Silverco Mining Intercepts 1,280 g/t Silver over 3.35 Metres True Width at Its 100%-Owned Cusi Mine in Chihuahua, Mexico
Original announcement by newsfile on
- Company
- Silverco Mining Ltd.
- Ticker
- SICO
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Chihuahua, Mexico
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-14 11:06:22 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Silverco Mining Ltd. announced significant drill results from its 30,000-meter program at the Cusi Mine in Chihuahua, Mexico, including a high-grade intercept of 1,280 g/t silver over 3.35 meters true width in hole UGCU26-09. The program, targeting resource growth and infill drilling in the Promontorio, San Miguel, and San Juan areas, aims to optimize mine planning and support a Mineral Resource update in H1 2027. These results validate the continuity of high-grade mineralization and are expected to enhance the project's value ahead of a planned production restart in Q4 2026.
Reasoning: The drill program delivered multiple high-grade silver intercepts, including a bonanza grade of 1,280 g/t Ag over 3.35 m true width, which confirms continuity and supports future resource growth and mine planning for the Cusi Mine restart. True widths were reported, and QA/QC procedures were disclosed, enhancing confidence in the results. However, the cut-off grade for compositing was not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- True Width Disclosed
- Step-Out Extension
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Infill Drilling
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 267
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 267. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (267)
UGCU26-09Cusi · silverGrade: 1096Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1096
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- True Width
- 1.28 m
- From
- 42.95 m
- To
- 45.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:42.95-45.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1096
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver equivalent intercept of 1,096 g/t AgEq over 1.28 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1,096”
Context: 2.10
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.28
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- True Width
- 1.28 m
- From
- 42.95 m
- To
- 45.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:42.95-45.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1096
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 0.48 g/t over 1.28 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 2.10
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.28
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · leadGrade: 1.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.59
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- True Width
- 1.28 m
- From
- 42.95 m
- To
- 45.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:42.95-45.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1096
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate lead grade of 1.59% over 1.28 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.59”
Context: 2.10
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.28
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · zincGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- True Width
- 1.28 m
- From
- 42.95 m
- To
- 45.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:42.95-45.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1096
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate zinc grade of 2.78% over 1.28 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“2.78”
Context: 2.10
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.28
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · silverGrade: 3574Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3574
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 42.95 m
- To
- 43.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:42.95-43.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3574
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional bonanza silver equivalent grade of 3,574 g/t AgEq over 0.37 m true width, indicating very high-grade mineralization. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“3,574”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · goldGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 42.95 m
- To
- 43.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:42.95-43.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 1.64 g/t over 0.37 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.64”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · leadGrade: 4.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 42.95 m
- To
- 43.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:42.95-43.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate lead grade of 4.11% over 0.37 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“4.11”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · zincGrade: 7.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 42.95 m
- To
- 43.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:42.95-43.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate zinc grade of 7.75% over 0.37 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“7.75”
Context: 0.60
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · silverGrade: 1222Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1222
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 3.35 m
- From
- 52.6 m
- To
- 59 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:52.6-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1222
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver equivalent intercept of 1,222 g/t AgEq over 3.35 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1,222”
Context: 6.40
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.35
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 3.35 m
- From
- 52.6 m
- To
- 59 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:52.6-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 0.42 g/t over 3.35 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 6.40
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.35
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · leadGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 3.35 m
- From
- 52.6 m
- To
- 59 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:52.6-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate lead grade of 1.28% over 3.35 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.28”
Context: 6.40
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.35
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · zincGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 3.35 m
- From
- 52.6 m
- To
- 59 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:52.6-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate zinc grade of 1.49% over 3.35 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.49”
Context: 6.40
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.35
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · silverGrade: 5392Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5392
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 55.6 m
- To
- 56.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:55.6-56.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5392
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional bonanza silver equivalent grade of 5,392 g/t AgEq over 0.65 m true width, indicating very high-grade mineralization. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“5,392”
Context: 1.25
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.65
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · goldGrade: 1.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 55.6 m
- To
- 56.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:55.6-56.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 1.69 g/t over 0.65 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.69”
Context: 1.25
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.65
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · leadGrade: 3.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 55.6 m
- To
- 56.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:55.6-56.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate lead grade of 3.09% over 0.65 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“3.09”
Context: 1.25
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.65
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-09Cusi · zincGrade: 5.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-09
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 55.6 m
- To
- 56.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 100.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-09:55.6-56.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319454
- Northing
- 3125945
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1678 m
- Azimuth
- 193.8 °
- Dip
- -52.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate zinc grade of 5.63% over 0.65 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“5.63”
Context: 1.25
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.65
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-10Cusi · silverGrade: 737Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-10
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 737
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- True Width
- 4.18 m
- From
- 83.5 m
- To
- 94 m
- Hole Depth
- 106.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-10:83.5-94
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319456
- Northing
- 3125949
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -85.2 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 737
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver equivalent intercept of 737 g/t AgEq over 4.18 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“737”
Context: 10.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.18
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-10Cusi · goldGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-10
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- True Width
- 4.18 m
- From
- 83.5 m
- To
- 94 m
- Hole Depth
- 106.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-10:83.5-94
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319456
- Northing
- 3125949
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -85.2 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 737
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 1.17 g/t over 4.18 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.17”
Context: 10.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.18
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-10Cusi · leadGrade: 4.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-10
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.79
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- True Width
- 4.18 m
- From
- 83.5 m
- To
- 94 m
- Hole Depth
- 106.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-10:83.5-94
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319456
- Northing
- 3125949
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -85.2 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 737
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate lead grade of 4.79% over 4.18 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“4.79”
Context: 10.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.18
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-10Cusi · zincGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-10
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- True Width
- 4.18 m
- From
- 83.5 m
- To
- 94 m
- Hole Depth
- 106.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-10:83.5-94
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319456
- Northing
- 3125949
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -85.2 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 737
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate zinc grade of 1.26% over 4.18 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.26”
Context: 10.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.18
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-10Cusi · silverGrade: 1198Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-10
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1198
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 1.79 m
- From
- 83.5 m
- To
- 88 m
- Hole Depth
- 106.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-10:83.5-88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319456
- Northing
- 3125949
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -85.2 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1198
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver equivalent intercept of 1,198 g/t AgEq over 1.79 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1,198”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.79
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-10Cusi · goldGrade: 2.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-10
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 1.79 m
- From
- 83.5 m
- To
- 88 m
- Hole Depth
- 106.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-10:83.5-88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319456
- Northing
- 3125949
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -85.2 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 2.69 g/t over 1.79 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“2.69”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.79
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-10Cusi · leadGrade: 10.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-10
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 1.79 m
- From
- 83.5 m
- To
- 88 m
- Hole Depth
- 106.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-10:83.5-88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319456
- Northing
- 3125949
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -85.2 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong lead grade of 10.67% over 1.79 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“10.67”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.79
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-10Cusi · zincGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-10
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 1.79 m
- From
- 83.5 m
- To
- 88 m
- Hole Depth
- 106.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-10:83.5-88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319456
- Northing
- 3125949
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -85.2 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate zinc grade of 2.53% over 1.79 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“2.53”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.79
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-10Cusi · silverGrade: 1134Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-10
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1134
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 0.6 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 92.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 106.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-10:91-92.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319456
- Northing
- 3125949
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -85.2 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1134
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver equivalent intercept of 1,134 g/t AgEq over 0.60 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1,134”
Context: 1.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.6
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-10Cusi · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-10
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 0.6 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 92.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 106.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-10:91-92.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319456
- Northing
- 3125949
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -85.2 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade of 0.03 g/t over 0.60 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 1.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.6
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-10Cusi · leadGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-10
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.89
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 0.6 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 92.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 106.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-10:91-92.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319456
- Northing
- 3125949
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -85.2 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak lead grade of 0.89% over 0.60 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.89”
Context: 1.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.6
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-10Cusi · zincGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-10
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 0.6 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 92.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 106.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-10:91-92.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319456
- Northing
- 3125949
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -85.2 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak zinc grade of 0.64% over 0.60 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 1.50
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.6
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · silverGrade: 112Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 112
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.65 m
- From
- 8.65 m
- To
- 15.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:8.65-15.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 112
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 112 g/t AgEq over 6.65 m downhole length. True width is not disclosed, and cut-off grade is not stated, lowering confidence in the economic significance of the intercept.
Positive factors
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“112”
Context: 6.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.65 m
- From
- 8.65 m
- To
- 15.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:8.65-15.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 112
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade of 0.06 g/t over 6.65 m downhole length. True width is not disclosed, and cut-off grade is not stated, lowering confidence in the economic significance of the intercept.
Positive factors
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 6.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · leadGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.65 m
- From
- 8.65 m
- To
- 15.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:8.65-15.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 112
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low lead grade of 0.12% over 6.65 m downhole length. True width is not disclosed, and cut-off grade is not stated, lowering confidence in the economic significance of the intercept.
Positive factors
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 6.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.65 m
- From
- 8.65 m
- To
- 15.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:8.65-15.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 112
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low zinc grade of 0.10% over 6.65 m downhole length. True width is not disclosed, and cut-off grade is not stated, lowering confidence in the economic significance of the intercept.
Positive factors
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 6.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · silverGrade: 290Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 290
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.88 m
- From
- 52 m
- To
- 54 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:52-54
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 290
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 290 g/t AgEq over 1.88 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“290”
Context: 2.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.88
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.88 m
- From
- 52 m
- To
- 54 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:52-54
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 0.44 g/t over 1.88 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: 2.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.88
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.88 m
- From
- 52 m
- To
- 54 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:52-54
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak lead grade of 0.40% over 1.88 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 2.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.88
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · zincGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.88 m
- From
- 52 m
- To
- 54 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:52-54
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak zinc grade of 0.17% over 1.88 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 2.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.88
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · silverGrade: 250Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 250
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.76 m
- From
- 67.8 m
- To
- 69.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:67.8-69.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 250 g/t AgEq over 1.76 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“250”
Context: 1.65
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.76
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.76 m
- From
- 67.8 m
- To
- 69.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:67.8-69.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold grade of 0.27 g/t over 1.76 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 1.65
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.76
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · leadGrade: 4.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.76 m
- From
- 67.8 m
- To
- 69.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:67.8-69.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate lead grade of 4.08% over 1.76 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“4.08”
Context: 1.65
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.76
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · zincGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.83
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.76 m
- From
- 67.8 m
- To
- 69.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:67.8-69.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak zinc grade of 0.83% over 1.76 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.83”
Context: 1.65
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.76
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · silverGrade: 207Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 207
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- True Width
- 3.22 m
- From
- 124.8 m
- To
- 128.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:124.8-128.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 207
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 207 g/t AgEq over 3.22 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“207”
Context: 3.85
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.22
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- True Width
- 3.22 m
- From
- 124.8 m
- To
- 128.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:124.8-128.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 0.48 g/t over 3.22 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 3.85
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.22
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · leadGrade: 3.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- True Width
- 3.22 m
- From
- 124.8 m
- To
- 128.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:124.8-128.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate lead grade of 3.23% over 3.22 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“3.23”
Context: 3.85
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.22
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · zincGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- True Width
- 3.22 m
- From
- 124.8 m
- To
- 128.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:124.8-128.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak zinc grade of 0.65% over 3.22 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: 3.85
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.22
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · silverGrade: 236Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 236
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 244.3 m
- To
- 245.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:244.3-245.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 236
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 236 g/t AgEq over 0.70 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“236”
Context: 0.75
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 244.3 m
- To
- 245.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:244.3-245.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 0.56 g/t over 0.70 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 0.75
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · leadGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 244.3 m
- To
- 245.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:244.3-245.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak lead grade of 0.23% over 0.70 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: 0.75
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-11Cusi · zincGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-11
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 244.3 m
- To
- 245.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 279 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-11:244.3-245.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 349.8 °
- Dip
- -27.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak zinc grade of 0.41% over 0.70 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 0.75
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-12Cusi · silverGrade: 85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-12
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.81 m
- From
- 64.2 m
- To
- 65.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 94.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-12:64.2-65.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319408
- Northing
- 3125912
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 285.5 °
- Dip
- -42.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 85 g/t AgEq over 0.81 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“85”
Context: 1.30
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.81
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-12Cusi · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-12
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.81 m
- From
- 64.2 m
- To
- 65.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 94.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-12:64.2-65.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319408
- Northing
- 3125912
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 285.5 °
- Dip
- -42.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak gold grade of 0.39 g/t over 0.81 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: 1.30
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.81
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-12Cusi · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-12
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.81 m
- From
- 64.2 m
- To
- 65.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 94.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-12:64.2-65.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319408
- Northing
- 3125912
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 285.5 °
- Dip
- -42.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak lead grade of 0.20% over 0.81 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: 1.30
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.81
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-12Cusi · zincGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-12
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 0.81 m
- From
- 64.2 m
- To
- 65.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 94.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-12:64.2-65.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319408
- Northing
- 3125912
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 285.5 °
- Dip
- -42.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 85
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak zinc grade of 0.19% over 0.81 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 1.30
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.81
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-13Cusi · silverGrade: 207Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-13
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 207
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.79 m
- From
- 63.8 m
- To
- 64.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 88.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 63.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-13:63.8-64.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319408
- Northing
- 3125913
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1676 m
- Azimuth
- 272.5 °
- Dip
- -60.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 207
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 207 g/t AgEq over 0.79 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“207”
Context: 1.10
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.79
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-13Cusi · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-13
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.79 m
- From
- 63.8 m
- To
- 64.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 88.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 63.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-13:63.8-64.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319408
- Northing
- 3125913
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1676 m
- Azimuth
- 272.5 °
- Dip
- -60.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 207
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 1.09 g/t over 0.79 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.09”
Context: 1.10
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.79
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-13Cusi · leadGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-13
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.79 m
- From
- 63.8 m
- To
- 64.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 88.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 63.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-13:63.8-64.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319408
- Northing
- 3125913
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1676 m
- Azimuth
- 272.5 °
- Dip
- -60.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 207
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate lead grade of 1.49% over 0.79 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.49”
Context: 1.10
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.79
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-13Cusi · zincGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-13
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- True Width
- 0.79 m
- From
- 63.8 m
- To
- 64.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 88.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 63.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-13:63.8-64.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319408
- Northing
- 3125913
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1676 m
- Azimuth
- 272.5 °
- Dip
- -60.5 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 207
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak zinc grade of 0.17% over 0.79 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 1.10
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.79
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · silverGrade: 201Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 201
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- True Width
- 2.44 m
- From
- 8.25 m
- To
- 12.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:8.25-12.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 201
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 201 g/t AgEq over 2.44 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“201”
Context: 4.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.44
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- True Width
- 2.44 m
- From
- 8.25 m
- To
- 12.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:8.25-12.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 201
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade of 0.05 g/t over 2.44 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 4.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.44
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · leadGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- True Width
- 2.44 m
- From
- 8.25 m
- To
- 12.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:8.25-12.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 201
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak lead grade of 0.18% over 2.44 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 4.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.44
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · zincGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- True Width
- 2.44 m
- From
- 8.25 m
- To
- 12.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:8.25-12.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 201
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak zinc grade of 0.14% over 2.44 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 4.00
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.44
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · silverGrade: 412Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 412
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 8.25 m
- To
- 9.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:8.25-9.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 412
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver equivalent grade of 412 g/t AgEq over 0.70 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“412”
Context: 1.15
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 8.25 m
- To
- 9.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:8.25-9.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade of 0.13 g/t over 0.70 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 1.15
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · leadGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 8.25 m
- To
- 9.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:8.25-9.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak lead grade of 0.39% over 0.70 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: 1.15
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · zincGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 8.25 m
- To
- 9.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:8.25-9.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak zinc grade of 0.18% over 0.70 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 1.15
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · silverGrade: 126Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 126
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- From
- 15.15 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:15.15-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 126
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver equivalent grade of 126 g/t AgEq over 1.65 m downhole length. True width is not disclosed, and cut-off grade is not stated, lowering confidence in the economic significance of the intercept.
Positive factors
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“126”
Context: 1.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- From
- 15.15 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:15.15-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade of 0.07 g/t over 1.65 m downhole length. True width is not disclosed, and cut-off grade is not stated, lowering confidence in the economic significance of the intercept.
Positive factors
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 1.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · leadGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- From
- 15.15 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:15.15-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low lead grade of 0.15% over 1.65 m downhole length. True width is not disclosed, and cut-off grade is not stated, lowering confidence in the economic significance of the intercept.
Positive factors
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 1.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · zincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- From
- 15.15 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:15.15-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low zinc grade of 0.11% over 1.65 m downhole length. True width is not disclosed, and cut-off grade is not stated, lowering confidence in the economic significance of the intercept.
Positive factors
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 1.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · silverGrade: 597Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 597
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.55 m
- From
- 54.65 m
- To
- 56.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:54.65-56.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver intercept of 597 g/t over 1.55 m true width, supporting resource growth and mine planning. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“597”
Context: 1.80
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.55
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · goldGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.55 m
- From
- 54.65 m
- To
- 56.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:54.65-56.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 1.35 g/t over 1.55 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.35”
Context: 1.80
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.55
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
UGCU26-14Cusi · leadGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-14
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.91
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.55 m
- From
- 54.65 m
- To
- 56.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 312 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-14:54.65-56.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Promontorio
- Easting
- 319401
- Northing
- 3125910
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
- Elevation
- 1675 m
- Azimuth
- 348.9 °
- Dip
- -16.3 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak lead grade of 0.91% over 1.55 m true width, contributing to the overall polymetallic intercept. True width is disclosed, and QA/QC procedures are in place, but the cut-off grade is not.
Positive factors
- True Width Disclosed
- QA/QC Disclosed
Negative factors
- Cut-off Undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.91”
Context: 1.80
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.55
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
IncludesCusi · silverGrade: 3645Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3645
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 42.95 m
- To
- 43.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:42.95-43.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3574
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3645 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2187.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 3645 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3,645”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · goldGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 42.95 m
- To
- 43.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:42.95-43.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3574
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.64 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.64 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.64”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · leadGrade: 4.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 42.95 m
- To
- 43.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:42.95-43.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3574
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.11 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.11”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · zincGrade: 7.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.37 m
- From
- 42.95 m
- To
- 43.55 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 42.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:42.95-43.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3574
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.75 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.6 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.75”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 1280Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1280
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 3.35 m
- From
- 52.6 m
- To
- 59 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 52.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:52.6-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1222
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1280 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8192.0 g/t·m is exceptional.
Positive factors
- 1280 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1,280”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.35
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 3.35 m
- From
- 52.6 m
- To
- 59 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 52.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:52.6-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1222
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.42 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.35
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 1.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 3.35 m
- From
- 52.6 m
- To
- 59 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 52.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:52.6-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1222
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.28 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 8.2 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.28”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.35
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.4 m
- True Width
- 3.35 m
- From
- 52.6 m
- To
- 59 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 52.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:52.6-59
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1222
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.49 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 9.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.49 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.49”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.35
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · silverGrade: 5729Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5729
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 55.6 m
- To
- 56.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 55.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:55.6-56.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5392
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5729 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 7161.3 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 5729 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5,729”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.65
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · goldGrade: 1.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 55.6 m
- To
- 56.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 55.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:55.6-56.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5392
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.69 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.69 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.69”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.65
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · leadGrade: 3.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 55.6 m
- To
- 56.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 55.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:55.6-56.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5392
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.09 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.09”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.65
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · zincGrade: 5.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.25 m
- True Width
- 0.65 m
- From
- 55.6 m
- To
- 56.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 55.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:55.6-56.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5392
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.63 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.0 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.63”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.65
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · silverGrade: 916Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 916
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 1.79 m
- From
- 83.5 m
- To
- 88 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:83.5-88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1198
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 916 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4122.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 916 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“916”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.79
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · goldGrade: 2.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 1.79 m
- From
- 83.5 m
- To
- 88 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:83.5-88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1198
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.69 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.1 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.69”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.79
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · leadGrade: 10.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 1.79 m
- From
- 83.5 m
- To
- 88 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:83.5-88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1198
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.67 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 48.0 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.67 % lead is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.67”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.79
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · zincGrade: 2.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- True Width
- 1.79 m
- From
- 83.5 m
- To
- 88 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:83.5-88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1198
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.53 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.53”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.79
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 1225Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1225
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 0.6 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 92.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:91-92.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1134
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1225 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1837.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1225 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1,225”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.6
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 0.6 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 92.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:91-92.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1134
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.6
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.89Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.89
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 0.6 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 92.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:91-92.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1134
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.89 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.89 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.89”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.6
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 0.6 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 92.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:91-92.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1134
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.64 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.64 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.6
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 290Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 290
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.88 m
- From
- 52 m
- To
- 54 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 52 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:52-54
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 290
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 290 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 580.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 290 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“290”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.88
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.88 m
- From
- 52 m
- To
- 54 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 52 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:52-54
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 290
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.44 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.88
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.88 m
- From
- 52 m
- To
- 54 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 52 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:52-54
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 290
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.88
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- True Width
- 1.88 m
- From
- 52 m
- To
- 54 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 52 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:52-54
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 290
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.17 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.88
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 156Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 156
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.76 m
- From
- 67.8 m
- To
- 69.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:67.8-69.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 156 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 257.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“156”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.76
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.76 m
- From
- 67.8 m
- To
- 69.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:67.8-69.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.27 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.76
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 4.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.76 m
- From
- 67.8 m
- To
- 69.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:67.8-69.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.08 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.08”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.76
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.83
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- True Width
- 1.76 m
- From
- 67.8 m
- To
- 69.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:67.8-69.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.83 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.83 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.83”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.76
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 121Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 121
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- True Width
- 3.22 m
- From
- 124.8 m
- To
- 128.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 124.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:124.8-128.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 207
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 121 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 465.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“121”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.22
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- True Width
- 3.22 m
- From
- 124.8 m
- To
- 128.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 124.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:124.8-128.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 207
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.48 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.48 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.22
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 3.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- True Width
- 3.22 m
- From
- 124.8 m
- To
- 128.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 124.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:124.8-128.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 207
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.23 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 12.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.23”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.22
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- True Width
- 3.22 m
- From
- 124.8 m
- To
- 128.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 124.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:124.8-128.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 207
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.65 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.65 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.22
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 223Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 223
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 244.3 m
- To
- 245.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 244.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:244.3-245.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 236
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 223 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 167.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 223 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“223”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 244.3 m
- To
- 245.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 244.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:244.3-245.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 236
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.56 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 244.3 m
- To
- 245.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 244.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:244.3-245.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 236
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.23 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 244.3 m
- To
- 245.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 244.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:244.3-245.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 236
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.41 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · silverGrade: 440Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 440
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 8.25 m
- To
- 9.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:8.25-9.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 412
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 440 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 506.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 440 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“440”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 8.25 m
- To
- 9.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:8.25-9.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 412
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.13 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · leadGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 8.25 m
- To
- 9.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:8.25-9.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 412
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.39 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.39”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · zincGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- True Width
- 0.7 m
- From
- 8.25 m
- To
- 9.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:8.25-9.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 412
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.18 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.7
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 132Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 132
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- From
- 15.15 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:15.15-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 126
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 132 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 217.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“132”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- From
- 15.15 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:15.15-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 126
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- From
- 15.15 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:15.15-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 126
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.15 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.65 m
- From
- 15.15 m
- To
- 16.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:15.15-16.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 126
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 597Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 597
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.55 m
- From
- 54.65 m
- To
- 56.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:54.65-56.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 616
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 597 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1074.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 597 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“597”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.55
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.55 m
- From
- 54.65 m
- To
- 56.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:54.65-56.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 616
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.35 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.35 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.35”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.55
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.91
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.55 m
- From
- 54.65 m
- To
- 56.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:54.65-56.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 616
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.91 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.91 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.91”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.55
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- True Width
- 1.55 m
- From
- 54.65 m
- To
- 56.45 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:54.65-56.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 616
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.32 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.55
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · silverGrade: 975Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 975
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- True Width
- 0.9 m
- From
- 54.65 m
- To
- 55.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:54.65-55.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 995
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 975 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1023.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 975 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“975”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.9
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- True Width
- 0.9 m
- From
- 54.65 m
- To
- 55.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:54.65-55.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 995
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.2 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.20”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.9
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · leadGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- True Width
- 0.9 m
- From
- 54.65 m
- To
- 55.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:54.65-55.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 995
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.06 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.06”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.9
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · zincGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- True Width
- 0.9 m
- From
- 54.65 m
- To
- 55.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54.65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:54.65-55.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 995
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.42 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.9
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 166Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 166
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- True Width
- 2.58 m
- From
- 68.25 m
- To
- 70.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:68.25-70.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 167
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 166 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 448.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“166”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.58
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- True Width
- 2.58 m
- From
- 68.25 m
- To
- 70.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:68.25-70.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 167
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.23 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.58
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- True Width
- 2.58 m
- From
- 68.25 m
- To
- 70.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:68.25-70.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 167
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.58
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- True Width
- 2.58 m
- From
- 68.25 m
- To
- 70.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:68.25-70.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 167
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.24 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.58
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 196Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 196
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.55 m
- True Width
- 3 m
- From
- 125.85 m
- To
- 129.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:125.85-129.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 196 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 695.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“196”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.55 m
- True Width
- 3 m
- From
- 125.85 m
- To
- 129.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:125.85-129.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.21 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.55 m
- True Width
- 3 m
- From
- 125.85 m
- To
- 129.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:125.85-129.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.90”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.55 m
- True Width
- 3 m
- From
- 125.85 m
- To
- 129.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 125.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:125.85-129.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.4 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.40”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 169Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 169
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.83 m
- From
- 153.75 m
- To
- 154.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:153.75-154.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 186
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 169 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 169.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“169”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.83
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.83 m
- From
- 153.75 m
- To
- 154.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:153.75-154.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 186
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.83
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.83 m
- From
- 153.75 m
- To
- 154.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:153.75-154.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 186
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.77 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.77 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.83
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 0.83 m
- From
- 153.75 m
- To
- 154.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 153.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:153.75-154.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 186
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.78 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.78 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.78”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.83
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 212.6 m
- To
- 212.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 212.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:212.6-212.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 269
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 75 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“75”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 212.6 m
- To
- 212.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 212.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:212.6-212.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 269
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.18 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 6.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 212.6 m
- To
- 212.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 212.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:212.6-212.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 269
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.33 % lead is strong against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 6.33 % lead is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“6.33”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 3.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 212.6 m
- To
- 212.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 212.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:212.6-212.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 269
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.45 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.45”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 369Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 369
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 1.29 m
- From
- 216.7 m
- To
- 218.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 216.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:216.7-218.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 494
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 369 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 498.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 369 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“369”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.29
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 1.29 m
- From
- 216.7 m
- To
- 218.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 216.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:216.7-218.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 494
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.24 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.29
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 2.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 1.29 m
- From
- 216.7 m
- To
- 218.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 216.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:216.7-218.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 494
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.14 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.14”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.29
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 5.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.35 m
- True Width
- 1.29 m
- From
- 216.7 m
- To
- 218.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 216.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:216.7-218.05
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 494
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.85 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.85”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.29
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UGCU26-15Cusi · silverGrade: 121Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-15
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 121
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.04 m
- From
- 77.3 m
- To
- 78.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-15:77.3-78.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 176
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 121 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 157.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“121”
Context: UGCU26-15
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.04
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UGCU26-15Cusi · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-15
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.04 m
- From
- 77.3 m
- To
- 78.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-15:77.3-78.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 176
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: UGCU26-15
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.04
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UGCU26-15Cusi · leadGrade: 2.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-15
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.04 m
- From
- 77.3 m
- To
- 78.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-15:77.3-78.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 176
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.55 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.55”
Context: UGCU26-15
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.04
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UGCU26-15Cusi · zincGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-15
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.04 m
- From
- 77.3 m
- To
- 78.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-15:77.3-78.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 176
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.62 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: UGCU26-15
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.04
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 365Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 365
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.5 m
- From
- 129.2 m
- To
- 130.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:129.2-130.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 602
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 365 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 584.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 365 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“365”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.5
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 4.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.5 m
- From
- 129.2 m
- To
- 130.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:129.2-130.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 602
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.91 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.91”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.5
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 2.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.5 m
- From
- 129.2 m
- To
- 130.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:129.2-130.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 602
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.47 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.47”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.5
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.5 m
- From
- 129.2 m
- To
- 130.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:129.2-130.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 602
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.44 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.44 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.44”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.5
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · silverGrade: 547Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 547
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.89 m
- From
- 129.85 m
- To
- 130.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:129.85-130.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 920
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 547 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 519.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 547 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“547”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.89
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · goldGrade: 7.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.89 m
- From
- 129.85 m
- To
- 130.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:129.85-130.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 920
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.97 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.97 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.97”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.89
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · leadGrade: 3.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.89 m
- From
- 129.85 m
- To
- 130.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:129.85-130.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 920
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.49 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.49”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.89
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · zincGrade: 1.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.99
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.95 m
- True Width
- 0.89 m
- From
- 129.85 m
- To
- 130.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 129.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:129.85-130.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 920
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.99 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.99 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.99”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.89
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.85 m
- True Width
- 0.59 m
- From
- 214.35 m
- To
- 217.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:214.35-217.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 114
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 86 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 245.1 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“86”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.59
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.85 m
- True Width
- 0.59 m
- From
- 214.35 m
- To
- 217.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:214.35-217.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 114
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.54 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.54 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.54”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.59
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.85 m
- True Width
- 0.59 m
- From
- 214.35 m
- To
- 217.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:214.35-217.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 114
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.44 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.59
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.85 m
- True Width
- 0.59 m
- From
- 214.35 m
- To
- 217.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:214.35-217.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 114
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.32 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.59
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 269Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 269
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- True Width
- 2.45 m
- From
- 321 m
- To
- 323.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 321 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:321-323.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 305
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 269 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 712.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 269 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“269”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.45
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- True Width
- 2.45 m
- From
- 321 m
- To
- 323.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 321 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:321-323.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 305
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.34 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.45
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- True Width
- 2.45 m
- From
- 321 m
- To
- 323.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 321 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:321-323.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 305
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.45
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- True Width
- 2.45 m
- From
- 321 m
- To
- 323.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 321 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:321-323.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 305
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.22 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.22 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.22”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.45
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UGCU26-16Cusi · silverGrade: 97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-16
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.33 m
- From
- 7.2 m
- To
- 8.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-16:7.2-8.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 97 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 155.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“97”
Context: UGCU26-16
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.33
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UGCU26-16Cusi · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-16
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.33 m
- From
- 7.2 m
- To
- 8.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-16:7.2-8.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: UGCU26-16
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.33
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UGCU26-16Cusi · leadGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-16
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.33 m
- From
- 7.2 m
- To
- 8.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-16:7.2-8.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: UGCU26-16
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.33
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
UGCU26-16Cusi · zincGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- UGCU26-16
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.33 m
- From
- 7.2 m
- To
- 8.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- UGCU26-16:7.2-8.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: UGCU26-16
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.33
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 229Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 229
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- True Width
- 1.85 m
- From
- 49.75 m
- To
- 51.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:49.75-51.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 229
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 229 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 469.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 229 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“229”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- True Width
- 1.85 m
- From
- 49.75 m
- To
- 51.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:49.75-51.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 229
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.23 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- True Width
- 1.85 m
- From
- 49.75 m
- To
- 51.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:49.75-51.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 229
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.5 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- True Width
- 1.85 m
- From
- 49.75 m
- To
- 51.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:49.75-51.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 229
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.16 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.85
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 172Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 172
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 1.03 m
- From
- 72.7 m
- To
- 73.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:72.7-73.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 168
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 172 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 172.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“172”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.03
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 1.03 m
- From
- 72.7 m
- To
- 73.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:72.7-73.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 168
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.03
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 1.03 m
- From
- 72.7 m
- To
- 73.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:72.7-73.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 168
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.46 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.03
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- True Width
- 1.03 m
- From
- 72.7 m
- To
- 73.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 72.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:72.7-73.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 168
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.16 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.03
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 190Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 190
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- True Width
- 0.53 m
- From
- 115.1 m
- To
- 115.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:115.1-115.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 284
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 190 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 104.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“190”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.53
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- True Width
- 0.53 m
- From
- 115.1 m
- To
- 115.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:115.1-115.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 284
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.52 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.53
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 2.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.91
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- True Width
- 0.53 m
- From
- 115.1 m
- To
- 115.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:115.1-115.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 284
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.91 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.91”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.53
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.55 m
- True Width
- 0.53 m
- From
- 115.1 m
- To
- 115.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 115.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:115.1-115.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 284
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.75 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.75 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.75”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.53
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 289Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 289
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.82 m
- From
- 260.35 m
- To
- 261.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:260.35-261.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 309
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 289 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 260.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 289 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“289”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.82
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.82 m
- From
- 260.35 m
- To
- 261.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:260.35-261.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 309
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.42 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.82
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.97
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.82 m
- From
- 260.35 m
- To
- 261.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:260.35-261.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 309
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.97 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.9 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.97 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.97”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.82
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- True Width
- 0.82 m
- From
- 260.35 m
- To
- 261.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 260.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:260.35-261.25
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 309
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.65 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.65 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.82
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-78Cusi · silverGrade: 126Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-78
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 126
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.69 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 129 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-78:126-129
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 125
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 126 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 378.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“126”
Context: CU-26-78
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.69
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-78Cusi · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-78
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.69 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 129 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-78:126-129
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 125
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: CU-26-78
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.69
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-78Cusi · leadGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-78
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.69 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 129 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-78:126-129
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 125
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.27 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: CU-26-78
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.69
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-78Cusi · zincGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-78
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.69 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 129 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-78:126-129
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 125
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.2 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: CU-26-78
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.69
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 165Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 165
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- True Width
- 5.95 m
- From
- 141 m
- To
- 148 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:141-148
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 155
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 165 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1155.0 g/t·m is moderate.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“165”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.95
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7 m
- True Width
- 5.95 m
- From
- 141 m
- To
- 148 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:141-148
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 155
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.95
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- True Width
- 5.95 m
- From
- 141 m
- To
- 148 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:141-148
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 155
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.6 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.95
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- True Width
- 5.95 m
- From
- 141 m
- To
- 148 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:141-148
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 155
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.95
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 260Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 260
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 1.37 m
- From
- 156 m
- To
- 157.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 156 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:156-157.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 243
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 260 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 312.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 260 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“260”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 1.37 m
- From
- 156 m
- To
- 157.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 156 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:156-157.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 243
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 1.37 m
- From
- 156 m
- To
- 157.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 156 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:156-157.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 243
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.16 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- True Width
- 1.37 m
- From
- 156 m
- To
- 157.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 156 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:156-157.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 243
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-79Cusi · silverGrade: 391Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-79
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 391
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.74 m
- From
- 346.5 m
- To
- 349.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-79:346.5-349.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 364
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 391 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1173.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 391 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“391”
Context: CU-26-79
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.74
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-79Cusi · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-79
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.74 m
- From
- 346.5 m
- To
- 349.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-79:346.5-349.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 364
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.13 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: CU-26-79
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.74
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-79Cusi · leadGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-79
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.74 m
- From
- 346.5 m
- To
- 349.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-79:346.5-349.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 364
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.07 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: CU-26-79
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.74
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-79Cusi · zincGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-79
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- True Width
- 2.74 m
- From
- 346.5 m
- To
- 349.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-79:346.5-349.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 364
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.32 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: CU-26-79
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.74
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · silverGrade: 636Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 636
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.37 m
- From
- 346.5 m
- To
- 348 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:346.5-348
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 585
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 636 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 954.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 636 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“636”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.37 m
- From
- 346.5 m
- To
- 348 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:346.5-348
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 585
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.13 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · leadGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.37 m
- From
- 346.5 m
- To
- 348 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:346.5-348
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 585
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · zincGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.37 m
- From
- 346.5 m
- To
- 348 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 346.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:346.5-348
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 585
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.35 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.37
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-80Cusi · silverGrade: 155Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-80
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 155
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.65 m
- True Width
- 4.39 m
- From
- 127.05 m
- To
- 131.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-80:127.05-131.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 151
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 155 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 720.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“155”
Context: CU-26-80
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.39
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-80Cusi · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-80
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.65 m
- True Width
- 4.39 m
- From
- 127.05 m
- To
- 131.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-80:127.05-131.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 151
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: CU-26-80
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.39
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-80Cusi · leadGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-80
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.65 m
- True Width
- 4.39 m
- From
- 127.05 m
- To
- 131.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-80:127.05-131.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 151
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.23 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: CU-26-80
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.39
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-80Cusi · zincGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-80
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.65 m
- True Width
- 4.39 m
- From
- 127.05 m
- To
- 131.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 127.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-80:127.05-131.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 151
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.16 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: CU-26-80
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 4.39
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 131Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 131
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.49 m
- From
- 142.95 m
- To
- 146.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 142.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:142.95-146.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 123
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 131 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 491.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“131”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.49
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.49 m
- From
- 142.95 m
- To
- 146.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 142.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:142.95-146.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 123
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.49
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.49 m
- From
- 142.95 m
- To
- 146.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 142.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:142.95-146.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 123
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.08 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.49
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.75 m
- True Width
- 3.49 m
- From
- 142.95 m
- To
- 146.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 142.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:142.95-146.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 123
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.05 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 3.49
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 330Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 330
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.75 m
- True Width
- 5.36 m
- From
- 163 m
- To
- 171.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:163-171.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 306
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 330 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2227.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 330 g/t silver is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“330”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.36
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.75 m
- True Width
- 5.36 m
- From
- 163 m
- To
- 171.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:163-171.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 306
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.14 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.36
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.75 m
- True Width
- 5.36 m
- From
- 163 m
- To
- 171.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:163-171.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 306
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.36
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.75 m
- True Width
- 5.36 m
- From
- 163 m
- To
- 171.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:163-171.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 306
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.03 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.36
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · silverGrade: 898Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 898
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.03 m
- From
- 167.5 m
- To
- 168.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 167.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:167.5-168.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 827
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 898 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1167.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 898 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“898”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.03
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.03 m
- From
- 167.5 m
- To
- 168.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 167.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:167.5-168.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 827
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.31 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.03
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · leadGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.03 m
- From
- 167.5 m
- To
- 168.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 167.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:167.5-168.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 827
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.27 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.03
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
IncludesCusi · zincGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Includes
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.03 m
- From
- 167.5 m
- To
- 168.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 10000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 167.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Includes:167.5-168.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 827
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.05 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: Includes
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.03
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-81Cusi · silverGrade: 1075Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-81
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1075
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.38 m
- From
- 465 m
- To
- 466.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 465 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-81:465-466.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 982
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1075 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1612.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1075 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1,075”
Context: CU-26-81
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.38
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-81Cusi · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-81
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.38 m
- From
- 465 m
- To
- 466.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 465 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-81:465-466.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 982
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.04 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: CU-26-81
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.38
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-81Cusi · leadGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-81
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.38 m
- From
- 465 m
- To
- 466.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 465 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-81:465-466.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 982
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.24 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: CU-26-81
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.38
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-81Cusi · zincGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-81
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.38 m
- From
- 465 m
- To
- 466.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 465 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-81:465-466.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 982
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.45 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: CU-26-81
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.38
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-82Cusi · silverGrade: 195Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-82
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 195
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 109 m
- To
- 110.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-82:109-110.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 185
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 195 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 253.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“195”
Context: CU-26-82
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.34
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-82Cusi · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-82
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 109 m
- To
- 110.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-82:109-110.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 185
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: CU-26-82
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.34
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-82Cusi · leadGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-82
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 109 m
- To
- 110.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-82:109-110.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 185
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.17 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: CU-26-82
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.34
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-82Cusi · zincGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-82
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.3 m
- True Width
- 1.34 m
- From
- 109 m
- To
- 110.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 109 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-82:109-110.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 185
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: CU-26-82
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.34
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 106Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 106
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.4 m
- From
- 135 m
- To
- 136.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:135-136.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 100
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 106 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 159.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“106”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.4
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.4 m
- From
- 135 m
- To
- 136.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:135-136.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 100
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.4
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.4 m
- From
- 135 m
- To
- 136.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:135-136.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 100
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.05 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.4
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.4 m
- From
- 135 m
- To
- 136.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:135-136.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 100
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.4
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 140Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 140
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- True Width
- 2.1 m
- From
- 145.5 m
- To
- 147.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:145.5-147.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 135
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 140 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 315.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“140”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.1
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- True Width
- 2.1 m
- From
- 145.5 m
- To
- 147.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:145.5-147.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 135
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.1
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- True Width
- 2.1 m
- From
- 145.5 m
- To
- 147.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:145.5-147.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 135
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.08 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.1
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- True Width
- 2.1 m
- From
- 145.5 m
- To
- 147.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 145.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:145.5-147.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 135
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.18 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.1
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-83Cusi · silverGrade: 75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-83
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 1.19 m
- From
- 401.35 m
- To
- 404.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 401.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-83:401.35-404.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 516
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 75 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 221.3 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“75”
Context: CU-26-83
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.19
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-83Cusi · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-83
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 1.19 m
- From
- 401.35 m
- To
- 404.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 401.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-83:401.35-404.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 516
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.88 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.88”
Context: CU-26-83
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.19
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-83Cusi · leadGrade: 10.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-83
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 1.19 m
- From
- 401.35 m
- To
- 404.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 401.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-83:401.35-404.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 516
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.49 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 30.9 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.49 % lead is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.49”
Context: CU-26-83
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.19
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-83Cusi · zincGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.95 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-83
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.95 m
- True Width
- 1.19 m
- From
- 401.35 m
- To
- 404.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 401.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-83:401.35-404.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 516
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.7 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 31.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.7 % zinc is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.70”
Context: CU-26-83
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.19
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 409.15 m
- To
- 411.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 409.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:409.15-411.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 112
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 70.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“27”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 409.15 m
- To
- 411.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 409.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:409.15-411.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 112
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.24 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 409.15 m
- To
- 411.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 409.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:409.15-411.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 112
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.14 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.14”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 2.96Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.96
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
- From
- 409.15 m
- To
- 411.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 409.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:409.15-411.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 112
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.96 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.7 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.96”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 40Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 40
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.85 m
- From
- 427.95 m
- To
- 429.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 427.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:427.95-429.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 194
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 40 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 74.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“40”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.85 m
- From
- 427.95 m
- To
- 429.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 427.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:427.95-429.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 194
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 4.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.85 m
- From
- 427.95 m
- To
- 429.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 427.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:427.95-429.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 194
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.26 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7.9 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.26”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 3.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.85 m
- From
- 427.95 m
- To
- 429.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 427.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:427.95-429.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 194
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.61 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.61”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.45 m
- True Width
- 2.24 m
- From
- 471.55 m
- To
- 474 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 471.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:471.55-474
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 41 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 100.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“41”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.24
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.45 m
- True Width
- 2.24 m
- From
- 471.55 m
- To
- 474 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 471.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:471.55-474
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.24
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 3.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.79
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.45 m
- True Width
- 2.24 m
- From
- 471.55 m
- To
- 474 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 471.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:471.55-474
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.79 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 9.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.79”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.24
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 7.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.52
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.45 m
- True Width
- 2.24 m
- From
- 471.55 m
- To
- 474 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 471.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:471.55-474
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.52 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 18.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.52”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.24
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.85 m
- True Width
- 5.46 m
- From
- 551.55 m
- To
- 559.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 551.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:551.55-559.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 147
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 27 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 211.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“27”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.46
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.85 m
- True Width
- 5.46 m
- From
- 551.55 m
- To
- 559.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 551.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:551.55-559.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 147
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.06 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.46
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.85 m
- True Width
- 5.46 m
- From
- 551.55 m
- To
- 559.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 551.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:551.55-559.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 147
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.03 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 15.9 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.03”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.46
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 4.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.85 m
- True Width
- 5.46 m
- From
- 551.55 m
- To
- 559.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 551.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:551.55-559.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 147
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.26 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 33.4 %·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.26”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 5.46
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-89Cusi · silverGrade: 77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-89
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.48 m
- From
- 457.6 m
- To
- 458.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 457.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-89:457.6-458.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 253
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 77 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“77”
Context: CU-26-89
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.48
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-89Cusi · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-89
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.48 m
- From
- 457.6 m
- To
- 458.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 457.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-89:457.6-458.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 253
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.16 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: CU-26-89
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.48
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-89Cusi · leadGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-89
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.48 m
- From
- 457.6 m
- To
- 458.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 457.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-89:457.6-458.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 253
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.20”
Context: CU-26-89
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.48
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
CU-26-89Cusi · zincGrade: 7.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CU-26-89
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- True Width
- 0.48 m
- From
- 457.6 m
- To
- 458.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 457.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CU-26-89:457.6-458.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 253
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.11 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.3 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.11”
Context: CU-26-89
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.48
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.39 m
- From
- 507.1 m
- To
- 508.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 507.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:507.1-508.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 56 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 89.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“56”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.39
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.39 m
- From
- 507.1 m
- To
- 508.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 507.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:507.1-508.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.05 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.39
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.39 m
- From
- 507.1 m
- To
- 508.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 507.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:507.1-508.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.45 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.39
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- True Width
- 1.39 m
- From
- 507.1 m
- To
- 508.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 507.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:507.1-508.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.8 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.10”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.39
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.26 m
- From
- 514.5 m
- To
- 516 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 514.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:514.5-516
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 106
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 11 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“11”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.26
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.26 m
- From
- 514.5 m
- To
- 516 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 514.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:514.5-516
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 106
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.02 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.26
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · leadGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.62
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.26 m
- From
- 514.5 m
- To
- 516 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 514.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:514.5-516
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 106
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.62 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.62”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.26
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
AndCusi · zincGrade: 3.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- And
- Project
- Cusi
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- SICO
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- True Width
- 1.26 m
- From
- 514.5 m
- To
- 516 m
- Hole Depth
- 20000 m
- Intercept Depth
- 514.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- And:514.5-516
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- CRS
- WGS84 UTM
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 106
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t Eq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.39 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.39”
Context: And
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 1.26
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.