Spark Expands Arapaima’s Gallium–Rare Earth Portfolio with Boa Vista Surface Results
Original announcement by cse on
- Company
- Spark Energy Minerals Inc.
- Ticker
- SPRK
- Exchange
- CSE
- Region
- Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Primary commodity
- Gallium
- Secondary commodities
- Rare earth, Scandium, Niobium, Neodymium praseodymium
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-24 17:37:30 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Spark Energy Minerals Inc. reported high-grade surface sampling results from its Boa Vista target at the Arapaima Project in Brazil, identifying it as a second mineralized center for gallium and rare earth elements. Soil samples returned up to 134.4 g/t Ga₂O₃, and stream sediments showed up to 1.0% TREO, with these results correlating well with previous near-surface drilling. The findings provide a strong foundation for follow-up exploration and drilling to define the extent and sources of mineralization.
Reasoning: New high-grade surface sampling results for gallium and rare earth elements at the Boa Vista target expand the company's critical minerals portfolio and provide strong vectors for follow-up drilling, although these are early-stage exploration results.
Positive factors
- High-grade gallium and rare earth results from surface samples
- Identification of a second mineralized center (Boa Vista)
- Surface geochemistry correlates with previous drilling
- Guidance for future exploration and drilling
- QA/QC disclosed
Negative factors
- Surface samples are early-stage and not definitive
- No new drill results reported in this release
- No mineral resource or economic analysis yet
- Scandium metallurgical recovery not demonstrated
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 5
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (5)
Fact 1Arapaima · galliumGrade: 83.3Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Arapaima
- Commodity
- gallium
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Ticker
- SPRK
Geometry
- Grade
- 83.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Boa Vista
- Easting
- 237553
- Northing
- 8109662
- CRS
- UTM zone 22S
- EPSG
- 32722
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol Ltda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade gallium in a soil sample indicates potential mineralization at the new Boa Vista target.
Positive factors
- High grade
- New target identified
Negative factors
- Early stage exploration
- Surface sample only
- Cut-off undisclosed
Evidence · table
“83,3”
Context: ARA-SL-034
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Fact 2Arapaima · scandiumGrade: 16.9Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Arapaima
- Commodity
- scandium
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Ticker
- SPRK
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Boa Vista
- Easting
- 237553
- Northing
- 8109662
- CRS
- UTM zone 22S
- EPSG
- 32722
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol Ltda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Scandium presence in a soil sample contributes to the critical minerals portfolio at Boa Vista, though metallurgical recovery is unproven.
Positive factors
- Presence of critical mineral
- New target identified
Negative factors
- Early stage exploration
- Surface sample only
- Cut-off undisclosed
- Metallurgical recovery not demonstrated
Evidence · table
“16,9”
Context: ARA-SL-034
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Fact 3Arapaima · rare earthGrade: 129Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Arapaima
- Commodity
- rare earth
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Ticker
- SPRK
Geometry
- Grade
- 129
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Boa Vista
- Easting
- 237553
- Northing
- 8109662
- CRS
- UTM zone 22S
- EPSG
- 32722
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol Ltda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Rare earth presence in a soil sample indicates potential mineralization at the new Boa Vista target.
Positive factors
- Presence of critical mineral
- New target identified
Negative factors
- Early stage exploration
- Surface sample only
- Cut-off undisclosed
Evidence · table
“129”
Context: ARA-SL-034
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Fact 4Arapaima · galliumGrade: 67.2Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Arapaima
- Commodity
- gallium
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Ticker
- SPRK
Geometry
- Grade
- 67.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Boa Vista
- Easting
- 237924
- Northing
- 8109718
- CRS
- UTM zone 22S
- EPSG
- 32722
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol Ltda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade gallium in a soil sample indicates potential mineralization at the new Boa Vista target.
Positive factors
- High grade
- New target identified
Negative factors
- Early stage exploration
- Surface sample only
- Cut-off undisclosed
Evidence · table
“67,2”
Context: ARA-SL-036
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Fact 5Arapaima · scandiumGrade: 16.9Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Arapaima
- Commodity
- scandium
- Region
- brazil
- Reported Region
- Minas Gerais, Brazil
- Ticker
- SPRK
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Boa Vista
- Easting
- 237924
- Northing
- 8109718
- CRS
- UTM zone 22S
- EPSG
- 32722
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Geosol Ltda
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates, standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Scandium presence in a soil sample contributes to the critical minerals portfolio at Boa Vista, though metallurgical recovery is unproven.
Positive factors
- Presence of critical mineral
- New target identified
Negative factors
- Early stage exploration
- Surface sample only
- Cut-off undisclosed
- Metallurgical recovery not demonstrated
Evidence · table
“16,9”
Context: ARA-SL-036
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.