Starcore Reports Q1 Results

Original announcement by prospectors_exchange on

Company
Starcore International Mines Ltd.
Ticker
SAM
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Queretaro, Mexico
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Production, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-16 17:06:30 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Starcore International Mines Ltd. reported its Q1 results for the period ended July 31, 2026, highlighting increased income from mining operations and a net income of $0.03 per share. The company achieved gold production of 1.8 thousand ounces and silver production of 13.6 thousand ounces from its San Martin mine in Mexico, with gold recovery at 85.5% and silver recovery at 58.1%. Despite some production declines and increased costs, the CEO expressed optimism for continued improvement.

Reasoning: Starcore reported mixed Q1 2026 results with increased income from mining operations and improved gold and silver recoveries, but also experienced declines in gold production, gold grade, and milled tonnes, alongside higher operating costs. The CEO expressed optimism for future improvements.

Positive factors

  • Increased income from mining operations
  • Improved gold and silver recoveries
  • Increased silver production and grade

Negative factors

  • Decreased gold production and grade
  • Decreased milled tonnes
  • Increased operating cash costs

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 12

Classification and evidence

Resource Updateneutral · Story-specific tag

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document reports quarterly financial and production results, which is a routine update.

Evidence · text

“Starcore Reports Q1 Results”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Salvador Garcia, B. Eng., a director of the Company and Chief Operating Officer, is stated as the Qualified Person for the project under NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“Salvador Garcia, B. Eng., a director of the Company and Chief Operating Officer, is the Company’s qualified person on the project as required under NI 43-101”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (2)

Fact 1San Martin Mine · goldRecovery: 85.5 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
San Martin Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Queretaro, Mexico
Ticker
SAM

Test Work

Processing Route
mill_cil

Recovery

Recovery
85.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Mine gold recovery improved significantly from 77.4% in Q1 2025 to 85.5% in Q1 2026, indicating operational improvements in carbon ore processing.

Positive factors

  • Recovery Improving

Evidence · table

“85.5 %”

Context: Mine Gold recovery

Fact 2San Martin Mine · silverRecovery: 58.1 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
San Martin Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Queretaro, Mexico
Ticker
SAM

Test Work

Processing Route
mill_cil

Recovery

Recovery
58.1 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Mine silver recovery improved from 54.8% in Q1 2025 to 58.1% in Q1 2026, indicating operational improvements in carbon ore processing.

Positive factors

  • Recovery Improving

Evidence · table

“5 8.1 %”

Context: Mine Silver recovery

Tags used in scoring

Low Recoverynegative

Recovery below the weak band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 58.1% is below the weak band (75%)

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.