Scottie Resources Intercepts 8.37 g/t Gold over 8.45 m and 122 g/t Gold over 1.2 m at Blueberry Contact Zone at Scottie Gold Mine Project, BC
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Scottie Resources Corp.
- Ticker
- SCOT
- Exchange
- TSXV
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 12:21:18 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Scottie Resources has reported new high-grade gold assays from its 2025 drilling program at the Blueberry Contact Zone within the Scottie Gold Mine Project in BC. Notable intercepts include 8.37 g/t gold over 8.45 m and 122 g/t gold over 1.2 m.
Reasoning: The announcement reports significant new gold intercepts (8.37 g/t and 122 g/t) at the Blueberry Contact Zone, representing high-grade exploration success.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercepts reported
- New assay results from 2025 drilling
Facts used in scoring: 2
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 122 g/t gold is exceptionally high grade for an epithermal gold system.
Evidence · text
“122 g/t Gold over 1.2 m”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
Fact 1Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 8.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.45 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Blueberry Contact Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 8.37 g/t over 8.45 m is a solid intercept for gold exploration.
Positive factors
- Strong grade and width
Evidence · text
“8.37 g/t Gold over 8.45 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 2Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 122Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 122
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Blueberry Contact Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 122 g/t gold is an exceptionally high-grade intercept.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade intercept
Evidence · text
“122 g/t Gold over 1.2 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.