1.01”
Context: 14.5
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 404.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 404.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14.5 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 108.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:94.0-108.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 14.5m at 404.8 ppm Mo, indicating a notable presence of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“404.8”
Context: 14.5
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.5 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 108.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:94.0-108.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 14.5m at 0.15 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 14.5
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.5 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 108.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:94.0-108.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 14.5m at 4.19 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“4.19”
Context: 14.5
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 2.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 97 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:94.0-97.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.33
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional intercept of 3.0m at 2.33% CuEq, significantly exceeding the 0.8% exceptional threshold for porphyry copper, indicating a bonanza intercept, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
- high_grade_width_product
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“2.33”
Context: 3.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 2.33% CuEq over 3.0m is exceptionally high-grade, exceeding the 0.8% exceptional threshold for porphyry copper.
Evidence · table
“2.33”
Context: 3.0
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 1778.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1778.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 97 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:94.0-97.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A high-grade intercept of 3.0m at 1778.2 ppm Mo, indicating a significant concentration of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“1778.2”
Context: 3.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 97 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:94.0-97.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 3.0m at 0.33 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 3.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 10.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 97 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:94.0-97.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 3.0m at 10.29 g/t Ag, indicating the presence of silver as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“10.29”
Context: 3.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 5.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 95.2 m
- To
- 95.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:95.2-95.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional intercept of 0.6m at 5.51% CuEq, significantly exceeding the 0.8% exceptional threshold for porphyry copper, indicating a bonanza intercept, with metal equivalent assumptions disclosed.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
- high_grade_width_product
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“5.51”
Context: 0.6
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 5.51% CuEq over 0.6m is exceptionally high-grade, exceeding the 0.8% exceptional threshold for porphyry copper.
Evidence · table
“5.51”
Context: 0.6
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 18Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 95.2 m
- To
- 95.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:95.2-95.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept of 0.6m at 18 ppm Mo, indicating trace molybdenum mineralization.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“18”
Context: 0.6
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 95.2 m
- To
- 95.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:95.2-95.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An exceptional intercept of 0.6m at 1.23 g/t Au, exceeding the 1 g/t exceptional threshold for porphyry gold, indicating a high-grade zone.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“1.23”
Context: 0.6
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 1.23 g/t Au over 0.6m is exceptionally high-grade, exceeding the 1 g/t exceptional threshold for porphyry gold.
Evidence · table
“1.23”
Context: 0.6
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 40.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 40.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 95.2 m
- To
- 95.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 95.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:95.2-95.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A strong intercept of 0.6m at 40.7 g/t Ag, exceeding the 30 g/t weak threshold for silver, indicating a higher-grade zone.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
Evidence · table
“40.7”
Context: 0.6
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 207 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 187 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:187.0-207.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 20.0m at 0.38% Cu, indicating consistent mineralization within the porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 20.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 19.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 207 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 187 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:187.0-207.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 20.0m at 19.3 ppm Mo, indicating the presence of molybdenum as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“19.3”
Context: 20.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.046Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.046
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 207 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 187 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:187.0-207.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate intercept of 20.0m at 0.046 g/t Au, indicating the presence of gold as a byproduct.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- grades_uncapped
Evidence · table
“0.046”
Context: 20.0
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that 'Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known'.
Evidence · text
“Intervals may not represent true widths which are not yet known”
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 207 m
- Hole Depth
- 341 m
- Intercept Depth
- 187 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:187.0-207.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681060
- Northing
- 5212644
- Elevation
- 446 m
- Azimuth
- 152 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
MEPS-25-13Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 135.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 540 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-13
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 135.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 540 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 543 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-13:3-543
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 135.9 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“135.9”
Context: MEPS-25-13
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 190 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 190 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 373 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:183-373
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 36.1 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 117.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 190 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 117.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 190 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 373 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:183-373
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 117.8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“117.8”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 190 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 190 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 373 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:183-373
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 190 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 190 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 373 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:183-373
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.28 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 243.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.28”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 237 m
- To
- 273 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:237-273
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 12.2 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 136.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 136.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 237 m
- To
- 273 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:237-273
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 136.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“136.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.071Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.071
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 237 m
- To
- 273 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:237-273
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.071 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.071 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.071”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 237 m
- To
- 273 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:237-273
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.26 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 81.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.26 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.26”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 248 m
- To
- 255 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:248-255
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.71 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 5.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.71 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 170.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 170.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 248 m
- To
- 255 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:248-255
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 170.8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“170.8”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 248 m
- To
- 255 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:248-255
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 6.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 248 m
- To
- 255 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:248-255
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.32 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 44.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.32 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.32”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 23.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 23.85 m
- From
- 415.15 m
- To
- 439 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:415.15-439
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.08 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 680.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 23.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 680.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 23.85 m
- From
- 415.15 m
- To
- 439 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:415.15-439
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 680.4 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“680.4”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 23.85 m
- From
- 415.15 m
- To
- 439 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:415.15-439
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 23.85 m
- From
- 415.15 m
- To
- 439 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:415.15-439
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.29 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-14Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 56.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 282.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-14
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 56.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 282.9 m
- From
- 3.9 m
- To
- 287 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-14:3.9-287
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 56.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“56.1”
Context: MEPS-25-14
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 147.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 147.2 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 219 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:72-219
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 44.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 79.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 147.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 79.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 147.2 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 219 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:72-219
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 79.8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“79.8”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 147.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 147.2 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 219 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:72-219
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 5.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.040”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 147.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 147.2 m
- From
- 72 m
- To
- 219 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:72-219
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.77 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 260.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.77”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 62.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 62.2 m
- From
- 178 m
- To
- 240.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:178-240.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 26.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.42 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 29.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 62.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 62.2 m
- From
- 178 m
- To
- 240.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:178-240.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 29.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“29.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.045Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.045
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 62.2 m
- From
- 178 m
- To
- 240.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:178-240.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.045 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.045 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.045”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 62.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 62.2 m
- From
- 178 m
- To
- 240.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:178-240.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 148.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.38”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 38.8 m
- From
- 179.8 m
- To
- 218.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:179.8-218.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 23.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.6 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 36.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 38.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 38.8 m
- From
- 179.8 m
- To
- 218.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:179.8-218.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 36.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“36.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.059Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.059
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38.8 m
- From
- 179.8 m
- To
- 218.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:179.8-218.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.059 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.059 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.059”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 3.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38.8 m
- From
- 179.8 m
- To
- 218.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:179.8-218.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.29 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 127.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.29 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.29”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.1 m
- From
- 87.9 m
- To
- 106 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:87.9-106
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 12.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.7 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.70”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 364.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 364.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 18.1 m
- From
- 87.9 m
- To
- 106 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:87.9-106
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 364.7 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“364.7”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.1 m
- From
- 87.9 m
- To
- 106 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:87.9-106
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.12 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.1 m
- From
- 87.9 m
- To
- 106 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:87.9-106
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.21 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 76.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.21 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.21”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 5.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.76
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 96.24 m
- To
- 97.18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:96.24-97.18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.76 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 5.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5.76 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.76”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 632Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 632
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 96.24 m
- To
- 97.18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:96.24-97.18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 632 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“632”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 96.24 m
- To
- 97.18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:96.24-97.18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.11 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.11 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 51.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 51.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 96.24 m
- To
- 97.18 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:96.24-97.18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 51.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“51.4”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-15Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 89Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 294.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-15
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 89
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 294.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 297 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-15:2.7-297
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 89 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“89.0”
Context: MEPS-25-15
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 117.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 117.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:2.7-120
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 28.2 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 187.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 117.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 187.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 117.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:2.7-120
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 187.6 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“187.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.053Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 117.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.053
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 117.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:2.7-120
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.053 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 6.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.053 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.053”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 117.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 117.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:2.7-120
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.66 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 194.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.66 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.66”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.5 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 108.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:94-108.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 9.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.62 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 404.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 404.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14.5 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 108.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:94-108.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 404.8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“404.8”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.5 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 108.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:94-108.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.5 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 108.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:94-108.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.19 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 60.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.19 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.19”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 97 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:94-97
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.02 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.02 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.02”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 1778.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1778.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 97 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:94-97
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1778.2 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“1778.2”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 97 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:94-97
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 10.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 94 m
- To
- 97 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:94-97
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.29 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.29 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.29”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 3.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.95
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 95.2 m
- To
- 95.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:95.2-95.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.95 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.95 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.95”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 18Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 95.2 m
- To
- 95.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:95.2-95.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 18 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“18”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 95.2 m
- To
- 95.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:95.2-95.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.23 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.23 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.23”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 40.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 40.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 95.2 m
- To
- 95.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:95.2-95.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 40.7 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“40.7”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 207 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:187-207
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 19.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 207 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:187-207
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 19.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“19.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.046Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.046
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 207 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:187-207
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.046 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.046 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.046”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20 m
- From
- 187 m
- To
- 207 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:187-207
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.31 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.31 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.31”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 27.12 m
- From
- 264 m
- To
- 291.12 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:264-291.12
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 10.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 28.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 27.12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 27.12 m
- From
- 264 m
- To
- 291.12 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:264-291.12
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 28.4 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“28.4”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27.12 m
- From
- 264 m
- To
- 291.12 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:264-291.12
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.05 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.050”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27.12 m
- From
- 264 m
- To
- 291.12 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:264-291.12
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.29 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 62.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.29 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.29”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-16Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 419.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-16
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 419.9 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 422.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-16:2.7-422.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 71.4 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: MEPS-25-16
MEPS-25-16Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 122.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 419.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-16
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 122.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 419.9 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 422.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-16:2.7-422.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 122.2 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“122.2”
Context: MEPS-25-16
MEPS-25-16Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 419.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-16
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 419.9 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 422.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-16:2.7-422.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 25.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.060”
Context: MEPS-25-16
MEPS-25-16Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 419.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-16
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 419.9 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 422.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-16:2.7-422.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.26 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 529.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.26”
Context: MEPS-25-16
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 177.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 177.3 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 266.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:89-266.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 40.8 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 109.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 177.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 109.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 177.3 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 266.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:89-266.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 109.7 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“109.7”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 177.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 177.3 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 266.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:89-266.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 17.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 177.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 177.3 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 266.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:89-266.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.74 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 308.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.74”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 101 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 101 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 186 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:85-186
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 25.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 170.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 101 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 170.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 101 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 186 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:85-186
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 170.9 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“170.9”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 101 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 101 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 186 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:85-186
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 16.2 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 101 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 101 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 186 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:85-186
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 171.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.70”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 86 m
- To
- 118 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:86-118
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 10.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 484.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 484.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 86 m
- To
- 118 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:86-118
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 484.6 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“484.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 86 m
- To
- 118 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:86-118
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 13.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 86 m
- To
- 118 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:86-118
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.62 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 83.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.62 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.62”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.55 m
- From
- 96.35 m
- To
- 109.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:96.35-109.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.66 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.66 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 852.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 852.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 13.55 m
- From
- 96.35 m
- To
- 109.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:96.35-109.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 852.7 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“852.7”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.55 m
- From
- 96.35 m
- To
- 109.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:96.35-109.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.98 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 13.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.98 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.98”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.55 m
- From
- 96.35 m
- To
- 109.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:96.35-109.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.95 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 67.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.95 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.95”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 97.33 m
- To
- 98.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:97.33-98.08
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 23Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 97.33 m
- To
- 98.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:97.33-98.08
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 23 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“23.0”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 12.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 97.33 m
- To
- 98.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:97.33-98.08
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.4 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 12.4 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.4”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 97.33 m
- To
- 98.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:97.33-98.08
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.40”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 20.9 m
- From
- 210.1 m
- To
- 231 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:210.1-231
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 23.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20.9 m
- From
- 210.1 m
- To
- 231 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:210.1-231
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 23.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“23.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.049Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.049
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.9 m
- From
- 210.1 m
- To
- 231 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:210.1-231
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.049 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.049 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.049”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.9 m
- From
- 210.1 m
- To
- 231 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:210.1-231
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.73 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 57.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.73 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.73”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-17Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 378.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-17
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 378.5 m
- From
- 2.5 m
- To
- 381 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-17:2.5-381
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 56.8 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: MEPS-25-17
MEPS-25-17Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 105.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 378.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-17
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 105.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 378.5 m
- From
- 2.5 m
- To
- 381 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-17:2.5-381
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 105.8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“105.8”
Context: MEPS-25-17
MEPS-25-17Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 378.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-17
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.021
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 378.5 m
- From
- 2.5 m
- To
- 381 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-17:2.5-381
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.021 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 7.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.021 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: MEPS-25-17
MEPS-25-17Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 378.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-17
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 378.5 m
- From
- 2.5 m
- To
- 381 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-17:2.5-381
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.17 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 442.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.17”
Context: MEPS-25-17
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 203 m
- To
- 239 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:203-239
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 14.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.41 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 46.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 203 m
- To
- 239 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:203-239
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 46.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“46.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.039
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 203 m
- To
- 239 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:203-239
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.039 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.039 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.039”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 203 m
- To
- 239 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:203-239
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.73 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 98.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.73 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.73”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.87
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.4 m
- From
- 218.6 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:218.6-227
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.87 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.87 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.87”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 89Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 89
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8.4 m
- From
- 218.6 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:218.6-227
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 89 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“89.0”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.072Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.072
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.4 m
- From
- 218.6 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:218.6-227
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.072 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.072 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.072”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.4 m
- From
- 218.6 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:218.6-227
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.21 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 27.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.21 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.21”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-18Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 387.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-18
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 387.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 390 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-18:2.7-390
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 116.2 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: MEPS-25-18
MEPS-25-18Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 54.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 387.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-18
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 54.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 387.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 390 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-18:2.7-390
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 54.8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“54.8”
Context: MEPS-25-18
MEPS-25-18Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 387.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-18
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.037
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 387.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 390 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-18:2.7-390
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.037 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 14.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.037”
Context: MEPS-25-18
MEPS-25-18Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 387.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-18
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 387.3 m
- From
- 2.7 m
- To
- 390 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-18:2.7-390
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.16 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 836.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.16”
Context: MEPS-25-18
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 237.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 237.2 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 337.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:100-337.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 94.9 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.4 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 53.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 237.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 53.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 237.2 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 337.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:100-337.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 53.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“53.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.044Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 237.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.044
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 237.2 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 337.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:100-337.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.044 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.044”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 237.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 237.2 m
- From
- 100 m
- To
- 337.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:100-337.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.93 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 695.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.93”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 60.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.82
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 60.6 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 243.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:183-243.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.82 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 49.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.82 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.82”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 138.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 60.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 138.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 60.6 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 243.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:183-243.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 138.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“138.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.064Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 60.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.064
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 60.6 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 243.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:183-243.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.064 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.064 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.064”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 5.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 60.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 60.6 m
- From
- 183 m
- To
- 243.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:183-243.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.74 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 347.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.74”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:224-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.78 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 42.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.78 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.78”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 35.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 35.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:224-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 35.6 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“35.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:224-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.13 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 12.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 224 m
- To
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:224-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.32 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 295.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“12.32”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 10.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 224.9 m
- To
- 225.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:224.9-225.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.5 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.5 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.50”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 53Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 53
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 224.9 m
- To
- 225.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:224.9-225.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 53 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“53.0”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 224.9 m
- To
- 225.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:224.9-225.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 64.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 64.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 224.9 m
- To
- 225.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:224.9-225.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 64.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“64.4”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 38.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 38.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 227.4 m
- To
- 227.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:227.4-227.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.9 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 11.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 38.9 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“38.9”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 23Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 23
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 227.4 m
- To
- 227.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:227.4-227.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 23 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“23.0”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 227.4 m
- To
- 227.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:227.4-227.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.71 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.71 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 196Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 196
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 227.4 m
- To
- 227.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:227.4-227.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 196 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 58.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“196”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 34 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 34 m
- From
- 298 m
- To
- 332 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:298-332
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 14.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.43 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 20.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 34 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 34 m
- From
- 298 m
- To
- 332 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:298-332
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 20.6 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“20.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.052Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 34 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.052
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 34 m
- From
- 298 m
- To
- 332 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:298-332
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.052 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.052 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.052”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 3.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 34 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 34 m
- From
- 298 m
- To
- 332 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:298-332
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.22 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 109.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.22 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.22”
Context: Including
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.