SQX: Annual Report to Shareholders
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- SQX Resources Limited
- Ticker
- SQX
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Unavailable
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Copper
- Document categories
- Drill results, Capital raise, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-30 07:22:35 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
SQX Resources Limited's annual report for the year ended June 30, 2026, highlights a transformative year with the acquisition of 80% of AM6 Pty Ltd, securing the Red Bird Gold Project in Arizona and the Williams Gold-Silver Project in Montana, USA. The company reported bonanza-grade gold and silver assays from sampling and maiden RC drilling at Red Bird, confirming a shallow gold system with significant intercepts. Additionally, SQX completed a $2 million placement and a subsequent $2.47 million entitlement offer to fund its exploration activities and corporate growth.
Reasoning: SQX Resources Limited had a transformative year, acquiring new US-based gold and silver projects and reporting high-grade exploration results from both sampling and maiden drilling. The company also successfully raised capital to support its growth. However, the detailed exploration results are largely historical restatements, and the company recorded an operating loss.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of new projects (Red Bird, Williams) in the USA, transforming the company's portfolio.
- High-grade gold and silver assays reported from sampling and maiden drilling at Red Bird.
- Maiden drilling at Red Bird confirmed a shallow gold system with significant intercepts.
- Expansion of landholding at the Williams project, increasing exploration potential.
- Successful completion of a $2 million placement and a subsequent $2.47 million entitlement offer to fund activities.
Negative factors
- Most detailed exploration results presented are re-releases of historical data, limiting novelty.
- The company reported an operating loss for the financial year.
- Decrease in working capital from the prior year.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 37
Classification and evidence
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that the exploration results are extracted from previous ASX Announcements, indicating they are not new assays or interpretations.
Evidence · text
“The information in this Annual Report that relates to Exploration Results, Exploration Targets and Exploration Data for SQX’s Projects was extracted from the following ASX Announcements:”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The report states that the information was issued in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code and confirms that the Competent Person’s findings have not been materially modified.
Evidence · text
“The reports were issued in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the JORC Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcements.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: No true width or drill orientation information is provided for any of the reported drill intercepts, implying they are downhole lengths.
Evidence · text
“45.7m @ 1.3g/t Au from 4.6m (incl. 13.7m @ 2.2g/t Au) in RBRC013”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Several channel samples and drill sub-intervals report gold grades significantly above the exceptional threshold for epithermal deposits (e.g., 38.5 g/t Au, 36.0 g/t Au, 75.1 g/t Au, 576 g/t Ag).
Evidence · text
“13.7m @ 16.0g/t Au (incl. 4.6m @ 38.5g/t Au)”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 37. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (37)
Fact 1Red Bird Gold Project · goldGrade: 16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Bird Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona, USA
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-03-24T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical channel sample shows a high-grade gold intercept over a good width, indicating strong mineralization in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low as it's a re-release.
Positive factors
- High gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Good intercept length for channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“13.7m @ 16.0g/t Au (incl. 4.6m @ 38.5g/t Au)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 2Red Bird Gold Project · goldGrade: 38.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Bird Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona, USA
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 38.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-03-24T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows bonanza-grade gold over a significant width, highlighting very high-grade zones within the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza-grade gold for an epithermal deposit.
- Good sub-interval width.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“4.6m @ 38.5g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 3Red Bird Gold Project · goldGrade: 18.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Bird Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona, USA
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-03-24T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical channel sample shows a high-grade gold intercept over a good width, indicating strong mineralization in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low as it's a re-release.
Positive factors
- High gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Good intercept length for channel sampling.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“6.7m @ 18.3g/t Au (incl. 3.0m @ 36.0g/t Au)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 4Red Bird Gold Project · goldGrade: 36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Bird Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona, USA
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-03-24T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows bonanza-grade gold over a significant width, highlighting very high-grade zones within the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza-grade gold for an epithermal deposit.
- Good sub-interval width.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“3.0m @ 36.0g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 5Red Bird Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Bird Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona, USA
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-03-24T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface channel sample shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, supporting near-surface mineralization potential, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length for surface channel sampling.
- Moderate gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“29.3m @ 1.3g/t Au (incl. 8.2m @ 1.8g/t Au)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 6Red Bird Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Bird Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona, USA
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-03-24T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, supporting near-surface mineralization potential, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Good sub-interval width.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“8.2m @ 1.8g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
RBRC013Red Bird North · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 45.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC013
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 45.7 m
- From
- 4.6 m
- To
- 50.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 4.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC013:4.6-50.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a significant width of moderate-grade gold, supporting the potential for a shallow open-pit scenario in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length for an epithermal gold system.
- Moderate gold grade, consistent with open-pit potential.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“45.7m @ 1.3g/t Au from 4.6m (incl. 13.7m @ 2.2g/t Au) in RBRC013”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC013Red Bird North · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC013
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a good width, indicating higher-grade zones within the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Good sub-interval width.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“13.7m @ 2.2g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC012Red Bird North · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 42.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC012
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 42.7 m
- From
- 4.6 m
- To
- 47.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 4.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC012:4.6-47.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a significant width of moderate-grade gold, supporting the potential for a shallow open-pit scenario in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length for an epithermal gold system.
- Moderate gold grade, consistent with open-pit potential.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“42.7m @ 1.4g/t Au from 4.6m (incl. 9.1m @ 3.9g/t Au) in RBRC012”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC012Red Bird North · goldGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC012
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a good width, indicating higher-grade zones within the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Good sub-interval width.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“9.1m @ 3.9g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC023Red Bird North · goldGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC023
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.4 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 47.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC023:22.9-47.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, indicating significant mineralization in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Good intercept length.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“24.4m @ 3.1g/t Au from 22.9m (incl. 9.1m @ 6.6g/t Au) in RBRC023”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC023Red Bird North · goldGrade: 6.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC023
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows bonanza-grade gold over a significant width, highlighting very high-grade zones within the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza-grade gold for an epithermal deposit.
- Good sub-interval width.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“9.1m @ 6.6g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC026Red Bird North · goldGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC026
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.9 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 48.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC026:22.9-48.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, indicating significant mineralization in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Good intercept length.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“25.9m @ 2.4g/t Au from 22.9m (incl. 6.1m @ 5.2g/t Au) in RBRC026”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC026Red Bird North · goldGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC026
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows bonanza-grade gold over a significant width, highlighting very high-grade zones within the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza-grade gold for an epithermal deposit.
- Good sub-interval width.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“6.1m @ 5.2g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC019Red Bird North · goldGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC019
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.9 m
- From
- 42.7 m
- To
- 65.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC019:42.7-65.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, indicating significant mineralization in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Good intercept length.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“22.9m @ 2.8g/t Au from 42.7m (incl. 4.6m @ 8.7g/t Au) in RBRC019”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC019Red Bird North · goldGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC019
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows bonanza-grade gold over a significant width, highlighting very high-grade zones within the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza-grade gold for an epithermal deposit.
- Good sub-interval width.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“4.6m @ 8.7g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC020Red Bird North · goldGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC020
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.8 m
- From
- 41.1 m
- To
- 57.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 41.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC020:41.1-57.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, indicating significant mineralization in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Good intercept length.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“16.8m @ 2.9g/t Au from 41.1m (incl. 6.1m @ 5.2g/t Au) in RBRC020”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC020Red Bird North · goldGrade: 5.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC020
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows bonanza-grade gold over a significant width, highlighting very high-grade zones within the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza-grade gold for an epithermal deposit.
- Good sub-interval width.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“6.1m @ 5.2g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC015Red Bird North · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC015
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 36.6 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 39.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC015:3-39.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a significant width of moderate-grade gold, supporting the potential for a shallow open-pit scenario in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length for an epithermal gold system.
- Moderate gold grade, consistent with open-pit potential.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“36.6m @ 1.0g/t Au from 3.0m in RBRC015”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC031Red Bird North · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC031
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 28.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC031:13.7-28.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width, indicating significant mineralization in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Good intercept length.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“15.2m @ 2.2g/t Au from 13.7m (incl. 7.6m @ 3.8g/t Au) in RBRC031”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC031Red Bird North · goldGrade: 3.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC031
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a good width, indicating higher-grade zones within the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Good sub-interval width.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“7.6m @ 3.8g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC027Red Bird North · goldGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC027
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 15.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC027:1.5-15.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a good width from very shallow depth, indicating significant near-surface mineralization, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Good intercept length from very shallow depth.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“13.7m @ 2.9g/t Au from 1.5m (incl. 4.6m @ 7.8g/t Au) in RBRC027”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC027Red Bird North · goldGrade: 7.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC027
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows bonanza-grade gold over a significant width, highlighting very high-grade zones within the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza-grade gold for an epithermal deposit.
- Good sub-interval width.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“4.6m @ 7.8g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC010Red Bird North · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC010
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27.4 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 42.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC010:15.2-42.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a significant width of moderate-grade gold, supporting the potential for a shallow open-pit scenario in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length for an epithermal gold system.
- Moderate gold grade, consistent with open-pit potential.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“27.4m @ 1.0g/t Au from 15.2m in RBRC010”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC025Red Bird North · goldGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC025
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.9 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 45.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC025:22.9-45.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a good width of moderate-grade gold, supporting the potential for a shallow open-pit scenario in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length for an epithermal gold system.
- Moderate gold grade, consistent with open-pit potential.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“22.9m @ 1.7g/t Au from 22.9m in RBRC025”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC016Red Bird North · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC016
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 35.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 22.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC016:22.9-35.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization in the epithermal system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an epithermal deposit.
- Moderate intercept length.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“12.2m @ 2.1g/t Au from 22.9m in RBRC016”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC026Red Bird North · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC026
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 9.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC026:0-9.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows moderate gold grade from surface over a moderate width, indicating near-surface mineralization, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade from surface, indicating near-surface mineralization.
- Moderate intercept length.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“9.1m @ 1.0g/t Au from 0m in RBRC026”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RBRC025Red Bird North · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RBRC025
- Project
- Red Bird North
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- usa_az
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 9.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RBRC025:0-9.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows moderate gold grade from surface over a moderate width, indicating near-surface mineralization, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade from surface, indicating near-surface mineralization.
- Moderate intercept length.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“9.1m @ 0.9g/t Au from surface in RBRC025”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 29Williams Gold-Silver Project · goldGrade: 75.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Williams Gold-Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- Montana, USA
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 75.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-18T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical channel sample shows bonanza-grade gold and high-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating very high-grade zones within the epithermal vein system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza-grade gold for an epithermal deposit.
- Associated with high-grade silver.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Narrow intercept length for channel sampling.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“0.6m @ 75.1g/t Au + 576g/t Ag (backs)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 30Williams Gold-Silver Project · silverGrade: 576Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Williams Gold-Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- Montana, USA
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 576
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-18T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical channel sample shows bonanza-grade silver and high-grade gold over a narrow width, indicating very high-grade zones within the epithermal vein system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza-grade silver for an epithermal deposit.
- Associated with high-grade gold.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Narrow intercept length for channel sampling.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“0.6m @ 75.1g/t Au + 576g/t Ag (backs)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 31Williams Gold-Silver Project · goldGrade: 40.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Williams Gold-Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- Montana, USA
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 40.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-18T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical channel sample shows bonanza-grade gold and high-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating very high-grade zones within the epithermal vein system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza-grade gold for an epithermal deposit.
- Associated with high-grade silver.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Narrow intercept length for channel sampling.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“0.7m @ 40.7g/t Au + 319g/t Ag (western drive face)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 32Williams Gold-Silver Project · silverGrade: 319Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Williams Gold-Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- Montana, USA
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 319
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- No
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-11-18T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical channel sample shows bonanza-grade silver and high-grade gold over a narrow width, indicating very high-grade zones within the epithermal vein system, though its novelty is low.
Positive factors
- Exceptional bonanza-grade silver for an epithermal deposit.
- Associated with high-grade gold.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Narrow intercept length for channel sampling.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“0.7m @ 40.7g/t Au + 319g/t Ag (western drive face)”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 33Scrub Paddock · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Scrub Paddock
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28 m
- From
- 101 m
- To
- 129 m
- Intercept Depth
- 101 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Scrub_Paddock:101-129
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-02-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a good width of moderate-grade gold, indicating mineralization potential, though its novelty is very low as it's a re-release from an older prospectus.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length for gold mineralization.
- Moderate gold grade.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“28m @ 1.2g/t Au from 101m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 34Scrub Paddock · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Scrub Paddock
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- SQX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
- From
- 42 m
- To
- 54 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Scrub_Paddock:42-54
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-02-16T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate width of moderate-grade gold, indicating mineralization potential, though its novelty is very low as it's a re-release from an older prospectus.
Positive factors
- Moderate intercept length for gold mineralization.
- Moderate gold grade.
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data, limiting novelty.
- Apparent width only, true width not stated.
Evidence · text
“12m @ 1.0g/t Au from 42m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 35Red Bird Gold ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Bird Gold Project
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona, USA
- Ticker
- SQX
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The acquisition of AM6 Pty Ltd was a significant strategic move, providing SQX with advanced gold-silver projects in the US and aligning vendor interests with project success, though the announcement itself is a summary of a past event.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of 80% interest in AM6 Pty Ltd, securing two advanced gold-silver projects.
- Consideration includes performance rights aligned with exploration and development milestones.
- Strategic expansion into the US minerals sector.
Negative factors
- Acquisition is a re-release of a previously announced event, limiting novelty.
Evidence · text
“On 14 October 2025, SQX entered into a binding agreement to acquire 80% of the issued share capital of AM6 Pty Ltd, the holder of the Williams Gold-Silver Project in Montana, USA and the Red Bird Gold Project in Arizona, USA, subject to satisfaction of conditions precedent including shareholder approval, due diligence and regulatory/third-party consents. Total consideration comprised: ▪ 20,000,000 fully paid ordinary shares in SQX (Consideration Shares); ▪ $250,000 in cash (Consideration Payment); and ▪ 30,000,000 Performance Rights, vesting in tranches of 10,000,000 upon satisfaction of defined exploration and development milestones. Completion of the acquisition occurred on 7 January 2026, securing SQX an 80% interest in AM6 and its portfolio of advanced gold exploration projects in the western United States.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 36View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Ticker
- SQX
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The successful $2 million placement provided essential funding for the company's strategic acquisition and exploration activities, demonstrating investor confidence, though the announcement itself is a summary of a past event.
Positive factors
- Successful capital raise providing funds for acquisition costs, exploration, and working capital.
- Placement to professional and sophisticated investors.
Negative factors
- Placement is a re-release of a previously announced event, limiting novelty.
Evidence · text
“During the year, SQX completed a placement to professional and sophisticated investors raising $2,000,000 (before costs) via the issue of 20,000,000 new shares at A$0.10 per share. Proceeds were applied to acquisition costs, exploration activities across the AM6 projects and working capital. The placement occurred in two tranches: Tranche 1 comprised 7,812,500 shares issued under the Company’s existing capacity pursuant to Listing Rules 7.1 and 7.1A on 22 October 2025, and Tranche 2 comprised the remaining 12,187,500 shares issued following receipt of shareholder approval under Listing Rule 7.1 at the Company’s Annual General Meeting held on 28 November 2025.”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 37View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Ticker
- SQX
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The successful and fully underwritten entitlement offer significantly boosts the company's financial position for future activities, although the lower issue price suggests some dilution for existing shareholders.
Positive factors
- Successful completion of a fully underwritten entitlement offer, raising significant capital.
- Provides additional funding for future operations and exploration activities.
Negative factors
- Issue price of $0.04 per share is lower than the previous placement price of $0.10, indicating dilution.
Evidence · text
“On 21 August 2026, the Company announced a fully underwritten non-renounceable pro rata entitlement offer of two (2) new shares for every three (3) shares held at an issue price of $0.04 per share to raise approximately $2.47 million (before costs) through the issue of up to 61,700,000 fully paid ordinary shares. ... On 21 September 2026, the Company announced the completion of the fully underwritten non-renounceable pro rata entitlement successfully raising $2.47 million (before costs).”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.