Sterling Drills Molybdenum Rich Breccia Below MEPS Discovery Intersecting 57 m of 0.81% CuEq Within a Near-Surface 358 m of 0.50% CuEq Including 8.5 m of 4.74% CuEq
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Sterling Metals Corp.
- Ticker
- SAG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Ontario
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Molybdenum, Gold, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-20 19:23:53 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Sterling Metals reported significant drill results from the Soo Copper Project, highlighting a new molybdenum-rich breccia body located below the high-grade copper zone. Key intercepts include 8.5 m at 4.74% CuEq and 57 m at 0.81% CuEq (averaging 1,077 ppm Mo) in hole SC-26-10.
Reasoning: The discovery of a molybdenum-rich breccia body immediately underlying the high-grade copper zone at the MEPS discovery is a significant geological expansion and adds a second critical metal to the project.
Positive factors
- discovery of molybdenum-rich breccia below copper zone
- high-grade copper intercepts
- continuous mineralization
- step-out success
Negative factors
- true widths not yet known
Facts used in scoring: 56
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Discovery of molybdenum-rich breccia below the known high-grade copper zone.
Evidence · text
“Discovery of a molybdenite-rich breccia body immediately below the high-grade copper zone”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes detailed QA/QC procedures, including blanks, standards, and duplicates, and names an accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“Laboratory QA/QC for the ICP analysis was 14% for each batch, including 5 method reagent blanks, 10 in-house controls, 10 samples duplicates, and 8 certified reference materials.”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 8.5 m at 4.74% CuEq is exceptionally high grade for this deposit type.
Evidence · table
“4.74”
Context: 8.50
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 56. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (56)
SC-26-10Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 497.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 497.55 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 501.55 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SC-26-10:4-501.55
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, certified reference materials
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Wide intercept of 0.24% Cu demonstrates the scale of the copper envelope.
Positive factors
- broad continuous mineralization
SC-26-10Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 227.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 497.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 227.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 497.55 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 501.55 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, certified reference materials
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Background molybdenum levels in the wide copper envelope.
SC-26-10Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 358 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 358 m
- From
- 44 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, certified reference materials
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant near-surface copper interval.
Positive factors
- near-surface continuity
SC-26-10Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24.65 m
- From
- 205.35 m
- To
- 230 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, certified reference materials
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper intercept in the GFP porphyry unit.
Positive factors
- high grade
SC-26-10Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 3.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.5 m
- From
- 218.5 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, certified reference materials
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional high-grade copper intercept.
Positive factors
- high grade
SC-26-10Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 57 m
- From
- 326 m
- To
- 383 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, certified reference materials
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Discovery of molybdenum-rich breccia below the copper zone.
Positive factors
- molybdenum-rich breccia discovery
SC-26-10Soo Copper Project · molybdenumGrade: 1077.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- molybdenum
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1077.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 57 m
- From
- 326 m
- To
- 383 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, certified reference materials
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high molybdenum grade in the newly discovered breccia.
Positive factors
- high molybdenum grade
SC-26-11Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 317.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-11
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 317.2 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 349.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SC-26-11:32-349.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, certified reference materials
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate width but lower grade copper intercept.
SC-26-11Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-11
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 225 m
- To
- 234 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, certified reference materials
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Small high-grade sub-interval.
SC-26-12Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 477 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-12
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 477 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 484 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SC-26-12:7-484
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, certified reference materials
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Wide but low-grade copper intercept.
SC-26-12Soo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-12
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 121.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Actlabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, certified reference materials
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate grade intercept.
SC-26-10Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 227.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 497.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 227.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 497.55 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 501.55 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SC-26-10:4-501.55
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 227.7 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“227.7”
Context: SC-26-10
SC-26-10Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 497.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 497.55 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 501.55 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SC-26-10:4-501.55
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 14.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: SC-26-10
SC-26-10Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 497.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-10
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.83
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 497.55 m
- From
- 4 m
- To
- 501.55 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SC-26-10:4-501.55
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.83 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 910.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.83”
Context: SC-26-10
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 358 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 358 m
- From
- 44 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:44-402
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 114.6 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 237Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 358 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 237
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 358 m
- From
- 44 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:44-402
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 237 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“237.0”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 358 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 358 m
- From
- 44 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:44-402
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 14.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 358 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 358 m
- From
- 44 m
- To
- 402 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:44-402
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.27 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 812.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.27”
Context: Including
AndSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14.95 m
- From
- 113.95 m
- To
- 128.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:113.95-128.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 11.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 58.1Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 58.1
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14.95 m
- From
- 113.95 m
- To
- 128.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:113.95-128.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 58.1 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“58.1”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.95 m
- From
- 113.95 m
- To
- 128.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:113.95-128.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 4.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.95 m
- From
- 113.95 m
- To
- 128.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:113.95-128.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.77 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 71.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.77 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.77”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24.65 m
- From
- 205.35 m
- To
- 230 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:205.35-230
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.63 % copper is strong against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 40.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.63 % copper is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.63”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 61.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 24.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 61.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 24.65 m
- From
- 205.35 m
- To
- 230 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:205.35-230
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 61.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“61.5”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.65 m
- From
- 205.35 m
- To
- 230 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:205.35-230
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.17 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 11.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.65 m
- From
- 205.35 m
- To
- 230 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:205.35-230
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.64 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 286.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11.64”
Context: And
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 3.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.5 m
- From
- 218.5 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:218.5-227
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.98 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 33.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3.98 % copper is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.98”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 118Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 118
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8.5 m
- From
- 218.5 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:218.5-227
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 118 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“118”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.5 m
- From
- 218.5 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:218.5-227
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 28.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.5 m
- From
- 218.5 m
- To
- 227 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:218.5-227
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.99 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 246.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“28.99”
Context: Including
AndSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 57 m
- From
- 326 m
- To
- 383 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:326-383
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 12.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.21 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 1077.4Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1077.4
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 57 m
- From
- 326 m
- To
- 383 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:326-383
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1077.4 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“1,077.4”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 57 m
- From
- 326 m
- To
- 383 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:326-383
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 57 m
- From
- 326 m
- To
- 383 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:326-383
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.17 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 66.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.17 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.17”
Context: And
SC-26-11Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 82.7Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 317.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-11
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 82.7
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 317.2 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 349.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SC-26-11:32-349.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 82.7 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“82.7”
Context: SC-26-11
SC-26-11Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 317.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-11
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 317.2 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 349.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SC-26-11:32-349.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: SC-26-11
SC-26-11Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 317.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-11
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 317.2 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 349.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SC-26-11:32-349.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.92 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 291.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.92”
Context: SC-26-11
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 147.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 147.25 m
- From
- 107 m
- To
- 254.25 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:107-254.25
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 30.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 111.5Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 147.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 111.5
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 147.25 m
- From
- 107 m
- To
- 254.25 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:107-254.25
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 111.5 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“111.5”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 147.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 147.25 m
- From
- 107 m
- To
- 254.25 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:107-254.25
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 147.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 147.25 m
- From
- 107 m
- To
- 254.25 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:107-254.25
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 169.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.15”
Context: Including
AndSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 225 m
- To
- 234 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:225-234
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 4.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 775.3Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 775.3
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 225 m
- To
- 234 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:225-234
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 775.3 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“775.3”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 225 m
- To
- 234 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:225-234
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 225 m
- To
- 234 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:225-234
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.48 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.48 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.48”
Context: And
SC-26-12Soo Copper Project · moGrade: 134.9Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 477 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-12
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 134.9
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 477 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 484 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SC-26-12:7-484
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 134.9 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“134.9”
Context: SC-26-12
SC-26-12Soo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 477 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-12
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 477 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 484 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SC-26-12:7-484
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: SC-26-12
SC-26-12Soo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 477 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SC-26-12
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 477 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 484 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SC-26-12:7-484
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 477.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: SC-26-12
IncludingSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 136.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 136.62 m
- From
- 111.3 m
- To
- 247.92 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:111.3-247.92
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 % copper is weak against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 28.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 95Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 136.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 95
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 136.62 m
- From
- 111.3 m
- To
- 247.92 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:111.3-247.92
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 95 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“95”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 136.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 136.62 m
- From
- 111.3 m
- To
- 247.92 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:111.3-247.92
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: Including
IncludingSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 136.62 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Including
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 136.62 m
- From
- 111.3 m
- To
- 247.92 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Including:111.3-247.92
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.33 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 181.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.33 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.33”
Context: Including
AndSoo Copper Project · copperGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 121.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:112-121.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 % copper is moderate against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 5.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · moGrade: 202.2Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- mo
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 202.2
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 121.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:112-121.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 202.2 ppm mo. No grade band defined for this commodity, so the score is a placeholder.
Negative factors
- No grade rubric for mo; intercept not scored.
Evidence · table
“202.2”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 121.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:112-121.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: And
AndSoo Copper Project · silverGrade: 2.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Soo Copper Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SAG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.4 m
- From
- 112 m
- To
- 121.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:112-121.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.59 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.59 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.59”
Context: And
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.