# RKB: 2026 Annual Financial Statements

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/rkb-2026-annual-financial-statements--844d576e-a0f8-4eb4-8b37-621af186f545

Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03146515

Publisher: asx

Original announcement: 2026-09-30T07:08:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-09-30T08:30:03.862Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-09-30T08:30:03.862Z

- Company: Rokeby Resources Limited

- Ticker: RKB

- Exchange: ASX

- Region: Victoria

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: Antimony, Copper, Silver, Lead, Zinc, Tin

- Document categories: Resource update, Agreement transaction, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-30 08:30:04 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.00 · Neutral

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Rokeby Resources Limited announced its annual financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2026, highlighting the landmark acquisition of the Omeo Gold Project in Victoria. The company has commenced a nine-hole drill program at Sunnyside to upgrade the historical, non-JORC compliant resource estimate of 2.4 Mt at 4.02 g/t Au for 320,000 ounces of gold. Despite an increased operating loss, the company's cash position was strengthened by a $4.34 million placement.

Reasoning: Rokeby Resources completed the acquisition of the Omeo Gold Project, a significant strategic move, and has commenced a drill program to upgrade its historical, non-JORC compliant resource estimate. The company reported an increased operating loss for the year but maintains a strong cash position.

- Positive factor: Acquisition of Omeo Gold Project, a significant strategic asset

- Positive factor: Commencement of a drill program at Sunnyside to upgrade the historical estimate

- Positive factor: Renewal of Mining Licence MIN 4921 for 20 years, underpinning long-term potential

- Positive factor: Strong cash position of $3.4 million at 30 June 2026 following a $4.34 million placement

- Negative factor: Historical resource estimate is non-JORC \(2012\) compliant and not classified by a Competent Person

- Negative factor: Increased operating loss for the year ended 30 June 2026 compared to the prior year

- Negative factor: Divestment of Northern Territory and Western Australia tenements, indicating portfolio rationalization

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 8

## Classification and evidence

**Historical Estimate Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that the resource estimate is 'non-JORC \(2012\) compliant' and 'A Competent Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a Mineral Resource in accordance with the JORC Code'.

Evidence · text

> Historical estimates are not JORC \(2012\) compliant. A Competent Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a Mineral Resource in accordance with the JORC Code.

**No QP/CP Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'A Competent Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a Mineral Resource in accordance with the JORC Code'.

Evidence · text

> A Competent Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a Mineral Resource in accordance with the JORC Code.

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: A significant portion of the Omeo Gold Project's historical resource is classified as Inferred, including 999 kt at Maude and 930 kt at Sunnyside, totaling 1,929 kt.

Evidence · table

> Inferred

Context: 999

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document presents a historical mineral resource estimate for the Omeo Gold Project, which is now being targeted for upgrade through a new drill program.

Evidence · text

> The Project is underpinned by a non-JORC \(2012\) Historical Mineral Resource Estimate of 2.4 Mt at 4.02 g/t Au for 320,000 ounces of gold across the Maude and Sunnyside deposits

**Maiden Resource**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.

Why it applies: The Omeo Gold Project's resource estimate is historical and is being presented by Rokeby for the first time as part of their acquisition, with plans to upgrade it.

Evidence · text

> The Project is underpinned by a non-JORC \(2012\) Historical Mineral Resource Estimate of 2.4 Mt at 4.02 g/t Au for 320,000 ounces of gold across the Maude and Sunnyside deposits

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 7. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (7)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/rkb-2026-annual-financial-statements--844d576e-a0f8-4eb4-8b37-621af186f545#fact-resource-facts-1)

Omeo Gold Project · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Omeo Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_vic
- Reported Region: Victoria
- Ticker: RKB

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: No
- Resource group id: resource:d737f0c6e0eeb223a84d
- Deposit or zone: Maude
- Mining method: underground
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 414000
- Grade: 5.2
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 69
- Contained Unit: koz

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-04-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical Indicated resource for the Maude deposit with a strong gold grade, but its non-JORC compliant status and lack of QP sign-off reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: Indicated category provides moderate geological confidence

- Positive factor: Grade of 5.2 g/t Au is considered strong for gold deposits

- Negative factor: Estimate is historical and non-JORC compliant, lacking current verification by a Competent Person

Evidence · table

> 5.2

Context: 414

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/rkb-2026-annual-financial-statements--844d576e-a0f8-4eb4-8b37-621af186f545#fact-resource-facts-2)

Omeo Gold Project · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Omeo Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_vic
- Reported Region: Victoria
- Ticker: RKB

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: No
- Resource group id: resource:a9d8bd0b911dfcdd6c06
- Deposit or zone: Maude
- Mining method: underground
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 999000
- Grade: 3.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 112
- Contained Unit: koz

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-04-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical Inferred resource for the Maude deposit with a moderate gold grade, but its non-JORC compliant status and lower confidence category are notable.

- Positive factor: Grade of 3.5 g/t Au is considered moderate for gold deposits

- Negative factor: Estimate is historical and non-JORC compliant, lacking current verification by a Competent Person

- Negative factor: Inferred category represents lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

> 3.5

Context: 999

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/rkb-2026-annual-financial-statements--844d576e-a0f8-4eb4-8b37-621af186f545#fact-resource-facts-3)

Omeo Gold Project · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Omeo Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_vic
- Reported Region: Victoria
- Ticker: RKB

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: No
- Resource group id: resource:54719c1bb8e0556fd794
- Deposit or zone: Sunnyside
- Mining method: underground
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 113000
- Grade: 8.8
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 32
- Contained Unit: koz

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-04-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical Indicated resource for the Sunnyside deposit shows an exceptional gold grade, but its non-JORC compliant status and lack of QP sign-off reduce overall confidence.

- Positive factor: Indicated category provides moderate geological confidence

- Positive factor: Grade of 8.8 g/t Au is considered exceptional for gold deposits

- Negative factor: Estimate is historical and non-JORC compliant, lacking current verification by a Competent Person

Evidence · table

> 8.8

Context: 113

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/rkb-2026-annual-financial-statements--844d576e-a0f8-4eb4-8b37-621af186f545#fact-resource-facts-4)

Omeo Gold Project · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Omeo Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_vic
- Reported Region: Victoria
- Ticker: RKB

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: No
- Resource group id: resource:6195763294670633c8fd
- Deposit or zone: Sunnyside
- Mining method: underground
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 930000
- Grade: 3.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 106
- Contained Unit: koz

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-04-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical Inferred resource for the Sunnyside deposit with a moderate gold grade, but its non-JORC compliant status and lower confidence category are notable.

- Positive factor: Grade of 3.5 g/t Au is considered moderate for gold deposits

- Negative factor: Estimate is historical and non-JORC compliant, lacking current verification by a Competent Person

- Negative factor: Inferred category represents lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

> 3.5

Context: 930

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/rkb-2026-annual-financial-statements--844d576e-a0f8-4eb4-8b37-621af186f545#fact-resource-facts-5)

Omeo Gold Project · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Omeo Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_vic
- Reported Region: Victoria
- Ticker: RKB

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: No
- Resource group id: resource:1bdca73eea13ab413b80
- Mining method: underground
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 527000
- Grade: 6
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 101
- Contained Unit: koz

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-04-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The total historical Indicated resource for the Omeo Gold Project shows a strong average gold grade, but its non-JORC compliant status and lack of QP sign-off reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: Total Indicated resource for the project provides moderate geological confidence

- Positive factor: Average grade of 6.0 g/t Au is considered strong for gold deposits

- Negative factor: Estimate is historical and non-JORC compliant, lacking current verification by a Competent Person

Evidence · table

> 6.0

Context: 527

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/rkb-2026-annual-financial-statements--844d576e-a0f8-4eb4-8b37-621af186f545#fact-resource-facts-6)

Omeo Gold Project · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Omeo Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_vic
- Reported Region: Victoria
- Ticker: RKB

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: No
- Resource group id: resource:784cb22aef268ad9cb50
- Mining method: underground
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 1929000
- Grade: 3.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 218
- Contained Unit: koz

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-04-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The total historical Inferred resource for the Omeo Gold Project is substantial in tonnage with a moderate gold grade, but its non-JORC compliant status and lower confidence category are significant considerations.

- Positive factor: Large tonnage in the Inferred category indicates significant exploration potential

- Positive factor: Average grade of 3.5 g/t Au is considered moderate for gold deposits

- Negative factor: Estimate is historical and non-JORC compliant, lacking current verification by a Competent Person

- Negative factor: Inferred category represents lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

> 3.5

Context: 1,929

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/rkb-2026-annual-financial-statements--844d576e-a0f8-4eb4-8b37-621af186f545#fact-resource-facts-7)

Omeo Gold Project · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Omeo Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_vic
- Reported Region: Victoria
- Ticker: RKB

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: No
- Resource group id: resource:09ac510fce7c3fa1e6a0
- Mining method: underground
- Resource basis: gross

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 2456000
- Grade: 4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 320
- Contained Unit: koz

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-04-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The total historical resource for the Omeo Gold Project is substantial in scale with a strong average gold grade, but its non-JORC compliant status and significant Inferred component are key considerations.

- Positive factor: Total historical resource of 320,000 ounces of gold is a significant scale

- Positive factor: Average grade of 4.0 g/t Au is considered strong for gold deposits

- Negative factor: Estimate is historical and non-JORC compliant, lacking current verification by a Competent Person

- Negative factor: A significant portion of the resource is in the Inferred category, representing lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

> 4.0

Context: 2,456

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
