Revival Gold Provides Update and Latest Results From Drilling at the Mercur Gold Project in Utah

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Revival Gold Inc.
Ticker
RVG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Utah
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-08-21 03:58:16 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Revival Gold announced new drill results from its Mercur Gold Project in Utah, with several intercepts extending outside the current pit designs. The results are consistent with previous PEA estimates and will support a planned 2026 pre-feasibility study. While the company disclosed robust QA/QC and compositing parameters, some intercepts show lower cyanide leachability, which could indicate metallurgical complexity.

Reasoning: New drill results confirm and extend mineralization consistent with PEA estimates, supporting a future PFS. While QA/QC and compositing are transparent, some intercepts show lower cyanide leachability, indicating potential metallurgical complexity.

Positive factors

  • step_out_extension
  • qaqc_disclosed
  • compositing_transparent
  • true_width_disclosed
  • pfs_supporting

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Facts used in scoring: 23

Classification and evidence

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The document states that 'True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-100% of drilled width.'

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-100% of drilled width.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Three intercepts (RM25-126, RM25-134 and RM25-133) extend outside the current pit designs, indicating potential upside in the Rover area.

Evidence · text

“Three intercepts extend outside the current pit designs indicating potential upside in the Rover area of the deposit.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed QA/QC Program section mentioning certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks, and an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The document clearly states that 'Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.'

Evidence · text

“Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.”

Refractory Orenegative

Ore requires oxidation/pressure treatment before recovery — a processing and recovery risk.

Why it applies: Several intercepts show low AuCN/AuFA ratios (e.g., 13%, 16%, 32%, 37%, 38%), indicating that a significant portion of the gold is not cyanide soluble and may be refractory.

Evidence · text

“AuCN/AuFA is the ratio of cyanide soluble gold assay to total gold in fire assay and provides an indication of potential heap leach recoverability for the material sampled.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The company states, 'We are currently infill drilling inferred resources'.

Evidence · text

“We are currently infill drilling inferred resources”

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The results are stated to be 'consistent with the PEA resource and metallurgical estimates'.

Evidence · text

“consistent with the PEA resource and metallurgical estimates.”

PFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.

Why it applies: The drilling program is explicitly stated to be 'in support of a planned 2026 pre-feasibility study'.

Evidence · text

“This year’s drilling is in support of a planned 2026 pre-feasibility study”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 23. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (23)

RM25-115Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-115
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
3 m
To
9.1 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
320 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade for open pit gold, but low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is high (90%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.87”

Context: 6.1

RM25-115Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-115
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
19.8 m
To
24.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
320 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Below weak grade for open pit gold and low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is moderate (64%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 4.6

RM25-115Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-115
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.4 m
From
45.7 m
To
73.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
320 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Below weak grade for open pit gold, but weak grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is moderate (58%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 27.4

RM25-116Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-116
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
4.6 m
To
12.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade for open pit gold, but low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is high (91%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: 7.6

RM25-116Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-116
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
21.3 m
To
25.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Below weak grade for open pit gold and low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is moderate (71%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 4.6

RM25-116Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-116
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.3 m
From
48.8 m
To
67.1 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade for open pit gold, but weak grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is moderate (50%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.64”

Context: 18.3

RM25-122Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-122
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.4 m
From
56.4 m
To
80.8 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
90 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade for open pit gold, but weak grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is high (79%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 24.4

RM25-126Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-126
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.9 m
From
16.8 m
To
42.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
220 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Below weak grade for open pit gold, but weak grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is low (32%), indicating potential refractory gold.

Positive factors

  • step_out_extension

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 25.9

RM25-127Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-127
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
7.6 m
To
13.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade for open pit gold, but low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is high (88%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 6.1

RM25-127Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-127
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.3 m
From
33.5 m
To
51.8 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
300 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade for open pit gold, with a weak grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is low (37%), indicating potential refractory gold.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 18.3

RM25-129Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-129
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
7.6 m
To
13.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade for open pit gold and low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is high (88%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: 6.1

RM25-129Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-129
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
36.6 m
To
45.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Below weak grade for open pit gold and low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is very low (13%), indicating significant refractory gold.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 9.1

RM25-129Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-129
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
50.3 m
To
57.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Below weak grade for open pit gold and low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is moderate (46%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 7.6

RM25-129Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-129
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
65.5 m
To
73.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Below weak grade for open pit gold and low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is high (95%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 7.6

RM25-133Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-133
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
7.6 m
To
12.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade for open pit gold, but low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is high (87%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.99”

Context: 4.6

RM25-133Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 56.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-133
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
56.4 m
From
53.3 m
To
109.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
140 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade for open pit gold, with a weak grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is high (80%). This intercept extends outside the current pit designs.

Positive factors

  • step_out_extension

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 56.4

RM25-134Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-134
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
9.1 m
To
12.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
70 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade for open pit gold, but low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is very high (98%). This intercept extends outside the current pit designs.

Positive factors

  • step_out_extension

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 3.0

RM25-134Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-134
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
50.3 m
To
57.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
70 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade for open pit gold and low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is moderate (73%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 7.6

RM25-134Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-134
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
67.1 m
To
76.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
70 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade for open pit gold and low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is moderate (51%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 9.1

RMC25-016Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-016
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
43.8 m
To
45.8 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Below weak grade for open pit gold and low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is high (90%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 2.0

RMC25-016Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-016
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
28.4 m
From
51.6 m
To
80 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Below weak grade for open pit gold, but weak grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is high (81%).

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 28.4

RMC25-018Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-018
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
16.5 m
To
19.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Below weak grade for open pit gold and low grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is very low (16%), indicating significant refractory gold.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 2.7

RMC25-018Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-018
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.9 m
From
37.6 m
To
54.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade for open pit gold, with a weak grade-width product. Cyanide leachability is low (38%), indicating potential refractory gold.

Negative factors

  • deleterious_flag

Evidence · table

“0.96”

Context: 16.9

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.