Scottie Resources Hits Multiple High-Grade Gold Intercepts at Blueberry Contact Zone Including 34.3 g/t Gold over 3.30 Metres and 9.97 g/t Gold over 9.70 Metres
Original announcement by prospectors_exchange on
- Company
- Scottie Resources Corp.
- Ticker
- SCOT
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-19 13:56:27 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Scottie Resources Corp. has announced high-grade gold drill results from its 2025 drilling program at the Blueberry Contact Zone within the Scottie Gold Mine Project. Highlights include 34.3 g/t gold over 3.30 metres (including 90.8 g/t gold over 1.05 metres) and 9.97 g/t gold over 9.70 metres. These new assays are reported to reinforce the strength and continuity of high-grade gold mineralization, de-risk, and strengthen the recently released Preliminary Economic Assessment for the project.
Reasoning: Scottie Resources reported multiple high-grade gold intercepts, including several bonanza grades, from the Blueberry Contact Zone. These results reinforce the strength and continuity of mineralization, expand the known system, and strengthen the project's Preliminary Economic Assessment.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- High-grade intercepts
- Step-Out Extension
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Multiple high-grade intercepts from multiple vein zones
- Near-surface mineralization
- Results de-risk and strengthen PEA
- Strong grades across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 47
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 47. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (47)
SR25-418Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 13.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-418
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 89 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-418:89-90
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold grade of 13.3 g/t over a narrow width of 1.00 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“13.3”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-418Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-418
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 89 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-418:89-90
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver grade of 3.00 g/t over 1.00 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.00”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-418Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 9.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-418
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- From
- 101.25 m
- To
- 104 m
- Intercept Depth
- 101.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-418:101.25-104
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold grade of 9.75 g/t over a moderate width of 2.75 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“9.75”
Context: 2.75
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-418Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-418
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.75 m
- From
- 101.25 m
- To
- 104 m
- Intercept Depth
- 101.25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-418:101.25-104
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver grade of 1.09 g/t over 2.75 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.09”
Context: 2.75
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-420Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-420
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- From
- 214.15 m
- To
- 216.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-420:214.15-216.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade of 1.31 g/t over 2.05 metres, below the weak threshold for orogenic underground deposits, and true width is not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.31”
Context: 2.05
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-420Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-420
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- From
- 214.15 m
- To
- 216.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 214.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-420:214.15-216.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Barren silver grade of 0.00 g/t over 2.05 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 2.05
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-420Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 34.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-420
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 282.1 m
- To
- 285.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 282.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-420:282.1-285.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional gold grade of 34.3 g/t over a moderate width of 3.30 metres, yielding a strong grade-thickness product, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade
- Strong grade-thickness product
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“34.3”
Context: 3.30
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 34.3 g/t gold over 3.30 metres is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic underground gold deposits (>=15 g/t).
Evidence · table
“34.3”
Context: 3.30
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-420Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-420
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.3 m
- From
- 282.1 m
- To
- 285.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 282.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-420:282.1-285.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver grade of 3.00 g/t over 3.30 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.00”
Context: 3.30
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-420Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 90.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-420
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 90.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 284.35 m
- To
- 285.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 284.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-420:284.35-285.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Bonanza gold grade of 90.8 g/t over a narrow width of 1.05 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“90.8”
Context: 1.05
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 90.8 g/t gold over 1.05 metres is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic underground gold deposits (>=15 g/t).
Evidence · table
“90.8”
Context: 1.05
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-420Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-420
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 284.35 m
- To
- 285.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 284.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-420:284.35-285.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver grade of 3.00 g/t over 1.05 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.00”
Context: 1.05
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-421Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-421
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 158.75 m
- To
- 159.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-421:158.75-159.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade of 1.90 g/t over 1.00 metres, below the weak threshold for orogenic underground deposits, and true width is not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.90”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-421Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-421
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 158.75 m
- To
- 159.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 158.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-421:158.75-159.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Barren silver grade of 0.00 g/t over 1.00 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-421Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 4.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-421
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 277 m
- To
- 286 m
- Intercept Depth
- 277 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-421:277-286
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- BBVein
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 4.52 g/t over a moderate width of 9.00 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade
- Moderate width
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“4.52”
Context: 9.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-421Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-421
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 277 m
- To
- 286 m
- Intercept Depth
- 277 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-421:277-286
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- BBVein
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Barren silver grade of 0.00 g/t over 9.00 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 9.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-422Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-422
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.55 m
- From
- 193.45 m
- To
- 196 m
- Intercept Depth
- 193.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-422:193.45-196
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional gold grade of 29.0 g/t over a narrow width of 2.55 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“29.0”
Context: 2.55
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 29.0 g/t gold over 2.55 metres is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic underground gold deposits (>=15 g/t).
Evidence · table
“29.0”
Context: 2.55
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-422Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 12.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-422
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.55 m
- From
- 193.45 m
- To
- 196 m
- Intercept Depth
- 193.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-422:193.45-196
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver grade of 12.4 g/t over 2.55 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“12.4”
Context: 2.55
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-422Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 2.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-422
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 208.75 m
- To
- 209.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 208.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-422:208.75-209.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade of 2.41 g/t over 1.00 metres, below the weak threshold for orogenic underground deposits, and true width is not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.41”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-422Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-422
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 208.75 m
- To
- 209.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 208.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-422:208.75-209.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Barren silver grade of 0.00 g/t over 1.00 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-422Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 4.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-422
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 211.75 m
- To
- 212.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 211.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-422:211.75-212.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 4.05 g/t over a narrow width of 1.00 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“4.05”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-422Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-422
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 211.75 m
- To
- 212.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 211.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-422:211.75-212.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver grade of 3.00 g/t over 1.00 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“3.00”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-422Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 6.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-422
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 248 m
- To
- 259 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-422:248-259
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 6.06 g/t over a moderate width of 11.00 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade
- Moderate width
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“6.06”
Context: 11.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-422Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 66.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-422
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 66.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 248 m
- To
- 259 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-422:248-259
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver grade of 66.5 g/t over a moderate width of 11.00 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade
- Moderate width
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“66.5”
Context: 11.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-422Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 19.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-422
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 254.5 m
- To
- 256.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 254.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-422:254.5-256.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional gold grade of 19.7 g/t over a narrow width of 2.25 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“19.7”
Context: 2.25
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 19.7 g/t gold over 2.25 metres is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic underground gold deposits (>=15 g/t).
Evidence · table
“19.7”
Context: 2.25
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-422Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 10Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-422
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 254.5 m
- To
- 256.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 254.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-422:254.5-256.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver grade of 10.00 g/t over 2.25 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“10.00”
Context: 2.25
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-423Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-423
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 209.55 m
- To
- 210.55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 209.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-423:209.55-210.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade of 2.17 g/t over 1.00 metres, below the weak threshold for orogenic underground deposits, and true width is not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.17”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-423Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-423
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 209.55 m
- To
- 210.55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 209.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-423:209.55-210.55
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Barren silver grade of 0.00 g/t over 1.00 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-423Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-423
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 216.6 m
- To
- 217.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 216.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-423:216.6-217.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade of 1.07 g/t over 1.05 metres, below the weak threshold for orogenic underground deposits, and true width is not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.07”
Context: 1.05
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-423Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-423
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 216.6 m
- To
- 217.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 216.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-423:216.6-217.65
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver grade of 2.00 g/t over 1.05 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.00”
Context: 1.05
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-423Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 100Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-423
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 100
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 237.35 m
- To
- 238.35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 237.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-423:237.35-238.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Bonanza gold grade of 100.0 g/t over a narrow width of 1.00 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“100.0”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 100.0 g/t gold over 1.00 metres is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic underground gold deposits (>=15 g/t).
Evidence · table
“100.0”
Context: 1.00
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-423Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-423
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 237.35 m
- To
- 238.35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 237.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-423:237.35-238.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Lemoffe
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Weak silver grade of 36.0 g/t over 1.00 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“36.0”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 6.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 35 m
- To
- 49 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:35-49
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 6.44 g/t over a moderate width of 14.00 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade
- Moderate width
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“6.44”
Context: 14.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 35 m
- To
- 49 m
- Intercept Depth
- 35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:35-49
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very low silver grade of 0.43 g/t over 14.00 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: 14.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 16.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 43 m
- To
- 47 m
- Intercept Depth
- 43 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:43-47
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional gold grade of 16.8 g/t over a moderate width of 4.00 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“16.8”
Context: 4.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 16.8 g/t gold over 4.00 metres is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic underground gold deposits (>=15 g/t).
Evidence · table
“16.8”
Context: 4.00
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 43 m
- To
- 47 m
- Intercept Depth
- 43 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:43-47
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very low silver grade of 1.00 g/t over 4.00 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.00”
Context: 4.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 47.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 47.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 47 m
- Intercept Depth
- 46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:46-47
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Bonanza gold grade of 47.1 g/t over a narrow width of 1.00 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“47.1”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 47.1 g/t gold over 1.00 metres is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic underground gold deposits (>=15 g/t).
Evidence · table
“47.1”
Context: 1.00
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 47 m
- Intercept Depth
- 46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:46-47
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very low silver grade of 4.00 g/t over 1.00 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“4.00”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 4.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 77.3 m
- To
- 80.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:77.3-80.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade of 4.51 g/t over a narrow width of 3.20 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“4.51”
Context: 3.20
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 2.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.2 m
- From
- 77.3 m
- To
- 80.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 77.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:77.3-80.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very low silver grade of 2.95 g/t over 3.20 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“2.95”
Context: 3.20
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 42.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 42.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 94.45 m
- To
- 95.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:94.45-95.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Bonanza gold grade of 42.4 g/t over a narrow width of 1.00 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
- Exceptional gold grade
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“42.4”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The intercept of 42.4 g/t gold over 1.00 metres is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic underground gold deposits (>=15 g/t).
Evidence · table
“42.4”
Context: 1.00
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 94.45 m
- To
- 95.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:94.45-95.45
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Road
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver grade of 12.0 g/t over 1.00 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“12.0”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 131.15 m
- To
- 134.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:131.15-134.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- BBVein
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade of 1.82 g/t over 3.00 metres, below the weak threshold for orogenic underground deposits, and true width is not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.82”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 131.15 m
- To
- 134.15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 131.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:131.15-134.15
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- BBVein
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Barren silver grade of 0.00 g/t over 3.00 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 167 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:164-167
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- BBVein
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade of 1.63 g/t over 3.00 metres, below the weak threshold for orogenic underground deposits, and true width is not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“1.63”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 167 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:164-167
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- BBVein
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Barren silver grade of 0.00 g/t over 3.00 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 9.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.7 m
- From
- 203.15 m
- To
- 212.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 203.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:203.15-212.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- BBVein
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong gold grade of 9.97 g/t over a moderate width of 9.70 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade
- Moderate width
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“9.97”
Context: 9.70
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · silverGrade: 5.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.7 m
- From
- 203.15 m
- To
- 212.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 203.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:203.15-212.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- BBVein
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver grade of 5.75 g/t over 9.70 metres, with true width not established.
Negative factors
- Low grade
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“5.75”
Context: 9.70
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
SR25-424Scottie Gold Mine · goldGrade: 15.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SR25-424
- Project
- Scottie Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- SCOT
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 208.35 m
- To
- 212.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 208.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SR25-424:208.35-212.85
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- BBVein
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- SGS Minerals
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional gold grade of 15.2 g/t over a moderate width of 4.50 metres, but true width is not established.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade
- Moderate width
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · table
“15.2”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: True width of the intervals has not yet been established by drilling.
Evidence · text
“True width of the intervals has not yet been es tablis hed by drilling”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release mentions standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken and a secure chain of custody was maintained.
Evidence · text
“Standards, blanks, and duplicate samples were taken at intervals and frequencies that meet or exceed industry best practices. A secure chain of custody is maintained in transporting and storing all samples.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The company aims to continue expanding and defining additional mineralization, suggesting step-out drilling.
Evidence · text
“continue expanding this high-grade predictable system. Fully funded for 2026, w e look forw ard to continuing to define additional mineralization.”
Infill DrillingRejected · neutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Reason: Results strengthen the PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and reinforce confidence in a robust, predictable mineralized system, indicating infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Results de-risk and strengthen the recently released PEA by improving confidence in mine planning and future development scenarios Strong grades reported across all major Blueberry Contact vein zones reinforce confidence in a robust, predicable mineralized system”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.