Selkirk Copper's Phase 2 Drilling Feeds Into Minto's 2027 Resource Update: 7 Things You Need to Know

Original announcement by cruxinvestor on

Company
Selkirk Copper Mines
Ticker
SCMI
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Yukon
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-10-20 12:05:58 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Selkirk Copper announced positive Phase 2 drill results from its Minto copper-gold-silver project in central Yukon, exceeding its 50,000-meter plan. Key intercepts include 44.7 meters at 3.0% copper equivalent at Minto North, confirming grade continuity and extending mineralization. These results are crucial for an upcoming resource update in Q1 2027, which will support the project's feasibility study.

Reasoning: Selkirk Copper reported strong Phase 2 drill results from its Minto project, including high-grade copper equivalent intercepts over significant widths, which exceeded the planned meterage and will feed into a 2027 resource update supporting a feasibility study.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper equivalent intercepts
  • Significant intercept widths
  • Drilling exceeded planned meterage
  • Confirmation of grade continuity
  • Extension of known mineralization
  • Results feeding into upcoming resource update for feasibility study

Negative factors

  • Internal waste noted in a key intercept
  • True widths are estimated as a range, not precisely stated
  • No QA/QC disclosure in the release
  • Cut-off grades for compositing are not disclosed

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 22

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The 44.7-meter intercept at Minto North grading 3.0% copper equivalent, including higher-grade sub-intervals up to 6.45% CuEq, is described as one of the best grade-by-width results of the entire drill program.

Evidence · text

“44.7 meters grading 2.12% copper, 1.16 grams per tonne gold and 10.7 grams per tonne silver, or 3.0% copper equivalent. ... The company ranks the 44.7-meter result among the best grade-by-width intercepts across Phase 1 and Phase 2 combined.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Step-out drilling at Area 118 extended the 301, 120, and 160 lenses, and a new 302 Lens was identified at Copper Keel, open to the east and south.

Evidence · text

“Area 118 Step-Outs Extended Lenses Close to Existing Underground Development ... 2 other holes tested the newly identified 302 Lens, where mineralization is open to the east and south at 50 to 70 meters below surface.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Infill drilling at Minto North's 202 Lens, Copper Keel's 101 Lens, and Minto Main's 114/117 lenses confirmed grade continuity and modeled geometry.

Evidence · text

“Infill drilling at the 202 Lens returned 44.7 meters grading... Copper Keel Infill Confirmed the Modeled Geometry... Infill drilling across the 114 and 117 lenses at Minto Main returned 27 meters grading...”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Intercepts are reported as drill-core lengths, with true widths estimated as 80% to 90% of these lengths, indicating that precise true widths are not provided.

Evidence · text

“Reported intercepts represent drill-core lengths; the company estimates true widths at approximately 80% to 90% of the core lengths.”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: The release does not disclose any information regarding QA/QC procedures, laboratory certifications, or Competent/Qualified Person sign-off.

Evidence · text

“Selkirk Copper's Phase 2 Drilling Feeds Into Minto's 2027 Resource Update: 7 Things You Need to Know”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: High-grade intervals are reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Evidence · text

“Selkirk Copper's Phase 2 Drilling Feeds Into Minto's 2027 Resource Update: 7 Things You Need to Know”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The main 44.7-meter intercept at Minto North explicitly states it includes an internal waste interval grading less than 0.1% copper equivalent.

Evidence · text

“Selkirk reported the Minto North result as a single 44.7-meter interval, which includes an internal waste interval grading less than 0.1% copper equivalent.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 22. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (22)

Fact 1Minto North · copperGrade: 2.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 44.7 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
44.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Minto North 202 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept at Minto North delivered an exceptional copper grade over a significant width, contributing to a high copper equivalent grade, and is highlighted as one of the best results of the program, despite the true width being an estimate.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade for underground mining
  • Significant intercept width
  • High copper equivalent grade
  • Ranked among best grade-by-width results
  • Internal dilution disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“44.7 meters grading 2.12% copper, 1.16 grams per tonne gold and 10.7 grams per tonne silver, or 3.0% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 2Minto North · goldGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.7 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Minto North 202 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept at Minto North shows a good gold grade over a significant width, contributing to a strong copper equivalent grade, supporting the overall positive result.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade
  • Significant intercept width
  • High copper equivalent grade
  • Internal dilution disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“44.7 meters grading 2.12% copper, 1.16 grams per tonne gold and 10.7 grams per tonne silver, or 3.0% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 3Minto North · silverGrade: 10.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44.7 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
10.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
44.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Minto North 202 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept at Minto North includes a good silver grade over a significant width, contributing to the overall high copper equivalent grade, reinforcing the positive nature of the result.

Positive factors

  • Good silver grade
  • Significant intercept width
  • High copper equivalent grade
  • Internal dilution disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“44.7 meters grading 2.12% copper, 1.16 grams per tonne gold and 10.7 grams per tonne silver, or 3.0% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 4Minto North · copperIntercept: 11.1 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Intercept
11.1 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Minto North 202 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.83
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within the Minto North intercept shows a very high copper equivalent grade over a good width, indicating a bonanza zone within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Very high copper equivalent grade
  • Good intercept width for a sub-interval

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed
  • Individual metal grades not provided

Evidence · text

“includes 11.1 meters at 5.83% copper equivalent”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 5Minto North · copperIntercept: 9.2 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Intercept
9.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Minto North 202 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.45
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval within the Minto North intercept shows an extremely high copper equivalent grade over a good width, further highlighting the presence of bonanza mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Extremely high copper equivalent grade
  • Good intercept width for a sub-interval

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed
  • Individual metal grades not provided

Evidence · text

“and 9.2 meters at 6.45% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 6Minto North · copperGrade: 2.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.7 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.94
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Minto North 202 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This infill hole at Minto North returned an exceptional copper grade and high copper equivalent over a good width, confirming high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade for underground mining
  • High copper equivalent grade
  • Good intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“12.7 meters at 4.55% copper equivalent (2.94% copper, 2.09 grams per tonne gold and 15.0 grams per tonne silver)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 7Minto North · goldGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.7 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Minto North 202 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This infill hole at Minto North includes a good gold grade, contributing to the high copper equivalent grade over a good width.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade
  • High copper equivalent grade
  • Good intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“12.7 meters at 4.55% copper equivalent (2.94% copper, 2.09 grams per tonne gold and 15.0 grams per tonne silver)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 8Minto North · silverGrade: 15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.7 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Minto North 202 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This infill hole at Minto North includes a good silver grade, contributing to the high copper equivalent grade over a good width.

Positive factors

  • Good silver grade
  • High copper equivalent grade
  • Good intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“12.7 meters at 4.55% copper equivalent (2.94% copper, 2.09 grams per tonne gold and 15.0 grams per tonne silver)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 9Minto North · copperGrade: 3.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.1 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
3.72
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.1 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Minto North 202 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.58
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This infill hole at Minto North delivered an exceptional copper grade and very high copper equivalent over a solid width, further confirming high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade for underground mining
  • Very high copper equivalent grade
  • Solid intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“5.1 meters at 5.58% copper equivalent (3.72% copper, 2.45 grams per tonne gold and 17.4 grams per tonne silver).”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 10Minto North · goldGrade: 2.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.1 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Minto North 202 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.58
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This infill hole at Minto North includes a good gold grade, contributing to the very high copper equivalent grade over a solid width.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade
  • Very high copper equivalent grade
  • Solid intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“5.1 meters at 5.58% copper equivalent (3.72% copper, 2.45 grams per tonne gold and 17.4 grams per tonne silver).”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 11Minto North · silverGrade: 17.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.1 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
17.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.1 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Minto North 202 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.58
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This infill hole at Minto North includes a good silver grade, contributing to the very high copper equivalent grade over a solid width.

Positive factors

  • Good silver grade
  • Very high copper equivalent grade
  • Solid intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“5.1 meters at 5.58% copper equivalent (3.72% copper, 2.45 grams per tonne gold and 17.4 grams per tonne silver).”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 12Minto North · copperGrade: 2.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.4 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Copper Keel 101 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This infill hole at Copper Keel returned a strong copper grade and good copper equivalent over a good width, confirming the continuity of the modeled geometry and exceeding expectations.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade for underground mining
  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • Good intercept width
  • Confirmed continuity of modeled geometry

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“12.4 meters of material grading 2.02% copper, 0.65 grams per tonne gold, and 4.8 grams per tonne silver, or 2.41% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 13Minto North · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.4 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Copper Keel 101 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This infill hole at Copper Keel includes a gold grade that contributes to the good copper equivalent grade over a good width, supporting the overall positive result.

Positive factors

  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • Good intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“12.4 meters of material grading 2.02% copper, 0.65 grams per tonne gold, and 4.8 grams per tonne silver, or 2.41% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 14Minto North · silverGrade: 4.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.4 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
4.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Copper Keel 101 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.41
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This infill hole at Copper Keel includes a silver grade that contributes to the good copper equivalent grade over a good width, supporting the overall positive result.

Positive factors

  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • Good intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“12.4 meters of material grading 2.02% copper, 0.65 grams per tonne gold, and 4.8 grams per tonne silver, or 2.41% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 15Minto North · copperGrade: 2.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.7 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
2.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Area 118 301 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This step-out hole at Area 118 delivered an exceptional copper grade and very high copper equivalent over a good width, extending mineralization close to existing development.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade for underground mining
  • Very high copper equivalent grade
  • Good intercept width
  • Step-out extended mineralization
  • Proximity to existing underground development

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“8.7 meters grading 2.14% copper, 1.61 grams per tonne gold and 10.1 grams per tonne silver, or 3.38% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 16Minto North · goldGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.7 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Area 118 301 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This step-out hole at Area 118 includes a good gold grade, contributing to the very high copper equivalent grade over a good width.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade
  • Very high copper equivalent grade
  • Good intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“8.7 meters grading 2.14% copper, 1.61 grams per tonne gold and 10.1 grams per tonne silver, or 3.38% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 17Minto North · silverGrade: 10.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.7 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
10.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Area 118 301 Lens
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.38
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This step-out hole at Area 118 includes a good silver grade, contributing to the very high copper equivalent grade over a good width.

Positive factors

  • Good silver grade
  • Very high copper equivalent grade
  • Good intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“8.7 meters grading 2.14% copper, 1.61 grams per tonne gold and 10.1 grams per tonne silver, or 3.38% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 18Minto North · copperIntercept: 14.9 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Intercept
14.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Area 118 120 and 160 lenses
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This step-out hole at Area 118 returned a moderate copper equivalent grade over a good width, extending mineralization near existing development.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept width
  • Step-out extended mineralization
  • Proximity to existing underground development

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed
  • Individual metal grades not provided

Evidence · text

“14.9 meters at 1.22% copper equivalent”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 19Minto North · copperIntercept: 10.2 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Intercept
10.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Area 118 120 and 160 lenses
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.05
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This step-out hole at Area 118 returned a moderate copper equivalent grade over a good width, extending mineralization near existing development.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept width
  • Step-out extended mineralization
  • Proximity to existing underground development

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed
  • Individual metal grades not provided

Evidence · text

“10.2 meters at 1.05% copper equivalent”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 20Minto North · copperGrade: 1.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
1.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
27 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Minto Main 114 and 117 lenses
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This infill hole at Minto Main returned a strong copper grade and good copper equivalent over a significant width, noted as thicker and higher grade than nearby intercepts.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade
  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • Significant intercept width
  • Thicker and higher grade than nearby intercepts

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“27 meters grading 1.42% copper, 0.58 grams per tonne gold and 3.4 grams per tonne silver, or 1.79% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 21Minto North · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Minto Main 114 and 117 lenses
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This infill hole at Minto Main includes a gold grade that contributes to the good copper equivalent grade over a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • Significant intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“27 meters grading 1.42% copper, 0.58 grams per tonne gold and 3.4 grams per tonne silver, or 1.79% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

Fact 22Minto North · silverGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Minto North
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
SCMI

Geometry

Grade
3.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Minto Main 114 and 117 lenses
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
No
QA/QC Methods
standards

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% copper equivalent
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This infill hole at Minto Main includes a silver grade that contributes to the good copper equivalent grade over a significant width.

Positive factors

  • Good copper equivalent grade
  • Significant intercept width

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimate range
  • No QA/QC disclosure
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“27 meters grading 1.42% copper, 0.58 grams per tonne gold and 3.4 grams per tonne silver, or 1.79% copper equivalent.”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.