# Silver Tiger Intersects 2.1 Metres of 7.72 Kilograms Per Tonne Silver Equivalent in The Caleigh Vein Including 0.53 Metres of 29.62 Kilograms Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/silver-tiger-intersects-2-1-metres-of-7-72-kilograms-per-tonne-silver-equivalent--84f21e66-ae12-4e8a-bdd0-788605596869 Original source: https://silvertigermetals.com/news/2026/silver-tiger-intersects-2.1-metres-of-7.72-kilograms-per-tonne-silver-equivalent-in-the-caleigh-vein-including-0.53-metres-of-29.62-kilograms Publisher: prospectors\_exchange Original announcement: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-09-16T17:12:19.072Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-09-16T17:12:19.072Z - Company: Silver Tiger Metals Inc. - Ticker: SLVR - Exchange: Unavailable - Region: Unavailable - Primary commodity: Silver - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Drill results - Extracted: 2026-09-16 17:12:19 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Silver Tiger Metals Inc. reported a high-grade silver equivalent intercept of 2.1 metres at 7.72 kg/t AgEq in the Caleigh Vein. The interval includes a high-grade sub-interval of 0.53 metres at 29.62 kg/t AgEq. Reasoning: The intercept of 2.1m at 7.72 kg/t AgEq is a strong result for an epithermal system, though the lack of specific assay details and QA/QC in the headline text limits full verification. - Positive factor: High-grade silver equivalent intercept - Positive factor: Strong sub-interval grade - Negative factor: No QA/QC disclosure - Negative factor: Metal equivalent assumptions undisclosed Facts used in scoring: 2 ## Classification and evidence **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: The provided text does not mention laboratory certification, QP sign-off, or specific QA/QC methods. Evidence · text > Silver Tiger Intersects 2.1 Metres of 7.72 Kilograms Per Tonne Silver Equivalent **Metal Equivalent Opaque** Polarity: negative Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Why it applies: The headline reports silver equivalent grades without disclosing the underlying price or recovery assumptions. Evidence · text > 7.72 Kilograms Per Tonne Silver Equivalent ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (2) ### Fact 1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/silver-tiger-intersects-2-1-metres-of-7-72-kilograms-per-tonne-silver-equivalent--84f21e66-ae12-4e8a-bdd0-788605596869#fact-drill-facts-0) El Tigre · silver Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id #### Identity - Project: El Tigre - Commodity: silver - Region: canada - Reported Region: canada - Ticker: SLVR #### Geometry - Grade: 7.72 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 2.1 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 7.72 - Metal Eq. Unit: kg/t AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: 7.72 kg/t AgEq is a significant intercept for the project. - Positive factor: Strong silver equivalent grade - Negative factor: Metal equivalent assumptions undisclosed Evidence · text > 2.1 Metres of 7.72 Kilograms Per Tonne Silver Equivalent #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Metal Equivalent Opaque** Polarity: negative Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions ### Fact 2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/silver-tiger-intersects-2-1-metres-of-7-72-kilograms-per-tonne-silver-equivalent--84f21e66-ae12-4e8a-bdd0-788605596869#fact-drill-facts-1) El Tigre · silver Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id #### Identity - Project: El Tigre - Commodity: silver - Region: canada - Reported Region: canada - Ticker: SLVR #### Geometry - Grade: 29.62 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.53 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 29.62 - Metal Eq. Unit: kg/t AgEq - Assumptions Disclosed: No #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: The sub-interval grade of 29.62 kg/t AgEq is exceptionally high. - Positive factor: Bonanza-style sub-interval grade - Negative factor: Metal equivalent assumptions undisclosed Evidence · text > 0.53 Metres of 29.62 Kilograms #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Metal Equivalent Opaque** Polarity: negative Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.