Revival Gold Intersects 3.43 g/t Gold over 131.7 Meters Including 6.6 g/t Gold over 42.5 Meters at Beartrack-Arnett in Idaho
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Revival Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- RVG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Idaho
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-08-20 19:33:04 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Revival Gold reported high-grade gold drill results at the Beartrack-Arnett Project in Idaho, highlighted by an intercept of 6.56 g/t Au over 42.5 meters in hole BT26-255D. The results suggest the presence of a north-plunging shoot and support the potential expansion of underground sulphide mineral resources.
Reasoning: The intercept of 6.56 g/t Au over 42.5m is a strong result for an orogenic gold deposit, providing evidence of high-grade sulphide mineralization and potential for underground mining.
Positive factors
- high-grade intercept
- significant width
- extension of known mineralization
- QA/QC disclosed
Negative factors
- true width estimated rather than measured
Facts used in scoring: 4
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 6.56 g/t gold over 42.5m is exceptionally high grade for this deposit type.
Evidence · text
“6.56 g/T gold over 42.5 meters”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release mentions certified reference materials, duplicates, blanks, and an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“ALS Minerals is an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: True widths are estimated at 40-50% of drilled width rather than being directly measured.
Evidence · text
“True widths are estimated to be 40-50% of drilled width.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (4)
BT26-255DBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 3.43Grade Unit: g/TIntercept: 131.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-255D
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.43
- Grade Unit
- g/T
- Intercept
- 131.7 m
- From
- 543.2 m
- To
- 674.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Significant gold intercept over a large width in an orogenic system.
Positive factors
- strong grade-width product
Negative factors
- true width estimated
Evidence · table
“3.43”
Context: 131.7
BT26-255DBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 6.56Grade Unit: g/TIntercept: 42.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-255D
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.56
- Grade Unit
- g/T
- Intercept
- 42.5 m
- From
- 632.4 m
- To
- 674.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade intercept providing compelling evidence of sulphide mineralization.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- true width estimated
Evidence · table
“6.56”
Context: 42.5
BT26-255DBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 11.58Grade Unit: g/TIntercept: 12.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-255D
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.58
- Grade Unit
- g/T
- Intercept
- 12.1 m
- From
- 639.3 m
- To
- 651.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high grade intercept within the high-grade zone.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- true width estimated
Evidence · table
“11.58”
Context: 12.1
BT26-253DWBeartrack-Arnett · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/TIntercept: 5.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BT26-253DW
- Project
- Beartrack-Arnett
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_id
- Reported Region
- Idaho
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- g/T
- Intercept
- 5.2 m
- From
- 528.2 m
- To
- 533.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low grade intercept in post-mineral unit.
Negative factors
- low grade
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: 5.2
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.