# Scottie Resources Files PEA for Scottie Gold Mine Project

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/scottie-resources-files-pea-for-scottie-gold-mine-project--51899b7f-29b9-4590-85e2-26ce719bf2d6

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/SCOT/news/6277999282810308/scottie-resources-files-pea-for-scottie-gold-mine-project

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2025-12-08T17:31:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Scottie Resources Corp.

- Ticker: SCOT

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: British Columbia

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Resource update, Other

- Extracted: 2026-08-22 11:08:30 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Scottie Resources has filed a Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for the Scottie Gold Mine Project in British Columbia. The PEA reports an after-tax NPV\(5\) of $215.8M at US$2,600/oz gold and highlights a high-grade inferred resource of 703,000 oz gold at 6.1 g/t.

Reasoning: The filing of a PEA with a robust NPV and high-grade resource is a major project milestone, though the lack of Indicated/Measured resources limits economic certainty.

- Positive factor: Strong NPV at current gold prices

- Positive factor: Short payback period

- Positive factor: High-grade resource \(6.1 g/t\)

- Positive factor: PEA completed by independent firm

- Negative factor: Resource is 100% Inferred

- Negative factor: PEA is preliminary and includes speculative inferred resources

Facts used in scoring: 1

## Classification and evidence

**All Inferred**

Polarity: negative

Definition: 100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is stated to be entirely in the Inferred category.

Evidence · text

> 703,000 gold ounces at an average grade of 6.1 g/t \(Inferred category\)

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The announcement is the formal filing of a Preliminary Economic Assessment.

Evidence · text

> has filed on SEDAR+ the Preliminary Economic Assessment \("PEA"\)

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Multiple independent Qualified Persons from Tetra Tech, Snowden Optiro, and Moose Mountain Technical Services are named.

Evidence · text

> The Independent Qualified Persons... are Hassan Ghaffari... Jianhui \(John\) Huang... Damian Gregory... and Sue Bird

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (1)

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/scottie-resources-files-pea-for-scottie-gold-mine-project--51899b7f-29b9-4590-85e2-26ce719bf2d6#fact-resource-facts-0)

gold

#### Identity

- Commodity: gold
- Ticker: SCOT

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Grade: 6.1
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 703000
- Contained Unit: oz

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-12-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The resource is high-grade but carries the highest geological uncertainty as it is entirely Inferred.

- Positive factor: High grade of 6.1 g/t

- Negative factor: 100% Inferred category

Evidence · text

> total of 703,000 gold ounces at an average grade of 6.1 g/t \(Inferred category\)

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.