Revival Gold Reports Additional Infill Results with 2026 Drilling Now 64% Complete at Mercur
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Revival Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- RVG.V
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Utah, U.S.A.
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-22 12:09:49 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Revival Gold has reported additional infill RC drilling results at the Mercur Gold Project in Utah, highlighting consistent gold grades in oxidized material. The results support the leachability assumptions of the 2025 PEA and suggest potential for expanding the heap leach mine plan.
Reasoning: Infill drilling confirms continuity of gold grades in oxidized material suitable for heap leaching, supporting the existing PEA model.
Positive factors
- consistent grades in oxidized material
- supports leachability estimates
- potential expansion of heap leach material
Negative factors
- true width is only estimated (70-98% of drilled width)
Facts used in scoring: 4
Classification and evidence
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The release explicitly states these are results from 20 infill RC drill holes.
Evidence · text
“Results from a further 20 infill RC drill holes”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details the use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, and names an ISO accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document notes that true width is estimated to be 70-98% of the drilled width, meaning the reported intercepts are downhole widths.
Evidence · text
“True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-98% of drilled width.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (4)
RM26-213Mercur · goldGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM26-213
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33.5 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 64.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM26-213:31-64.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Mercur area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/T
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.92 g/t over 33.5m is a solid infill intercept for an oxide/heap leach target.
Positive factors
- good width
Negative factors
- apparent width only
Evidence · text
“0.92 grams per tonne ("g/T") gold over 33.5 meters width at 31 meters downhole in RM26-213”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM26-217Mercur · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM26-217
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30.5 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 50.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM26-217:20-50.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Mercur area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/T
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.57 g/t over 30.5m is consistent with oxide/heap leach expectations.
Positive factors
- good width
Evidence · text
“0.57 g/T gold over 30.5 meters width at 20 meters downhole in RM26-217”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM26-220Mercur · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM26-220
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 55 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM26-220:26-55
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Mercur area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/T
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.75 g/t over 29m is a solid infill result.
Positive factors
- good width
Evidence · text
“0.75 g/T gold over 29.0 meters width at 26 meters downhole in RM26-220”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
RM26-223Mercur · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM26-223
- Project
- Mercur
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- RVG.V
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.9 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 30.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RM26-223:8-30.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Mercur area
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/T
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 0.76 g/t over 22.9m is consistent with the program's objectives.
Positive factors
- good width
Evidence · text
“0.76 g/T gold over 22.9 meters width at 8 meters downhole in RM26-223”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.