Scorpio Gold Drills 2.56 g/t Gold over 13.38 Metres from 293.28 Metres Within Manhattan Caldera, at Black Mammoth
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Scorpio Gold
- Ticker
- SGN
- Exchange
- TSXV
- Region
- Unavailable
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-20 21:34:59 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Scorpio Gold reported significant gold drill results at the Black Mammoth project, highlighted by hole 26MN-096 which returned 2.56 g/t gold over 13.38 metres. The mineralization is hosted within the Manhattan Caldera volcanics, showing high-grade continuity with a 3.84 m sub-interval at 8.38 g/t gold.
Reasoning: The intercept of 2.56 g/t Au over 13.38 m is strong for an exploration-stage project, supported by a high-grade 8.38 g/t Au sub-interval.
Positive factors
- Significant gold grade and width
- High-grade sub-interval reported
Facts used in scoring: 3

Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The document does not mention QA/QC protocols or lab certification.
Evidence · text
“Hole 26MN-096 returned”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: The release lacks basic QA/QC disclosure regarding lab certification or sampling protocols.
Evidence · text
“Hole 26MN-096 returned”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (3)
26MN-096Black Mammoth · goldGrade: 2.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MN-096
- Project
- Black Mammoth
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SGN
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.38 m
- From
- 293.28 m
- To
- 306.66 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MN-096:293.28-306.66
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 2.56 g/t over 13.38m is a solid exploration intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong grade and width
Evidence · text
“2.56 g/t gold over 13.38 metres ("m") from 293.28 m”
26MN-096Black Mammoth · goldGrade: 8.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.84 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MN-096
- Project
- Black Mammoth
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SGN
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.84 m
- From
- 298.95 m
- To
- 302.79 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 26MN-096:298.95-302.79
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 8.38 g/t gold is a high-grade component of the main intercept.
Positive factors
- High-grade sub-interval
Evidence · text
“including 8.38 g/t gold over 3.84 m from 298.95 m”
26MN-053Black Mammoth · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.69 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 26MN-053
- Project
- Black Mammoth
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- SGN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.69 m
- From
- 230.12 m
- To
- 254.81 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-06-24T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Wide but lower grade intercept.
Positive factors
- Wide intercept
Negative factors
- Lower grade
Evidence · text
“0.75 g/t gold over 24.69 m from 230.12 m (26MN-053)”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.