Silver X Expands Red Silver Drill Program More Than Five-Fold to 6,650 Meters Following High-Grade Channel Sampling Results
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Silver X Mining Corp.
- Ticker
- AGX
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Lead, Zinc, Gold
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-08-20 22:26:24 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Silver X Mining Corp. has significantly expanded its underground diamond drill program at the Red Silver Project in Peru from 1,200 meters to 6,650 meters. This expanded program aims to grow the existing NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to higher confidence categories, building on previously reported high-grade silver channel sampling results. The drilling will leverage existing underground infrastructure for cost-efficient execution, targeting the project's high-grade, silver-pure vein systems.
Reasoning: Silver X Mining Corp. has significantly expanded its drill program at the Red Silver Project, aiming to grow and upgrade its high-grade silver resource, which is a strong positive for the project's future, despite the current resource being predominantly inferred.
Positive factors
- expanded_drill_program
- high_grade_channel_samples
- resource_upgrade_objective
- existing_underground_infrastructure
- qp_signoff
- iso_certified_lab
Negative factors
- predominantly_inferred_resource
- production_without_reserves_caution
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 89
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release explicitly states that Silver X follows rigorous QA/QC protocols, including the use of an ISO-certified laboratory and insertion of standards, blanks, and duplicates.
Evidence · text
“Silver X follows rigorous QA/QC protocols. Drill core is geologically and geotechnically logged, cut and sampled under documented chain-of-custody procedures, and dispatched to an ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru. The program includes the regular insertion of certified reference materials (standards), blanks and field duplicates.”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Mr. A. David Heyl, a Qualified Person under NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the technical content of the news release.
Evidence · text
“Mr. A. David Heyl, B.Sc., C.P.G., a Qualified Person under NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the technical content of this news release on behalf of Silver X.”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: The Mineral Resources at the Red Silver Project are predominantly classified as Inferred Mineral Resources, as explicitly stated in the cautionary note and shown in the resource table.
Evidence · text
“The Mineral Resources at the Red Silver Project are predominantly classified as Inferred Mineral Resources.”
All Inferrednegative
100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.
Why it applies: The resource table shows 1,908,725 tonnes of Inferred Mineral Resources compared to 41,600 tonnes of Measured + Indicated, indicating a very high proportion of inferred material.
Evidence · table
“Total Inferred”
Context: 1,908,725
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The document repeatedly refers to the 'NI 43-101 Mineral Resource' and 'NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment'.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Category Upgradepositive
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Why it applies: A dual objective of the drill program is to 'upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories'.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Production Without Reservesnegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The document includes a 'Cautionary Note regarding Production without Mineral Reserves', indicating that the decision to commence production is not based on a pre-feasibility or feasibility study.
Evidence · text
“Cautionary Note regarding Production without Mineral Reserves”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 89. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (89)
Fact 1Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 735Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.56 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 735
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.56 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver channel sample with disclosed width, but previously reported, so low novelty for this release.
Positive factors
- high_grade
- true_width_disclosed
Negative factors
- historical_data
Evidence · table
“735”
Context: 0.56
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 735 g/t is exceptionally high for an epithermal silver deposit.
Evidence · table
“735”
Context: 0.56
True Width DisclosedRejected · positive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Reason: The average width of 0.56m is stated for the channel sample.
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 735
Historical Estimate OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Reason: Channel sampling results were previously reported on January 13, 2026.
Evidence · text
“previously reported January 13, 2026”
Fact 2Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.56 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.56 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead grade from historical channel sample.
Negative factors
- historical_data
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: 0.56
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Historical Estimate OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Reason: Channel sampling results were previously reported on January 13, 2026.
Evidence · text
“previously reported January 13, 2026”
Fact 3Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.56 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.56 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grade from historical channel sample.
Negative factors
- historical_data
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: 0.56
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Historical Estimate OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Reason: Channel sampling results were previously reported on January 13, 2026.
Evidence · text
“previously reported January 13, 2026”
Fact 4Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 649Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 649
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver channel sample with disclosed width, but previously reported, so low novelty for this release.
Positive factors
- high_grade
- true_width_disclosed
Negative factors
- historical_data
Evidence · table
“649”
Context: 0.50
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 649 g/t is exceptionally high for an epithermal silver deposit.
Evidence · table
“649”
Context: 0.50
True Width DisclosedRejected · positive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Reason: The average width of 0.50m is stated for the channel sample.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 649
Historical Estimate OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Reason: Channel sampling results were previously reported on January 13, 2026.
Evidence · text
“previously reported January 13, 2026”
Fact 5Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead grade from historical channel sample.
Negative factors
- historical_data
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 0.50
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Historical Estimate OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Reason: Channel sampling results were previously reported on January 13, 2026.
Evidence · text
“previously reported January 13, 2026”
Fact 6Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grade from historical channel sample.
Negative factors
- historical_data
Evidence · table
“0.69”
Context: 0.50
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Historical Estimate OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Reason: Channel sampling results were previously reported on January 13, 2026.
Evidence · text
“previously reported January 13, 2026”
Fact 7Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 497Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.92 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 497
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver channel sample with disclosed width, but previously reported, so low novelty for this release.
Positive factors
- high_grade
- true_width_disclosed
Negative factors
- historical_data
Evidence · table
“497”
Context: 0.92
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 497 g/t is exceptionally high for an epithermal silver deposit.
Evidence · table
“497”
Context: 0.92
True Width DisclosedRejected · positive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Reason: The average width of 0.92m is stated for the channel sample.
Evidence · table
“0.92”
Context: 497
Historical Estimate OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Reason: Channel sampling results were previously reported on January 13, 2026.
Evidence · text
“previously reported January 13, 2026”
Fact 8Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.92 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead grade from historical channel sample.
Negative factors
- historical_data
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 0.92
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Historical Estimate OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Reason: Channel sampling results were previously reported on January 13, 2026.
Evidence · text
“previously reported January 13, 2026”
Fact 9Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.92 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grade from historical channel sample.
Negative factors
- historical_data
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 0.92
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Historical Estimate OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Reason: Channel sampling results were previously reported on January 13, 2026.
Evidence · text
“previously reported January 13, 2026”
Fact 10Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 396Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.82 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 396
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.82 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver channel sample with disclosed width, but previously reported, so low novelty for this release.
Positive factors
- high_grade
- true_width_disclosed
Negative factors
- historical_data
Evidence · table
“396”
Context: 0.82
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 396 g/t is exceptionally high for an epithermal silver deposit.
Evidence · table
“396”
Context: 0.82
True Width DisclosedRejected · positive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Reason: The average width of 0.82m is stated for the channel sample.
Evidence · table
“0.82”
Context: 396
Historical Estimate OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Reason: Channel sampling results were previously reported on January 13, 2026.
Evidence · text
“previously reported January 13, 2026”
Fact 11Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.82 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.82 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead grade from historical channel sample.
Negative factors
- historical_data
Evidence · table
“0.48”
Context: 0.82
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Historical Estimate OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Reason: Channel sampling results were previously reported on January 13, 2026.
Evidence · text
“previously reported January 13, 2026”
Fact 12Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 1.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.82 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.82 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Sample Type
- channel
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-13T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grade from historical channel sample.
Negative factors
- historical_data
Evidence · table
“1.98”
Context: 0.82
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Historical Estimate OnlyRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Reason: Channel sampling results were previously reported on January 13, 2026.
Evidence · text
“previously reported January 13, 2026”
Fact 13Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 800.92Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 800.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- high_grade
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“800.92”
Context: 832,650
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 832,650
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: A Qualified Person has reviewed and approved the technical content.
Evidence · text
“Mr. A. David Heyl, B.Sc., C.P.G., a Qualified Person under NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the technical content”
Fact 14Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 832,650
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 832,650
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 15Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: 832,650
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 832,650
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 16Red Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace gold grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 832,650
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 832,650
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 17Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 209.95Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 209.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“209.95”
Context: 32,500
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 32,500
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 18Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace lead grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 32,500
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 32,500
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 19Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace zinc grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 32,500
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 32,500
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 20Red Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace gold grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 32,500
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 32,500
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 21Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 195.95Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 195.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“195.95”
Context: 475,800
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 475,800
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 22Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace lead grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 475,800
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 475,800
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 23Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace zinc grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 475,800
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 475,800
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 24Red Silver Project · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace gold grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 475,800
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 475,800
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 25Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 1839.15Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1839.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Bonanza-grade silver in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- bonanza_grade
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“1839.15”
Context: 178,425
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 178,425
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 26Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: 178,425
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 178,425
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 27Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 178,425
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 178,425
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 28Red Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace gold grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 178,425
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 178,425
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 29Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 651.93Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 651.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- high_grade
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“651.93”
Context: 32,500
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 32,500
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 30Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 32,500
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 32,500
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 31Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace zinc grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 32,500
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 32,500
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 32Red Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace gold grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 32,500
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 32,500
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 33Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 74.96Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 74.96
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“74.96”
Context: 356,850
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 356,850
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 34Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace lead grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 356,850
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 356,850
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 35Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace zinc grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 356,850
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 356,850
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 36Red Silver Project · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace gold grade in the inferred category, part of the existing resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 356,850
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 356,850
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 37Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 496.1Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 496.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in the inferred category, representing the total inferred resource, which is predominantly inferred.
Positive factors
- high_grade
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
- all_inferred
Evidence · table
“496.10”
Context: 1,908,725
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 1,908,725
All InferredRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.
Reason: The total inferred resource is 1,908,725 tonnes, while M&I is only 41,600 tonnes, indicating a predominantly inferred resource.
Evidence · table
“Total Inferred”
Context: 1,908,725
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 38Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead grade in the inferred category, representing the total inferred resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
- all_inferred
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 1,908,725
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 1,908,725
All InferredRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.
Reason: The total inferred resource is 1,908,725 tonnes, while M&I is only 41,600 tonnes, indicating a predominantly inferred resource.
Evidence · table
“Total Inferred”
Context: 1,908,725
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 39Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grade in the inferred category, representing the total inferred resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
- all_inferred
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 1,908,725
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 1,908,725
All InferredRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.
Reason: The total inferred resource is 1,908,725 tonnes, while M&I is only 41,600 tonnes, indicating a predominantly inferred resource.
Evidence · table
“Total Inferred”
Context: 1,908,725
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 40Red Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace gold grade in the inferred category, representing the total inferred resource.
Negative factors
- inferred_resource
- all_inferred
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 1,908,725
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Inferred ResourceRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Reason: The resource is classified as Inferred Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 1,908,725
All InferredRejected · negative · Story-specific tag
100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.
Reason: The total inferred resource is 1,908,725 tonnes, while M&I is only 41,600 tonnes, indicating a predominantly inferred resource.
Evidence · table
“Total Inferred”
Context: 1,908,725
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 41Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 496.1Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 496.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in the measured category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- high_grade
- measured_resource
Evidence · table
“496.10”
Context: 20,800
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Measured ResourceRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Reason: The resource is classified as Measured Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Measured”
Context: 20,800
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: A Qualified Person has reviewed and approved the technical content.
Evidence · text
“Mr. A. David Heyl, B.Sc., C.P.G., a Qualified Person under NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the technical content”
Fact 42Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead grade in the measured category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- measured_resource
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 20,800
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Measured ResourceRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Reason: The resource is classified as Measured Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Measured”
Context: 20,800
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 43Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grade in the measured category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- measured_resource
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 20,800
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Measured ResourceRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Reason: The resource is classified as Measured Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Measured”
Context: 20,800
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 44Red Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace gold grade in the measured category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- measured_resource
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 20,800
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Measured ResourceRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.
Reason: The resource is classified as Measured Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Measured”
Context: 20,800
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 45Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 496.1Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 496.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in the indicated category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- high_grade
- indicated_resource
Evidence · table
“496.10”
Context: 20,800
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Indicated ResourceRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Reason: The resource is classified as Indicated Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Indicated”
Context: 20,800
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: A Qualified Person has reviewed and approved the technical content.
Evidence · text
“Mr. A. David Heyl, B.Sc., C.P.G., a Qualified Person under NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the technical content”
Fact 46Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead grade in the indicated category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- indicated_resource
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 20,800
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Indicated ResourceRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Reason: The resource is classified as Indicated Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Indicated”
Context: 20,800
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 47Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grade in the indicated category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- indicated_resource
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 20,800
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Indicated ResourceRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Reason: The resource is classified as Indicated Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Indicated”
Context: 20,800
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 48Red Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace gold grade in the indicated category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- indicated_resource
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 20,800
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Indicated ResourceRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Reason: The resource is classified as Indicated Mineral Resource.
Evidence · table
“Indicated”
Context: 20,800
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 49Red Silver Project · silverGrade: 496.1Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 496.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver in the combined Measured + Indicated category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- high_grade
- indicated_resource
Evidence · table
“496.10”
Context: 41,600
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Indicated ResourceRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Reason: The resource is classified as Indicated Mineral Resource (as per rule for combined M&I).
Evidence · table
“M&I”
Context: 41,600
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: A Qualified Person has reviewed and approved the technical content.
Evidence · text
“Mr. A. David Heyl, B.Sc., C.P.G., a Qualified Person under NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the technical content”
Fact 50Red Silver Project · leadGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead grade in the combined Measured + Indicated category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- indicated_resource
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 41,600
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Indicated ResourceRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Reason: The resource is classified as Indicated Mineral Resource (as per rule for combined M&I).
Evidence · table
“M&I”
Context: 41,600
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 51Red Silver Project · zincGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc grade in the combined Measured + Indicated category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- indicated_resource
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 41,600
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Indicated ResourceRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Reason: The resource is classified as Indicated Mineral Resource (as per rule for combined M&I).
Evidence · table
“M&I”
Context: 41,600
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
Fact 52Red Silver Project · goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace gold grade in the combined Measured + Indicated category, part of the existing resource.
Positive factors
- indicated_resource
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 41,600
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Indicated ResourceRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Reason: The resource is classified as Indicated Mineral Resource (as per rule for combined M&I).
Evidence · table
“M&I”
Context: 41,600
NI 43-101 CompliantRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Reason: The resource is reported as NI 43-101 compliant.
Evidence · text
“NI 43-101 Mineral Resource”
DDH-ML-01Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-01
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“65”
Context: DDH-ML-01
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-02Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-02
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“75”
Context: DDH-ML-02
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-03Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-03
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“120”
Context: DDH-ML-03
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-04Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-04
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“120”
Context: DDH-ML-04
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-05Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-05
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“95”
Context: DDH-ML-05
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-06Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-06
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 90 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“90”
Context: DDH-ML-06
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-07Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-07
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 90 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“90”
Context: DDH-ML-07
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-08Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-08
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 90 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“90”
Context: DDH-ML-08
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-09Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-09
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 90 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“90”
Context: DDH-ML-09
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-10Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-10
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“75”
Context: DDH-ML-10
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-11Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-11
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 50 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“50”
Context: DDH-ML-11
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-12Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-12
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 50 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“50”
Context: DDH-ML-12
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-13Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-13
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“60”
Context: DDH-ML-13
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
DDH-ML-14Red Silver ProjectHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH-ML-14
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
Evidence · table
“45”
Context: DDH-ML-14
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Silvia_01Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Silvia_01
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“350”
Context: Silvia_01
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Silvia_02Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Silvia_02
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“350”
Context: Silvia_02
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Silvia_03Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Silvia_03
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 450 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“450”
Context: Silvia_03
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Larissa_01Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Larissa_01
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 280 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“280”
Context: Larissa_01
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Larissa_02Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Larissa_02
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 350 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“350”
Context: Larissa_02
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Larissa_03Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Larissa_03
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 380 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“380”
Context: Larissa_03
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Larissa_04Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Larissa_04
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 340 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“340”
Context: Larissa_04
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Milagrosa_01Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Milagrosa_01
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 115 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“115”
Context: Milagrosa_01
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Milagrosa_02Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Milagrosa_02
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 100 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“100”
Context: Milagrosa_02
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Milagrosa_03Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Milagrosa_03
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 100 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“100”
Context: Milagrosa_03
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Milagrosa_04Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Milagrosa_04
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 100 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“100”
Context: Milagrosa_04
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Mariela_01Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Mariela_01
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 230 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“230”
Context: Mariela_01
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Mariela_02Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Mariela_02
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 230 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“230”
Context: Mariela_02
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Luz_01Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Luz_01
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 400 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“400”
Context: Luz_01
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Luz_02Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Luz_02
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 260 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“260”
Context: Luz_02
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Luz_03Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Luz_03
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 280 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“280”
Context: Luz_03
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Luz_04Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Luz_04
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 330 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“330”
Context: Luz_04
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
MJ_01Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ_01
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 120 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“120”
Context: MJ_01
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
MJ_02Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ_02
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 100 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“100”
Context: MJ_02
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
MJ_03Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ_03
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 200 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“200”
Context: MJ_03
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
MJ_04Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MJ_04
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 320 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“320”
Context: MJ_04
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Rossana_01Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Rossana_01
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 60 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“60”
Context: Rossana_01
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
Rossana_02Red Silver ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Rossana_02
- Project
- Red Silver Project
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Huancavelica, Peru
- Ticker
- AGX
Geometry
- Hole Depth
- 90 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- resource
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ISO-certified laboratory in Lima, Peru
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Planned drill hole as part of the expanded program to grow and upgrade the resource, including step-out and infill drilling.
Positive factors
- part_of_expanded_program
- resource_expansion_objective
- step_out_extension
- infill_drilling
Evidence · table
“90”
Context: Rossana_02
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Phase II of the drill program includes infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Phase II - Resource Expansion and Infill Drilling”
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: Phase II of the drill program extends drilling beyond the current resource area.
Evidence · text
“Phase II extends drilling beyond the current resource area”
Resource UpdateRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Reason: The drill program aims to grow the current Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource.
Evidence · text
“grow the current NI 43-101 Mineral Resource and upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource”
Category UpgradeRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Reason: The drill program aims to upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories.
Evidence · text
“upgrade portions of the Inferred Resource to Measured and Indicated categories”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.