Sterling Metals Expands Bornite Zone within Large Porphyry Copper System
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Sterling Metals Corp.
- Ticker
- SAG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Ontario
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Molybdenum, Gold, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-21 03:16:14 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Sterling Metals announced new assay results from its 2025 drilling program at the Soo Copper Project, revealing wide and high-grade copper intercepts, including bonanza-grade bornite mineralization. The program successfully expanded the mineralized footprint by approximately 300m to the south and 250m to the west, defining a higher-grade core within the large porphyry system. These results are expected to significantly impact resource development potential and plans for a larger 2026 resource exploration program.
Reasoning: Sterling Metals reported exceptional drill results from its Soo Copper Project, including bonanza-grade copper, gold, and silver intercepts within a large porphyry system. The program successfully expanded the known mineralized footprint to the south and west, defining a higher-grade bornite core. While true widths are not yet known and CuEq assumptions are from another project, the overall scale and grade of the new discoveries are highly material and novel.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- high_grade_width
- porphyry_deposit_type
- step_out_extension
- qaqc_disclosed
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 431
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 431. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (431)
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 480.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 480.1 m
- From
- 3.9 m
- To
- 484 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:3.9-484
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.20% is weak for a porphyry deposit, but the intercept length of 480.1m is continuous, indicating broad mineralization.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: 480.1
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 480.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 480.1 m
- From
- 3.9 m
- To
- 484 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:3.9-484
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 4.3 ppm is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: 480.1
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.016Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 480.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.016
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 480.1 m
- From
- 3.9 m
- To
- 484 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:3.9-484
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.016 g/t is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.016”
Context: 480.1
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 480.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.79
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 480.1 m
- From
- 3.9 m
- To
- 484 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:3.9-484
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 0.79 g/t is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.79”
Context: 480.1
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 186.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 186.63 m
- From
- 194.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:194.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.3
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.30% is moderate for a porphyry deposit over a significant width of 186.63m.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 186.63
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 186.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 186.63 m
- From
- 194.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:194.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 3.6 ppm is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“3.6”
Context: 186.63
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 186.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.022
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 186.63 m
- From
- 194.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:194.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.022 g/t is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.022”
Context: 186.63
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 186.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 186.63 m
- From
- 194.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:194.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.12 g/t is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“1.12”
Context: 186.63
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 47.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 47.5 m
- From
- 213 m
- To
- 260.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:213-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.44
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.44% is strong for a porphyry deposit over a moderate width of 47.5m.
Positive factors
- strong_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: 47.5
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 47.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 47.5 m
- From
- 213 m
- To
- 260.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:213-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 4.1 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: 47.5
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 47.5 m
- From
- 213 m
- To
- 260.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:213-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.019 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: 47.5
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 47.5 m
- From
- 213 m
- To
- 260.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:213-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.77 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“1.77”
Context: 47.5
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 254 m
- To
- 260.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:254-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.7
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.70% is strong for a porphyry deposit over a narrow width of 6.5m.
Positive factors
- strong_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.70”
Context: 6.5
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 254 m
- To
- 260.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:254-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 3.9 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“3.9”
Context: 6.5
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.032Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.032
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 254 m
- To
- 260.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:254-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.032 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.032”
Context: 6.5
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 254 m
- To
- 260.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:254-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.87 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“1.87”
Context: 6.5
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 26.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 26.8 m
- From
- 354.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:354.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.58
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.58% is strong for a porphyry deposit over a moderate width of 26.8m.
Positive factors
- strong_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 26.8
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 26.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 26.8 m
- From
- 354.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:354.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 8.5 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“8.5”
Context: 26.8
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.088
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.8 m
- From
- 354.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:354.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.088 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.088”
Context: 26.8
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.8 m
- From
- 354.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:354.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.34 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“1.34”
Context: 26.8
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 370.5 m
- To
- 380.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:370.5-380.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 1.07% is exceptional for a porphyry deposit over a moderate width of 10m.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“1.07”
Context: 10
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 17.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 370.5 m
- To
- 380.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:370.5-380.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 17.6 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“17.6”
Context: 10
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 370.5 m
- To
- 380.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:370.5-380.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.19 g/t is weak for a porphyry deposit over a moderate width of 10m.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 10
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 370.5 m
- To
- 380.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:370.5-380.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681062
- Northing
- 5212466
- Elevation
- 455 m
- Azimuth
- 158 °
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 2.35 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“2.35”
Context: 10
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 336 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.83
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 336 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 341 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:5-341
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.83
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.83% is exceptional for a porphyry deposit over a continuous width of 336m.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.83”
Context: 336
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 43.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 336 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 43.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 336 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 341 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:5-341
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 43.5 ppm is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“43.5”
Context: 336
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 336 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 336 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 341 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:5-341
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.39 g/t is moderate for a porphyry deposit over a continuous width of 336m.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: 336
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 336 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 336 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 341 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:5-341
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 2.75 g/t is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“2.75”
Context: 336
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 262.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 262.5 m
- From
- 47.5 m
- To
- 310 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:47.5-310
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 1.02% is exceptional for a porphyry deposit over a continuous width of 262.5m.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“1.02”
Context: 262.5
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 46.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 262.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 262.5 m
- From
- 47.5 m
- To
- 310 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:47.5-310
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 46.6 ppm is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“46.6”
Context: 262.5
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 262.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 262.5 m
- From
- 47.5 m
- To
- 310 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:47.5-310
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.49 g/t is moderate for a porphyry deposit over a continuous width of 262.5m.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: 262.5
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 3.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 262.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 262.5 m
- From
- 47.5 m
- To
- 310 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:47.5-310
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 3.15 g/t is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“3.15”
Context: 262.5
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 3.13Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 68.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.13
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 68.28 m
- From
- 179.72 m
- To
- 248 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:179.72-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.13
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 3.13% is exceptional for a porphyry deposit over a significant width of 68.28m, resulting in a strong GT product of 216.9 %m.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade
- high_grade_width
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“3.13”
Context: 68.28
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 71Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 68.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 71
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 68.28 m
- From
- 179.72 m
- To
- 248 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:179.72-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 71 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“71”
Context: 68.28
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 68.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 68.28 m
- From
- 179.72 m
- To
- 248 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:179.72-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 1.83 g/t is strong for a porphyry deposit over a significant width of 68.28m.
Positive factors
- strong_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“1.83”
Context: 68.28
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 8.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 68.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 68.28 m
- From
- 179.72 m
- To
- 248 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:179.72-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 8.46 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“8.46”
Context: 68.28
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 14.5Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.5
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 181.25 m
- To
- 181.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:181.25-181.65
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.5
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 14.5% is bonanza for a porphyry deposit, though over a very narrow width of 0.4m.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“14.5”
Context: 0.4
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 181.25 m
- To
- 181.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:181.25-181.65
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 3 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 0.4
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 181.25 m
- To
- 181.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:181.25-181.65
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 1.03 g/t is exceptional for a porphyry deposit, though over a very narrow width of 0.4m.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“1.03”
Context: 0.4
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 22.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 181.25 m
- To
- 181.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:181.25-181.65
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 22.9 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“22.9”
Context: 0.4
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 18.92Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 9.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.92
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 9.15 m
- From
- 215.6 m
- To
- 224.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:215.6-224.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 18.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 18.92% is bonanza for a porphyry deposit over a moderate width of 9.15m, resulting in an exceptional GT product of 173.1 %m.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- high_grade_width
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“18.92”
Context: 9.15
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 80.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 80.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.15 m
- From
- 215.6 m
- To
- 224.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:215.6-224.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 80.6 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“80.6”
Context: 9.15
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 13.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.15 m
- From
- 215.6 m
- To
- 224.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:215.6-224.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 13.2 g/t is bonanza for a porphyry deposit over a moderate width of 9.15m, resulting in a strong GT product of 120.78 g/t*m.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- high_grade_width
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“13.2”
Context: 9.15
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 46.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.15 m
- From
- 215.6 m
- To
- 224.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:215.6-224.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 46.26 g/t is weak for a porphyry deposit over a moderate width of 9.15m.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“46.26”
Context: 9.15
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 193.85Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 193.85
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 219.85 m
- To
- 220.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:219.85-220.45
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 193.85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 193.85% is bonanza for a porphyry deposit, though over a very narrow width of 0.6m.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“193.85”
Context: 0.6
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 219.85 m
- To
- 220.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:219.85-220.45
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 2 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 0.6
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 196Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 196
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 219.85 m
- To
- 220.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:219.85-220.45
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 196 g/t is bonanza for a porphyry deposit, though over a very narrow width of 0.6m.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“196”
Context: 0.6
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 168Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 168
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 219.85 m
- To
- 220.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:219.85-220.45
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 168 g/t is moderate for a porphyry deposit, though over a very narrow width of 0.6m.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“168”
Context: 0.6
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 36.04Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 36.04
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- From
- 220.45 m
- To
- 221 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:220.45-221
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 36.04
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 36.04% is bonanza for a porphyry deposit, though over a very narrow width of 0.55m.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“36.04”
Context: 0.55
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- From
- 220.45 m
- To
- 221 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:220.45-221
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 2 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 0.55
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.342Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.342
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- From
- 220.45 m
- To
- 221 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:220.45-221
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.342 g/t is moderate for a porphyry deposit, though over a very narrow width of 0.55m.
Positive factors
- moderate_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.342”
Context: 0.55
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 210Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 210
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- From
- 220.45 m
- To
- 221 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:220.45-221
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 210 g/t is strong for a porphyry deposit, though over a very narrow width of 0.55m.
Positive factors
- strong_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“210”
Context: 0.55
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 120 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 120 m
- From
- 341 m
- To
- 461 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:341-461
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.31
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.31% is moderate for a porphyry deposit over a significant width of 120m.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: 120
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 460.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 120 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 460.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 120 m
- From
- 341 m
- To
- 461 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:341-461
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 460.1 ppm is moderate for a porphyry deposit over a significant width of 120m.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“460.1”
Context: 120
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 120 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 120 m
- From
- 341 m
- To
- 461 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:341-461
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.008 g/t is weak for a porphyry deposit over a significant width of 120m.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- weak_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.008”
Context: 120
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 120 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 120 m
- From
- 341 m
- To
- 461 m
- Hole Depth
- 597 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:341-461
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 0.57 g/t is weak for a porphyry deposit over a significant width of 120m.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- weak_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 120
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 316.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 316.88 m
- From
- 1.12 m
- To
- 318 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:1.12-318
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.20% is weak for a porphyry deposit, but the intercept length of 316.88m is continuous, indicating broad mineralization.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: 316.88
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 33.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 316.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 316.88 m
- From
- 1.12 m
- To
- 318 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:1.12-318
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 33.1 ppm is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“33.1”
Context: 316.88
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 316.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 316.88 m
- From
- 1.12 m
- To
- 318 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:1.12-318
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.017 g/t is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: 316.88
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 316.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 316.88 m
- From
- 1.12 m
- To
- 318 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:1.12-318
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 0.5 g/t is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 316.88
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 68.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 68.75 m
- From
- 78.25 m
- To
- 147 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:78.25-147
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.32
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.32% is moderate for a porphyry deposit over a significant width of 68.75m.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 68.75
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 13Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 68.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 68.75 m
- From
- 78.25 m
- To
- 147 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:78.25-147
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 13 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“13”
Context: 68.75
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 68.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 68.75 m
- From
- 78.25 m
- To
- 147 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:78.25-147
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.023 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: 68.75
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 68.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 68.75 m
- From
- 78.25 m
- To
- 147 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:78.25-147
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 0.89 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.89”
Context: 68.75
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 26.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 26.75 m
- From
- 98.25 m
- To
- 125 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:98.25-125
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.51
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.51% is strong for a porphyry deposit over a moderate width of 26.75m.
Positive factors
- strong_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: 26.75
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 14.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 26.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 26.75 m
- From
- 98.25 m
- To
- 125 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:98.25-125
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 14.3 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“14.3”
Context: 26.75
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.037
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.75 m
- From
- 98.25 m
- To
- 125 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:98.25-125
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.037 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.037”
Context: 26.75
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.75 m
- From
- 98.25 m
- To
- 125 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:98.25-125
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.49 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“1.49”
Context: 26.75
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.06
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 105 m
- To
- 111 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:105-111
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 1.06% is exceptional for a porphyry deposit over a narrow width of 6m.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“1.06”
Context: 6.0
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 7.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 105 m
- To
- 111 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:105-111
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 7.3 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“7.3”
Context: 6.0
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.079Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.079
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 105 m
- To
- 111 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:105-111
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.079 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.079”
Context: 6.0
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 3.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 105 m
- To
- 111 m
- Hole Depth
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:105-111
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681061
- Northing
- 5212471
- Elevation
- 457 m
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -80 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 3.86 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“3.86”
Context: 6.0
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 347.58 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 347.58 m
- From
- 12.42 m
- To
- 360 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:12.42-360
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.28
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.28% is moderate for a porphyry deposit over a continuous width of 347.58m.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 347.58
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 75.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 347.58 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 75.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 347.58 m
- From
- 12.42 m
- To
- 360 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:12.42-360
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 75.9 ppm is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“75.9”
Context: 347.58
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 347.58 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.022
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 347.58 m
- From
- 12.42 m
- To
- 360 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:12.42-360
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.022 g/t is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.022”
Context: 347.58
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 347.58 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 347.58 m
- From
- 12.42 m
- To
- 360 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:12.42-360
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 1.42 g/t is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“1.42”
Context: 347.58
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 35 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:14-35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.52% is strong for a porphyry deposit over a significant width of 21m.
Positive factors
- strong_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 21
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 126.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 126.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 35 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:14-35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 126.1 ppm is moderate for a porphyry deposit over a significant width of 21m.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“126.1”
Context: 21
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.058Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.058
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 35 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:14-35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.058 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.058”
Context: 21
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 35 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:14-35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 2.04 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“2.04”
Context: 21
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 166 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 166 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 328 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:162-328
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.36
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The CuEq grade of 0.36% is moderate for a porphyry deposit over a significant width of 166m.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: 166
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 18Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 166 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 166 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 328 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:162-328
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 18 ppm is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“18”
Context: 166
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 166 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 166 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 328 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:162-328
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.029 g/t is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: 166
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 166 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 166 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 328 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:162-328
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade of 2.23 g/t is low, but consistent with broad mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“2.23”
Context: 166
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.97
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.5 m
- From
- 220.5 m
- To
- 237 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:220.5-237
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade of 0.97% is exceptional for a porphyry deposit over a moderate width of 16.5m.
Positive factors
- exceptional_grade
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.97”
Context: 16.5
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 34Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 34
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 16.5 m
- From
- 220.5 m
- To
- 237 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:220.5-237
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The molybdenum grade of 34 ppm is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“34”
Context: 16.5
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.091Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.091
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.5 m
- From
- 220.5 m
- To
- 237 m
- Hole Depth
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:220.5-237
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 681154
- Northing
- 5212669
- Elevation
- 421 m
- Azimuth
- 224 °
- Dip
- -46 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade of 0.091 g/t is low, but consistent with mineralization in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- porphyry_deposit_type
Negative factors
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_assumptions_not_project_specific
- grade_capping_not_applied
Evidence · table
“0.091”
Context: 16.5
MEPS-25-01Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 480.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 480.1 m
- From
- 3.9 m
- To
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-01:3.9-484
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“4.3”
Context: MEPS-25-01
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 186.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 186.63 m
- From
- 194.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:194.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 48.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 186.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 186.63 m
- From
- 194.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:194.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3.6 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“3.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.022Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 186.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.022
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 186.63 m
- From
- 194.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:194.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.022 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.022 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.022”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 186.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 186.63 m
- From
- 194.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:194.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.12 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 209.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.12”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 47.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 47.5 m
- From
- 213 m
- To
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:213-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 19.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.4 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 47.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 47.5 m
- From
- 213 m
- To
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:213-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 47.5 m
- From
- 213 m
- To
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:213-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.019 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.019 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 47.5 m
- From
- 213 m
- To
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:213-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.77 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 84.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.77 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.77”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 254 m
- To
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:254-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.64 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.64 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 254 m
- To
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:254-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3.9 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“3.9”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.032Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.032
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 254 m
- To
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:254-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.032 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.032 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.032”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.5 m
- From
- 254 m
- To
- 260.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:254-260.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.87 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.87 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.87”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26.8 m
- From
- 354.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:354.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 12.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.48 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 26.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 26.8 m
- From
- 354.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:354.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“8.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.088
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.8 m
- From
- 354.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:354.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.088 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.088 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.088”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.8 m
- From
- 354.7 m
- To
- 381.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:354.7-381.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.34 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 35.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.34 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.34”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.87
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 370.5 m
- To
- 380.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:370.5-380.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.87 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.87 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.87”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 17.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 370.5 m
- To
- 380.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:370.5-380.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 17.6 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“17.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 370.5 m
- To
- 380.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:370.5-380.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 370.5 m
- To
- 380.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:370.5-380.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.35 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.35 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.35”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-02Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 43.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 336 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-02
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 43.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 336 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 341 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-02:5-341
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 43.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“43.5”
Context: MEPS-25-02
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 262.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 262.5 m
- From
- 47.5 m
- To
- 310 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:47.5-310
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 136.5 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.52 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 46.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 262.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 262.5 m
- From
- 47.5 m
- To
- 310 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:47.5-310
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 46.6 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“46.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 262.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 262.5 m
- From
- 47.5 m
- To
- 310 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:47.5-310
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 128.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.49 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 3.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 262.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 262.5 m
- From
- 47.5 m
- To
- 310 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:47.5-310
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.15 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 826.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.15”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 68.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 68.28 m
- From
- 179.72 m
- To
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:179.72-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.39 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 94.9 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.39 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.39”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 71Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 68.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 71
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 68.28 m
- From
- 179.72 m
- To
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:179.72-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 71 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“71”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 68.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 68.28 m
- From
- 179.72 m
- To
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:179.72-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.83 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 125.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.83 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.83”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 8.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 68.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 68.28 m
- From
- 179.72 m
- To
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:179.72-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.46 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 577.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.46”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 13.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 181.25 m
- To
- 181.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:181.25-181.65
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.3 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 13.3 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 181.25 m
- To
- 181.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:181.25-181.65
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 181.25 m
- To
- 181.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:181.25-181.65
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.03 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.03 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.03”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 22.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 181.25 m
- To
- 181.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:181.25-181.65
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 22.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.9”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 6.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.15 m
- From
- 215.6 m
- To
- 224.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:215.6-224.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.8 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 62.2 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.8 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.8”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 80.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 80.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.15 m
- From
- 215.6 m
- To
- 224.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:215.6-224.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 80.6 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“80.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 13.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.15 m
- From
- 215.6 m
- To
- 224.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:215.6-224.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.2 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 120.8 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 13.2 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.2”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 46.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 46.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.15 m
- From
- 215.6 m
- To
- 224.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:215.6-224.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 46.26 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 423.3 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“46.26”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 21.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 219.85 m
- To
- 220.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:219.85-220.45
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21.3 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 12.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 21.3 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“21.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 219.85 m
- To
- 220.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:219.85-220.45
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 196Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 196
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 219.85 m
- To
- 220.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:219.85-220.45
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 196 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 117.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 196 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“196”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 168Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 168
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 219.85 m
- To
- 220.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:219.85-220.45
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 168 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 100.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“168”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- From
- 220.45 m
- To
- 221 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:220.45-221
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 18.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 33 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“33”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- From
- 220.45 m
- To
- 221 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:220.45-221
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.342Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.342
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- From
- 220.45 m
- To
- 221 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:220.45-221
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.342 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.342”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 210Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 210
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- From
- 220.45 m
- To
- 221 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:220.45-221
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 210 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 115.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 210 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“210”
Context: Including
AndSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 120 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 120 m
- From
- 341 m
- To
- 461 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:341-461
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 460.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 120 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 460.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 120 m
- From
- 341 m
- To
- 461 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:341-461
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 460.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“460.1”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.008Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 120 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.008
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 120 m
- From
- 341 m
- To
- 461 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:341-461
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.008 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.008 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.008”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 120 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 120 m
- From
- 341 m
- To
- 461 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:341-461
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 68.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.57 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: And
MEPS-25-03Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 33.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 316.88 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-03
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 316.88 m
- From
- 1.12 m
- To
- 318 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-03:1.12-318
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 33.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“33.1”
Context: MEPS-25-03
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 68.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 68.75 m
- From
- 78.25 m
- To
- 147 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:78.25-147
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.28 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 19.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 13Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 68.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 68.75 m
- From
- 78.25 m
- To
- 147 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:78.25-147
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 13 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“13”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 68.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 68.75 m
- From
- 78.25 m
- To
- 147 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:78.25-147
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.023 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.023 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 68.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 68.75 m
- From
- 78.25 m
- To
- 147 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:78.25-147
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.89 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 61.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.89 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.89”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26.75 m
- From
- 98.25 m
- To
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:98.25-125
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 12.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.45 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 14.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 26.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 26.75 m
- From
- 98.25 m
- To
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:98.25-125
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 14.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“14.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.037
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.75 m
- From
- 98.25 m
- To
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:98.25-125
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.037 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.037 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.037”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.75 m
- From
- 98.25 m
- To
- 125 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:98.25-125
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.49 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 39.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.49 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.49”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 105 m
- To
- 111 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:105-111
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.94 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 5.6 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.94 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.94”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 7.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 105 m
- To
- 111 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:105-111
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“7.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.079Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.079
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 105 m
- To
- 111 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:105-111
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.079 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.079 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.079”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 3.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 105 m
- To
- 111 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:105-111
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.86”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-04Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 75.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 347.58 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-04
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 75.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 347.58 m
- From
- 12.42 m
- To
- 360 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-04:12.42-360
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 75.9 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“75.9”
Context: MEPS-25-04
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:14-35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 126.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 126.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:14-35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 126.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“126.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.058Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.058
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:14-35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.058 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.058 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.058”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:14-35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.04 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 42.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.04 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.04”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 166 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 166 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 328 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:162-328
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 49.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 18Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 166 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 166 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 328 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:162-328
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 18 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“18”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.029Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 166 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.029
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 166 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 328 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:162-328
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.029 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.029 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.029”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 166 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 166 m
- From
- 162 m
- To
- 328 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:162-328
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.23 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 370.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.23”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.97
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.5 m
- From
- 220.5 m
- To
- 237 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:220.5-237
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.97 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 16.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.97 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.97”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 34Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 34
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 16.5 m
- From
- 220.5 m
- To
- 237 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:220.5-237
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 34 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“34”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.091Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.091
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.5 m
- From
- 220.5 m
- To
- 237 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:220.5-237
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.091 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.091 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.091”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 10.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.5 m
- From
- 220.5 m
- To
- 237 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:220.5-237
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.07 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 166.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 10.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.07”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 231.5 m
- To
- 237 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:231.5-237
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.62 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.62 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.62”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 21.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 231.5 m
- To
- 237 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:231.5-237
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 21.4 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“21.4”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 231.5 m
- To
- 237 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:231.5-237
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 20.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.5 m
- From
- 231.5 m
- To
- 237 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:231.5-237
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.14 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 110.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 20.14 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“20.14”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 8.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.31
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 231.5 m
- To
- 231.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:231.5-231.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.31 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.1 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.31 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.31”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 231.5 m
- To
- 231.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:231.5-231.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 231.5 m
- To
- 231.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:231.5-231.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 75.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 75.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 231.5 m
- To
- 231.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:231.5-231.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 75.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“75.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 2.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 233.5 m
- To
- 236 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:233.5-236
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.27 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 5.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.27 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.27”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 13.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 233.5 m
- To
- 236 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:233.5-236
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 13.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“13.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 233.5 m
- To
- 236 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:233.5-236
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.26”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 34.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 233.5 m
- To
- 236 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:233.5-236
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 34.94 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 87.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“34.94”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-05Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 250.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-05
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 250.75 m
- From
- 1.25 m
- To
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-05:1.25-252
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 15.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: MEPS-25-05
MEPS-25-05Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 250.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-05
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 250.75 m
- From
- 1.25 m
- To
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-05:1.25-252
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.4 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: MEPS-25-05
MEPS-25-05Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 250.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-05
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 250.75 m
- From
- 1.25 m
- To
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-05:1.25-252
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.010”
Context: MEPS-25-05
MEPS-25-05Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 250.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-05
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 250.75 m
- From
- 1.25 m
- To
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-05:1.25-252
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 85.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.34 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: MEPS-25-05
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 51.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:49-51.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.58 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 51.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:49-51.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.035
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 51.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:49-51.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.035 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.035 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.035”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 49 m
- To
- 51.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:49-51.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.78 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.78 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.78”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 2.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 190.77 m
- To
- 191.23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:190.77-191.23
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.15 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.15 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.15”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 190.77 m
- To
- 191.23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:190.77-191.23
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 190.77 m
- To
- 191.23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:190.77-191.23
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 9.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.46 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.46 m
- From
- 190.77 m
- To
- 191.23 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:190.77-191.23
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.9”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-06Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 332.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-06
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 332.3 m
- From
- 4.7 m
- To
- 337 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-06:4.7-337
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 26.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: MEPS-25-06
MEPS-25-06Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 332.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-06
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 332.3 m
- From
- 4.7 m
- To
- 337 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-06:4.7-337
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: MEPS-25-06
MEPS-25-06Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 332.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-06
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 332.3 m
- From
- 4.7 m
- To
- 337 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-06:4.7-337
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.009 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: MEPS-25-06
MEPS-25-06Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 332.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-06
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 332.3 m
- From
- 4.7 m
- To
- 337 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-06:4.7-337
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 113.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.34 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: MEPS-25-06
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.95
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 151.3 m
- To
- 151.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:151.3-151.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.95 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.95 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.95”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 151.3 m
- To
- 151.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:151.3-151.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 151.3 m
- To
- 151.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:151.3-151.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 151.3 m
- To
- 151.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:151.3-151.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 7.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 221 m
- To
- 223 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:221-223
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.48 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 221 m
- To
- 223 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:221-223
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.038Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.038
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 221 m
- To
- 223 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:221-223
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.038 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.038 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.038”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 221 m
- To
- 223 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:221-223
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.35 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.35 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.35”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-07Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 417.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-07
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 417.2 m
- From
- 0.8 m
- To
- 418 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-07:0.8-418
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 54.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: MEPS-25-07
MEPS-25-07Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 22.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 417.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-07
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 417.2 m
- From
- 0.8 m
- To
- 418 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-07:0.8-418
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 22.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“22.1”
Context: MEPS-25-07
MEPS-25-07Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 417.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-07
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 417.2 m
- From
- 0.8 m
- To
- 418 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-07:0.8-418
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 7.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.017 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: MEPS-25-07
MEPS-25-07Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 417.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-07
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 417.2 m
- From
- 0.8 m
- To
- 418 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-07:0.8-418
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.72 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 300.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: MEPS-25-07
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 227.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 227.4 m
- From
- 156 m
- To
- 383.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:156-383.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 40.9 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 12.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 227.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 227.4 m
- From
- 156 m
- To
- 383.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:156-383.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 12.6 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“12.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 227.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.021
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 227.4 m
- From
- 156 m
- To
- 383.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:156-383.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.021 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.021 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 227.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 227.4 m
- From
- 156 m
- To
- 383.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:156-383.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.08 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 245.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.08”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 48.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 48.4 m
- From
- 335 m
- To
- 383.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:335-383.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 15.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 38.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 48.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 38.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 48.4 m
- From
- 335 m
- To
- 383.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:335-383.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 38.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“38.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.043
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 48.4 m
- From
- 335 m
- To
- 383.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:335-383.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.043 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.043 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.043”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 48.4 m
- From
- 335 m
- To
- 383.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:335-383.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.89 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 91.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.89 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.89”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 335.6 m
- To
- 340 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:335.6-340
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.94 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.1 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.94 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.94”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 128.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 128.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 335.6 m
- To
- 340 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:335.6-340
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 128.8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“128.8”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.089Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.089
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 335.6 m
- To
- 340 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:335.6-340
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.089 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.089 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.089”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.4 m
- From
- 335.6 m
- To
- 340 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:335.6-340
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.99 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.99 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.99”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-08Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 347.39 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-08
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 347.39 m
- From
- 0.61 m
- To
- 348 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-08:0.61-348
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 48.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: MEPS-25-08
MEPS-25-08Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 347.39 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-08
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 347.39 m
- From
- 0.61 m
- To
- 348 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-08:0.61-348
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.7 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“2.7”
Context: MEPS-25-08
MEPS-25-08Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 347.39 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-08
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.015
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 347.39 m
- From
- 0.61 m
- To
- 348 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-08:0.61-348
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 5.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.015 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: MEPS-25-08
MEPS-25-08Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 347.39 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-08
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 347.39 m
- From
- 0.61 m
- To
- 348 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-08:0.61-348
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 180.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.52 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: MEPS-25-08
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 232 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 232 m
- From
- 51 m
- To
- 283 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51-283
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 44.1 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 232 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 232 m
- From
- 51 m
- To
- 283 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51-283
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 232 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 232 m
- From
- 51 m
- To
- 283 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51-283
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 232 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 232 m
- From
- 51 m
- To
- 283 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51-283
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.65 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 150.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.65 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 51 m
- To
- 86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51-86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 51 m
- To
- 86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51-86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.8”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.036Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.036
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 51 m
- To
- 86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51-86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.036 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.036 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.036”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 51 m
- To
- 86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:51-86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 21.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 31.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 31.25 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 283 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-283
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 18.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.6 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 31.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 31.25 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 283 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-283
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 31.25 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 283 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-283
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.019 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.019 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 31.25 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 283 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-283
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.51 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 47.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.51 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.51”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 259 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-259
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.41 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 10.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.41 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.41”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 8.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 259 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-259
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.9 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“8.9”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.035
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 259 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-259
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.035 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.035 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.035”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 3.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.25 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 259 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-259
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.31 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.31 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.31”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 3.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.61 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.61 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 254.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-254.36
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.17 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.17 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.17”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 8.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.61 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.61 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 254.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-254.36
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8.2 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“8.2”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.073Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.61 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.073
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.61 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 254.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-254.36
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.073 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.073 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.073”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 6.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.61 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.61 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 254.36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-254.36
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.95 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.95 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.95”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 8.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.82
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-252
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.82 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.82 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.82”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-252
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-252
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 19.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 251.75 m
- To
- 252 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:251.75-252
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 19.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.87
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 274 m
- To
- 281 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:274-281
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.87 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.1 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.87 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.87”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 274 m
- To
- 281 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:274-281
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.035
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 274 m
- To
- 281 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:274-281
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.035 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.035 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.035”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 274 m
- To
- 281 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:274-281
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.13 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.13 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.13”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-09Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 378.16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-09
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 378.16 m
- From
- 3.04 m
- To
- 381.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-09:3.04-381.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 52.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: MEPS-25-09
MEPS-25-09Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 7.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 378.16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-09
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 378.16 m
- From
- 3.04 m
- To
- 381.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-09:3.04-381.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7.8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“7.8”
Context: MEPS-25-09
MEPS-25-09Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 378.16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-09
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 378.16 m
- From
- 3.04 m
- To
- 381.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-09:3.04-381.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.011 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: MEPS-25-09
MEPS-25-09Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 378.16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-09
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 378.16 m
- From
- 3.04 m
- To
- 381.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-09:3.04-381.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 211.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: MEPS-25-09
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 255.34 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 255.34 m
- From
- 125.86 m
- To
- 381.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:125.86-381.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 46.0 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 255.34 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 255.34 m
- From
- 125.86 m
- To
- 381.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:125.86-381.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 11.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“11.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 255.34 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 255.34 m
- From
- 125.86 m
- To
- 381.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:125.86-381.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.013 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.013 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 255.34 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 255.34 m
- From
- 125.86 m
- To
- 381.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:125.86-381.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.68 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 173.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.68 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.68”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 47 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 47 m
- From
- 223 m
- To
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:223-270
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 19.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.42 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 31.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 47 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 31.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 47 m
- From
- 223 m
- To
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:223-270
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 31.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“31.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 47 m
- From
- 223 m
- To
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:223-270
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 47 m
- From
- 223 m
- To
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:223-270
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.08 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 50.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.08 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.08”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.91
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 223 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:223-227
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.91 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.6 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.91 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.91”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 10.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 223 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:223-227
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 10.8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“10.8”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.037
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 223 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:223-227
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.037 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.037 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.037”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 223 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:223-227
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.09 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.09 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.09”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.3 m
- From
- 255.7 m
- To
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:255.7-270
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.62 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 90.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 90.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14.3 m
- From
- 255.7 m
- To
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:255.7-270
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 90.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“90.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.3 m
- From
- 255.7 m
- To
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:255.7-270
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.026 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.3 m
- From
- 255.7 m
- To
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:255.7-270
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.36 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.36 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.36”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 14.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 255.7 m
- To
- 256 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:255.7-256
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14.9 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 14.9 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“14.9”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 255.7 m
- To
- 256 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:255.7-256
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 255.7 m
- To
- 256 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:255.7-256
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.56 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 26.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 255.7 m
- To
- 256 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:255.7-256
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 26.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 19.15 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 365.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:346-365.15
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 19.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 19.15 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 365.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:346-365.15
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.15 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 365.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:346-365.15
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.15 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 365.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:346-365.15
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.37 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.37 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.37”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-10Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 442.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 442.45 m
- From
- 1.55 m
- To
- 444 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-10:1.55-444
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 53.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: MEPS-25-10
MEPS-25-10Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 442.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 442.45 m
- From
- 1.55 m
- To
- 444 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-10:1.55-444
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 16.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“16.3”
Context: MEPS-25-10
MEPS-25-10Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 442.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 442.45 m
- From
- 1.55 m
- To
- 444 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-10:1.55-444
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.017 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.017 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: MEPS-25-10
MEPS-25-10Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 442.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 442.45 m
- From
- 1.55 m
- To
- 444 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-10:1.55-444
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 265.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: MEPS-25-10
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 40.5 m
- From
- 45.5 m
- To
- 86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:45.5-86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 6.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 40.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 40.5 m
- From
- 45.5 m
- To
- 86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:45.5-86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.032Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.032
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 40.5 m
- From
- 45.5 m
- To
- 86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:45.5-86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.032 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.032 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.032”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 40.5 m
- From
- 45.5 m
- To
- 86 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:45.5-86
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.62 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:68-73
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.56 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:68-73
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.032Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.032
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:68-73
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.032 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.032 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.032”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 68 m
- To
- 73 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:68-73
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.78 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.78 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.78”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 181 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 181 m
- From
- 221 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:221-402
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 32.6 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 181 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 181 m
- From
- 221 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:221-402
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 181 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 181 m
- From
- 221 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:221-402
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 181 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 181 m
- From
- 221 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:221-402
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.89 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 161.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.89 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.89”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 29 m
- From
- 373 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:373-402
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.8 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 19Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 19
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 29 m
- From
- 373 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:373-402
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 19 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“19”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.047Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.047
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29 m
- From
- 373 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:373-402
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.047 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.047 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.047”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29 m
- From
- 373 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:373-402
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.33 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 38.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.33 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.33”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.68
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 393 m
- To
- 397.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:393-397.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.68 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.68 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.68”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 393 m
- To
- 397.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:393-397.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 6.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“6.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 393 m
- To
- 397.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:393-397.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 3.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 393 m
- To
- 397.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:393-397.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.25”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-11Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 438.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-11
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 438.95 m
- From
- 2.05 m
- To
- 441 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-11:2.05-441
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 83.4 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: MEPS-25-11
MEPS-25-11Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 22Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 438.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-11
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 438.95 m
- From
- 2.05 m
- To
- 441 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-11:2.05-441
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 22 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“22”
Context: MEPS-25-11
MEPS-25-11Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 438.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-11
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 438.95 m
- From
- 2.05 m
- To
- 441 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-11:2.05-441
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.026 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 11.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: MEPS-25-11
MEPS-25-11Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 438.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-11
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 438.95 m
- From
- 2.05 m
- To
- 441 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-11:2.05-441
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.12 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 491.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.12”
Context: MEPS-25-11
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 279.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 279.52 m
- From
- 135.23 m
- To
- 414.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:135.23-414.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 69.9 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 25.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 279.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 25.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 279.52 m
- From
- 135.23 m
- To
- 414.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:135.23-414.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 25.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“25.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.034Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 279.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.034
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 279.52 m
- From
- 135.23 m
- To
- 414.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:135.23-414.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.034 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 9.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.034 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.034”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 279.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 279.52 m
- From
- 135.23 m
- To
- 414.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:135.23-414.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.39 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 388.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.39”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.75 m
- From
- 336.75 m
- To
- 355.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:336.75-355.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.98 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 18.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.98 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.98”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 33.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 18.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.6
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 18.75 m
- From
- 336.75 m
- To
- 355.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:336.75-355.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 33.6 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“33.6”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.75 m
- From
- 336.75 m
- To
- 355.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:336.75-355.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.12 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.75 m
- From
- 336.75 m
- To
- 355.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:336.75-355.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.93 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 92.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.93 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.93”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.38 m
- From
- 344.12 m
- To
- 355.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:344.12-355.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.42 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 16.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.42 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.42”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 39.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 39.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 11.38 m
- From
- 344.12 m
- To
- 355.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:344.12-355.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 39.7 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“39.7”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.38 m
- From
- 344.12 m
- To
- 355.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:344.12-355.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 6.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.38 m
- From
- 344.12 m
- To
- 355.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:344.12-355.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.63 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 75.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.63 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.63”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 13.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.28 m
- From
- 349.55 m
- To
- 349.83 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:349.55-349.83
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.1 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 13.1 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 338Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 338
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.28 m
- From
- 349.55 m
- To
- 349.83 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:349.55-349.83
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 338 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“338”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.28 m
- From
- 349.55 m
- To
- 349.83 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:349.55-349.83
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.28 m
- From
- 349.55 m
- To
- 349.83 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:349.55-349.83
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 22 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 410.3 m
- To
- 414.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:410.3-414.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.72 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.72 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 90.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 90.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 410.3 m
- To
- 414.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:410.3-414.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 90.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“90.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 410.3 m
- To
- 414.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:410.3-414.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 410.3 m
- To
- 414.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:410.3-414.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.28 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.28 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.28”
Context: Including
MEPS-25-12Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 435.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-12
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 435.85 m
- From
- 2.15 m
- To
- 438 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-12:2.15-438
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 104.6 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: MEPS-25-12
MEPS-25-12Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 53.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 435.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-12
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 53.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 435.85 m
- From
- 2.15 m
- To
- 438 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-12:2.15-438
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 53.8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“53.8”
Context: MEPS-25-12
MEPS-25-12Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 435.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-12
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.035
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 435.85 m
- From
- 2.15 m
- To
- 438 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-12:2.15-438
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.035 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 15.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.035”
Context: MEPS-25-12
MEPS-25-12Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 435.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MEPS-25-12
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 435.85 m
- From
- 2.15 m
- To
- 438 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MEPS-25-12:2.15-438
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.32 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 575.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.32”
Context: MEPS-25-12
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 300.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 300.45 m
- From
- 131.55 m
- To
- 432 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:131.55-432
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 90.1 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 69.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 300.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 69.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 300.45 m
- From
- 131.55 m
- To
- 432 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:131.55-432
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 69.7 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“69.7”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.046Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 300.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.046
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 300.45 m
- From
- 131.55 m
- To
- 432 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:131.55-432
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.046 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 13.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.046”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 300.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 300.45 m
- From
- 131.55 m
- To
- 432 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:131.55-432
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.67 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 501.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.67”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 277.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 277.6 m
- From
- 131.55 m
- To
- 409.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:131.55-409.15
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 88.8 %·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 73.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 277.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 73.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 277.6 m
- From
- 131.55 m
- To
- 409.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:131.55-409.15
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 73.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“73.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.048Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 277.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.048
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 277.6 m
- From
- 131.55 m
- To
- 409.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:131.55-409.15
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.048 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 13.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.048”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 277.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 277.6 m
- From
- 131.55 m
- To
- 409.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:131.55-409.15
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.75 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 485.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.75”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.89 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.89 m
- From
- 177 m
- To
- 183.89 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:177-183.89
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 7.6 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.1 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.10”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 57.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.89 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 57.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.89 m
- From
- 177 m
- To
- 183.89 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:177-183.89
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 57.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“57.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.89 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.89 m
- From
- 177 m
- To
- 183.89 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:177-183.89
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.89 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.89 m
- From
- 177 m
- To
- 183.89 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:177-183.89
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.82 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 33.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.82 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.82”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 49.89 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 49.89 m
- From
- 315.46 m
- To
- 365.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:315.46-365.35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 33.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.67 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 150Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 49.89 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 150
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 49.89 m
- From
- 315.46 m
- To
- 365.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:315.46-365.35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 150 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“150”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49.89 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 49.89 m
- From
- 315.46 m
- To
- 365.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:315.46-365.35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.12 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49.89 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 49.89 m
- From
- 315.46 m
- To
- 365.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:315.46-365.35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.37 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 218.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.37”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.46
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 343 m
- To
- 358 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:343-358
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.46 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 21.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.46 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.46”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 151Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 151
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 343 m
- To
- 358 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:343-358
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 151 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“151”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 343 m
- To
- 358 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:343-358
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 9.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 343 m
- To
- 358 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:343-358
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.63 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 144.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 9.63 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“9.63”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- From
- 343 m
- To
- 352.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:343-352.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.81 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 17.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.81 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.81”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 155.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 155.8
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- From
- 343 m
- To
- 352.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:343-352.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 155.8 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“155.8”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- From
- 343 m
- To
- 352.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:343-352.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 11.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- From
- 343 m
- To
- 352.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:343-352.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.84 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 117.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11.84 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.84”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 2.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 343 m
- To
- 349.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:343-349.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.56 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 15.9 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.56 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.56”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 236.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 236.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 343 m
- To
- 349.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:343-349.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 236.9 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“236.9”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 343 m
- To
- 349.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:343-349.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.67 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 17.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 343 m
- To
- 349.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:343-349.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17.75 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 110.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 17.75 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“17.75”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 4.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.92
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 346.8 m
- To
- 349.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:346.8-349.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.92 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 11.8 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.92 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.92”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 377Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 377
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 346.8 m
- To
- 349.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:346.8-349.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 377 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“377”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 346.8 m
- To
- 349.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:346.8-349.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.62 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.62 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.62”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 38.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 38.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 346.8 m
- To
- 349.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:346.8-349.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.42 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 92.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“38.42”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 8.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 348.2 m
- To
- 348.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:348.2-348.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.62 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 8.62 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.62”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 18Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 348.2 m
- To
- 348.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:348.2-348.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 18 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“18”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 4.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 348.2 m
- To
- 348.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:348.2-348.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.86 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.86 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.86”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 71.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 71.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 348.2 m
- To
- 348.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:348.2-348.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 71.4 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 35.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“71.4”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 391 m
- To
- 395 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:391-395
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.06 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.06 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.06”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 43.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 43.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 391 m
- To
- 395 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:391-395
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 43.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“43.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 391 m
- To
- 395 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:391-395
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.14 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 6.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 391 m
- To
- 395 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:391-395
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 6.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.05”
Context: Including
MJ-25-05Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ-25-05
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 255.4 m
- To
- 255.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJ-25-05:255.4-255.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.09 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.09 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.09”
Context: MJ-25-05
MJ-25-05Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ-25-05
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 255.4 m
- To
- 255.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJ-25-05:255.4-255.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: MJ-25-05
MJ-25-05Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ-25-05
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 255.4 m
- To
- 255.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJ-25-05:255.4-255.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: MJ-25-05
MJ-25-05Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ-25-05
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 255.4 m
- To
- 255.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJ-25-05:255.4-255.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.1”
Context: MJ-25-05
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22.4 m
- From
- 340.6 m
- To
- 363 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:340.6-363
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.14 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 22.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 22.4 m
- From
- 340.6 m
- To
- 363 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:340.6-363
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“2.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.011
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.4 m
- From
- 340.6 m
- To
- 363 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:340.6-363
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.011 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.011”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.4 m
- From
- 340.6 m
- To
- 363 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:340.6-363
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.67 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
- From
- 348.7 m
- To
- 349.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:348.7-349.05
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.26 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.26 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.26”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
- From
- 348.7 m
- To
- 349.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:348.7-349.05
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
- From
- 348.7 m
- To
- 349.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:348.7-349.05
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.35 m
- From
- 348.7 m
- To
- 349.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:348.7-349.05
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.3”
Context: Including
MJ-25-06Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.066Grade Unit: %Intercept: 385 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ-25-06
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.066
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 385 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 390 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJ-25-06:5-390
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.066 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 25.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.066”
Context: MJ-25-06
MJ-25-06Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 385 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ-25-06
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 385 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 390 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJ-25-06:5-390
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“2.1”
Context: MJ-25-06
MJ-25-06Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 385 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ-25-06
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.015
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 385 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 390 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJ-25-06:5-390
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 5.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.015 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: MJ-25-06
MJ-25-06Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 385 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ-25-06
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 385 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 390 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJ-25-06:5-390
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.54 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 207.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: MJ-25-06
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.019Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.019
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 74 m
- To
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:74-75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.019 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.019 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.019”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 74 m
- To
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:74-75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 0.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 2.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 74 m
- To
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:74-75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.57 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.57 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.57”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 74 m
- To
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:74-75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.3 m
- From
- 168.7 m
- To
- 182 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:168.7-182
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 13.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 13.3 m
- From
- 168.7 m
- To
- 182 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:168.7-182
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.4 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“4.4”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.018Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.018
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.3 m
- From
- 168.7 m
- To
- 182 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:168.7-182
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.018 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.018 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.018”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.3 m
- From
- 168.7 m
- To
- 182 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:168.7-182
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.78 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 168.7 m
- To
- 169.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:168.7-169.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.03 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.03 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.03”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 32Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 168.7 m
- To
- 169.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:168.7-169.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 32 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“32”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 168.7 m
- To
- 169.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:168.7-169.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 3.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 168.7 m
- To
- 169.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:168.7-169.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.7”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 302 m
- To
- 323 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:302-323
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 3.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 302 m
- To
- 323 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:302-323
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1.4 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“1.4”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 302 m
- To
- 323 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:302-323
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.012 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.012 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 302 m
- To
- 323 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:302-323
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.57 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: Including
MJ-25-07Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 285.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ-25-07
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 285.55 m
- From
- 2.45 m
- To
- 288 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJ-25-07:2.45-288
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 25.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: MJ-25-07
MJ-25-07Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 285.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ-25-07
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 285.55 m
- From
- 2.45 m
- To
- 288 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJ-25-07:2.45-288
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.7 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“4.7”
Context: MJ-25-07
MJ-25-07Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 285.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ-25-07
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 285.55 m
- From
- 2.45 m
- To
- 288 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJ-25-07:2.45-288
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.01 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: MJ-25-07
MJ-25-07Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 285.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ-25-07
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 285.55 m
- From
- 2.45 m
- To
- 288 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MJ-25-07:2.45-288
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 117.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.41 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: MJ-25-07
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.36
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 28.8 m
- To
- 29.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:28.8-29.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.36 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.36 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.36”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 28.8 m
- To
- 29.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:28.8-29.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.054Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.054
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 28.8 m
- To
- 29.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:28.8-29.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.054 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.054 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.054”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 28.8 m
- To
- 29.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:28.8-29.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 61.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 61.5 m
- From
- 80 m
- To
- 141.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:80-141.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 9.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 61.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 61.5 m
- From
- 80 m
- To
- 141.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:80-141.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“2.3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 61.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 61.5 m
- From
- 80 m
- To
- 141.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:80-141.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.012 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.012 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 61.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 61.5 m
- From
- 80 m
- To
- 141.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:80-141.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 33.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 70 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 70 m
- From
- 218 m
- To
- 288 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:218-288
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.12 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 9.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 70 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 70 m
- From
- 218 m
- To
- 288 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:218-288
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 9.7 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“9.7”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.012Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 70 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.012
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 70 m
- From
- 218 m
- To
- 288 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:218-288
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.012 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.012 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.012”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 70 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 70 m
- From
- 218 m
- To
- 288 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:218-288
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.54 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 37.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.54 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 277 m
- To
- 277.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:277-277.25
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.47 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.47 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.47”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 277 m
- To
- 277.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:277-277.25
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 277 m
- To
- 277.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:277-277.25
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.13 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 277 m
- To
- 277.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:277-277.25
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: Including
RB-25-01Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 276 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RB-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 276 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 279 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RB-25-01:3-279
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 13.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.05 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: RB-25-01
RB-25-01Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 276 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RB-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 276 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 279 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RB-25-01:3-279
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: RB-25-01
RB-25-01Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 276 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RB-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 276 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 279 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RB-25-01:3-279
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.009 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.009 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: RB-25-01
RB-25-01Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 276 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RB-25-01
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 276 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 279 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RB-25-01:3-279
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 82.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: RB-25-01
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 105.45 m
- To
- 105.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:105.45-105.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.1 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 105.45 m
- To
- 105.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:105.45-105.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.044Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.044
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 105.45 m
- To
- 105.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:105.45-105.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.044 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.044 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.044”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 105.45 m
- To
- 105.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:105.45-105.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.7 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.7 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.7”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 243 m
- To
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:243-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 243 m
- To
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:243-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 4.4 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“4.4”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.014Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.014
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 243 m
- To
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:243-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.014 g/t gold is below against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.014 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.15 g/t) on the porphyry deposit band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.014”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- Ontario
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 243 m
- To
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:243-248
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.86”
Context: Including
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.