REVIVAL GOLD REPORTS ADDITIONAL INFILL RESULTS WITH 2026 DRILLING NOW 64% COMPLETE AT MERCUR
Original announcement by prospectors_exchange on
- Company
- Revival Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- RVG
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Utah, U.S.A.
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-22 12:49:07 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Revival Gold has reported additional infill RC drilling results at the Mercur Gold Project in Utah, with the 2026 program now 64% complete. The new intercepts consist of consistent low-grade gold (0.57 to 0.92 g/t) over significant widths, supporting the project's heap leachability assumptions.
Reasoning: Infill drilling results confirm continuity of low-grade gold suitable for heap leaching, supporting the existing PEA mine plan and suggesting expansion potential.
Positive factors
- consistent grades in oxidized material
- supports heap leachability estimates
- potential expansion of heap leachable material
Facts used in scoring: 4
Classification and evidence
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The release explicitly states these are additional infill drilling results.
Evidence · text
“report additional infill results”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details the use of certified reference materials, duplicates, and blanks, and names an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The release states that technical information was reviewed and approved by two Qualified Persons (QP).
Evidence · text
“Technical information included in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP... and Mr. Everett Brill, RM SME, a QP”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (4)
RM26-213Mercur · goldGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM26-213
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33.5 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 64.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM26-213:31-64.5
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/T
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.92 g/t over 33.5m is consistent with the project's low-grade heap leach profile.
Positive factors
- consistent grade
Evidence · text
“0.92 grams per tonne ("g/T") gold over 33.5 meters width 1 at 31 meters downhole in RM26-213”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM26-217Mercur · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM26-217
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30.5 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 50.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM26-217:20-50.5
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/T
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low grade but significant width supports the bulk tonnage heap leach model.
Positive factors
- significant width
Evidence · text
“0.57 g/T gold over 30.5 meters width 1 at 20 meters downhole in RM26-217”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM26-220Mercur · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM26-220
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM26-220:26-55
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/T
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consistent with project expectations for oxidized material.
Positive factors
- consistent grade
Evidence · text
“0.75 g/T gold over 29.0 meters width 1 at 26 meters downhole in RM26-220”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM26-223Mercur · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM26-223
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.9 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 30.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM26-223:8-30.9
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/T
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Consistent with project expectations for oxidized material.
Positive factors
- consistent grade
Evidence · text
“0.76 g/T gold over 22.9 meters width 1 at 8 meters downhole in RM26-223”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.