Revival Gold Intersects 8.4 g/T gold over 6.2 Meters and 8.5 g/T gold over 3.4 Meters Supporting Overall Continuity of Mineralization at the Beartrack-Arnett Joss Target
Original announcement by prospectors_exchange on
- Company
- Revival Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- RVG
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Idaho, U.S.A.
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-10-07 13:04:18 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Revival Gold reported successful wedge hole drilling results at the Joss target of the Beartrack-Arnett Project in Idaho, including intercepts of up to 8.5 g/t gold. The results support the structural continuity of the Panther Creek Shear Zone and aim to augment upcoming mineral resource updates.
Reasoning: Successful wedge hole drilling at the Joss target confirms continuity of high-grade mineralization within the Panther Creek Shear Zone, supporting potential underground development.
Positive factors
- High-grade intercepts in wedge holes
- Supports continuity of mineralization at Joss target
- QA/QC protocols and lab accreditation disclosed
- QP/CP sign-off provided
Negative factors
- True widths are only estimated (40-55% of drilled width)
Facts used in scoring: 5
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release mentions certified reference materials, duplicates, and blanks, and names an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: True widths are not explicitly stated for the new intercepts, only estimated as 40-55% of drilled width.
Evidence · text
“True widths are estimated to be 40-55% of drilled width.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (5)
BT26-254DWBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-254DW
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 49.5 m
- From
- 799 m
- To
- 848.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 799 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-254DW:799-848.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad mineralized intercept supporting continuity.
Positive factors
- Significant width at moderate grade
Evidence · text
“2.2 g/T gold over 49.5 meters drilled width 1 at 799 meters downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
BT26-254DWBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-254DW
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 828 m
- To
- 834.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 828 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-254DW:828-834.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong grade within the larger mineralized interval.
Positive factors
- High grade intercept
Evidence · text
“8.4 g/T gold over 6.2 meters drilled width 1 at 828 meters downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
BT26-255DWBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-255DW
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 484 m
- To
- 486.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-255DW:484-486.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade intercept in a wedge hole.
Positive factors
- High grade
Evidence · text
“7.9 g/T gold over 2.2 meters drilled width 1 at 484 meters downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
BT26-255DWBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-255DW
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.6 m
- From
- 551 m
- To
- 572.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 551 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-255DW:551-572.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Solid intercept supporting continuity.
Positive factors
- Good width and grade
Evidence · text
“4.3 g/T gold over 21.6 meters drilled width 1 at 551 meters downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
BT26-255DWBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-255DW
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 555 m
- To
- 558.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 555 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-255DW:555-558.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade sub-interval.
Positive factors
- High grade
Evidence · text
“8.5 g/T gold over 3.4 meters drilled width 1 at 555 meters downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.