Revival Gold Intersects 8.4 g/t Gold over 6.2 Meters and 8.5 g/t Gold over 3.4 Meters Supporting Overall Continuity of Mineralization at the Beartrack-Arnett Joss Target
Original announcement by jmn on
- Company
- Revival Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- RVG
- Exchange
- TSXV
- Region
- Idaho
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-07 12:31:34 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Revival Gold reported successful wedge hole drilling results at the Joss target of the Beartrack-Arnett Project in Idaho, including intercepts of 8.4 g/t gold over 6.2m and 8.5 g/t gold over 3.4m. These results support the structural continuity of the Panther Creek Shear Zone and the potential for underground mining.
Reasoning: Successful wedge hole drilling at the Joss target confirms continuity of high-grade gold mineralization, supporting the underground potential of the Beartrack-Arnett project.
Positive factors
- High-grade intercepts (8.4 g/t and 8.5 g/t Au)
- Supports continuity of mineralization at Joss target
- Wedge holes successfully intercepting mineralized zones
- QA/QC disclosed with accredited lab and QP sign-off
Negative factors
- True widths are only estimated (40-55% of drilled width)
Facts used in scoring: 5
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release mentions regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicates, and blanks, and names an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling program is described as wedge holes to support continuity and augment resource updates, which is characteristic of infill/definition work.
Evidence · text
“The 2026 drilling program in the Joss area was designed to expand the area of known mineralization , augment an update to the Beartrack-Arnett's mineral resources estimate”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (5)
BT26-254DWBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-254DW
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 49.5 m
- From
- 799 m
- To
- 848.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 799 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-254DW:799-848.5
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate grade intercept over significant width.
Evidence · text
“2.2 g/T gold over 49.5 meters drilled width 1 at 799 meters downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
BT26-254DWBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 8.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-254DW
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 828 m
- To
- 834.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 799 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-254DW:828-834.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong grade intercept within the larger mineralized interval.
Positive factors
- High grade intercept
Evidence · text
“8.4 g/T gold over 6.2 meters drilled width 1 at 828 meters downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
BT26-255DWBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-255DW
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 484 m
- To
- 486.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 484 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-255DW:484-486.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade but narrow intercept.
Evidence · text
“7.9 g/T gold over 2.2 meters drilled width 1 at 484 meters downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
BT26-255DWBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-255DW
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.6 m
- From
- 551 m
- To
- 572.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 551 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-255DW:551-572.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Solid grade and width intercept.
Evidence · text
“4.3 g/T gold over 21.6 meters drilled width 1 at 551 meters downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
BT26-255DWBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-255DW
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- usa_id
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.4 m
- From
- 555 m
- To
- 558.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 551 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BT26-255DW:555-558.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade sub-interval within a larger intercept.
Positive factors
- High grade sub-interval
Evidence · text
“8.5 g/T gold over 3.4 meters drilled width 1 at 555 meters downhole”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.