Silverco Mining Releases Remainder of 2025 Assays, Drilling 13.6m Grading 370 g/t AgEq, 12.0m Grading 236 g/t AgEq, 3.7m Grading 803 g/t AgEq, and 6.8m Grading 255 g/t AgEq
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Silverco Mining Ltd.
- Ticker
- SICO
- Exchange
- TSXV
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-21 01:49:14 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Silverco Mining has released the final assay results from its 15,000 metre 2025 diamond drill program at the Cusi Property. The results include multiple high-grade silver equivalent intercepts, notably 803 g/t AgEq over 3.7m.
Reasoning: The release reports several high-grade silver equivalent intercepts, including a bonanza-style 803 g/t AgEq over 3.7m, concluding a 15,000m drilling program.
Positive factors
- High grade silver equivalent intercepts
- Significant width on several intercepts
Facts used in scoring: 5
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 803 g/t AgEq is exceptionally high grade for silver.
Evidence · text
“803 g/t AgEq over 3.7 meters”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (5)
San MiguelsilverGrade: 370Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 13.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- San Miguel
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 370
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 13.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 370 g/t AgEq over 13.6m is a strong intercept for silver.
Positive factors
- Strong grade and width
Evidence · text
“370 g/t AgEq over 13.6 metres”
San MiguelsilverGrade: 236Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- San Miguel
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 236
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 12 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 236 g/t AgEq over 12.0m is a strong intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong grade and width
Evidence · text
“236 g/t AgEq over 12.0 metres”
San MiguelsilverGrade: 803Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 3.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- San Miguel
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 803
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 3.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 803 g/t AgEq is an exceptionally high grade.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade
Evidence · text
“803 g/t AgEq over 3.7 meters”
San MiguelsilverGrade: 548Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 3.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- San Miguel
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 548
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 548 g/t AgEq is a high grade intercept.
Positive factors
- High grade
Evidence · text
“548 g/t AgEq over 3.9 metres”
San JuansilverGrade: 255Grade Unit: g/t AgEqIntercept: 6.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- San Juan
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 255
- Grade Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Intercept
- 6.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 255 g/t AgEq over 6.8m is a strong intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong grade
Evidence · text
“255 g/t AgEq over 6.8 metres”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.