Silver X Intersects up to 17.86 m True Width at Blenda Rubia, Advancing Scalable Mining Strategy

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Silver X Mining Corp.
Ticker
AGX
Exchange
TSX
Region
central Peru
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Lead, Zinc, Copper
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-20 23:58:44 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Silver X Mining Corp. reports significant drill results from its Blenda Rubia target in central Peru, revealing true widths up to 17.86 meters within a broad, continuous high-grade silver-polymetallic system. These results indicate a potential shift towards bulk-style mining scenarios, complementing existing vein mining and positioning Blenda Rubia as a low-cost feed source for the nearby Nueva Recuperada processing plant. The company is advancing both step-out and infill drilling to further define the system's scale and support future mine planning.

Reasoning: The drill results from Blenda Rubia reveal significant true widths up to 17.86 meters and high-grade silver-polymetallic mineralization, fundamentally changing the understanding of the deposit from narrow veins to a broad mineralized corridor. This supports the potential for scalable bulk-style mining, enhancing production and cost efficiency, and is further de-risked by disclosed QA/QC and QP sign-off.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • Significant Intercept Widths
  • High Silver Grades
  • Potential for Bulk Mining
  • Proximity to Processing Plant
  • QA/QC Disclosed
  • QP Signed
  • Step-Out Extension
  • Infill Drilling

Facts used in scoring: 94

Atlas analysis — Silver X Mining Corp.: Silver X Intersects up to 17.86 m True Width at Blenda Rubia, Advancing Scalable Mining Strategy. 79.86 g/t over 54.85 m; 79.86 g/t over 54.85 m; 94.92 g/t over 35.35 m

Classification and evidence

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The announcement highlights estimated true widths reaching up to 17.86 meters and provides specific true width values in Table 3 for most intercepts.

Evidence · text

“estimated true widths reaching up to 17.86 meters”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The company states that 'Step-out drilling is ongoing to extend the mineralized corridor laterally and at depth'.

Evidence · text

“Step-out drilling is ongoing to extend the mineralized corridor laterally and at depth”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The company states that 'Infill drilling is being accelerated between key intercepts to define continuity and support near-term mine planning'.

Evidence · text

“Infill drilling is being accelerated between key intercepts to define continuity and support near-term mine planning”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed 'Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)' section, mentioning company protocols, certified reference materials, blanks, duplicates, chain-of-custody, and external check assays.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Drill core from Blenda Rubia was logged, photographed, sawn and sampled by Silver X personnel under Company protocols. Sample intervals were selected based on geological criteria including veins, breccias, sulphide distribution and alteration intensity. Analytical work referenced in this release was completed using both the Company's internal laboratory and Bureau Veritas (Peru), depending on the hole and sample batch. Silver X's QA/QC program includes the insertion of certified reference materials, blanks and duplicates, together with chain-of-custody procedures and periodic external check assays.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 94. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (94)

DDH-BR-001Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 103.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-001
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
103.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.55 m
True Width
1.41 m
From
260.4 m
To
264.95 m
Hole Depth
299.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-001:260.40-264.95
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504722.802
Northing
8550666.181
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4428.265 m
Azimuth
174.9 °
Dip
-65.9 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralized corridor.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“103.43”

Context: DDH-BR-001

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 1.41 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.41”

Context: DDH-BR-001

DDH-BR-001Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 79.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-001
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
79.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
True Width
0.83 m
From
260.4 m
To
263.1 m
Hole Depth
299.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-001:260.40-263.10
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504722.802
Northing
8550666.181
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4428.265 m
Azimuth
174.9 °
Dip
-65.9 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“79.94”

Context: 260.40

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 0.83 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.83”

Context: 260.40

DDH-BR-001Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 175.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-001
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
175.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.45 m
True Width
0.45 m
From
263.5 m
To
264.95 m
Hole Depth
299.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-001:263.50-264.95
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504722.802
Northing
8550666.181
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4428.265 m
Azimuth
174.9 °
Dip
-65.9 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“175.14”

Context: 263.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 0.45 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: 263.50

DDH-BR-002Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 102.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-002
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
102.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m
True Width
0.75 m
From
366.2 m
To
368.4 m
Hole Depth
382 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-002:366.20-368.40
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504721.237
Northing
8550666.948
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4428.158 m
Azimuth
216.6 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralized corridor.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“102.73”

Context: DDH-BR-002

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 0.75 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: DDH-BR-002

DDH-BR-003Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 79.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 54.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-003
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
79.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
54.85 m
True Width
17.86 m
From
186.7 m
To
241.55 m
Hole Depth
242.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-003:186.70-241.55
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-74.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant true width of 17.86 m with moderate silver grade, indicating a broad mineralized corridor and supporting the potential for bulk mining.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • Significant Intercept Widths

Evidence · table

“79.86”

Context: DDH-DDH-BR-003

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 17.86 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“17.86”

Context: DDH-DDH-BR-003

DDH-BR-003Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 289.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-003
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
289.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.8 m
True Width
2.8 m
From
187.7 m
To
198.5 m
Hole Depth
242.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-003:187.70-198.50
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-74.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong silver grade over a good true width as a sub-interval within the broader mineralized corridor.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • High Silver Grades

Evidence · table

“289.27”

Context: 187.70

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 2.80 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.80”

Context: 187.70

DDH-BR-003Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 49.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-003
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
49.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.85 m
True Width
0.93 m
From
203.5 m
To
206.35 m
Hole Depth
242.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-003:203.50-206.35
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-74.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“49.82”

Context: 203.50

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 0.93 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 203.50

DDH-BR-003Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 52.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-003
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
52.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
True Width
3 m
From
206.35 m
To
215.55 m
Hole Depth
242.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-003:206.35-215.55
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-74.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a good true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“52.84”

Context: 206.35

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 3.00 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“3.00”

Context: 206.35

DDH-BR-003Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 48.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-003
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
48.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
True Width
2.47 m
From
217.75 m
To
225.35 m
Hole Depth
242.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-003:217.75-225.35
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
10 °
Dip
-74.8 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“48.15”

Context: 217.75

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 2.47 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.47”

Context: 217.75

DDH-BR-005Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 94.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-005
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
94.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35.35 m
From
443.4 m
To
478.75 m
Hole Depth
500.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-005:443.40-478.75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
285 °
Dip
-53 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a significant apparent width, but true width is pending, reducing confidence in its geometry.

Positive factors

  • Significant Intercept Widths

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“94.92”

Context: DDH-BR-005

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states 'Pending' for the real width of this intercept, indicating only apparent width is reported.

Evidence · table

“Pending”

Context: DDH-BR-005

DDH-BR-005Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 105.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-005
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
105.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.7 m
From
443.4 m
To
448.1 m
Hole Depth
500.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-005:443.40-448.10
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
285 °
Dip
-53 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over an apparent width, but true width is pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“105.77”

Context: 443.40

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states 'Pending' for the real width of this intercept.

Evidence · table

“Pending”

Context: 443.40

DDH-BR-005Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 99.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-005
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
99.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.65 m
From
451.9 m
To
454.55 m
Hole Depth
500.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-005:451.90-454.55
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
285 °
Dip
-53 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over an apparent width, but true width is pending.

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“99.43”

Context: 451.90

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states 'Pending' for the real width of this intercept.

Evidence · table

“Pending”

Context: 451.90

DDH-BR-005Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 256.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-005
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
256.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.2 m
From
469.55 m
To
478.75 m
Hole Depth
500.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-005:469.55-478.75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
285 °
Dip
-53 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong silver grade over a good apparent width, but true width is pending.

Positive factors

  • High Silver Grades

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“256.35”

Context: 469.55

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document states 'Pending' for the real width of this intercept.

Evidence · table

“Pending”

Context: 469.55

DDH-BR-006Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 51.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-006
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
51.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.4 m
True Width
2.19 m
From
239.25 m
To
245.65 m
Hole Depth
329.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-006:239.25-245.65
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
55 °
Dip
-64 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“51.32”

Context: DDH-BR-006

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 2.19 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.19”

Context: DDH-BR-006

DDH-BR-006Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 151.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-006
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
151.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
True Width
0.38 m
From
239.25 m
To
240.35 m
Hole Depth
329.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-006:239.25-240.35
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
55 °
Dip
-64 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a very narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“151.60”

Context: 239.25

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 0.38 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 239.25

DDH-BR-006Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 113.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-006
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
113.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
True Width
0.38 m
From
243.35 m
To
244.45 m
Hole Depth
329.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-006:243.35-244.45
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
55 °
Dip
-64 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a very narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“113.64”

Context: 243.35

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 0.38 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 243.35

DDH-BR-007Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 92.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-007
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
92.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.17 m
True Width
1.42 m
From
275.77 m
To
283.94 m
Hole Depth
539.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-007:275.77-283.94
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
345 °
Dip
-78 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“92.35”

Context: DDH-BR-007

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 1.42 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.42”

Context: DDH-BR-007

DDH-BR-007Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 78.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-007
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
78.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.98 m
True Width
0.69 m
From
275.77 m
To
279.75 m
Hole Depth
539.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-007:275.77-279.75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
345 °
Dip
-78 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“78.94”

Context: 275.77

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 0.69 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.69”

Context: 275.77

DDH-BR-007Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 288.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-007
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
288.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
True Width
0.16 m
From
279.75 m
To
280.65 m
Hole Depth
539.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-007:279.75-280.65
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
345 °
Dip
-78 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong silver grade over a very narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • High Silver Grades

Evidence · table

“288.67”

Context: 279.75

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 0.16 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 279.75

DDH-BR-007Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 53.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-007
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
53.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.8 m
True Width
0.31 m
From
280.65 m
To
282.45 m
Hole Depth
539.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-007:280.65-282.45
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
345 °
Dip
-78 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a very narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“53.37”

Context: 280.65

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 0.31 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 280.65

DDH-BR-008Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 43.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-008
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
43.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.65 m
True Width
2.74 m
From
110.25 m
To
117.9 m
Hole Depth
213.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-008:110.25-117.90
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
325 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“43.87”

Context: DDH-BR-008

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 2.74 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“2.74”

Context: DDH-BR-008

DDH-BR-008Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 80.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-008
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
80.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
True Width
4.66 m
From
135 m
To
148 m
Hole Depth
213.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-008:135.00-148.00
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
325 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a good true width.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“80.20”

Context: 135.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 4.66 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“4.66”

Context: 135.00

DDH-BR-008Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 273.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-008
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
273.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.45 m
True Width
1.24 m
From
135 m
To
138.45 m
Hole Depth
213.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-008:135.00-138.45
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
325 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong silver grade over a narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • High Silver Grades

Evidence · table

“273.82”

Context: 135.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 1.24 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 135.00

DDH-BR-008Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 37.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.28 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-008
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
37.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.28 m
True Width
0.5 m
From
146.72 m
To
148 m
Hole Depth
213.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-008:146.72-148.00
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
325 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a very narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“37.96”

Context: 146.72

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 0.50 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: 146.72

DDH-BR-009Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 38.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-009
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
38.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50.98 m
True Width
16.6 m
From
163.5 m
To
214.48 m
Hole Depth
244.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-009:163.50-214.48
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
325 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant true width of 16.60 m with moderate silver grade, further defining the broad mineralized corridor.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • Significant Intercept Widths

Evidence · table

“38.51”

Context: DDH-BR-009

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 16.60 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“16.60”

Context: DDH-BR-009

DDH-BR-009Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 196.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-009
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
196.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.22 m
True Width
0.72 m
From
166.4 m
To
168.62 m
Hole Depth
244.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-009:166.40-168.62
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
325 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong silver grade over a very narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed
  • High Silver Grades

Evidence · table

“196.82”

Context: 166.40

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 0.72 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: 166.40

DDH-BR-009Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 94.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.42 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-009
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
94.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.42 m
True Width
1.76 m
From
175.65 m
To
181.07 m
Hole Depth
244.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-009:175.65-181.07
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
325 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“94.80”

Context: 175.65

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 1.76 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.76”

Context: 175.65

DDH-BR-009Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 3.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-009
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
3.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
True Width
1.17 m
From
190.75 m
To
194.75 m
Hole Depth
244.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-009:190.75-194.75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
325 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“3.95”

Context: 190.75

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 1.17 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.17”

Context: 190.75

DDH-BR-009Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 121.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.68 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-009
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
121.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.68 m
True Width
1.37 m
From
209.8 m
To
214.48 m
Hole Depth
244.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-009:209.80-214.48
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
325 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“121.16”

Context: 209.80

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 1.37 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.37”

Context: 209.80

DDH-BR-010Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 74.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.03 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-010
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
74.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.03 m
True Width
6.85 m
From
165.04 m
To
185.07 m
Hole Depth
215.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-010:165.04-185.07
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a good true width, contributing to the understanding of the mineralized corridor.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“74.76”

Context: DDH-BR-010

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 6.85 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“6.85”

Context: DDH-BR-010

DDH-BR-010Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 95.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.99 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-010
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
95.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.99 m
True Width
1.65 m
From
165.04 m
To
171.03 m
Hole Depth
215.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-010:165.04-171.03
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“95.35”

Context: 165.04

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 1.65 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.65”

Context: 165.04

DDH-BR-010Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 55.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-010
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
55.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.35 m
True Width
1.47 m
From
171.03 m
To
176.38 m
Hole Depth
215.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-010:171.03-176.38
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“55.50”

Context: 171.03

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 1.47 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“1.47”

Context: 171.03

DDH-BR-010Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 72.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.69 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-010
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
72.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.69 m
True Width
3.81 m
From
176.38 m
To
185.07 m
Hole Depth
215.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-010:176.38-185.07
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Easting
504588.77
Northing
8550505.39
CRS
UTM
Elevation
4425.48 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow true width as a sub-interval.

Positive factors

  • True Width Disclosed

Evidence · table

“72.43”

Context: 176.38

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

True Width DisclosedRejected · positive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Reason: The document explicitly states a real width of 3.81 m for this intercept.

Evidence · table

“3.81”

Context: 176.38

DDH-BR-011Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 514.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-011
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
514.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-011:1.40m
Mining Method
mixed

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (Peru)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays, chain_of_custody

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional silver grade over a narrow apparent width, but true width and collar data are not provided in this table.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza Intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent Width Only

Evidence · table

“514.57”

Context: 1.40

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The silver grade of 514.57 g/t is above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.

Evidence · table

“514.57”

Context: 1.40

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document does not provide true width for this intercept in Table 2.

Evidence · table

“Apparent width”

Context: DDH-BR-003

DDH-BR-001Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 1.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-001
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
1.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.55 m
From
260.4 m
To
264.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-001:260.4-264.95
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.42 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 6.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.42”

Context: DDH-BR-001

DDH-BR-001Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-001
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.55 m
From
260.4 m
To
264.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-001:260.4-264.95
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: DDH-BR-001

DDH-BR-001Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-001
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.55 m
From
260.4 m
To
264.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-001:260.4-264.95
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.003 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: DDH-BR-001

Includes:Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 79.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
79.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
260.4 m
To
263.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::260.4-263.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 79.94 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 215.8 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“79.94”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.87
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.7 m
From
260.4 m
To
263.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::260.4-263.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.87 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.87 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.87”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.7 m
From
260.4 m
To
263.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::260.4-263.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.7 m
From
260.4 m
To
263.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::260.4-263.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.002 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: Includes:

DDH-BR-002Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-002
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
1.27
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
366.2 m
To
368.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-002:366.2-368.4
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.27 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.27”

Context: DDH-BR-002

DDH-BR-002Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-002
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
366.2 m
To
368.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-002:366.2-368.4
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: DDH-BR-002

DDH-BR-002Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-002
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m
From
366.2 m
To
368.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-002:366.2-368.4
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.002 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: DDH-BR-002

DDH-DDH-BR-003Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 79.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 54.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-DDH-BR-003
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
79.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
54.85 m
From
186.7 m
To
241.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-DDH-BR-003:186.7-241.55
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 79.86 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4380.3 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 79.86 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“79.86”

Context: DDH-DDH-BR-003

DDH-DDH-BR-003Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 54.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-DDH-BR-003
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.77
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
54.85 m
From
186.7 m
To
241.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-DDH-BR-003:186.7-241.55
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.77 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 42.2 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.77”

Context: DDH-DDH-BR-003

DDH-DDH-BR-003Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 54.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-DDH-BR-003
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
54.85 m
From
186.7 m
To
241.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-DDH-BR-003:186.7-241.55
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 7.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.13 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: DDH-DDH-BR-003

DDH-DDH-BR-003Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 54.85 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-DDH-BR-003
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
54.85 m
From
186.7 m
To
241.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-DDH-BR-003:186.7-241.55
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.004 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: DDH-DDH-BR-003

Includes:Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 289.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
289.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.8 m
From
187.7 m
To
198.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::187.7-198.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 289.27 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3124.1 g/t·m is strong.

Positive factors

  • 289.27 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“289.27”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 2.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
2.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.8 m
From
187.7 m
To
198.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::187.7-198.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.47 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 26.7 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.47”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.8 m
From
187.7 m
To
198.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::187.7-198.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.34 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.003
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.8 m
From
187.7 m
To
198.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::187.7-198.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.003 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.003 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.003”

Context: Includes:

DDH-BR-005Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 1.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 35.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-005
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
1.82
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
35.35 m
From
443.4 m
To
478.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-005:443.4-478.75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.82 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 64.3 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.82”

Context: DDH-BR-005

DDH-BR-005Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 35.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-005
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
35.35 m
From
443.4 m
To
478.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-005:443.4-478.75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.25 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 44.2 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.25”

Context: DDH-BR-005

DDH-BR-005Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.233Grade Unit: %Intercept: 35.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-005
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.233
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
35.35 m
From
443.4 m
To
478.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-005:443.4-478.75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.233 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 8.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.233 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.233”

Context: DDH-BR-005

Includes:Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 105.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
105.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.7 m
From
443.4 m
To
448.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::443.4-448.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 105.77 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 497.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“105.77”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.7 m
From
443.4 m
To
448.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::443.4-448.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.25 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 5.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.25”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.7 m
From
443.4 m
To
448.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::443.4-448.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.25 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.25 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.25”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.171Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.171
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.7 m
From
443.4 m
To
448.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::443.4-448.1
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.171 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.171 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.171”

Context: Includes:

DDH-BR-006Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-006
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.4 m
From
239.25 m
To
245.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-006:239.25-245.65
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.73 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.73 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: DDH-BR-006

DDH-BR-006Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-006
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.4 m
From
239.25 m
To
245.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-006:239.25-245.65
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.94 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.94 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: DDH-BR-006

DDH-BR-006Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-006
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.4 m
From
239.25 m
To
245.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-006:239.25-245.65
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.015 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.015 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: DDH-BR-006

Includes:Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 151.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
151.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
239.25 m
To
240.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::239.25-240.35
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 151.6 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 166.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“151.60”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
1.72
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m
From
239.25 m
To
240.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::239.25-240.35
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.72 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.9 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.72”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 0.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.98
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m
From
239.25 m
To
240.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::239.25-240.35
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.98 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.98 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.98”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.051Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.051
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m
From
239.25 m
To
240.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::239.25-240.35
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.051 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.051 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.051”

Context: Includes:

DDH-BR-007Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-007
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.17 m
From
275.77 m
To
283.94 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-007:275.77-283.94
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.73 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.73 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: DDH-BR-007

DDH-BR-007Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-007
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.17 m
From
275.77 m
To
283.94 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-007:275.77-283.94
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: DDH-BR-007

DDH-BR-007Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-007
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.002
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.17 m
From
275.77 m
To
283.94 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-007:275.77-283.94
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.002 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.002 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.002”

Context: DDH-BR-007

Includes:Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 78.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
78.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.98 m
From
275.77 m
To
279.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::275.77-279.75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 78.94 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 314.2 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“78.94”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.98 m
From
275.77 m
To
279.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::275.77-279.75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.59 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.98 m
From
275.77 m
To
279.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::275.77-279.75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.98 m
From
275.77 m
To
279.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::275.77-279.75
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.000”

Context: Includes:

DDH-BR-008Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 2.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-008
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
2.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.65 m
From
110.25 m
To
117.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-008:110.25-117.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.04 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 15.6 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.04”

Context: DDH-BR-008

DDH-BR-008Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-008
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
1.87
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.65 m
From
110.25 m
To
117.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-008:110.25-117.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.87 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 14.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.87 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.87”

Context: DDH-BR-008

DDH-BR-008Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.217Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-008
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.217
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.65 m
From
110.25 m
To
117.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-008:110.25-117.9
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.217 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 1.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.217 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.217”

Context: DDH-BR-008

Includes:Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 80.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
80.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
135 m
To
148 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::135-148
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 80.2 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1042.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“80.20”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
135 m
To
148 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::135-148
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.05 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 13.7 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.05”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 2.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
2.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
135 m
To
148 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::135-148
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.37 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 30.8 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.37”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.011Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.011
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
135 m
To
148 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::135-148
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.011 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.011 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.011”

Context: Includes:

DDH-BR-009Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 50.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-009
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.77
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
50.98 m
From
163.5 m
To
214.48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-009:163.5-214.48
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.77 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 39.3 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.77”

Context: DDH-BR-009

DDH-BR-009Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 50.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-009
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
50.98 m
From
163.5 m
To
214.48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-009:163.5-214.48
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.54 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 27.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: DDH-BR-009

DDH-BR-009Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 50.98 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-009
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
50.98 m
From
163.5 m
To
214.48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-009:163.5-214.48
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.007 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: DDH-BR-009

Includes:Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 196.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
196.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.22 m
From
166.4 m
To
168.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::166.4-168.62
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 196.82 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 436.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“196.82”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 4.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
4.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.22 m
From
166.4 m
To
168.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::166.4-168.62
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.37 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 9.7 %·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.37”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 2.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
2.52
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.22 m
From
166.4 m
To
168.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::166.4-168.62
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.52 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.52”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.079Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.079
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.22 m
From
166.4 m
To
168.62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::166.4-168.62
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.079 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.079 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.079”

Context: Includes:

DDH-BR-010Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 2.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20.03 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-010
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
2.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
20.03 m
From
165.04 m
To
185.07 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-010:165.04-185.07
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.44 % lead is moderate against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 48.9 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.44”

Context: DDH-BR-010

DDH-BR-010Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20.03 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-010
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
20.03 m
From
165.04 m
To
185.07 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-010:165.04-185.07
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 12.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.60”

Context: DDH-BR-010

DDH-BR-010Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20.03 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-BR-010
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.004
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
20.03 m
From
165.04 m
To
185.07 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-BR-010:165.04-185.07
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.004 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.004 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.004”

Context: DDH-BR-010

Includes:Blenda Rubia · silverGrade: 95.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.99 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
silver
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
95.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.99 m
From
165.04 m
To
171.03 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::165.04-171.03
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 95.35 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 571.1 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“95.35”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · leadGrade: 1.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.99 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
lead
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
1.98
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.99 m
From
165.04 m
To
171.03 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::165.04-171.03
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.98 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 11.9 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.98”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · zincGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.99 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
zinc
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.99 m
From
165.04 m
To
171.03 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::165.04-171.03
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.59 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: Includes:

Includes:Blenda Rubia · copperGrade: 0.007Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.99 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes:
Project
Blenda Rubia
Commodity
copper
Region
peru
Reported Region
central Peru
Ticker
AGX

Geometry

Grade
0.007
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.99 m
From
165.04 m
To
171.03 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes::165.04-171.03
Mining Method
mixed

Location

CRS
UTM

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.007 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.007 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.007”

Context: Includes:

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.