Scorpio Gold Drills 3.02 g/t Gold over 48.92 Metres from 118.87 Metres and 1.19 g/t Gold over 99.94 Metres from 98.61 Metres at the Goldwedge Target at Manhattan

Original announcement by newsfile on

Company
Scorpio Gold Corp.
Ticker
SGLD
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Nevada, USA
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-02 10:49:25 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Scorpio Gold announced new drill results from its Manhattan District Project in Nevada, highlighted by 3.02 g/t gold over 48.92 metres including 19.29 g/t gold over 5.24 metres in hole 26MN-115, and 1.19 g/t gold over 99.94 metres in hole 26MN-118. These step-out holes extend known mineralization and confirm the structural model, with the company noting potential for both bulk tonnage and high-grade underground production. All results are from exploration drilling targeting new mineralization outside the existing resource model.

Reasoning: New drill results from the Goldwedge and Zanzibar Trend targets at Manhattan confirm high-grade gold mineralization over significant widths, extending known zones and supporting the structural model. The results include bonanza grades and wide moderate-grade intercepts, indicating potential for both bulk tonnage and high-grade underground targets, with strong QA/QC and QP sign-off.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercepts
  • Significant widths
  • Step-out drilling extending mineralization
  • Confirmation of structural model
  • Potential for underground mining

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 15

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Hole 26MN-115 returned 19.29 g/t gold over 5.24 m, which is well above the exceptional threshold for epithermal gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“19.29”

Context: 5.24

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill holes 26MN-115 and 26MN-118 are described as 'approximately 50 m step-outs along the projected Reliance Fault'.

Evidence · text

“Drill holes 26MN-115 and 26MN-118 are both approximately 50 m step-outs along the projected Reliance Fault”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including the use of unmarked coarse blanks, certified reference materials, laboratory duplicates, and states that MSALABS facilities comply with ISO 17025:2017.

Evidence · text

“HQ sized diamond drill core samples were cut in halves, then bagged and secured with security tags to ensure integrity during transportation to the Elko, NV, MSALABS facility for preparation. For quality assurance (" QA "), unmarked coarse blanks, unmarked certified reference materials, and requested laboratory duplicates were inserted into the sampling sequence. QA samples were systematically inserted into each batch of samples, amounting to approximately 10% of the run of samples. Samples were analyzed for gold using a two-cycle PhotonAssay TM analysis method (~500 g) of crushed material (70% passing 2 mm). All MSALABS facilities comply with ISO 17025:2017.”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The scientific and technical information has been reviewed, verified and approved by Leo Hathaway, P. Geo., Executive Technical Director of Scorpio Gold, a 'Qualified Person' under NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“The scientific and technical information in this news release has been reviewed, verified and approved by Leo Hathaway, P. Geo., Executive Technical Director of Scorpio Gold, a "Qualified Person", as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 ")”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'There is insufficient geological information to estimate a true width for the drill intercepts reported.'

Evidence · text

“Note: There is insufficient geological information to estimate a true width for the drill intercepts reported.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: While internal dilution rules are disclosed, the primary cut-off grade used for reporting the main drill intervals is not explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“¹ Intervals contain no more than 3 continuous metres grading less than 0.1 g/t gold.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 15. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (15)

26MN-115Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 3.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.92 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-115
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
3.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.92 m
From
118.87 m
To
167.79 m
Hole Depth
388 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
342 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a significant width, contributing positively to the project's bulk tonnage potential and extending mineralization in a step-out hole.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade
  • Significant width
  • Step-out drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.02”

Context: 48.92

26MN-115Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 19.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-115
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
19.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.24 m
From
151.79 m
To
157.03 m
Hole Depth
388 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
underground

Location

Azimuth
342 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept over a good width is highly positive, confirming the presence of high-grade feeder zones within the broader mineralization and supporting potential underground development.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade
  • Strong grade-thickness product
  • Indicates high-grade feeder zones

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“19.29”

Context: 5.24

26MN-115Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 5.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-115
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
5.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.15 m
From
173.58 m
To
183.73 m
Hole Depth
388 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
underground

Location

Azimuth
342 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional gold grade over a good width confirms significant mineralization at the faulted contact, supporting the geological model.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade
  • Moderate grade-thickness product

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“5.14”

Context: 10.15

26MN-115Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-115
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.7 m
From
210.92 m
To
227.62 m
Hole Depth
388 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
342 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralized envelope but not representing high-grade potential.

Positive factors

  • Moderate width

Negative factors

  • Weak grade
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 16.70

26MN-116Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-116
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.16 m
From
95.71 m
To
117.87 m
Hole Depth
285 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a moderate width confirms mineralization along the Zanzibar Trend, contributing to the overall resource potential.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade
  • Moderate width

Negative factors

  • Weak grade-thickness product
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 22.16

26MN-116Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 3.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-116
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
3.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.75 m
From
98.66 m
To
102.41 m
Hole Depth
285 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
underground

Location

Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a narrow width indicates localized higher-grade zones within the Zanzibar Trend.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Weak grade-thickness product
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.72”

Context: 3.75

26MN-116Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-116
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.05 m
From
166.33 m
To
170.38 m
Hole Depth
285 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a narrow width confirms mineralization but is not highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Weak grade-thickness product
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.87”

Context: 4.05

26MN-116Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-116
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.05 m
From
205.07 m
To
230.12 m
Hole Depth
285 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a moderate width confirms mineralization along the Zanzibar Trend, contributing to the overall resource potential.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade
  • Moderate width

Negative factors

  • Weak grade-thickness product
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.84”

Context: 25.05

26MN-116Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 3.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.47 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-116
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
3.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.47 m
From
213.33 m
To
216.8 m
Hole Depth
285 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
underground

Location

Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold grade over a narrow width indicates localized higher-grade zones within the Zanzibar Trend.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Weak grade-thickness product
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.63”

Context: 3.47

26MN-118Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-118
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.6 m
From
59.28 m
To
68.88 m
Hole Depth
344 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
344 °
Dip
-62 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a narrow width confirms mineralization but is not highly material on its own.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Weak grade-thickness product
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.58”

Context: 9.60

26MN-118Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 99.94 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-118
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
1.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
99.94 m
From
98.61 m
To
198.55 m
Hole Depth
344 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
344 °
Dip
-62 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over an exceptional width, indicating significant bulk tonnage potential and extending mineralization in a step-out hole.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade
  • Exceptional width
  • Strong grade-thickness product
  • Step-out drilling

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.19”

Context: 99.94

26MN-118Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 1.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-118
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
1.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.8 m
From
126.95 m
To
139.75 m
Hole Depth
344 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
344 °
Dip
-62 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A moderate gold grade over a moderate width contributes to the overall mineralization but is not a standout result.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade
  • Moderate width

Negative factors

  • Weak grade-thickness product
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.86”

Context: 12.80

26MN-118Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 5.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-118
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
5.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.18 m
From
147.82 m
To
152 m
Hole Depth
344 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
underground

Location

Azimuth
344 °
Dip
-62 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional gold grade over a narrow width indicates localized high-grade mineralization, supporting the potential for underground targets.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade

Negative factors

  • Narrow width
  • Weak grade-thickness product
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“5.13”

Context: 4.18

26MN-118Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-118
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.14 m
From
227.38 m
To
235.52 m
Hole Depth
344 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
344 °
Dip
-62 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a sub-economic gold grade over a narrow width, indicating limited mineralization potential at this location.

Negative factors

  • Sub-economic grade
  • Narrow width
  • Weak grade-thickness product
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 8.14

26MN-113Manhattan District Project · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
26MN-113
Project
Manhattan District Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada, USA
Ticker
SGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.16 m
From
51.79 m
To
53.95 m
Hole Depth
716 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Azimuth
135 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
MSALABS
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
3 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, and the company explicitly states no significant mineralization was encountered, making it a negative result for this initial scout hole.

Negative factors

  • Weak grade
  • Narrow width
  • Weak grade-thickness product
  • Apparent width only
  • No significant mineralization encountered

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 2.16

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.