Southern Energy Corp. Announces Successful Cotton Valley Completion Results at Williamsburg
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Southern Energy Corp.
- Ticker
- SOU.V
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Mississippi
- Primary commodity
- Natural gas
- Secondary commodities
- Condensate
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-10-15 07:02:20 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Southern Energy Corp. has completed the Terrible Creek 21-2 #2 Cotton Valley well in Mississippi, reporting successful initial flow test results. The well produced 2.3 MMcf/d of natural gas and 50 barrels of condensate per day without requiring fracture stimulation, suggesting a high-permeability gas condensate reservoir.
Reasoning: The well exceeded thickness expectations and delivered high flow rates without stimulation, supporting a larger development play.
Positive factors
- Successful flow test results
- High permeability deliverability without fracture stimulation
- Significant upside potential from 7,200 acres of mapped closure
- Presence of liquids-rich gas condensate reservoir
Negative factors
- Results are preliminary and based on a 72-hour test
Facts used in scoring: 3
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The announcement includes a Qualified Person's statement from Gary McMurren, P.Eng.
Evidence · text
“Gary McMurren, Chief Operating Officer... has approved the technical information”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (3)
Terrible Creek 21-2 #2Williamsburg Field · natural gasGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: MMcf/dIntercept: 21.64 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Terrible Creek 21-2 #2
- Project
- Williamsburg Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- mississippi
- Reported Region
- mississippi
- Ticker
- SOU.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- MMcf/d
- Intercept
- 21.64 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Terrible Creek 21-2 #2:flow_test
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Stabilized rate of 2.3 MMcf/d achieved without fracture stimulation.
Positive factors
- High flow rate for a non-stimulated well
Negative factors
- Short duration test
Evidence · text
“flowing at a stabilized rate of 2.3 MMcf/d of natural gas”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Terrible Creek 21-2 #2Williamsburg Field · condensateGrade: 50Grade Unit: barrels per dayIntercept: 21.64 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Terrible Creek 21-2 #2
- Project
- Williamsburg Field
- Commodity
- condensate
- Region
- mississippi
- Reported Region
- mississippi
- Ticker
- SOU.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 50
- Grade Unit
- barrels per day
- Intercept
- 21.64 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Terrible Creek 21-2 #2:flow_test
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 50 barrels of condensate per day reported alongside gas.
Positive factors
- Adds liquid weighting to production
Evidence · text
“plus 50 barrels of condensate per day”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Terrible Creek 21-2 #2Williamsburg Field · natural gasIntercept: 21.64 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Terrible Creek 21-2 #2
- Project
- Williamsburg Field
- Commodity
- natural gas
- Region
- mississippi
- Reported Region
- mississippi
- Ticker
- SOU.V
Geometry
- Intercept
- 21.64 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Terrible Creek 21-2 #2:gross_interval
QA/QC
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Gross interval thickness of 110 feet exceeded expectations.
Positive factors
- Exceeded expectations based on offset wells
Evidence · text
“encountered a Cotton Valley "C" gross interval thickness of approximately 110 feet”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.